The Medical Sciences

Thomas Broman

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.021

20 - The Medical Sciences

from Part II - Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Thomas Broman

Edited by

Roy Porter

Show author details

Roy Porter: Affiliation:
Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Mention the term “medical science” to someone, and it is likely to evoke an image of white-coated scientists working at a laboratory bench. In the mind of a more historically informed listener, the term might produce a more specific image – of Louis Pasteur gazing at a test tube, of Xavier Bichat bending over one of his corpses in the Hotel-Dieu, or even of William Harvey ligating a vein – but the general meaning would remain largely the same, because for us the association between “medical science” and “experiment” is a powerful one. Yet for all its pervasiveness, this association is misleading when we consider the medical sciences in the eighteenth century. An image far more appropriate than the laboratory would be the simple podium or lectern, for the medical sciences were understood by eighteenth-century physicians primarily as a body of theoretical doctrines that formed one part of the university medical curriculum. The medical sciences, especially the subjects of physiology and pathology, furnished the bridge between medical knowledge proper and the domain of natural philosophy. And natural philosophy attempted in turn to provide a comprehensive theoretical knowledge of the elemental makeup of the world and the motions of matter. Therefore, insofar as physiology and pathology explained the composition and actions of the living body in its healthy and diseased states and rendered those explanations in terms consistent with natural philosophy, they legitimated medicine’s claim to the status of scientific knowledge.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 463 - 484

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.021 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boerhaave, Herman, Institutions medicae (Leiden, 1730), § 40.Google Scholar

Brockliss, L. W. B., French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Brockliss, Laurence and Jones, Colin, The Medical World of Early Modern France (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Broman, Thomas H., The Transformation of German Academic Medicine, 1750–1820 (Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRef Google Scholar

Broman, Thomas, “The Habermasian Public Sphere and ‘Science in the Enlightenment,’” History of Science, 36 (1998).CrossRef Google Scholar

Bynum, W. E., “Cullen and the Study of Fevers in Britain, 1760–1820,” in Bynum, W. E. and Nutton, V. (eds.), Theories of Fever from Antiquity to the Enlightenment, Medical History, suppl. 1 (London, 1981).Google Scholar

Bynum, W. F. and Porter, Roy (eds.), Brunonianism in Britain and Europe: Medical History, suppl. number 8 (London, 1988)Google Scholar

Clark, William, “German Physics Textbooks in the Goethezeit,” History of Science, 35 (1997).Google Scholar

Doigetal, A.. (eds.), William Cullen and the Eighteenth-Century Medical World (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François, La physiologie des lumières, Archives internationales d’histoire des idées, vol. 95 (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1982)Google Scholar

Emerton, Norma, The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form in the Seventeenth Century (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

French, R. K., Robert Whytt, the Soul, and Medicine (London: Wellcome Institute of the History of Medicine, 1969).Google Scholar

Galen, , On the Natural Faculties, trans. Brock, A. J., Loeb Classical Library vol. 71 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Gaub, Hieronymous David, Institutiones pathologiae medicinalis, 2nd ed. (Edinburgh, 1762), § 419–605.Google Scholar

Geyer-Kordesch, Johanna, “Die ‘Theoria Medica Vera’ und Georg Ernst Stahls Verhältnis zur Aufklärung,” in Kaiser, Wolfram and Völker, Arina (eds.), Georg Ernst Stahl (1659–1734): Wissenschaftliche Beiträge der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg 66 (E73) (Halle, 1985).Google Scholar

Geyer-Kordesch, Johanna, “Medizinische Fallbeschreibungen und ihre Bedeutung in der Wissensreform des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts,” Medizin, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 9 (1990).Google Scholar

Goodman, Dena, “Public Sphere and Private Life: Toward a Synthesis of Current Historiographical Approaches to the Old Regime,” History and Theory, 31 (1992).CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, trans. Burger, Thomas with Lawrence, Frederick (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Haigh, Elizabeth, Xavier Bichat and the Medical Theory of the Eighteenth Century, Medical History, suppl. 4 (London, 1984).Google Scholar

Henkelmann, Thomas, Zur Geschichte der pathophysiologischen Denkens: John Brown und sein System der Medizin (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981).CrossRef Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Friedrich, Fundamenta medicinae, trans. and intro. King, Lester S. (New York: American Elsevier, 1971)Google Scholar

Jacob, Margaret, “The Mental Landscape of the Public Sphere: A European Perspective,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 28 (1994)CrossRef Google Scholar

King, Lester S., The Philosophy of Medicine: The Early Eighteenth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).CrossRef Google Scholar

La Vopa, Anthony J., “Conceiving a Public: Ideas and Society in Eighteenth-Century Europe,” The Journal of Modern History, 44 (1992)Google Scholar

Lawrence, Christopher, “Ornate Physicians and Learned Artisans: Edinburgh Medical Men, 1726–1776,” in Bynum, W. E. and Porter, Roy (eds.), William Hunter and the Eighteenth-Century Medical World (Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Lawrence, Susan C., Charitable Knowledge: Hospital Pupils and Practitioners in Eighteenth-Century London (Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRef Google Scholar

Lesch, John E., Science and Medicine in France: The Emergence of Experimental Physiology, 1790–1855 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984).CrossRef Google Scholar

Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. II, chap. xxi (Repr. ed. New York: Dover Publications, 1959).Google Scholar

Lüthy, C. H. and Newman, W. R. (eds.), “The Fate of Hylomorphism: ‘Matter’ and ‘Form’ in Early Modern Science,” Early Science and Medicine, 3, 1 (1997).Google Scholar

Martin, Julian, “Sauvages’s Nosology: Medical Enlightenment in Montpellier,” in Cunningham, Andrew and French, Roger (eds.), The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Metzger, Hélène, Newton, Stahl, Boerhaave et la Doctrine Chimique (Paris: F. Alcan, 1930).Google Scholar

Morgagni, Giovanni Battista, The Seats and Causes of Disease Investigated by Anatomy, vol. 1, trans. Alexander, Benjamin, repr. ed. with an Intro, and trans, of five letters by Klemperer, Paul (New York: Hafner, 1960).Google Scholar

Rashdall, Hastings, in Powicke, F. M. and Emden, Ab. B. (eds.), The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936).Google Scholar

Rather, L. J., “The ‘Six Things Non-Natural,’” Clio Medica, 3 (1968).Google Scholar

Roe, Shirley A., “Anatomia animata: The Newtonian Physiology of Albrecht von Haller,” in Mendelsohn, Everett (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences: Essays in Honor of I. Bernard Cohen (Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Rosner, Lisa, Medical Education in the Age of Improvement: Edinburgh Students and Apprentices, 1760–1826 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Rothschuh, Karl E., Physiologie: Der Wandel ihrer Konzepte, Probleme und Methoden vom 16. bis 19. Jahrhundert (Freiburg, 1968).Google Scholar

Sennert, Daniel, Epitome institutionum medicinae (Amsterdam, 1644).Google Scholar

Siraisi, Nancy G., Medieval and Early Renaissance Medicine (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).CrossRef Google Scholar

Siraisi, Nancy G., Avicenna in Renaissance Italy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987)CrossRef Google Scholar

Stahl, Georg Ernst, Paraenesis ad aliena a medica doctrina arcendum (Halle, 1706).Google Scholar

Toellner, Richard, Albrecht von Haller: Über die Einheit im Denken des letzten Universalgelehrten: Sudhoff Archiv, Beihefte, Heft 10 (Wiesbaden, 1971).Google Scholar

von Haller, Albrecht, “A Dissertation on the Sensible and Irritable Parts of Animals,” reprinted in Roe, Shirley A. (ed.), The Natural Philosophy of Albrecht von Haller (New York: Arno Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Wellman, Kathleen, La Mettrie: Medicine, Philosophy, and Enlightenment (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Wood, Paul, “Science, the Universities, and the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century Scotland,” History of Universities, 14 (1994)Google Scholar

Book contents

20 - The Medical Sciences

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive