Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T16:04:59.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Legal Education and Legal Thought, 1790–1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Michael Grossberg
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
American Bar Foundation, Chicago
Get access

Summary

The years from 1790 to 1920 saw the transformation of American society from an agrarian republic of 4 million people huddled on the Atlantic seaboard to a continental nation of some 105 million people, recognized as the dominant financial and industrial power in the world. Legal education (and legal culture generally) responded to and reflected the historical forces behind this radical transformation. In 1790, aspiring lawyers learned law and gained admission to practice by apprenticing themselves to practicing lawyers. Law office law unavoidably tended to be local law. By 1920, 143 law schools (most affiliated with universities) dominated – indeed, all but monopolized – legal education and were close to controlling entry into the profession. Through their trade group, the Association of American Law Schools, and with the support of the American Bar Association, they had by the beginning of the 1920s created the institutional mechanisms for defining, if not fully implementing, national standards for legal education. In legal education as in many other areas of American society, institutionalization and organization were the keys to power, and power increasingly flowed from the top down.

The normative assumptions of this new educational regime emanated from the reforms first introduced by Dean Christopher Columbus Langdell at Harvard Law School in 1870. Langdell’s ideas were stoutly resisted, initially even at Harvard. They were never implemented anywhere else in pure form, and they were rooted more deeply in tradition than Langdell acknowledged. Nevertheless, his institutional and pedagogic innovations became the common denominator of modern legal education.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelder, Samuel L., “Christopher C. Langdell,” Green Bag, 18 (1906).Google Scholar
Field, David Dudley Field, “Magnitude and Importance of Legal Science,” reprinted in Steve, Sheppard, ed., The History of Legal Education in the United States: Commentaries and Primary Sources (Pasadena, CA, 1999).Google Scholar
Hadley, Arthur T., “Is the B.A. Degree Essential for Professional Study?American Law School Review I (1906).Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C., “Legal Education and the Rationalization of Law: A Tale of Two Countries – The United States and Australia,” ABF Working Paper #8711. Presented at the 10th World Congress of Sociology, Mexico City, 1982.Google Scholar
Langdell, C. C., A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts (Boston, 1870), viii.Google Scholar
Langdell, C., A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, 2d ed., 1879).
Lee, Edward T., “The Evening Law School,” American Law School Review 4 (1915).Google Scholar
Redlich, Josef, The Common Law and the Case Method in American University Law Schools (New York, 1914).Google Scholar
Reed, Alfred Z., Training for the Public Profession of the Law (New York, 1921).Google Scholar
Root, Elihu, “The Training of Lawyers,” American Law School Review 4 (1916).Google Scholar
Warren, Charles, History of the American Bar (Cambridge, MA, 1912).Google Scholar
Warren, Charles, History of the Harvard Law School (New York, 1908), I.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John H., “Should the Standard of Admission to the Bar Be Based on Two Years or More of College-Grade Education? It Should,” American Law School Review 4 (1915).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×