American Psychological Association, Center for Psychology in Schools and Education. (2017). Top 20 principles from psychology for pre-K–12 creative, talented, and gifted students’ teaching and learning. www.apa.org/ed/schools/teaching-learning/top-twenty-principles.aspxGoogle Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49 , 283–291. doi:10.1177/001698620504900402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 97–111. doi:10.1002/j.2162–6057.1982.tb00326.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, A. L., & Edmunds, G. A. (2005). Sensitivity: A double-edged sword for the pre-adolescent and adolescent gifted child. Roeper Review, 27(2), 69–77. doi:10.1080/02783190509554293Google Scholar

Gagné, F. (2013). The DMGT 2.0: From gifted inputs to talented outputs. In Callahan, C. M. & Hertberg-Davis, H. L. (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 56–68). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gere, D. R., Capps, S. C., Mitchell, D. W., & Grubbs, E. (2009). Sensory sensitivities of gifted children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(3), 288–295. doi:10.5014/ajot.63.3.288Google Scholar

Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1965). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality, 33(3), 309–329. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1965.tb01389.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jarvin, L., & Subotnik, R. F. (2010). Wisdom from conservatory faculty: Insights on success in music performance. Roeper Review, 32 , 78–87. doi:10.1080/02783191003587868Google Scholar

Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831–1836. doi:10.1177/0956797613478615Google Scholar

McClusky, K. W., Baker, P. A., & McCluskey, A. L. A. (2005). Creative problem solving with marginalized populations: Reclaiming lost prizes through in-the-tranches interventions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 330–341. doi:10.1177/001698620504900406Google Scholar

Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1999). Creative out-of-school activities in intellectually gifted adolescents as predictors of their life accomplishment in young adults: A longitudinal study. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 77–87. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_1Google Scholar

Nusbaum, E., & Silvia, P. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002Google Scholar

Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2017). The role of domains in the conceptualization of talent. Roeper Review, 39, 59–69. doi:10.1080/02783193.2017.1247310Google Scholar

Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Thomson, D. (2015). Talent development as a framework for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 38, 49–59. doi:10.1177/1076217514556531Google Scholar

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2007.02007.xGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalysis of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2014). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to guide for talent development (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock.Google Scholar

Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: The link between polymathy and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 127–151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10692–008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and education. Creative Education, 1, 166–169. doi:10.4236/ce.2010.13026Google Scholar

Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860Google Scholar

Stanley, J. C. (1980). On educating the gifted. Educational Researcher, 9(3), 8–12. doi:10.2307/1175006Google Scholar

Starko, A. (2018). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27, 11–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X027003011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Subotnik, R. F., Edmiston, A. M., Cook, L., & Ross, M. D. (2010). Mentoring for talent development, creativity, social skills, and insider knowledge: The APA Catalyst Program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 714–739. doi:10.1177/1932202x1002100406Google Scholar

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1) 3–54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tirri, K. (2007). Comparison of academically average and gifted students’ self-rated ethical sensitivity. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 587–601. doi:10.1080/13803610701786953CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tirri, K. (2011). Combining excellence and ethics: Implications for moral education for the gifted. Roeper Review, 33(1), 59–64. doi:10.1080/02783193.2011.530207Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms–technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personal Press.Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom: What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: NEA.Google Scholar

Vuyk, M. A., Krieshok, T. S., & Kerr, B. A. (2016). Openness to experience rather than overexcitabilities: Call it like it is. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 192–211. doi:10.1177/0016986216645407Google Scholar

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484–492. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.97.3.484Google Scholar

Worrell, F. C., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Subotnik, R. F. (2019). The psychology of high performance: Overarching themes. In Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain specific talent (pp. 369–385). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0000120–018Google Scholar

Baron‐Cohen, S., Campbell, R., Karmiloff‐Smith, A., Grant, J., & Walker, J. (1995). Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes?. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 379–398. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1995.tb00687.xGoogle Scholar

Barton, E. E., & Wolery, M. (2008). Teaching pretend play to children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 109–125. doi:10.1177/0271121408318799Google Scholar

Barton, E. E., & Wolery, M. (2010). Training teachers to promote pretend play in children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77, 85–106. doi:10.1177/001440291007700104Google Scholar

Bentenuto, A., De Falco, S., & Venuti, P. (2016). Mother-child play: A comparison of autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, and typical development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1829. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01829Google Scholar

Cassidy, S. B. (1984). Prader-Willi syndrome. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 14(1), 5–55. doi:10.1016/0045-9380(84)90043-4Google Scholar

Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Baird, G., Drew, A., & Cox, A. (2003). Predicting language outcomes in infants with autism and pervasive developmental disorder. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 38, 265–285. doi:10.1080/136820310000104830Google Scholar

Cox, N. S., Alison, J. A., Rasekaba, T., & Holland, A. E. (2012). Telehealth in cystic fibrosis: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 18(2), 72–78. doi:10.1258/jtt.2011.110705Google Scholar

Cunningham, C. C., Glenn, S. M., Wilkinson, P., & Sloper, P. (1985). Mental ability, symbolic play and receptive and expressive language of young children with Down’s syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 26(2), 255–265. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1985.tb02264.xGoogle Scholar

De Falco, S., Esposito, G., Venuti, P., & Bornstein, M. H. (2008). Fathers’ play with their Down syndrome children. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(6), 490–502. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01052.xGoogle Scholar

DiCarlo, C. F., & Reid, D. H. (2004). Increasing pretend toy play of toddlers with disabilities in an inclusive setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(2), 197–207.Google Scholar

Dimitropoulos, A., Ho, A., & Feldman, B. (2013). Social responsiveness and competence in Prader-Willi syndrome: Direct comparison to autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(1), 103–113. doi:10.1007/s10803–012-1547-3Google Scholar

Dimitropoulos, A., Zyga, O., Doernberg, E. A., & Russ, S. W. (2020). Show me what happens next: Preliminary efficacy of a remote play-based intervention for children with Prader-Willi syndrome. (Electronic publication).Google Scholar

Dimitropoulos, A., Zyga, O., & Russ, S. (2017). Evaluating the feasibility of a play-based telehealth intervention program for children with Prader-Willi syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(9), 2814–2825. doi:10.1007/s10803–017-3196-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doernberg, E. A., Dimitropoulos, A., & Russ, S. W. (2020). Believing in make-believe: Efficacy of a pretend play intervention for school-aged children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi:10.1007/s10803–020-04547-8Google Scholar

dos Santos, D. M., Lucisano, R. V., & Pfeifer, L. I. (2019). An investigation of the quality of pretend play ability in children with cerebral palsy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(2), 210–218. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greenspan, S. I., & Wieder, S. (1997). Developmental patterns and outcomes on infants and children with disorders of relating and communicating: A chart review of 200 cases of children with autistic spectrum diagnoses. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 1, 87–141.Google Scholar

Harris, P. L. (2000). The work of the imagination. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hsieh, H. C. (2012). Effectiveness of adaptive pretend play on affective expression and imagination of children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(6), 1975–1983. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.013Google Scholar

Jennett, P. A., Hall, L. A., Hailey, D., Ohinmaa, A., Anderson, C., Thomas, R., … Scott, R. E. (2003). The socio-economic impact of telehealth: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9(6), 311–320. doi:10.1258/135763303771005207Google Scholar

Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles, M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A., & Adolphs, R. (2000). II. Hypersociability in Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(Supplement), 30–46. doi:10.1258/135763303771005207Google Scholar

Kasari, C., Freeman, S., & Paparella, T. (2006). Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: A randomized controlled intervention study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 611–620. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01567.xGoogle Scholar

Kasari, C., Gulsrud, A., Freeman, S., Paparella, T., & Hellemann, G. (2012). Longitudinal follow-up of children with autism receiving targeted interventions on joint attention and play. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(5), 487–495. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2012.02.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kasari, C., Gulsrud, A., Paparella, T., Hellemann, G., & Berry, K. (2015). Randomized comparative efficacy study of parent-mediated interventions for toddlers with autism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 554–563. doi:10.1037/a0039080Google Scholar

Lee, G. T., Feng, H., Xu, S., & Jin, S. J. (2019). Increasing “object-substitution” symbolic play in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Behavior Modification, 43(1), 82–114. doi:10.1177/0145445517739276Google Scholar

Lense, M., & Dykens, E. (2013). Musical learning in children and adults with Williams syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(9), 850–860. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01611.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Libby, S., Powell, S., Messer, D., & Jordan, R. (1997). Imitation of pretend play acts by children with autism and Down syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27(4), 365–383. doi:10.1023/a:1025801304279Google Scholar

Lifter, K., & Bloom, L. (1989). Object knowledge and the emergence of language. Infant Behavior and Development, 12(4), 395–423. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(89)90023-4Google Scholar

Lifter, K., Ellis, J., Cannon, B., & Anderson, S. R. (2005). Developmental specificity in targeting and teaching play activities to children with pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Early Intervention, 27(4), 247–267. doi:10.1177/105381510502700405Google Scholar

Lifter, K., Mason, E. J., & Barton, E. E. (2011). Children’s play: Where we have been and where we could go. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 281–297. doi:10.1177/1053815111429465Google Scholar

Lovaas, O. I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Ly, T. M., & Hodapp, R. M. (2005). Children with Prader-Willi syndrome vs. Williams syndrome: Indirect effects on parents during a jigsaw puzzle task. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(12), 929–939. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00782.xGoogle Scholar

Malone, M. D. (1997). Preschoolers’ categorical and sequential toy play: Change over time. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 45–61. doi:10.1177/105381519702100106Google Scholar

Mandell, D. S., Barry, C. L., Marcus, S. C., Xie, M., Shea, K., Mullan, K., & Epstein, A. J. (2016). Effects of autism spectrum disorder insurance mandates on the treated prevalence of autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Pediatrics, 170(9), 887. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1049Google Scholar

McConnell, S. R. (2002). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 351–372. doi:10.1023/a:1020537805154Google Scholar

McGeary, D. D., McGeary, C. A., & Gatchel, R. J. (2012). A comprehensive review of telehealth for pain management: Where we are and the way ahead. Pain Practice, 12(7), 570–577. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00534.xGoogle Scholar

Mercer, J. (2015). Examining DIR/Floortime as a treatment for children with autism spectrum disorders: A review of research and theory. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(5), 625–635. doi:10.1177/1049731515583062Google Scholar

Motti, F., Cicchetti, D., & Sroufe, L. A. (1983). From infant affect expression to symbolic play: The coherence of development in Down syndrome children. Child Development, 54(5), 1168–1175. doi:10.2307/1129672Google Scholar

O’Connor, C., & Stagnitti, K. (2011). Play, behaviour, language and social skills: The comparison of a play and a non-play intervention within a specialist school setting. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 1205–1211.Google Scholar

O’Toole, C., & Chiat, S. (2006). Symbolic functioning and language development in children with Down syndrome. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(2), 155–171. doi:10.1080/13682820500221600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Papaeliou, C. F., Fryssira, H., Kodakos, A., Kaila, M., Benaveli, E., Michaelides, K., … Polemikos, N. (2011). Nonverbal communication, play, and language in Greek young children with Williams syndrome. Child Neuropsychology, 17(3), 225–241. doi:10.1080/09297049.2010.524151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Riguet, C. B., Taylor, N. D., Benaroya, S., & Klein, L. S. (1982). Symbolic play in autistic, Down’s, and normal children of equivalent mental age. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11(4), 439–448. doi:10.1007/bf01531618Google Scholar

Russ, S. W., & Doernberg, E. (2018). Play and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 607–622). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Russ, S. W., & American Psychological Association. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity (pp. 45–62). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandbank, M., Bottema-Beutel, K., Crowley, S., Cassidy, M., Dunham, K., Feldman, J. I., … Woynaroski, T. G. (2019, Nov. 25). Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies 517 of young children. Psychological Bulletin, 146, 1–29. doi:10.1037/bul0000215Google Scholar

Shire, S. Y., Shih, W., Chang, Y. C., Bracaglia, S., Kodjoe, M., & Kasari, C. (2019). Sustained community implementation of JASPER intervention with toddlers with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(5), 1863–1875. doi:10.1007/s10803–018-03875-0Google Scholar

Sigman, M., & Ruskin, E. (1999). Change and continuity in the social competence of children with autism, Down syndrome, and developmental delays [Monograph]. Society for Research in Child Development. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sigman, M., Ruskin, E., Arbelle, S., Corona, R., Dissanayake, C., Espinosa, M., … Robinson, B. F. (1999). Continuity and change in the social competence of children with autism, Down syndrome, and developmental delays. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i–139.Google Scholar

Solomon, R., Van Egeren, L. A., Mahoney, G., Huber, M. S. Q., & Zimmerman, P. (2014). PLAY Project Home Consultation Intervention Program for young children with autism spectrum disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 35(8), 475–485. doi:10.1097/dbp.0000000000000096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Strain, P. S. (1985). Social and non-social determinants of acceptability in handicapped preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4(4), 47–58. doi:10.1177/027112148500400406Google Scholar

Strømme, P., Bjømstad, P. G., & Ramstad, K. (2002). Prevalence estimation of Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Neurology, 17(4), 269–271. doi:10.1177/088307380201700406Google Scholar

Thiemann-Bourque, K., Johnson, L. K., & Brady, N. C. (2019). Similarities in functional play and differences in symbolic play of children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 124(1), 77–91. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-124.1.77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ungerer, J., & Sigman, M. (1984). The relation of play and sensorimotor behavior to language in the second year. Child Development, 55, 1448–1455. doi:10.2307/1130014Google Scholar

Venuti, P., De Falco, S., Esposito, G., & Bornstein, M. H. (2009). Mother–child play: Children with Down syndrome and typical development. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114(4), 274–288. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-114.4:274-288Google Scholar

Venuti, P., De Falco, S., Giusti, Z., & Bornstein, M. H. (2008). Play and emotional availability in young children with Down syndrome. Infant Mental Health Journal: Official Publication of The World Association for Infant Mental Health, 29(2), 133–152. doi:10.1002/imhj.20168Google Scholar

Vieillevoye, S., & Nader-Grosbois, N. (2008). Self-regulation during pretend play in children with intellectual disability and in normally developing children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29(3), 256–272.Google Scholar

Wing, L., Gould, J., Yeates, S. R., & Brierley, L. M. (1977). Symbolic play in severely mentally retarded and in autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18(2), 167–178. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1977.tb00426.xGoogle Scholar

Zyga, O., & Dimitropoulos, A. (2020). Preliminary characterization of parent–child interaction in pre-schoolers with Prader-Willi syndrome: The relationship between engagement and parental stress. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 125(1), 76–84.Google Scholar

Zyga, O., Russ, S. W., Ievers-Landis, C. E., & Dimitropoulos, A. (2015). Assessment of pretend play in Prader-Willi syndrome: A direct comparison to autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 975–987. doi:10.1007/s10803–014-2252-1Google Scholar

Barlow, H., & Morgenstern, S. (1950). A dictionary of vocal themes. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Berry, C. (1981). The Nobel scientists and the origins of scientific achievement. British Journal of Sociology, 32, 381–391. doi:10.2307/589284Google Scholar

Bliss, W. D. (1970). Birth order of creative writers. Journal of Individual Psychology, 26, 200–202.Google Scholar

Boring, M. D., & Boring, E. G. (1948). Masters and pupils among the American psychologists. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 527–534. doi:10.2307/1418317Google Scholar

Borowiecki, K. J. (2014). Artistic creativity and extreme events: The heterogeneous impact of war on composers’ production. Poetics, 47, 83–105. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2014.10.005Google Scholar

Bramwell, B. S. (1948). Galton’s “Hereditary Genius” and the three following generations since 1869. Eugenics Review, 39, 146–153.Google Scholar

Candolle, A. de, (1873). Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles. Genève: Georg.Google Scholar

Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4Google Scholar

Cassandro, V. J. (1998). Explaining premature mortality across fields of creative endeavor. Journal of Personality, 66, 805–833. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00033Google Scholar

Cassandro, V. J., & Simonton, D. K. (2010). Versatility, openness to experience, and topical diversity in creative products: An exploratory historiometric analysis of scientists, philosophers, and writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 1–18. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01322.xGoogle Scholar

Clark, R. D., & Rice, G. A. (1982). Family constellations and eminence: The birth orders of Nobel Prize winners. Journal of Psychology, 110, 281–287. doi:10.1080/00223980.1982.9915350Google Scholar

Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375–393). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Dennis, W. (1955, April). Variations in productivity among creative workers. Scientific Monthly, 80, 277–278.Google Scholar

Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 1–8. doi:10.1093/geronj/21.1.1Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, J. M. (1978). Parental loss and genius. American Psychologist, 33, 211–223.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Creative genius: A view from the expert-performance approach. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 321–349). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science, 4, 366–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00583.xGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (2006). The development of scientific talent in Westinghouse Finalists and members of the National Academy of Sciences. Journal of Adult Development, 13, 23–35. doi:10.1007/s10804–006-9002-3Google Scholar

Friis-Olivarius, M., & Christensen, B. T. (2019). Not quite equal odds: Openness to experience moderates the relation between quantity and quality of ideas in divergent production. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00355Google Scholar

Furnham, A., & Bonnett, C. (1992). British research productivity in psychology 1980–1989: Does the Lotka-Price law apply to university departments as it does to individuals? Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1333–1341. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90176-pGoogle Scholar

Galenson, D. W. (2005). Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of artistic creativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Hass, R. W., & Weisberg, R. W. (2009). Career development in two seminal American songwriters: A test of the equal odds rule. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 183–190. doi:10.1080/10400410902855275Google Scholar

Hellmanzik, C. (2014). Prominent modern artists: Determinants of creativity. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 564–585). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. Jr (2014). Genetics of intellectual and personality traits associated with creative genius: Could geniuses be Cosmobian Dragon Kings? In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 269–296). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Jones, B. F., Reedy, E. J., & Weinberg, B. A. (2014). Age and scientific genius. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 422–450). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (2000–2001). Genius, lunatics and poets: Mental illness in prize-winning authors. Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 20, 305–314. doi:10.1080/713842357Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (2003). The cost of the muse: Poets die young. Death Studies, 27, 813–822.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (2005). The door that leads into madness: Eastern European poets and mental illness. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 99–103. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_8Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2002). The will, the wit, the judgement: The importance of an early start in productive and successful creative writing. High Ability Studies, 13, 115–123. doi:10.1080/1359813022000048770Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2006). Why doesn’t the writing cure help poets? Review of General Psychology, 10, 268–282. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.3.268Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114–124. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01284.xGoogle Scholar

Kell, H. J., & Lubinski, D. (2014). The study of mathematically precocious youth at maturity: Insights into elements of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 397–421). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2008a). Longitudinal hit ratios of classical composers: Reconciling “Darwinian” and expertise acquisition perspectives on lifespan creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 221–235. doi:10.1037/a0012860Google Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2008b). One-hit wonders in classical music: Evidence and (partial) explanations for an early career peak. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 179–195. doi:10.1080/10400410802059952Google Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2014). Musical creativity over the lifespan. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 451–472). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.3.169Google Scholar

Liu, L., Wang, Y., Sinatra, R., Giles, C. L., Song, C., & Wang, D. (2018). Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. Nature, 559, 396–399. doi:10.1038/s41586–018-0315-8Google Scholar

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–323. doi:10.1016/s0016–0032(26)91166-6Google Scholar

Ludwig, A. M. (1992). Creative achievement and psychopathology: Comparison among professions. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46, 330–356. doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1992.46.3.330Google Scholar

Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 25, 1608–1618. doi:10.1177/0956797614535810Google Scholar

McCann, S. J. H. (2001). The precocity–longevity hypothesis: Earlier peaks in career achievement predict shorter lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1429–1439. doi:10.1177/01461672012711004Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Greenberg, D. M. (2014). Openness to experience. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 222–243). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

McCurdy, H. G. (1960). The childhood pattern of genius. Horizon, 2, 33–38.Google Scholar

McKay, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Literary geniuses: Their life, work, and death. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 473–487). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Newman, J., & Taylor, A. (1994). Family training for political leadership: Birth order of United States state governors and Australian prime ministers. Political Psychology, 15, 435–442. doi:10.2307/3791565Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E. (1968). Birth order and participation in dangerous sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 351–353. doi:10.1037/h0025573Google Scholar

Overskeid, G., Grønnerød, C., & Simonton, D. K. (2012). The personality of a nonperson: Gauging the inner Skinner. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 187–197. doi:10.1177/1745691611434212Google Scholar

Price, D. (1986). Little science, big science … and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Ramey, C. H., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The “poetical activity” of Emily Dickinson: A further test of the hypothesis that affective disorders foster creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 173–185. doi:10.1080/10400419.2004.9651451Google Scholar

Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., van Baaren, R. B., Strick, M., Derks, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 961–964. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar

Saad, C. S., Damian, R. I., Benet-Martinez, V., Moons, W. G., & Robins, R. W. (2013). Multiculturalism and creativity: Effects of cultural context, bicultural identity, and cognitive fluency. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 369–375. doi:10.1177/1948550612456560Google Scholar

Schaefer, C. E., & Anastasi, A. (1968). A biographical inventory for identifying creativity in adolescent boys. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 42–48. doi:10.1037/h0025328Google Scholar

Schubert, D. S. P., Wagner, M. E., & Schubert, H. J. P. (1977). Family constellation and creativity: Firstborn predominance among classical music composers. Journal of Psychology, 95, 147–149. doi:10.1080/00223980.1977.9915871Google Scholar

Segal, S. M., Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1980). The relationship of scientific creativity in the biological sciences to predoctoral accomplishments and experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 491–502. doi:10.3102/00028312017004491Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1975). Age and literary creativity: A cross-cultural and transhistorical survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 259–277.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1976). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218–226. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.33.2.218Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.11.791Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1980). Techno-scientific activity and war: A yearly time-series analysis, 1500–1903 A.D. Scientometrics, 2, 251–255. doi:10.1007/bf02016346Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1983). Intergenerational transfer of individual differences in hereditary monarchs: Genetic, role-modeling, cohort, or sociocultural effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.354Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1984a). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1273Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1984b). Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process. Developmental Review, 4, 77–111. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(84)90020-0Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1984c). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251–267. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.251Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1989). Age and creative productivity: Nonlinear estimation of an information-processing model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 29, 23–37. doi:10.2190/u81m-7lwl-xxn4–10t8Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1991). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119–130. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.119Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1992a). Leaders of American psychology, 1879–1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5–17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.5Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1992b). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463. doi:10.1177/0146167292184009Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.66Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2000a). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0504Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2000b). Creativity: Cognitive, developmental, personal, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–158. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.151Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2007a). Cinema composers: Career trajectories for creative productivity in film music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 160–169. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.1.3.160Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2007b). Creative life cycles in literature: Poets versus novelists or conceptualists versus experimentalists? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 133–139. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.1.3.133Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Gender differences in birth order and family size among 186 eminent psychologists. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 15–22. doi:10.1891/1939-7054.1.1.15Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441–452. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01152.xGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158–174. doi:10.1037/a0022912Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Creative productivity and aging: An age decrement – or not? In Whitbourne, S. K. & Sliwinski, M. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of adult development and aging (pp. 477–496). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual-differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agenda. Intelligence, 45, 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.007Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2014b). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61. doi:10.1037/a0035367Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2016a). Are pure mathematicians the lyric poets of the sciences? In Casazza, P., Krantz, S. G., & Ruden, R. D. (Eds.), I, mathematician II: Further introspections on the mathematical life (pp. 165–174). Bedford, MA: The Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2016b). Early and late bloomers among classical composers: Were the greatest geniuses also prodigies? In McPherson, G. (Ed.), Musical prodigies: Interpretations from psychology, music education, musicology and ethnomusicology (pp. 185–197). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2017a). Big-C versus little-c creativity: Definitions, implications, and inherent educational contradictions. In Beghetto, R. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2017b). Creative geniuses, polymaths, child prodigies, and autistic savants: The ambivalent function of interests and obsessions. In O’Keefe, P. A. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), The science of interests (pp. 175–185). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2018). Defining creativity: Don’t we also need to define what is not creative? Journal of Creative Behavior, 52, 80–90. doi:10.1002/jocb.137Google Scholar

Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., & Barabási, A. L. (2016, Nov. 4). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354, aaf5239. doi:10.1126/science.aaf5239Google Scholar

Slater, E., & Meyer, A. (1959). Contributions to a pathography of the musician: 1. Robert Schumann. Confinia Psychiatrica, 2, 65–94.Google Scholar

Stewart, L. H. (1977). Birth order and political leadership. In Hermann, M. G. (Ed.), The psychological examination of political leaders (pp. 205–236). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Stroebe, W. (2010). The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity? American Psychologist, 65, 660–673. doi:10.1037/a0021086Google Scholar

Sulloway, F. J. (2010). Why siblings are like Darwin’s finches: Birth order, sibling competition, and adaptive divergence within the family. In Buss, D. M. & Hawley, P. H. (Eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 86–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sulloway, F. J. (2014). Openness to scientific innovation. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 546–563). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Sulloway, F. J., & Zweigenhaft, R. L. (2010). Birth order and risk taking in athletics: A meta-analysis and study of major league baseball players. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 402–416. doi:10.1177/1088868310361241Google Scholar

Teigen, K. H. (1984). A note on the origin of the term “nature and nurture”: Not Shakespeare and Galton, but Mulcaster. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 20, 363–364. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(198410)20:4<363::aid-jhbs2300200406>3.0.co;2-4Google Scholar

Terry, W. S. (1989). Birth order and prominence in the history of psychology. Psychological Record, 39, 333–337. doi:10.1007/bf03395885Google Scholar

Vohs, K., Redden, J., & Rahinel, R. (2013). Physical order produces healthy choices, generosity, conventionality, whereas disorder produces creativity. Psychological Science, 24, 1860–1867. doi:10.1177/0956797613480186Google Scholar

White, R. K. (1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 460–489. doi:10.1080/00224545.1931.9918987Google Scholar

Winner, E. (2014). Child prodigies and adult genius: A weak link. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 297–320). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, J., & Russ, S. (2016). Fostering pretend play skills and creativity in elementary school girls: A group play intervention. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 114–125. doi:10.1037/aca0000039Google Scholar

Sawyer, P. K. (1997). Pretend play as improvisation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Singer, J. (1973). The child’s world of make-believe. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar