Aspelin, J. (2015). Lärares relationskompetens. Begreppsdiskussion med stöd i Martin Bubers begrepp ‘det sociala’ och ‘det mellanmänskliga’ [Teacher’s relational competence. A concept discussion, supported by Martin Buber’s concepts of ‘the social’ and ‘the inter-human’]. Utbildning och Demokrati, 24(3), 49–64.Google Scholar

Aspelin, J., & Persson, S. (2011). Co-existence and co-operation: The two-dimensional conception of education. Education, 1(1), 6–11.Google Scholar

Baumer, S., Ferholt, B., & Lecusay, R. (2005). Promoting narrative competence through adult–child joint pretense: Lessons from the Scandinavian educational practice of playworld. Cognitive Development, 20, 576–590.Google Scholar

Bennet, N., Wood, E., & Rogers, S. (1997) Teaching through play. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Biesta, G. (2004). The community of those who have nothing in common: Education and the language of responsibility. Interchange, 35(3), 302–324.Google Scholar

Blunden, A. (2016). Translating perezhivanie into English. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 274–283.Google Scholar

Bredikyte, M., & Hakkarainen, P. (2011). Play intervention and play development. In Lobman, C. & O’Neill, B. E. (Eds.), Play and performance (pp. 59–83). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

European Early Childhood Education Research Association, the ‘Rethinking Play’ special interest group. (2017). Position paper about the role of play in early childhood education and care. Available at www.eecera.org/custom/uploads/2017/01/POSITION-PAPER-SIG-RETHINKING-PLAY.pdf.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B. (2009). Adult and child development in adult–child joint play: The development of cognition, emotion, imagination and creativity in playworlds. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B. (2010). A multiperspectival analysis of creative imagining: Applying Vygotsky’s method of literary analysis to a playworld. In Connery, C., John-Steiner, V., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural historical approach to play, meaning-making and the arts (pp. 163–180). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B. (2015). Perezhivanie in researching playworlds: Applying the concept of perezhivanie in the study of play. In Davis, S., Ferholt, B., Grainger-Clemson, H., Jansson, S.-M., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (Eds.), Dramatic interactions in education: Vygotskian and socio-cultural approaches to drama, education and research (pp. 57–75). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B., & Lecusay, R. (2010). Adult and child development in the zone of proximal development: Socratic dialogue in a playworld. Mind Culture and Activity, 17(1), 59–83.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B., & Nilsson, M. (2016a). Perezhivanija as a means of creating the aesthetic form of consciousness. Mind, Culture, and Activity, Symposium on Perezhivanie, 23, 25–36.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B., & Nilsson, M. (2016b). Early childhood perezhivanija. Mind, Culture, and Activity, Symposium on Perezhivanie, 23, 25–36.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B., & Nilsson, M. (2018a). Playworlds and the pedagogy of listening. In Bruce, T., Bredikyte, M., & Hakkarainen, P. (Eds.), Handbook of play (pp. 261–273). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B., & Nilsson, M. (2018b). Aesthetics of play and joint playworlds. In Bruce, T., Bredikyte, M., & Hakkarainen, P. (Eds.), Handbook of play (pp. 58–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B., Nilsson, M., Jansson, A., & Alnervik, K. (2015). Creativity in education: Play and exploratory learning. In Hansson, T. (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to activity theory (pp. 264–284). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B., Nilsson, M., Jansson, A., & Alnervik, K. (2016). Current playworld research in Sweden: Rethinking the role of young children and their teacher in the design and execution of early childhood research. In Iorio, J. M. & Parnell, W. (Eds.), Disrupting early childhood education research: Imagining new possibilities (pp. 117–138). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ferholt, B., & Rainio, A. P. (2016). Teacher support of student engagement in early childhood: Embracing ambivalence through playworlds. Early Years, 36(4), 413–425.Google Scholar

Gaskins, S. (1999). Children’s daily lives in a Mayan village: A case study of culturally constructed roles and activities. In Goncu, G. (Ed.), Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 25–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, P. (2008). The challenges and possibilities of a narrative learning approach in the Finnish early childhood education system. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hakkarainen, P., Bredikyte, M., Jakkula, K., & Munter, H. (2013). Adult play guidance and children’s play development in a narrative play-world. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 213–225.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, P., & Ferholt, B. (2013). Creative imagination in play-worlds: Wonder-full early childhood education in Finland and the United States. In Egan, K., Cant, A., & Judson, G. (Eds.), Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum (pp. 203–218). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hofmann, R., & Rainio, A. P. (2007). ‘It doesn’t matter what part you play, it just matters that you’re there’: Towards shared agency in narrative play activity in school. In Alanen, R. & Pöyhönen, S. (Eds.), Language in action: Vygotsky and Leontievian legacy today (pp. 308–328). Newcastle-upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Johansson, E., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2006). Lek och läroplan. Möten mellan barn och lärare i förskolan och skolan [Play and curriculum. Encounters between children and teachers in preschool and school]. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Göteburgenis.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (1995). Aesthetics of play: A didactic study of play and culture in preschools. PhD dissertation, University of Karlstad, Research Report 95:12, Social Sciences. SKOBA.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (1989). Från fakta till fantasi [From facts to fantasy]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (1992). Ensam i vida världen [Lonely in the wide world]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (1995). Lekens estetik. En didaktisk studie om lek och kultur i förskolan. Forskningsrapport 95: 12, SKOBA, Högskolan i Karlstad. [The aesthetics of play. A didactic study of play and culture in preschools. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.]Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (1996). Lekens möjligheter [The possibilities of play]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (2000). Historia som tema och gestaltning [History as theme and gestalt]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (2001a). When small children play: How adults dramatize and children create meaning. Early Years, 21(1), 7–14.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (2001b). The relationship between play and dance. Research in Dance Education, 2(1), 41–53.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (2002). Lek i skolan [Play in school]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(4), 245–251.Google Scholar

Marjanovic-Shane, A., Ferholt, B., Nilsson, M., Rainio, A. P., & Miyazaki, K. (2011). Playworlds: An art of development. In Lobman, C. & O’Neill, B. (Eds.), Play and culture studies, vol. 11 (pp. 3–31). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., & Ferholt, B. (2014). Vygotsky’s theories of play, imagination and creativity in current practice: Gunilla Lindqvist’s ‘creative pedagogy of play’ in U.S. kindergartens and Swedish Reggio-Emilia inspired preschools. Perspectiva, 32(1), 919–950.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., Ferholt, B., & Lecusay, R. (2018a). ‘The playing-exploring child’: Re-conceptualizing the relationship between play and learning in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(3), 1–15.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., Granqvist, A. K., Johansson, E., Thure, J., & Ferholt, B. (2018b). Lek, lärande och lycka: lek och utforskande i förskolan [Play, learning and happiness: Play and exploration in preschool]. Stockholm: Gleerups.Google Scholar

Persson, S. (2015). Delstudie 4: Pedagogiska relationer i förskolan. Förskola tidig intervention (Pedagogical Relations in Preschool. Preschool Early Intervention). Delrapport från SKOLFORSK-projektet. Vetenskapsrådet.Google Scholar

Rainio, A. P. (2007). Ghosts, bodyguards and fighting fillies: Manifestations of pupil agency in play pedagogy. ACTIO: International Journal for Human Activity Theory, 1, 149–160.Google Scholar

Rainio, A. P. (2008a). From resistance to involvement: Examining agency and control in playworld activity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 15(2), 115–140.Google Scholar

Rainio, A. P. (2008b). Developing the classroom as a figured world. Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainio, A. P. (2009). Horses, girls, and agency: Gender in play pedagogy. Outlines – Critical Practice Studies, 1, 27–44.Google Scholar

Rainio, A. P. (2010). Lionhearts of the playworld: An ethnographic case study of the development of agency in play pedagogy. Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Institute of Behavioral Sciences.Google Scholar

Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Imagination and its development in childhood. In Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1 (pp. 339–350). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar