Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: The Age of the New
- Part I The New Nature
- 2 Physics and Foundations
- 3 Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
- 4 The Meanings of Experience
- 5 Proof and Persuasion
- Part II Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge
- Part III Dividing the Study of Nature
- Part IV Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
- Index
- References
3 - Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
from Part I - The New Nature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: The Age of the New
- Part I The New Nature
- 2 Physics and Foundations
- 3 Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
- 4 The Meanings of Experience
- 5 Proof and Persuasion
- Part II Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge
- Part III Dividing the Study of Nature
- Part IV Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
- Index
- References
Summary
The story of the changing forms of explanation adopted in the early modern sciences is too often told as a story of the wholesale rejection of the systematic Aristotelian treatment of causal questions that flourished in medieval as well as ancient science. Narratives of this sort have ignored a promising alternative way of understanding the multifaceted transformation that occurred in early modern natural philosophers’ beliefs about causality. By focusing instead on the Aristotelian tradition’s contributions to the development of rival forms of explanation, it becomes possible to characterize these new sorts of explanations against a rich conceptual background. Of course, scientific innovators in the period 1500–1800 did widely reject Aristotle’s account of the four kinds of causes as a source of acceptable theories in the specific sciences. But a more tempered view of this rejection may better reveal how the new sorts of explanations were actually conceived by their originators.
THREE NOTABLE CHANGES IN EARLY MODERN SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATIONS
This chapter considers three notable changes in early modern scientific explanations. The first was a change in the overall purpose of scientific research that was initiated by those critics of Aristotelianism who relinquished Aristotle’s goal of understanding the form of each natural substance. Rather than trying to elucidate each substance’s form, early modern innovators in the specific sciences, as well as natural philosophy, sought to determine the fundamental constituent parts – whether elements or atoms – of each kind of material body and also to identify the lawlike regularities exhibited in the organization and motions of these fundamental elements or atoms.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 70 - 105Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
De principiis naturae, critical Latin text, ed. (Textus Philosophici Friburgenses, 2) (Fribourg: Société Philosophique, 1950), chap. 5.Google Scholar
De principiis naturae, chap. 4, translated in Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements, ed. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Metaphysics, 5.2, trans. , in The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. , 2 vols. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984), 2.Google Scholar
A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Receiv’d Notion of Nature (London: Printed by H. Clark for John Taylor, 1686).Google Scholar
A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things (London: Printed by H. C. for John Taylor, 1688).Google Scholar
French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
“The New Philosophy and Medicine in Seventeenth-Century England,” in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
“The Problem of Method in Newton’s Natural Philosophy,” in Nature and Scientific Method, ed. (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 22) (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1991).Google Scholar
and “Unnatural Conceptions: The Study of Monsters in Sixteenth-and Seventeenth-Century France and England,” Past and Present, 92 (1981).Google Scholar
“Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity,” Annals of Scholarship, 8 (1991).Google Scholar
Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Principles of Philosophy, 1.24–8, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. , , , and , 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984–91), I.Google Scholar
The Mechanization of the World Picture, trans. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
A Bibliography of Aristotle Editions, 1501–1600 (Bibliotheca Bibliographica Aureliana, 38) (Baden-Baden: Verlag Valentin Koerner, 1971).Google Scholar
The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
“The Margarita Philosophica of Gregorius Reisch: A Bibliography,” The Library, 10 (1929).Google Scholar
Letters on Sunspots, excerpts translated in Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, ed. (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1957).Google Scholar
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems – Ptolemaic and Copernican, trans. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literacy and Learning, 1300–1600 (The John Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science, 107) (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
“Newton and the Method of Analysis,” in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, ed. , 5 vols. (New York: Charles Scribners’ Sons, 1973–74), 3.Google Scholar
“Analysis and Synthesis in Newton’s Mathematical Work,” in The Cambridge Companion to Newton, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
A Treatise of Human Nature [1739–40], ed. , rev. text by (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Loeb Classical Library nos. 184–5, trans. , 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1925), 2.Google Scholar
Aristotle: The Desire to Understand (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justus Lipsius: The Philosophy of Renaissance Stoicism (New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 2.8.9 (4th rev. ed., London, 1700), ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
On the Nature of the Universe [De rerum natura], trans. and rev. (London: Penguin Books, 1994), bk. 2, II.Google Scholar
“Natural Motion and Its Causes: Newton on the ‘Vis Insita’ of Bodies,” in Self Motion: From Aristotle to Newton, ed. and (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
“The Impact of Newton’s Principia on the Philosophy of Science,” Philosophy of Science, 68 (2001).Google Scholar
Newton on Matter and Activity (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978).Google Scholar
The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution (New York: Harper and Row, 1980).Google Scholar
in his “Laws of Nature,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. and , 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
“The Medieval and Renaissance Tradition of Minima Naturalia,” in Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, ed. , , and (Leiden: Brill, 2001).Google Scholar
Gehennical Fire: The Lives of George Starkey, an American Alchemist in the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica, ed. and , with , 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972), 2.Google Scholar
The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. and (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999).Google Scholar
“Epistemology of the Sciences,” in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. , , , and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Expositio super octo Aristotelis Stagiritae libros de physico auditu: Averrois… in eosdem libros proemium ac commentaria [1552], fols. 96v, 97v, 112r, 213r, translated in , Scientific Reinterpretation of Form.Google Scholar
Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotelis Naturalis auscultationis libri VIII [1596] (repr., Frankfurt: Minerva, 1964).Google Scholar
Aristotelis Peripateticorum principis organum [1597] (repr., Hildesheim: Geory Olms, 1967).Google Scholar
“Bacon’s Forms and the Maker’s Knowledge Tradition,” in The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Margarita philosophica, 2.5, 3rd Basel ed., expanded by Oronce Finé (Basel: S. H. Petri, 1583).Google Scholar
Aristotle and the Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
On Efficient Causality: Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18, and 19, trans. (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gassendi the Atomist, Advocate of History in an Age of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Causality and Scientific Explanation, 2 vols. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1972 and 1974), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds., The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Opera logica, col. 489, translated in , The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1961).Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by