Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Tsai, Pui-Jen 2011. Spatial analysis of tuberculosis in four main ethnic communities in Taiwan during 2005 to 2009. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 01, Issue. 03, p. 125.

  • Print publication year: 1993
  • Online publication date: March 2008

IV.1 - Early Mortality Data: Sources and Difficulties of Interpretation

from Part IV - Measuring Health

The subject of early (for our purposes, pre–World War II) data on mortality is a vast one, and thus this treatment is quite broad. The emphasis is on identifying classes of data, sources of ambiguity, and general approaches to problems of interpretation. Wherever possible, citations are made to critical surveys of the literature, rather than to the literature itself. Some of the points discussed here can be extended, with appropriate caution and revision, to the equally important, but much less tractable area of early morbidity data.

Protostatistical Populations

There are rich opportunities for studying death and disease in populations for which vital statistics in the modern sense are nonexistent. Primary data sources include faunal evidence obtained by archaeological excavation, epigraphic evidence from funerary monuments, and information contained in parish records and family genealogies. In most cases, however, although these data allow inferences to be made regarding overall mortality among specific and highly localized populations, they contain little information on national-level populations and, with the exception of some faunal evidence, on causes of death. We can address the first shortcoming merely by assuming that the population studied accurately represents the total population, an assumption that is probably robust in very high mortality populations. The second difficulty – the lack of information on causes of death – is irremediable in the main. Furthermore, these data are rarely complemented by accurate population statistics, which are essential for computing rates and probabilities. Because of the dearth of early census data, genealogies and parish records, which provide a link between birth and death records, are especially important for estimating life expectancy (e.g., Henry 1956; Hollingsworth 1964; Wrigley 1968).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge World History of Human Disease
  • Online ISBN: 9781139053518
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
Arriaga Eduardo. 1968. New life tables for Latin American populations in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. University of California, Institute of International Studies, Population Monograph Ser. No. 3. Berkeley.
Condran Gretchen, and Crimmins Eileen. 1979. A description and evaluation of mortality data in the federal census: 1850–1900. Historical Methods 12.
Crimmins Eileen. 1980. The completeness of 1900 mortality data collected by registration and enumeration for rural and urban parts of states: Estimates using the Chandra Sekar–Deming technique. Historical Methods 13.
Erhardt Carl, and Berlin Joyce, eds. 1974. Mortality and morbidity in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.
Graunt John. 1662. Natural and political observations mentioned in a following index, and made upon the bills of mortality. London.
Haines Michael, and Avery Roger. 1980. The American life table of 1830–1860: An evaluation. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 11.
Henry Louis. 1956. Anciennes families génèvoises. Paris.
Hollingsworth T. H. 1964. The demography of the British peerage. Population Studies, suppl. 18(2).
MacKellar Landis. 1987. U.S. adult white crude death and net migration rates, by state, in 1850. In Proceedings of the Middle States Division of the Association of American Geographers, New York, New York, October 17–18, 1986, ed. Kelly Cathy and Rengert George. Philadelphia.
Manton Kenneth, and Stallard Eric. 1984. Recent trends in mortality analysis. New York.
Marks E., Seltzer W., and Krotki K.. 1974. Population growth estimation: A handbook of vital statistics measurement. New York.
Preston Samuel, Keyfitz Nathan, and Schoen Robert. 1972. Causes of death: Life tables for national populations. New York.
Preston Samuel. 1976. Mortality patterns in national populations, with special reference to recorded causes of death. New York.
Short Thomas. 1750. New observations on city, town, and country bills of mortality. London.
Shryock Henry, and Siegal Jacob. 1980. The methods and materials of demography. Washington, D.C..
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1923. Mortality rates: 1910–20. Washington, D.C..
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1933. Introduction to vital statistics of the United States: 1900–1930. Washington, D.C..
U.S. Bureau of the Census and Library of Congress. 1943a. Vital statistics rates in the United States: 1900–40. Washington, D.C..
U.S. Bureau of the Census and Library of Congress. 1943b. General censuses and vital statistics in the Americas. Washington, D.C..
U.S. Bureau of the Census and Library of Congress. 1946. National censuses and vital statistics in Europe: 1918–1939. Washington, D.C..
U.S. Public Health Service. 1961. Guide to United States life tables: 1900–1959. Public Health Service Publication No. 1086, Public Health Bibliography Ser. No. 42. Washington, D.C..
United Nations, 1983. Manual on indirect methods of demographic estimation. New York.
Vinovkis Maris. 1971. The 1789 life table of Edward Wigglesworth. Journal of Economic History 31.
Vinovkis Maris. 1972. Mortality rates and trends in Massachusetts before 1860. Journal of Economic History 32.
Wrigley E.A. 1968. Mortality in pre-industrial England: The case of Colyton, Devon, over three centuries. Daedalus 97.
Wrigley E.A. 1969. Population and historyNew York.