Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Forensic Psychology
- Part I Psychological Underpinnings
- Part II Psychology and Criminal Behaviour
- Part III Assessment
- Part IV Interventions
- Part V Civil Proceedings
- 5.1 Court Decisions about the Upbringing of Children
- 5.2 Parenting
- 5.3 Immigration, Asylum Seekers, and Refugees
- 5.4 Occupational Stress and Traumatic Stress
- 5.5 Capacity and Consent in the Criminal and Civil Contexts
- Part VI Professional Practices
- Index
- References
5.1 - Court Decisions about the Upbringing of Children
from Part V - Civil Proceedings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Forensic Psychology
- Part I Psychological Underpinnings
- Part II Psychology and Criminal Behaviour
- Part III Assessment
- Part IV Interventions
- Part V Civil Proceedings
- 5.1 Court Decisions about the Upbringing of Children
- 5.2 Parenting
- 5.3 Immigration, Asylum Seekers, and Refugees
- 5.4 Occupational Stress and Traumatic Stress
- 5.5 Capacity and Consent in the Criminal and Civil Contexts
- Part VI Professional Practices
- Index
- References
Summary
Courts are regularly called upon to make judgments on aspects of children’s upbringing, particularly where parents separate and there are disputes around where children will live. In this chapter, the children’s rights issues which arise in cases regarding children’s upbringing are considered; particularly where they intersect with issues concerning elements of the discipline of psychology. Following an exploration of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and its impact on the lives of children, two of the most important principles in the CRC are considered – the best interest principle (Art. 3) and principle of respect for the views of the child (Art. 12). The chapter then examines how an enhanced awareness and understanding of developmental psychology has impacted cases concerning children’s upbringing. Particularly contested issues in the area are then examined – children’s attachment to caregivers, children’s own wishes, shared residence and perceptions of mothers versus fathers.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology , pp. 645 - 657Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 664–678.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to its mother. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39, 350–373.Google ScholarPubMed
Bix, B. (2008). The best interest of the child (Research Paper No. 08–08). University of Minnesota Law School.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cave, E. (2014). Adolescent refusal of MMR inoculation: F (Mother) v F (Father). The Modern Law Review, 77(4), 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, E., & Stavrinides, Z. (2013). Medical Practitioners, Adolescents and Informed Consent Project Final Report. University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Collier, R. (2009). Fathers’ rights, gender and welfare: Some questions for family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31(4), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2016). The implementation of the rights of the child during adolescence (CRC/C/GC/20). United Nations.Google Scholar
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2009). The right to be heard (CRC/C/GC/12). United Nations.Google Scholar
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2003). General measures of implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC/GC/2003/5). United Nations.Google Scholar
Daly, A. (2020). Assessing children’s capacity: Reconceptualising our understanding through the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 28(3), 471–499.Google Scholar
Daly, A. (2018). Children, autonomy and the courts: beyond the right to be heard. Brill/Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M. (2018). Does shared parenting by separated parents affect the adjustment of young children? Journal of Child Custody, 15(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundy, L., Kilkelly, U., Byrne, B., & Kang, J. (2012). The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A study of legal implementation in 12 countries. UNICEF.Google Scholar
Main, M., Hesse, E., & Hesse, S. (2011). Attachment theory and research: Overview, with suggested applications to child custody. Family Court Review, 49(1), 426–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, J. (2011). Guest editor’s introduction to Special Issue on attachment theory, separation, and divorce: Forging coherent understandings for family law. Family Court Review 49(3), 418–425.Google Scholar
Parkes, A., Shore, C., O’Mahony, C., & Burns, K. (2015). The right of the child to be heard? Professional experiences of child care proceedings in the Irish district court. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 27(4), 423–444.Google Scholar
Parkes, A. (2013). Children and international human rights law: The right of children to be heard. Routledge.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Prout, A., & James, A. (1997). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In James, A. & Prout, A. (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, N., Fitzgerald, R., Morag, T., Bajpai, A., & Graham, A. (2012). International models of child participation in family law proceedings following parental separation/divorce. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20(4), 645–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvortrup, J. (1994). An introduction. In Qvortrup, J., Bardy, M., Sgritta, G., & Windersberger, H. (Eds.), Childhood matters: social theory, practice and politics. Avebury Press.Google Scholar
Stalford, H., & Hollingsworth, K. (2020). “This case is about you and your future”: Towards judgments for children. The Modern Law Review, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stretch, R., McCann, R., Roberts, S.A., Elton, P., Baxter, D., & Brabin, L. (2009). A qualitative study to assess school nurses’ views on vaccinating 12–13 year old school girls against human papillomavirus without parental consent. BMC Public Health, 9, 254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vygotsky, L. (1978). The role of play in development. In Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar