Abdel-Latif, Ahmed, The Climate Technology Mechanism: Issues and Challenges, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development [ICTSD] (Mar. 2011), www.ictsd.org/downloads/2011/04/technologymechanism.pdf.Google Scholar

Abdel-Latif, Ahmed, Intellectual Property Rights and Green Technologies from Rio to Rio: An Impossible Dialogue, ICTSD (Jul. 2012), www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2012/07/intellectual-property-rights-and-green-technologies-from-rio-to-rio-an-impossible-dialogue.pdf.Google Scholar

Abdel-Latif, Ahmed, Intellectual Property Rights and the Transfer of Climate Change Technologies: Issues, Challenges, and Way Forward, 15 Climate Policy 103, (Dec. 24, 2014).Google Scholar

Abdel-Latif, Ahmed, Maskus, Keith E., Okediji, Ruth, Reichman, Jerome H., and Roffe, Pedro, Overcoming the Impasse on Intellectual Property and Climate Change at the UNFCCC: A Way Forward (2011), www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2012/02/overcoming-the-impasse-on-intellectual-property-and-climate-change-at-the-unfccc-a-way-forward.pdfGoogle Scholar

Agreement Between the Department of Energy of the United States of America (USDOE) and the Planning Commission of the Republic of India Cooperation Agreement on a Joint Clean Energy Research and Development Centre (2010), www.state.gov/documents/organization/159460.pdf.Google Scholar

Awad, Bassem, Global Patent Pledges: A Collaborative Mechanism for Climate Change Technology, Centre for International Governance Innovation [CIGI], (Nov. 2015), www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/no.81.pdf.Google Scholar

Baker, Dean, Jayadev, Arjun, and Stiglitz, Joseph, Innovation, Intellectual Property and Development, A Better Set of Approaches for The 21st Century, 52–53 (Jul. 2017).Google Scholar

Balta, Wayne, Welcome to the Eco-Patent Commons, Corporate Eco Forum [CEF]: EcoInnovator Blog (Sep. 7, 2015), www.corporateecoforum.com/welcome-to-the-eco-patent-commons/.Google Scholar

Breakthrough Energy Coalition, Breakthrough Energy, www.b-t.energy/coalition/.Google Scholar

CERC, CERC BEE Drafts Groundbreaking Joint IP Agreement (Feb. 2017), www.us-china-cerc.org/2017/02/20/cerc-bee-drafts-groundbreaking-joint-ip-agreement/.Google Scholar

CERC, Intellectual Property, CERC, www.us-china-cerc.org/intellectual-property/.Google Scholar

CERC, Overview, CERC, www.us-china-cerc.org/overview/.Google Scholar

CERC, Water and Energy Technologies, CERC, www.us-china-cerc.org/water-and-energy-technologies/Google Scholar

de Coninck, Heleen and Sagar, Ambuj, Technology Development and Transfer (Article 10), in The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and Commentary (Klein, Daniel, Carazo, María Pía, Doelle, Meinhard, Bulmer, Jane, & Higham, Andrew eds., 2017).Google Scholar

Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Fast-tracking green patent applications: An empirical analysis, ICTSD (2013), http://ictsd.org/downloads/2013/02/fast-tracking-green-patent-applications-anempirical- analysis.pdf.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Tim, Enhancing Climate Technology Transfer through Greater Public–Private Cooperation: Lessons from Thailand and the Philippines, 29 Natural Resource Forum 165 (2005).Google Scholar

Fujitsu, Fujitsu Partners with WIPO GREEN to Achieve SDGs (Sep. 19, 2017), www.fujitsu.com/global/about/resources/news/press-releases/2017/0919-02.html.Google Scholar

Ghosh, Arunabha, Effective Climate Technology Partnerships, Business Standard (Oct. 15, 2015), www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/arunabha-ghosh-effective-climate-tech-partnerships-115101501416_1.html.Google Scholar

Ghosh, Arunabha, Vijayakumar, Anupama, and Ray, Sudatta, Climate Technology Partnerships: Form, Function and Impact, Centre for International Governance Innovation (Oct. 27, 2015), www.cigionline.org/publications/climate-technology-partnerships-form-function-and-impact.Google Scholar

International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property, Climate Change and Environmental Technologies – The Role of Intellectual Property, esp. Patents (Sep. 2014), http://aippi.org/wpcontent/uploads/committees/198/Report198Report+Climate+Change+and+Environmental+Technologies+-+The+Role+of+IP+esp.+PatentsEnglish.pdf.Google Scholar

International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property, Resolution on Patent Rights and Green Technology/Climate Change, AIPPI Congress Milan (Sep. 20, 2016), http://aippi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Resolution-on-Patent-Rights-and-Green-Technology-Climate-Change-English.pdf.Google Scholar

International Standards and Patents in Renewable Energy [IRENA], INSPIRE – International Standards and Patents in Renewable Energy, INFOCUS (Nov. 2016), http://remember.irena.org/sites/Documents/Shared%20Documents/In%20Focus%20def/INSPIRE.pdfGoogle Scholar

Joint Energy Research and Development Center [JCERDC], Indo-US Joint Clean Energy Research and Development Center, www.iusstf.org/story/53-61-Joint-Clean-Energy-Research-and-Development-Center(JCERDC).html.Google Scholar

Lewis, Joanna, A Better Approach to Intellectual Property? Lessons from the US-China Clean Energy Research Center, (Jun. 2015), www.paulsoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PPEE_US-China-Coop-in-Cleantech-IP_English.pdf.Google Scholar

Mission Innovation, Joint Launch Statement (Nov. 30, 2015), available at: www.mission-innovation.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Mission-Innovation-Joint-Launch-Statement.pdf.Google Scholar

Morgera, Elisa and Kulovesi, Kati, Public–private Partnerships for Wider and Equitable Access to Climate Technologies, in Environmental Technologies, Intellectual Property and Climate Change 128 (Abbe E. L. Brown ed., 2013).Google Scholar

Musk, Elon, Our Patents Belong to You, Tesla (Jun. 12, 2014), www.tesla.com/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you.Google Scholar

Palakshappa, Rajeev, Is Technology Collaboration the New Technology Transfer? But How To Do It?, Council on Energy, Environment, and Water: Official Blog (Jul. 6, 2011) at: http://ceew.in/blog/?p=19.Google Scholar

The Paris Agreement, Apr. 22, 2016, available at: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf.Google Scholar

Protocol Between the Department of Energy of the United States (USDOE) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) and the National Energy Administration (NEA) of the People’s Republic of China For Cooperation On an Energy Research Center, art. III (Nov. 17, 2009) www.us-china-cerc.org/pdfs/US/US_China_CERC_Protocol_and_IP_Annex_English_17_Nov_2009.pdf.Google Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew, Intellectual Property and Climate Change: Inventing Clean Technologies (2011).Google Scholar

Santamauro, Jon. P, Failure Is Not an Option: Enhancing the Use of Intellectual Property Tools to Secure Wider and More Equitable Access to Climate Change Technologies, in Environmental Technologies, Intellectual Property and Climate Change 84 (Abbe E. L. Brown ed., 2013).Google Scholar

Smith, Van, Enabling Environments or Enabling Discord: Intellectual Property Rights, Public–Private Partnerships, and the Quest for Green Technology Transfer, 42 Georgetown Journal of International Law 817 (2011).Google Scholar

United Nations (U.N.) G. A. Res. A/70/1, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1 (Sep. 25, 2015), available at: www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.Google Scholar

U.N. Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Earth Summit Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development, ¶¶34.1 – 34.29 (Dec. 1994), available at: www.dataplan.info/img_upload/7bdb1584e3b8a53d337518d988763f8d/agenda21-earth-summit-the-united-nations-programme-of-action-from-rio_1.pdf.Google Scholar

U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development, The Future We Want: Outcome Document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, ¶273 (2012), available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/733FutureWeWant.pdf.Google Scholar

U.N. Environment Programme [UNEP] & European Patent Office [EPO], Patents and Clean Energy Technologies in Africa (2013), http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/f87537c7cbb85344c1257b24005e7119/$FILE/patents_clean_energy_technologies_in_Africa_en.pdf.Google Scholar

UNEP & EPO, Patents and Climate Change Mitigation Technologies in Latin America and the Caribbean (2014), http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/2841b369787d5e72c1257da800335111/$FILE/patents_Latin_America_report_en.pdf.Google Scholar

UNEP, EPO, & ICTSD, Patents and Clean Energy, Bridging the Gap Between Policy and Evidence, (2010), www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2010/09/summarypatentscleanenergyspanish2.pdf.Google Scholar

U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change [UNFCCC], art. 4.5 (Jun. 4, 1992), available at: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.Google Scholar

UNFCCC, The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action Under the Convention, ¶121(d), Decision 1/CP.16, FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1 (Mar. 15, 2011).Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Joint Annual Report of the Technology Executive Committee and the Climate Technology Centre and Network for 2017, FCCC/SB/2017/3, ¶62(b), at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2017/sb/eng/03.pdf.Google Scholar

UNFCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakesh From 29 October to 20 November 2001, Decision 4/CP.7, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1 (Jan. 21, 2002).Google Scholar

US-China Clean Energy Research Center [CERC], Annual Report 2014–2015 and Review of CERC Phase 1, www.us-china-cerc.org/pdfs/CERC-AR-508-compliant-spreads_FINAL_Onscreen.pdf.Google Scholar

U.N. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goal 9, U.N. Dep’t of Econ. and Soc. Affairs, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg9.Google Scholar

The White House Office of the Press Secretary, US-India Joint Statement – “Shared Effort; Progress for All” (Jan. 25, 2015), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/25/us-india-joint-statement-shared-effort-progress-all.Google Scholar

World Intellectual Property Organization [WIPO], Multi-stakeholder Platforms, www.wipo.int/cooperation/en/multi_stakeholder_platforms/.Google Scholar

WIPO, Report of the Director General to the 2016 WIPO Assemblies (2016) www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_1050_2016.pdf.Google Scholar

WIPO, About WIPO GREEN, WIPO GREEN, www3.wipo.int/wipogreen/en/aboutus/.Google Scholar

WIPO, The Charter, WIPO GREEN, www3.wipo.int/wipogreen/docs/en/charter.pdf.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN, Facilitating the Transfer and Diffusion of Clean Technology: Opportunities on Wastewater Treatment in South East Asia. Report of a Pilot Project. Global Challenges Program (2016), www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ip_mnl_15/wipo_ip_mnl_15_report.pdf.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN, Facilitating the Transfer of Clean Technologies in East Africa: Opportunities in Agriculture and Water Technologies (2017), www3.wipo.int/wipogreen/docs/en/wipogreen_eastafrica_matchmaking_report2016.pdf.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN, Facilitating the Transfer and Diffusion of Clean Technology: Opportunities on Wastewater Treatment in South East Asia. Report of a Pilot Project. Global Challenges Program (2016), www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ip_mnl_15/wipo_ip_mnl_15_report.pdf.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN, Frequently Asked Questions, www3.wipo.int/wipogreen/en/faqs.html.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN, InvenTrust and WIPO GREEN Launch “Open Challenges Contest” (Aug. 23, 2017), www3.wipo.int/wipogreen/en/news/2017/news_0007.html.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN, Pro Bono IP Advice for WIPO GREEN Users (Jun. 30, 2015), www3.wipo.int/wipogreen/en/news/2015/news_0006.html.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN, Showcasing Innovative Climate Solutions for Africa: Exhibition and Roundtables: WIPO GREEN at COP 22 in Marrakech (Nov. 17, 2016), www3.wipo.int/wipogreen/en/news/2016/news_0007.html.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN Network, WIPO GREEN, www3.wipo.int/wipogreen/en/network/.Google Scholar

WIPO GREEN, Year in Review 2016, www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_greenreport_2016.pdf.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization [WTO], Ministerial Declaration of 14 November 2001, WT/MIN (01)/DEC/2, (2002).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by Ecuador to the TRIPS Council of the WTO, Contribution of IP to Facilitating the Transfer of Environmentally Rational Technology, IP/C/W/585 (March 5, 2013).Google Scholar

Abdel-Latif, Ahmed, et al., Overcoming the Impasse on Intellectual Property and Climate Change at the UNFCCC: A Way Forward, ICTSD Policy Brief No. 11, November 2011 (December 2011).Google Scholar

Agostino, Deborah, Arena, Marika, Azzone, Giovanni, Dal Molin, Martina, & Masella, Cristina, Developing a Performance Measurement System for Public Research Centers, 7 Int. J. of Bus. Sci. & Applied Mgmt. 43 (2012).Google Scholar

Agreement Relating to Community Patents, Dec. 15, 1989, art. 27.Google Scholar

Anderson, Lauren, World Bank calls for Broad Shift in Thinking to hasten WASH, SDG Implementation (Aug. 29, 2017), http://sdg.iisd.org/news/world-bank-calls-for-broad-shift-in-thinking-to-hasten-wash-sdg-implementation/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2017–08–29%20-%20SDG%20Update%20AE&utm_content=2017–08–29%20-%20SDG%20Update%20AE+CID_1ef3d184061a4a424444fd3f204597a4&utm_source=cm&utm_term=World%20Bank%20Calls%20for%20Broad%20Shift%20in%20Thinking%20to%20Hasten%20WASH%20SDG%20Implementation (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Andersen, Stephen O. et al., Technical Summary, in Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer: A Special Report of IPCC Working Group III 15–16 (2000), www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/spm/srtt-en.pdf (last visited Oct. 10, 2017).Google Scholar

Arun, Korhan & Yildirim, Durmus C., Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Intellectual Property, Patents and R&D, 7 Queen Mary J. Intell. Prop. 226 (2017).Google Scholar

Autor, David, Dorn, David, Hanson, Gordon H., Pisano, Gary, & Shu, Pian, Foreign Competition and Domestic Innovation: Evidence from U.S. Patents (NBER Working Paper No. 22879, Nov. 2016), www.nber.org/papers/w22879 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Balta, Wayne, Welcome to the Eco-Patent Commons, CEF EcoInnovator Blog, www.corporateecoforum.com/welcome-to-the-eco-patent-commons/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Barnett, Jonathan, Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes, 119 Yale L. J. 384 (2009).Google Scholar

Barton, John H., Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic, Biofuel, and Wind Technologies, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development Issue Paper No. 2, http://ictsd.net/downloads/2008/11/intellectual-property-and-access-to-clean-energy-technologies-in-developing-countries_barton_ictsd-2007.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

Barton, John H., Mitigating Climate Change Through Technology Transfer: Addressing the Needs of Developing Countries, Chatham House, Energy, Environment and Development Programme: Programme Paper 08/02 (2008).Google Scholar

Bennett, Alan B., Reservation of Rights for Humanitarian Uses, in Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agriculture Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices 41 (Anatole Krattiger et al. eds., 2007).Google Scholar

Boie, Bertram, The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights through Bilateral Investment Treaties: Is there a TRIPS-plus Dimension? (NCRR Trade Regulation, Working Paper No. 2010/19, Nov. 2010), www.wti.org/media/filer_public/c5/47/c5475d4a-f97c-4a8b-a12a-4ae491c6abb3/the_protection_of_iprs_through_bits.pdf (last visited Jun. 17, 2016).Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja A. & Risse, Thomas, Public-Private Partnerships: Effective and Legitimate Tools of Transnational Governance?, in Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century 195, 196 (Edgar Grande & Louis W. Pauly eds., 2005).Google Scholar

Bouchard, Ron, Qualifying Intellectual Property II: A New Innovation Index for Pharmaceutical Patents & Products, 28 Santa Clara Comp. & High Tech. L.J. 287 (2011).Google Scholar

Branstetter, Lee, Foley, C. Fritz, & Saggi, Kamal, Has the Shift to Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Promoted Technology Transfer, FDI, and Industrial Development?, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 93 (2010).Google Scholar

Brewer, Thomas L., Technology Transfer and Climate Change: International Flows, Barriers, and Frameworks, in Climate Change, Trade and Competitiveness (Lael Brainerd and Isaac Sorkin eds.).Google Scholar

Brewer, Thomas L., The Trade Regime and the Climate Regime: Institutional Evolution and Adaptation, 3 Climate Pol’y 329 (2003).Google Scholar

Brown, Phillip, Lauder, Hugh & Ashton, David, Education, Globalization and the Future of the Knowledge Economy, 7 Eur. Educ. Res. J. 131 (2008), http://orca.cf.ac.uk/19085/1/Brown%20Lauder.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Burleson, Elizabeth, Energy Policy, Intellecutal Property, and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change, 18 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 69 (2009).Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene & Lee, Edward eds., Research Handbook On Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports (2017).Google Scholar

Canada NAFTA Decision, Case No. UNCT/14/2, final award, (Mar. 16, 2017), www.ippractice.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Lilly-v-Canada-NAFTA-Arb-Award.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Carrier, Michael A., Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law (2009).Google Scholar

Carrier, Michael, Innovation for the 21st Century: A Response to Seven Critics, 61 Ala. L. Rev. 597 (2010).Google Scholar

Carroll, Michael W., Copyright, Fair Use, and Creative Commons Licenses, in Risk and Entrepreneurship in Libraries: Seizing Opportunities for Change 18 (Pamela Bluh & Cindy Hepfer eds., 2009).Google Scholar

Carroll, Michael W., One Size Does Not Fit All: A Framework for Tailoring Intellectual Property Rights, 70 Ohio St. L.J. 1361 (2009).Google Scholar

Carroll, Michael W., The Problem of Uniformity Cost in Intellectual Property Law, 55 Am. U. L. Rev. 55 (2008).Google Scholar

Cavazos, Ricardo & Lippoldt, Douglas, The Strengthening of IPR Protection: Policy Complements, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 99 (2010).Google Scholar

Cheung, Tai Ming, Mahnken, Thomas, Seligsohn, Deborah, Pollpeter, Kevin, Anderson, Eric, & Yang, Fan (University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation), Planning for Innovation: Understanding China’s Plans for Technological, Energy, Industrial, and Defense Development (2016), www.uscc.gov/Research/planning-innovation-understanding-china’s-plans-technological-energy-industrial-and-defense (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Chien, Colleen V., Opening up the Patent System: Exclusionary and Diffusionary Levers in Patent Law, 89 So. Calif. L. Rev. 793, 801 (2016).Google Scholar

Chatham House Workshop Report, IPRs and the Innovation and Diffusion of Climate Technologies (2007).Google Scholar

Choi, Jay P., Compulsory Licensing as an Antitrust Remedy, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 74 (2010).Google Scholar

Chon, Margaret, Trademark Goodwill as a Public Good: Brands and Innovations in Corporate Social Responsibility, 21 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 277 (2017).Google Scholar

Cohen, Wesley M., Nelson, Richard R., & Walsh, John P., Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not) (Nat’l Bureau of Econ. Research, Working Paper No. W7552, 2000), www.nber.org/papers/w7552 (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Wesley M. & Levin, Richard C., Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure, in 2 Handbook of Industrial Organization 1059 (Richard Schmalensee & Robert Willig eds., 1989).Google Scholar

Cohen, Wesley M. et al., Firm Size & R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination, 35 J. Industrial Econ. 543 (1987).Google Scholar

Competition & Tax Law, Declaration on the Three-Step Test, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property (2009), www.ip.mpg.de (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Conservation Commons, ConserveOnline, http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/commons/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Consortium Partners, CTCN, www.ctc-n.org/about-ctcn/consortium-partners (last visited Oct. 10, 2017).Google Scholar

Copenhagen Economics, Are IPRs a Barrier to the Transfer of Climate Change Technologies?, 4 (2009), http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/february/tradoc_142371.pdf (last visited Jul. 23, 2013).Google Scholar

Correa, Carlos M., Multilateral Agreements and Policy Opportunities, Policy Dialogue 11(2008), http://policydialogue.org/files/events/Correa_Multilateral_Agreements_and_Policy_Opportunities.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

Correa, Carlos M., Review of the TRIPS Agreement: Fostering the Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries, 2 J. World Intel. Prop. 939 (1999).Google Scholar

Contreras, Jorge L., Patent Pledges: Between the Public Domain and Market Exclusivity, 2015 Mich. St. L. Rev. 787.Google Scholar

Creative Commons, Open Science, https://creativecommons.org/about/program-areas/open-science (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

David, Paul A., Mitigating “Anticommons” Harms to Research, in Science and Technology: New Moves in “Legal Jujitsu” against Unintended Adverse Consequences of the Exploitation of Intellectual Property Rights on Results of Publicly and Privately Funded Research, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 59 (2010).Google Scholar

Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Martin, Ralf, & Bassi, Samuela, Climate Change Policy, Innovation, and Growth, London Sch. of Econ. & Pol. Sci., at 9–19, www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Dechezlepretre-et-al-policy-brief-Jan-2016.pdf (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar

Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Glachant, Matthieu, Haščič, Ivan, Johnstone, Nick, & Ménière, Yann, Invention and Transfer of Climate Change-Mitigation Technologies: A Global Analysis, 5 Rev. Envt’l. Econ. Pol’y 109 (2011).Google Scholar

Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Glachant, Matthieu, Hascic, Ivan, Johnstone, Nick, & Ménière, Yann, Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies on a Global Scale: A Study Drawing on Patent Data 4 (CERNA, Mines Paris Tech, Agence Française de Développement, Working Paper, 2008), https://sallan.org/pdf-docs/Dechezlepretre.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies on a Global Scale: A Study Drawing on Patent Data 4 (CERNA, Mines Paris Tech, Agence Française de Développement, Working Paper, November 2008), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.153.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdf (last visited Jul. 15, 2012).Google Scholar

Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Popp, D., Fiscal and Regulatory Instruments for Clean Technology Development in the European Union, London Sch. of Econ. & Pol. Sci., Policy Paper, at 10, 18–20 (Jul. 2015), www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/fiscal-and-regulatory-instruments-for-clean-technology-development-in-the-european-union/ (last visited Jun. 18, 2016) (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Deere-Birkbeck, Carolyn, Global Governance in the Context of Climate Change: The Challenges of Increasingly Complex Risk Parameters, 85 Int’l Affairs 1173 (2009).Google Scholar

Derclaye, Estelle, Not Only Innovation But Also Collaboration, Funding, Goodwill and Commitment: Which Role for Patent Laws in Post-Copenhagen Climate Change Action, 9 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 663 (2010).Google Scholar

Díaz-García, Cristina, González-Moreno, Ángela, & Sáez-Martínez, Francisco J., Eco-Innovation: Insights from a Literature Review, 17 Innovation: Organization & Management 6 (2015).Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, Reconsidering Experimental Use, Akron L. Rev. (Forthcoming Jun. 2017) https://ssrn.com/abstract=3010401 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Durán-Romero, Gemma & Urraca-Ruiz, Ana, Climate Change and Eco-Innovation. A Patent Data Assessment of Environmentally Sound Technologies, 17 Innovation: Org. & Mgmt. 115 (2015).Google Scholar

Harry, Dykman, Patent Licensing Within the Manufacturer’s Aircraft Association (MAA), 46 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 646 (1964).Google Scholar

European Commission Decision of 13 May 2009, COMP/37.990 (Intel) ¶¶ 1749–53, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/37990/37990_3581_11.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

European Parliament and European Council Directive 2004/27, art. 1.8(6), [2004] OJ L136/34 (EC), https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2004_27/dir_2004_27_en.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

European Patent Office [EPO], Overview of the Latin American and Caribbean Clean Energy Potential and Exploitation Levels, http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/2841b369787d5e72c1257da800335111/$FILE/patents_Latin_America_summary_en.pdf.Google Scholar

EPO-United Nations Environmental Programme [UNEP], Patents and Clean Energy Technologies in Africa, http://www.epo.org/news-issues/technology/sustainable-technologies/clean-energy/patents-africa.html (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Fair, Robert, Does Climate Change Justify Compulsory Licensing of Green Technology, 6 B.Y.U. Int’l L. & Mgmt. Rev. 21 (2009).Google Scholar

Fankauser, Sam, Bowen, Alex, Calel, Raphael, Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Grover, David, Rydge, James, & Sato, Misato, Who Will Win the Green Race? In Search of Environmental Competitiveness and Innovation, 23 Global Envtl. Change 902 (2013).Google Scholar

Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) at 14 (2014), (“Regional Key Risks and Potential for Risk Reduction”), www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar

Figueres, Christiana, Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, Whiteman, Gail, Rockström, Johan, Hobley, Anthony, & Rahmstorf, Stefan, Comment: Three Years to Safeguard Our Climate, 546 Nature 593 (Jun. 29, 2017).Google Scholar

Fisher, William, Intellectual Property and Innovation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Perspectives, 37 Industrial Property, Innovation, and the Knowledge-Based Economy, Beleidsstudies Technologie Economie (2001), cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/Innovation.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Foray, Dominique, Technology Transfer in the TRIPS Age: The Need for New Types of Partnerships between the Least Developed and Most Advanced Economies (2009), www.ictsd.org/downloads/2012/02/technology-transfer-in-the-trips-age.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Frischmann, Brett M., An Economic Theory of Infrastructure and Commons Management, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 917 (2005).Google Scholar

Frischmann, Brett M., Infrastucture: The Social Value of Shared Resources (2012).Google Scholar

Frischmann, Brett, Innovation and Institutions: Rethinking the Economics of U.S. Science and Technology Policy, 24 Vt. L. Rev. 347 (2000).Google Scholar

Gantz, David A. & Ala’i, Padideh, Climate Change Innovation, Products and Services Under the GATT/WTO System, in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change 271 (Joshua D. Sarnoff, ed., 2016).Google Scholar

Ge, Mengpin, Friedrich, Johannes, & Damassa, Thomas, 6 Graphs Explain the World’s Top 10 Emitters (Cumulative CO₂ Emissions 1850–2011), World Resources Institute (2014), www.wri.org/blog/2014/11/6-graphs-explain-world%E2%80%99s-top-10-emitters (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar

Global Environmental Facility, Organization, www.thegef.org/about/organization (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Governing Knowledge Commons (Brett M. Frischmann, Michael J. Madison, & Katherine J. Strandburg eds., 2014).Google Scholar

Green Climate Fund, GFC in Numbers, 2017, www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/24871/GCF_in_Numbers.pdf/226fc825-3c56-4d71-9a4c-60fd83e5fb03 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Green Exchange (2012), www.greenexchange.com (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

The Guardian, Earth’s Oceans are Warming 13% Faster Than Thought, and Accelerating (Mar. 10, 2017), www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/mar/10/earths-oceans-are-warming-13-faster-than-thought-and-accelerating, (last visited Oct. 10, 2017).Google Scholar

Hall, Bronwyn & Helmers, C., The Role of Patent Protection in (Clean/Green) Technologies 7 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 16323, 2010), www.nber.org/papers/w16323 (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

Hazucha, Branislav, International Standards and Essential Patents: From International Harmonization to Competition of Technologies (2010).Google Scholar

Hemphill, C. Scott, Network Neutrality and the False Promise of Zero-Price Regulation, 25 Yale J. Reg. 135 (2008).Google Scholar

Holzapfel, Henrik & Sarnoff, Joshua D., A Cross-Atlantic Dialog on Experimental Use and Research Tools, 48 IDEA 123 (2008).Google Scholar

International Council on Human Rights Policy, Beyond Technology Transfer: Protecting Human Rights in a Climate-Constrained World, in Sarnoff, Joshua D., Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change (2016).Google Scholar

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int’l., Inc., 137 S.Ct. 1523 (2017).Google Scholar

International HapMap Project (2011), http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Johnson, Daniel & Lybecker, Kristina, Challenges to Technology Transfer: A Literature Review of the Constraints on Environmental Technology Dissemination (2009) http://ssrn.com/abstract=1456222 (last visited Jul. 15, 2012).Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L. & Rose, Nancy L., The Effects of Economic Regulation, in Handbook of Industrial Organization 1464 (1989).Google Scholar

Kapczynski, Amy, The Cost of Price: Why and How to Get Beyond Intellectual Property Internalism, 59 UCLA L. Rev. 970 (2012).Google Scholar

Khan, B. Zorina, Antitrust and Innovation Before the Sherman Act, 77 Antitrust L.J. 757 (2011).Google Scholar

Kim, Chulhyun & Kim, Moon-Soo, Identifying Core Environmental Technologies Through Patent Analysis, 17 Innovation: Org. & Mgt. 139 (2015).Google Scholar

Kristensen, Henrik, Vinding, K. F., Grieger, K., & Hansen, S. F., Adopting Eco-Innovation in Danish Polymer Industry Working with Nanotechnology: Drivers, Barriers and Future Strategies, 6 Nanotech. L. & Bus. 416 (2009).Google Scholar

Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, 568 U.S. 519 (2013).Google Scholar

Kunstadt, R. & Maggioni, I., A Proposed “U.S. Public Patent Pool,” les Nouvelles, 10 (2011).Google Scholar

Lee, Bernice, Iliev, Ilian, & Preston, Felix, A Chatham House Report: Who Owns Our Low Carbon Future? Intellectual Property and Energy Technologies, Royal Institute of International Affairs, (2009).Google Scholar

Lee, Peter, Inverting the Logic of Scientific Discovery: Applying Common Law Patentable Subject Matter Doctrine to Constrain Patents on Biotechnology Research Tools, 19 Harv. J.L. & Tech 84 (2005).Google Scholar

Lee, Peter, Patents, Paradigm-Shifts, and Progress in Biomedical Science, 114 Yale L.J. 69 (2004).Google Scholar

Lee, Peter, Toward a Distributive Commons in Patent Law, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 974 (2009).Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark, Industry-Specific Antitrust Policy for Innovation, 2011 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 637 (2011).Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence, Code: Version 2.0 (2006).Google Scholar

Levin, Richard C., Klevorick, Alvin K., Nelson, Richard R., & Winter, Sidney G., Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, 18 Brookings Papers on Econ. Activity 783 (1987).Google Scholar

Li, Yahong, Imitation to Innovation in China: The Role of Patents in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries 70 (2010).Google Scholar

Liberti, Lahra, Intellectual Property Rights in International Investment Agreements (OECD, Working Paper No. 2010/01, 2010), www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2010_1.pdf (last visited Jun. 17, 2016).Google Scholar

Love, James & Hubbard, Tim, Paying for Public Goods, in Code: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital Economy 207 (James Love, Tim Hubbard, & Rishab Aiyer Ghosh eds., 2005).Google Scholar

Madison, Michael, Frischmann, Brett M., & Strandburg, Katherine, The University as Constructed Cultural Commons, 30 Wash. U. J. L. & Pol’y 365 (2009).Google Scholar

Magat, Wesley A. & Viscusi, W. Kip, Informational Approaches to Regulation (1992).Google Scholar

Mandel, Gregory N., When to Open Infrastructure Access, 35 Ecology L. Q. 205 (2008).Google Scholar

Manne, Geoffrey, Assuming More Than We Know About Innovation Markets: A Review of Michael Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century, 61 Ala. L. Rev. 553 (2010).Google Scholar

Mara, Kaitlin, New Climate Technologies Rarely Reaching Developing Countries, Panel Says, IP Watch (Jul. 13, 2010), www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2010/07/13/new-climate-technologies-rarely-reaching-developing-countries-panel-says (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith, Research and Development Subsidies: A Need for WTO Disciplines? E15 Initiative, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development [ICTSD] and World Economic Forum (2015), http://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/E15_Subsidies_Maskus_final.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith E., The Curious Economics of Parallel Imports, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 123 (2010).Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith E. & Okediji, Ruth, Intellectual Property Rights and International Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change: Risks, Opportunities and Policy Options, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 10 (2010), http://ictsd.org/i/publications/97782/ (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith E. & Okediji, Ruth L., Legal and Economic Perspectives on International Technology Transfer in Environmentally Sound Technologies, in Intellectual Property Rights: Legal and Economic Challenges for Development 392 (2014).Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith & Ridley, William, Intellectual Property-Related Preferential Trade Agreements and the Composition of Trade (draft of Mar. 17, 2017) (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Merck KGAA v. Integra LifeSciences I Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005).Google Scholar

Merges, Robert P. & Nelson, Richard R., On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, 90 Colum. L. Rev. 839 (1990).Google Scholar

Mimura, Carol, Technology Licensing for the Benefit of the Developing World: UC Berkeley’s Socially Responsible Licensing Program, 21 J. Assoc. Univ. Tech. Managers 15 (2007).Google Scholar

Montes, Manuel F., Industrialization, Inequality and Sustainability: What Kinds of Industry Policy Do We Need?, South Center Policy Brief (Aug. 2017), www.southcentre.int/policy-brief-44-august-2017/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

National Academies of Science, Engineering & Medicine, Returns to Federal Investments in the Innovation System: Proceedings of a Workshop – in Brief, (Oct. 2017), https://doi.org/10.17226/24905 (last visited Oct. 12, 2017).Google Scholar

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Batelle, www.battelle.org/our-work/laboratory-management/national-renewable-energy-laboratory (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

National Research Council, Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest, National Academies Press 7 (2010).Google Scholar

O’Connor, Sean, Origins of Patent Exhaustion: Jacksonian Politics, ‘Patent Farming,’ and the Basis of the Bargain (Mar. 8, 2017), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2920738 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, National Systems for Financing Innovation (1995).Google Scholar

Nesta, Lionel, Vona, Francesco, & Nicolli, Francesco, Environmental Policies, Product Market Regulation and Innovation in Renewable Energy (2012) (unpublished manuscript), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2192441 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, 639 Fed. App’x 639 (Fed. Cir. 2016), cert. granted, 137 S.Ct. 2239 (U.S. Nov. 23, 2016).Google Scholar

Oliva, Maria J. et al., Climate Change, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (2008), http://ictsd.org/i/publications/31159 (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

OMB 2013 Budget Report (Apr. 29, 2013).Google Scholar

Ordover, Janusz A., Economic Foundations and Considerations in Protecting Industrial and Intellectual Property, 53 Antitrust L. J. 503 (1984).Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions (1990).Google Scholar

Panel Report, Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products, WTO Doc. WT/DS114/R, ¶¶ 7.54–7.57, 7.69 (adopted Apr. 7, 2000), www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/7428d.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Parson, Edward A., Starting the Dialog on Climate Engineering Governance: A World Commission, Centre for International Governance Innovation, www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Fixing%20Climate%20Governance%20PB%20no8_0.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Peritz, Rudolph J. R., Competition Within Intellectual Property Regimes: The Instance of Patent Rights, in Intellectual Property and Competition Law: New Frontiers 27 (Steven Anderman & Ariel Ezrachi eds., 2011).Google Scholar

Polar Information Commons, Welcome to the Polar Information Commons (PIC), www.polarcommons.org/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Porter, Michael E., Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of U.S. Competitiveness, Council on Competitiveness (2001).Google Scholar

Powell, Walter W., Owen-Smith, Jason, & Smith-Doerr, Laurel, The Science Of Science Policy: A Handbook (Kaye H. Fealing et al. eds., 2011).Google Scholar

Prakash, Aseem, Greening the Firm: The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism (2000).Google Scholar

Prins, Gwyn et al., The Hartwell Paper: A New Direction for Climate Policy After the Crash of 2009, 5 (2010), http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27939/ (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

Public Library of Science, Welcome to PLOS, www.plos.org (last visited Nov. 18, 2017).Google Scholar

Radka, Mark, Some Perspectives About the Climate Technology Centre/Climate Technology Network, U.N. Environment Programme (2012), http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/ad_hoc_working_groups/lca/application/pdf/some_perspectives_about_the_ctc_ctn.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Rai, Arti K. & Eisenberg, Rebecca S., Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine, 66 Law & Contemp. Probs. 294 (2003).Google Scholar

Reichman, Jerome H., Comment: Compulsory Licensing of Patented Pharmaceutical Inventions: Evaluating the Options, 37 J.L. Med. & Ethics 253 (2009).Google Scholar

Reichman, Jerome H., Intellectual Property in International Perspective: Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law Symposium, 48 Hous. L. Rev. 1137 (2009).Google Scholar

Reynolds, Jesse L., Solar Climate Engineering, Law, and Regulation, in The Oxford Handbook on the Law and Regulation of Technology 799 (Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford & Karen Yeung eds., 2016), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862471 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Reynolds, Jesse L., Contreras, Jorge L., & Sarnoff, Joshua D., Solar Climate Engineering and Intellectual Property: Toward a Research Commons, 18 Minn. J. L., Sci. & Tech. 1 (2017).Google Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew, Intellectual Property and Climate Change: Inventing Clean Technologies (2001).Google Scholar

Rismann, Jeffrey & Orvis, Robbie, Carbon Capture and Storage: An Expensive Option for Reducing U.S. CO2 Emissions, Forbes (May 3, 2017), www.forbes.com/sites/energyinnovation/2017/05/03/carbon-capture-and-storage-an-expensive-option-for-reducing-u-s-co2-emissions/#420d40956482 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Rosch, J. Thomas, Antitrust Regulation of Innovation Markets: Remarks at the ABA Antitrust Intellectual Property Conference (2009), www.ftc.gov/speeches/rosch/090205innovationspeech.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Ruggles, C.O., Problems of Public-Utility Rate Regulation and Fair Return, 32 J. Pol. Econ. 543 (1924).Google Scholar

Ruttan, Vernon W., Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development (2006).Google Scholar

Sallet, Jonathan, Paisley, Ed & Masterman, Justin, The Geography of Innovation: The Federal Government and the Growth of Regional Innovation Clusters, Science Progress 1 (2009), www.scienceprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/eda_paper.pdf (last visited Jul. 15, 2012).Google Scholar

Sampath, Padmashree Gehl & Roffe, Pedro, Unpacking the International Technology Transfer Debate: Fifty Years and Beyond Research, ICTSD Issue Paper No. 36, 17, 19 (Nov. 2012), www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2012/11/unpacking-the-international-technology-transfer-debate-fifty-years-and-beyond.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Samuelson, Pamela, Reverse Engineering Under Siege, Berkeley School of Information 1–3, http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/CACM%20on%20Bunner.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Sarnoff, Joshua D., Government Choices in Innovation Funding (with Reference to Climate Change), 62 Emory L. J. 1087 (2013).Google Scholar

Sarnoff, Joshua D., Intellectual Property and Climate Change, with an Emphasis on Patents and Technology Transfer, in The Oxford Handbook of International Climate Change Law 391 (Gray, Kevin R., Richard Tarasofsky, & Cinnamon P. Carlarne eds., 2016).Google Scholar

Sarnoff, Joshua D., Patent Eligible Inventions after Bilski: History and Theory, 63 Hastings L. J. 53 (2011).Google Scholar

Sarnoff, Joshua D., The Likely Mismatch Between Federal R&D Funding and Desired Innovation, 18 Vanderbilt J. Enter. & Tech. L. 363 (2016).Google Scholar

Sarnoff, Joshua D., The Patent System and Climate Change, 16 Va. J. L. & Tech. 301 (2011).Google Scholar

Sarnoff, Joshua D. & Holman, Christopher, Recent Developments Affecting the Enforcement, Procurement, and Licensing of Research Tool Patents, 23 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 1299 (2008).Google Scholar

Sarnoff, Joshua D. (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change (2016).Google Scholar

Schuiling, R. D. & Tickel, Oliver, Olivine Against Climate Change and Ocean Acidification, Innovation Concepts, www.innovationconcepts.eu/res/literatuurSchuiling/olivineagainstclimatechange23.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Science Commons, About Science Commons, http://sciencecommons.org/about (last visited Nov. 19, 2017) (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Scotchmer, Suzanne, Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law, Winter 1991 J. Econ. Persp. 33 (2009).Google Scholar

So, Anthony D., Sampat, Bhaven N, Rai, Arti K, Cook-Deegan, Robert, Reichman, Jerome H, Weissman, Robert, & Kapczynski, Amy, Is Bayh-Dole good for developing countries? Lessons from the US experience, 6 PLoS Biol. (2008) http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060262 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Srinivas, K. Ravi, Climate Change, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights, Research and Information System for Developing Countries, Discussion Paper No. 153, 26 (2009), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1440742 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E., Lecture, Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights, 57 Duke L. J. 1693 (2008).Google Scholar

Strandburg, Katherine J., Users as Innovators: Implications for Patent Doctrine, 79 U. Colo. L. Rev. 467 (2008).Google Scholar

Styianou, Konstantinos, An Innovation-Centric Approach of Telecommunications Infrastructure Regulation, 16 Va. J.L. & Tech. 221 (2011).Google Scholar

Sundaram, Jomo Kwame, Chowdhury, Anis, Sharma, Krishnan, & Platz, Daniel, Public-Private Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Fit for Purpose? 6 (U.N. Dept. of Econ. & Soc. Affairs, DESA Working Paper No. 148, ST/ESA/2016/DWP/148, Feb. 2016).Google Scholar

Szakalski, Dustin, Progress in the Aircraft Industry and the Role of Patent Pools and Cross-Licensing Agreements, 15 UCLA J. L. & Tech. 1 (2011).Google Scholar

Takalo, Tuomas, Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies, Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers, Paper No. 1 (2013), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2217502 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

United Nations [U.N.] Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention on its Seventh Session, U.N. Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/14, at 156 (Nov. 20, 2009).Google Scholar

U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UNDESA], Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

UNDESA, World Economic and Social Survey 2009 (2009).Google Scholar

UNDESA, World Economic and Social Survey 2010 (2010).Google Scholar

United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP], The Adaptation Gap Finance Report 2016, at 3 (May 2016), http://web.unep.org/adaptationgapreport/2016 (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar

UNEP, EPO and ICTSD, Patents and Clean Energy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Policy: Final Report (2010), http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/cc5da4b168363477c12577ad00547289/$FILE/patents_clean_energy_study_en.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change [UNFCCC], 1771 U.N.T.S. 107, signed Jun. 1992, entered into force Mar. 21, 1994.Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Paris Agreement, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, Draft Decision –/CP.21 Annex (2015), http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf (last visited Dec. 21, 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventeenth Session, Held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011: Decision 4/CP.17 Technology Executive Committee – Modalities and Procedures, UNFCCC, Report No. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1 ¶ 4 (a)-(f) (2011).Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Eighteenth Session, Held in Doha from 26 November to 8 December 2012, UNFCCC, Report No. FCCC/CP/2012/8/Add.2. ¶ 10, (2012).Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Nineteenth Session, Held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013: Decision 3/CP19, Long-term Climate Finance, UNFCCC, Report No. FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 ¶¶ 7–9 (2013).Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report on Activities and Performance of the Technology Executive Committee for 2012, UNFCCC, Report No. FCCC/SB/2012/2 ¶ 35(g) (2012).Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Support for Implementing Climate Technology Activities, TT:CLEAR, http://unfccc.int/ttclear/support/technology-mechanism.html (last visited Oct. 10, 2017).Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Technology Mechanism (2013), http://unfccc.int/ttclear/templates/render_cms_page?TEM_home (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

UNFCCC, TT:CLEAR, http://unfccc.int/ttclear/support/technology-mechanism.html (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

UNFCCC Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention, Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan, 23 UNFCCC (2009), http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/awglca5/eng/misc01.pdf.Google Scholar

UNFCCC Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention, Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention on its Seventh Session, UNFCCC Doc. No. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/14, 156 (2009), http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/awglca7/eng/14.pdf.UNFCCC, Draft Decision CP.16, Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (2010), ¶¶ IV.A.98–99, http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_16/application/pdf/cop16_lca.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

[U.N.] Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goal 9, U.N. Dep’t of Econ. and Soc. Affairs, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg9 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

[U.N.] Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goal 13, U.N. Dep’t of Econ. and Soc. Affairs, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg13 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

[U.N.] Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goal 17, U.N. Dep’t of Econ. and Soc. Affairs, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg17 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

U.S. Code 15 U.S.C. 3710 §12(d)(1) (1986) ([Commerce and trade] Cooperative research and development agreements).Google Scholar

17 U.S.C. §506(a) (2006) ([Copyrights] Criminal offenses).Google Scholar

18 U.S.C. §2319(a) (2006) (Criminal infringement of a copyright).Google Scholar

35 U.S.C. §201(b) (2006) ([Patents] Definitions).Google Scholar

35 U.S.C. § 202(c)(4) (2006) ([Patents] Disposition of rights).Google Scholar

35 U.S.C. § 203(a) (2006) ([Patents] March-in rights).Google Scholar

35 U.S.C. § 207(a)(2) (2006) ([Patents] Domestic and foreign protection of federally owned inventions).Google Scholar

35 U.S.C. § 271(e) (2006) ([Patents] Infringement of Patent).Google Scholar

42 U.S.C. §4701 et seq. (2006) ([The Public Health and Welfare] Congressional findings and declaration of policy).Google Scholar

U.S. Department Energy Off. Sci., Human Genome Project Information (2011), www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/home.shtml (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/NNSA Overseas Presence Advisory Board’s Overseas Corps Training Program Agreement, http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/DOE-Overseas-Corps-Training-Program.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

U.S. Department of State, Memorandum of Understanding Signed Between the Government of India and the Government of the United States, (Nov. 30, 2009), https://2009–2017.state.gov/p/sca/rls/press/2009/132776.htm (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

U.S. Department of State, Memorandum of Understanding to Enhance Cooperation on Climate Change, Energy and Environment Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the People’s Republic of China (Jul. 2009), https://2009–2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/july/126592.htm (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [U.S. EPA], Climate Leadership Awards, http://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/awards/index.html (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

U.S. EPA, Energy Star® – The Power to Protect the Environment Through Energy Efficiency, EPA 430-R-03–008, 2–3 (2003).Google Scholar

U.S. EPA, Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Data, (2016), www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html (last visited Jun. 15, 2016).Google Scholar

U.S. Global Climate Change Research Program, Climate Science Special Report (CSSR) (Jun. 28, 2017), www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/climate/2017/climate-report-final-draft-clean.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Van Overwalle, Geertrui, Individualism, Collectivism and Openness in Patent Law: Promoting Access Through Exclusion, Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law (Jan Rósen, ed., 2011), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1718687 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Verizon v. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (2004).Google Scholar

Wessner, Charles W. & Wolff, Alan W. eds., Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for the Global Economy 53 (2012).Google Scholar

World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change, World Bank (2009).Google Scholar

World Energy Council, World Energy Resources: Carbon Capture and Storage 2016, www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/WEResources_CCS_2016.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

World Trade Organization [WTO], Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (April 15, 1994), Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments – Result of the Uruguay Rounds 33 I.L.M. 81 (1994).Google Scholar

WTO & UNEP, Trade and Climate Change WTO-UNEP Report (2009).Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K., Enforcement, Economics and Estimates, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 1 (2010).Google Scholar

Abdel-Latif, Ahmed, et al., Overcoming the Impasse on Intellectual Property and Climate Change at the UNFCCC: A Way Forward (International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Policy Brief No. 11, 2011), http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2480.Google Scholar

Adeoti, John, et al., Biotechnology R&D partnership for industrial innovation in Nigeria, 25 Technovation 349–365 (2005).Google Scholar

Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm, Partnerships: Machines of Possibilities (2008).Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, Karin, Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development, 12 European J. of Int’l Relations 467–498 (2006).Google Scholar

Benner, Thorsten et al., Progress or Peril? Networks and Partnerships in Global Environmental Governance, The Post-Johannesburg Agenda (2003).Google Scholar

Bitzer, Verena, et al., Intersectoral Partnerships for a Sustainable Coffee Chain: Really Addressing Sustainability or Just Picking (Coffee) Cherries?, 18 Global Envtl. Change 271–284 (2008).Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja A., Organizing Babylon—On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks, 76 Pub. Admin 253–273 (1998).Google Scholar

Brinkerhoff, Derick W. & Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M., Public–Private Partnerships: Perspectives on Purposes, Publicness, and Good Governance, 31 Pub. Admin. & Develop. 2–14 (2011).Google Scholar

Bull, Benedict & McNeill, Desmond, Development issues in global governance: public–private partnerships and market multilateralism (2007).Google Scholar

Buse, Kent, Governing Public–Private Infectious Disease Partnerships, 10 The Brown J. World Affairs 232 (2004).Google Scholar

CAI-Asia, Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities (2010).Google Scholar

Chan, Sander, et al., Reinvigorating International Climate Policy: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Nonstate Action, 6 Global Pol’y, 466–473 (2015).Google Scholar

Chon, Margaret, PPPs in Global IP (public–private partnerships in global intellectual property), in Methods and Perspectives in Intellectual Property 296 (Graeme B. Dinwoodie ed., 2013).Google Scholar

Deibel, Eric & Mert, Ayşem, Partnerships and Miracle Crops: On Open Access and the Commodification of Plant Varieties, 16 Asian Biotechnology and Develop Rev. 1–33 (2014).Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne, New Governance and Experimentalism, 2010 Wisc. L. Rev. 227 (2010).Google Scholar

Haas, Peter, When Does Power Listen to Truth? A Constructive Approach to the Policy Process, 11 J. European Pub. Pol’y, 569–592 (2004).Google Scholar

The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Rodney B. Hall & Thomas Biersteker eds., 2002).Google Scholar

Earth Negotiations Bulletin – Summary of the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the World Summit on Sustainable Development, International Institute for Substantial Development www.iisd.ca/vol22/enb2219e.html (last visited Sept. 28, 2017).Google Scholar

Kleyn, Dominique, et al., Partnership and Innovation in the Life Sciences, 11 Int’l J. Innovation Mgmt., 323–330 (2007).Google Scholar

Marten, Jens, Multi-stakeholder Partnerships – Future Models of Multilateralism?, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Occasional Papers Berlin, January 2007.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, James, Who Is in Charge Here? Governance for Sustainable Development in a Complex World, 9 J. Envtl. Pol’y & Planning, 299–314 (2007).Google Scholar

Mert, Ayşem, Environmental Governance Through Partnerships: A Discourse Theoretical Study (2015).Google Scholar

Mert, Ayşem, Hybrid Governance Mechanisms as Political Instruments: The Case of Sustainability, Partnerships, 14 Int’l Envtl. Agreements, 225–244 (2013).Google Scholar

Mert, Ayşem, The Privatisation of Environmental Governance: On Myths, Forces of Nature, and Other Inevitabilities, 21 Envtl. Values, 475–498 (2012).Google Scholar

Mert, Ayşem & Dellas, Eleni, Assessing the Legitimacy of Technology Transfer Through Partnerships for Sustainable Development in the Water Sector, in Public–Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Emergence, Influence and Legitimacy 209 (Philip Pattberg et al. eds., 2012).Google Scholar

Morsink, Karlijn et al., Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies, 39 Energy Pol’y 1–5 (2011).Google Scholar

Ottaway, Marina, Corporation Goes Global: International Organizations, Nongovernmental Organization Networks, and Transnational Business, 7 Global Governance 265–292 (2001).Google Scholar

Pattberg, Philipp & Stripple, Johannes, Beyond the Public and Private Divide: Remapping Transnational Climate Governance in the 21st Century, 8 Int’l Envtl. Agreements: Politics, Law And Economics 367–388 (2008).Google Scholar

Public–private partnerships for Sustainable Development: Emergence, Influence and Legitimacy (Pattberg, Philip et al. eds., 2012).Google Scholar

Reinicke, Wolfgang H., Global Public Policy: Governing Without Government? (1998).Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N., Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World (1997).Google Scholar

Schaferhoff, Marco et al., Transnational Public–Private Partnerships in International Relations: Making Sense of Concepts, Research Frameworks, and Results, 11 Int’l Studies Rev., 451–474 (2009).Google Scholar

Statement of the Bellagio Conference on Cultural Agency/Cultural Authority: Politics and Poetics of Intellectual Property in the Post-Colonial Era, March 11, 1993, http://case.edu/affil/sce/BellagioDec.html.Google Scholar

Streck, Charlotte, New Partnerships in Global Environmental Policy: The Clean Development Mechanism, 13 J. Envtl. & Develop, 295–322 (2004).Google Scholar

United Nations [UN] Brochure, Partnerships for Sustainable Development, U.N. Doc. DPI/2323 – 03–46703 (August 2003), www.un.org/esa/sustdev/partnerships/publications/brochure_E.pdf.Google Scholar

UN Documents Cooperation Circles, Gathering a Body of Global Agreements, Agenda 21 Chapter, www.un-documents.net/agenda21.htm.Google Scholar

UN Environment Programme – Ozone Secretariat, Handbook for the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, UNEP/Earthprint (2006).Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics, 46 Int’l Org. 391–425 (1992).Google Scholar

Widerberg, Oscar & Stripple, Johannes, The Expanding Field of Corporate Initiatives for Decarbonization: A Review of Five Databases, 7 Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 486–500 (2016).Google Scholar

Widerberg, Oscar & Pattberg, Philipp, International Cooperative Initiatives in Global Climate Governance: Raising the Ambition Level or Delegitimizing the UNFCCC?, 6 Global Pol’y, 45–56 (2015).Google Scholar

Wolpert, John D., Breaking Out of the Innovation Box, 80 Harv. Bus. Rev., 76–83 (2002).Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, TRIPS: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Part I – General provisions and basic principles, WTO (Jan. 21, 2017), www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/t_agm2_e.htm.Google Scholar

Zacher, Mark W., The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for International Order and Governance, in Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics 58 (James N. Rosenau & Ernst-Otto Czempiel eds., 1992).Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Regieren Jenseits des Nationalstaates (1998).Google Scholar

Agdomar, Michelle, Removing the Greek From Feta and Adding Korbel to Champagne: The Paradox of Geographical Indications in International Law, 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 541 (2008).Google Scholar

Akaki, Pablo P., Mexican Agrifood Geographical Indications: Between Productivity and Sustainability, in AC&SD, Agri-Chain and Sustainable Development (2016), https://acsd2016.cirad.fr/content/download/4317/32688/version/1/file/Book+of+abstracts.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Biénabe, Estelle & Marie-Vivien, Delphine, Institutionalizing Geographical Indications in Southern Countries: Lessons Learned from Basmati and Rooibos, 98 World Dev. 58 (Oct. 2017).Google Scholar

Biénabe, Estelle & Marie-Vivien, Delphine, The Multifaceted Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: A Worldwide Review, 98 World Dev. 1 (2017).Google Scholar

Bowen, Sarah, Embedding Local Places in Global Spaces: Geographical Indications as a Territorial Development Strategy, 75(2) Rural Sociology 209 (2010).Google Scholar

Bowen, Sarah & Zapata, Ana Valenzuela, Geographical Indications, Terroir, and Socioeconomic and Ecological Sustainability: The Case of Tequila, 25(1) J. Rural Studies 108 (2009).Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene, In Territorio Veritas? Bringing Geographical Coherence into the Ambiguous Definition of Geographical Indications of Origin, 6 WIPO J. 57 (2014).Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene, Of Markets, Culture, and Terroir: The Unique Economic and Culture-Related Benefits of Geographical Indications of Origin, in International Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research 433 (Daniel J. Gervais ed., 2015).Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene, Time to Say Local Cheese and Smile at Geographical Indications? International Trade and Local Development in the United States, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 373 (2015).Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene & Loon, Ng-Loy Wee eds., Geographical Indications at the Crossroads of Trade, Development, and Culture: Focus on Asia-Pacific (2017).Google Scholar

Case C-108/01, Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma en Salumificio S. Rita SpA v. Asda Stores Ltd. and Hygrade Foods Ltd., 2003 E.C.R. I-5163.Google Scholar

Chever, Tanguy, Renault, Christian, Renault, Séverine, & Romieu, Violaine, Value of Production of Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs, Wines, Aromatised Wines and Spirits Protected by a Geographical Indication (GI) (2012), an external study commissioned by the EU Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/external-studies/2012/value-gi/final-report_en.pdf (last visited Jul. 20, 2017).Google Scholar

Coombe, Rosemary J., et al., Geographical Indications: The Promise, Perils and Politics of Protecting Place-Based Products, in The Sage Handbook of Intellectual Property 207 (Matthew David & Deborah Halbert eds. 2014).Google Scholar

Coombe, Rosemary J. & Aylwin, Nicole, Bordering Diversity and Desire: Using Intellectual Property to a Mark Place-Based Products, 43 Env’t and Planning 2027, 2027–29 (2011).Google Scholar

Coombe, Rosemary J. & Ali Malik, S., Rethinking the Work of Geographical Indications in Asia: Addressing Hidden Geographies of Gendered Labor, in Geographical Indications at the Crossroads of Trade, Development, and Culture: Focus on Asia-Pacific 87 (Irene Calboli & Ng-Loy Wee Loon eds., 2017).Google Scholar

Council Regulation 2081/92 of 14 Jul. 1992 on the Protection of Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs, 1992 O.J. (L 208) 1.Google Scholar

Décret-loi du 30 Juillet 1935 Relatif à la Défense du Marché du Vins et au Régime Economique de l’alcool, Journal Officiel de la République Française [J.O.] [Official Gazete of France], Jul. 31, 1935.Google Scholar

Ehring, Lothar, National Treatment Under the GATT 1994, in The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law – Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property 34 (Anselm Kamperman Sanders ed., 2014).Google Scholar

The EU‑Vietnam Free Trade Agreement, EU‑Viet. (Aug. 5, 2015), http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/august/tradoc_153674.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

European Commission, Trade, Geographical Indications, http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/intellectual-property/geographical-indications/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

European Commission, European Commission’s Trade Policy Portal, http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/intellectual-property/geographical-indications/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Gangjee, Dev, Geographical Indications and Cultural Heritage, 4 WIPO J. 92 (2012).Google Scholar

Gangjee, Dev, 46 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue No. 7 ( 2005 ).Google Scholar

Gangjee, Dev, Quibbling Siblings: Conflicts Between Trademarks and Geographic Indications, 82 Chi. Kent L. Rev. 1253, 1256–9 (2007).Google Scholar

Gangjee, Dev, Relocating the Law of Geographical Indications (2012).Google Scholar

Gangjee, Dev (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Geographical Indications ( 2016 ).Google Scholar

Geographical Indications Act (Cap 117B, 1999 Rev. Ed.) (Sing.).Google Scholar

Geographical Indications Act (No. 19 of 2014) (Sing.).Google Scholar

The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration & Protection) Act, No. 48 of 1999.Google Scholar

Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules, 2002.Google Scholar

Geographical Indication Registry, State Wise Registration Details of G.I. Applications, www.ipindia.nic.in/newsdetail.htm?283/State+wise+registration+details+of+GI+applications+15th+September+2003+Till+Date (last visited Aug. 18, 2017).Google Scholar

Giovannucci, Daniele et al., Guide to Geographical Indications: Linking Products and their Origins (2009).Google Scholar

Hughes, Justin, Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon: The Spirited Debate About Geographical Indications, 58 Hastings L. J. 299 (2006).Google Scholar

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, North-South Coalition Sets Out “Draft Modalities” on TRIPS, www.ictsd.org/north-south-coalition-sets-out-%E2%80%98draft-modalities%E2%80%99-on-trips (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Leong, Susanna H.S., European Union-Singapore Free Trade Agreement: A New Chapter for Geographical Indications in Singapore, in Geographical Indications at the Crossroads of Trade, Development, and Culture: Focus on Asia-Pacific 33 (Irene Calboli & Ng-Loy Wee Loon eds., 2017).Google Scholar

The Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration, 923 U.N.T.S. 205 (Oct. 31, 1958).Google Scholar

Loi du 6 Mai 1919 Relative à la Protection des Appelations d’Origine, Journal Officiel de la République Française [J.O.] [Official Gazette of France], May 8, 1919.Google Scholar

Loi du 1er Août 1905 sur les Fraudes et Falsífications en Matière des Produits ou de Services, Journal Officiel de la République Française [J.O.] [Official Gazete of France], Aug. 5, 1905.Google Scholar

Marie-Vivien, Delphine, The Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: from Disengagement in France/Europe to Significant Involvement in India, 13(2) J. of World Intell. 121 (2010).Google Scholar

Marie-Vivien, Delphine, Bérard, Laurence, Boutonnet, Jean-Pierre, & Casabianca, Francois, Are French Geographical Indications Losing Their Soul? Analyzing Recent Developments in the Governance of the Link to the Origin in France, 98 World Dev. 24 (Oct. 2015).Google Scholar

Menapace, Luisa & Moschini, Gian Carlo, Quality Certification by Geographical Indications, Trademarks, and Firm Reputation, 39 European Review of Agricultural Economics 544 (2012).Google Scholar

Menapace, Luisa et al., Consumers’ Preference for Geographical Origin Labels: Evidence from the Canadian Olive Oil Market, 38 Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 193, (2011 ).Google Scholar

O’Connor, Bernard, The Law of Geographical Indications ( 2004 ).Google Scholar

Office of the United States Trade Representative, The United States Officially Withdraws from the Transpacific-Partnership, https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2017/january/US-Withdraws-From-TPP (last visited Jul. 20, 2017).Google Scholar

Pai, Yogesh & Singla, Tania, “Vanity GIs:” India’s Legislation on Geographical Indications and the Missing Regulatory Framework, in Geographical Indications at the Crossroads of Trade, Development, and Culture: Focus on Asia-Pacific 333 (Irene Calboli & Ng-Loy Wee Loon eds., 2017).Google Scholar

Rangnekar, Dwijen, Indications of Geographical Origin in Asia: Legal and Policy Issues to Resolve, in Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development: Development Agendas in a Changing World 273 (Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz & Pedro Roffe eds., 2009).Google Scholar

Ritzert, Margaret, Champagne Is from Champagne: An Economic Justification for Extending Trademark-Level Protection to Wine-Related Geographical Indicators, 37 AIPLA Q.J. 191 (2009).Google Scholar

U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goals, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs (last visited Nov. 20, 2017).Google Scholar

Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, Chapter 18: Intellectual Property, available at https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/TPP-Final-Text-Intellectual-Property.pdf (last visited Jul. 20, 2017).Google Scholar

World Intellectual Property Organization, Diplomatic Conference for the Adoption of a New Act of the Lisbon Agreement – The Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications (2015), http://www.wipo.int/meetings/diplomatic_conferences/2015/en/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

World Intellectual Property Organization, The Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications, WIPO Lex. No. TRT/LISBON/009 (May 20, 2015), available at www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=15625 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights arts. 22–24 (April 15, 1994), Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments – Result of the Uruguay Rounds vol. 31, 33 I.L.M. 81 (1994).Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, Complaint by Australia, EC – Protections of Trademarks and Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs, WTO Doc. WT/DS290/R (adopted April 20, 2005).Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, Complaint by the United States, EC – Trademarks and Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs, WTO Doc. WT/DS174/R (adopted Apr. 20, 2005).Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, The Ministerial Declaration, WTO Doc. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 (adopted in Doha, Qatar, Nov. 14, 2001).Google Scholar