Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:00:24.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Address Systems and Social Markers

from Part Five - Semantics and Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2022

Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Changes of social order in societies in remote times up to the present time have had a major impact on the use of address systems and their change, as has language contact due to population movements whether forced or unforced. There are several important factors influencing these changes involving processes of (de)grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. Indeed, there is a series of extra-linguistic variables associated with pronominal address including social position, relative authority, group membership, generation, age, sex, kinship, genealogic distance, mood, social context, and language variety. It is precisely these features which turn second person pronouns into social markers. This chapter has a threefold objective: first, to shed some light on the complex architecture of address systems which Romance languages have developed over time out of their shared Latin heritage; second, to familiarize readers with some of the different kinds of address systems conventionalized in Romance; and, finally, to foreground the processes of language change which led to the great variety of systems present in the post-Latin varieties today.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Adams, J. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960). ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 253–76.Google Scholar
Dakubu, E.K. (2012). ‘The Portuguese language on the Gold Coast, 1471–1897’, Ghana Journal of Linguistics 1: 1533.Google Scholar
Ferrari, L. (2015). ‘Spanish varieties of Latin America 1: South America’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 258–78.Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, J. (2013). ‘Politeness distinctions in pronouns’. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/45.Google Scholar
Jungbluth, K. (2015). ‘Creoles’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 332–56.Google Scholar
Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds) (2015). Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jungbluth, K. and Vallentin, R. (2015). ‘Brazilian Portuguese’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluge, B. (2016). ‘Forms of address and community identity’. In Moyna, M. and Rivera-Mills, S. (eds), Forms of Address in the Spanish of the Americas. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 325–33.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2015). ‘Varieties in Italy’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 75113.Google Scholar
Lopes, C. R. S. and Couto, L.R. (eds) (2011). As formas de tratamento em português e em espanhol: variação, mudança e funções conversacionais. Niterói: Editora da UFF.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (2013). ‘Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns’. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/44.Google Scholar
Stavinschi, A. (2015). ‘Romanian’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×