Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:51:38.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

38 - Bone Complications of Myeloma and Lymphoma

from PART II - CLINICAL RESEARCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

G. David Roodman
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, United States
David Lyden
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Danny R. Welch
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Bethan Psaila
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

OVERVIEW OF MYELOMA BONE DISEASE

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common cancer to involve bone, with up to 90 percent of patients developing bone lesions [1]. The bone lesions are purely osteolytic in nature and do not heal in the vast majority of patients. Up to 60 percent of patients develop pathologic fractures over the course of their disease [2]. Bone disease is a hallmark of MM, and myeloma bone disease differs from bone metastasis caused by other tumors. Although myeloma and other osteolytic metastases induce increased osteoclastic bone destruction, in contrast with other tumors, once myeloma tumor burden exceeds 50 percent in a local area, osteoblast activity is either severely depressed or absent [3]. The basis for this severe imbalance between increased osteoclastic bone resorption and decreased bone formation is currently a topic of intensive investigation.

The clinical and economic impact of myeloma bone disease in patients with myeloma can be catastrophic. Saad and coworkers [4] retrospectively assessed the impact of pathologic fractures on survival of patients with malignant disease. Patients with myeloma had the highest incidence of fracture (43%) compared with patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer, respectively. Myeloma patients who experienced pathologic fractures had at least a 20 percent increased risk of death compared with myeloma patients without pathologic fractures. Further, patients who had a prior skeletal-related event, which included pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression syndrome, surgery to bone, or radiation therapy to bone, were more likely to develop new pathologic fractures as compared with patients who did not have a prior skeletal-related event.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cancer Metastasis
Biologic Basis and Therapeutics
, pp. 417 - 424
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Roodman, GD (2004) Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 32: 290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melton, LJ 3rd, Kyle, RA et al. (2005) Fracture risk with multiple myeloma: a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res. 20: 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taube, T, Beneton, MN et al. (1992) Abnormal bone remodelling in patients with myelomatosis and normal biochemical indices of bone resorption. Eur J Haematol. 49: 192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saad, F, Lipton, A et al. (2007) Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer. 110: 1860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, RA, Therneau, TM et al. (2004) Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: trend over 6 decades. Cancer. 101: 2667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyajobi, BO (2007) Multiple myeloma/hypercalcemia. Arthritis Res Ther. 9 Suppl 1: S4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sourbier, C, Massfelder, T (2006) Parathyroid hormone-related protein in human renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 240: 170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roodman, GD (2007) Treatment strategies for bone disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 40: 1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunn, WG, Conley, A et al. (2006) A crosstalk between myeloma cells and marrow stromal cells stimulates production of DKK1 and interleukin-6: a potential role in the development of lytic bone disease and tumor progression in multiple myeloma. Stem Cells. 24: 986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giuliani, N, Colla, S et al. (2004) New insight in the mechanism of osteoclast activation and formation in multiple myeloma: focus on the receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL). Exp Hematol. 32: 685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, SJ, Cruz, JC et al. (2000) Macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha is a potential osteoclast stimulatory factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 96: 671.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, JW, Chung, HY et al. (2004) IL-3 expression by myeloma cells increases both osteoclast formation and growth of myeloma cells. Blood. 103: 2308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, H, Lacey, DL et al. (1999) Tumor necrosis factor receptor family member RANK mediates osteoclast differentiation and activation induced by osteoprotegerin ligand. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96: 3540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakagawa, N, Kinosaki, M et al. (1998) RANK is the essential signaling receptor for osteoclast differentiation factor in osteoclastogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 253: 395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, WJ, Simonet, WS et al. (2003) Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 423: 337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasuda, H, Shima, N et al. (1998) Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95: 3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofbauer, LC, Heufelder, AE (1998) Osteoprotegerin and its cognate ligand: a new paradigm of osteoclastogenesis. Eur J Endocrinol. 139: 152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsukii, K, Shima, N et al. (1998) Osteoclast differentiation factor mediates an essential signal for bone resorption induced by 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, prostaglandin E2, or parathyroid hormone in the microenvironment of bone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 246: 337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougall, WC, Glaccum, M et al. (1999) RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev. 13: 2412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacey, DL, Timms, E et al. (1998) Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell. 93: 165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonet, WS, Lacey, DL et al. (1997) Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell. 89: 309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bucay, N, Sarosi, I et al. (1998) Osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification. Genes Dev. 12: 1260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Sarosi, I et al. (2000) RANK is the intrinsic hematopoietic cell surface receptor that controls osteoclastogenesis and regulation of bone mass and calcium metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97: 1566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearse, RN, Sordillo, EM et al. (2001) Multiple myeloma disrupts the TRANCE/osteoprotegerin cytokine axis to trigger bone destruction and promote tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98: 11581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terpos, E, Szydlo, R et al. (2003) Soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand-osteoprotegerin ratio predicts survival in multiple myeloma: proposal for a novel prognostic index. Blood. 102: 1064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaccoby, S, Pearse, RN et al. (2002) Myeloma interacts with the bone marrow microenvironment to induce osteoclastogenesis and is dependent on osteoclast activity. Br J Haematol. 116: 278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, JH, Choi, SJ et al. (2001) Macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha is an osteoclastogenic factor in myeloma that is independent of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand. Blood. 97: 3349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magrangeas, F, Nasser, V et al. (2003) Gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma reveals molecular portraits in relation to the pathogenesis of the disease. Blood. 101: 4998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashimoto, T, Abe, M et al. (2004) Ability of myeloma cells to secrete macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha and MIP-1beta correlates with lytic bone lesions in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 125: 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsina, M, Boyce, B et al. (1996) Development of an in vivo model of human multiple myeloma bone disease. Blood. 87: 1495.Google Scholar
Choi, SJ, Oba, Y et al. (2001) Antisense inhibition of macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha blocks bone destruction in a model of myeloma bone disease. J Clin Invest. 108: 1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masih-Khan, E, Trudel, S et al. (2006) MIP-1alpha (CCL3) is a downstream target of FGFR3 and RAS-MAPK signaling in multiple myeloma. Blood. 108: 3465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solary, E, Guiguet, M et al. (1992) Radioimmunoassay for the measurement of serum IL-6 and its correlation with tumour cell mass parameters in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 39: 163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sati, HI, Apperley, JF et al. (1998) Interleukin-6 is expressed by plasma cells from patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Br J Haematol. 101: 287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karadag, A, Oyajobi, BO et al. (2000) Human myeloma cells promote the production of interleukin 6 by primary human osteoblasts. Br J Haematol. 108: 383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abe, M, Hiura, K et al. (2004) Osteoclasts enhance myeloma cell growth and survival via cell-cell contact: a vicious cycle between bone destruction and myeloma expansion. Blood. 104: 2484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hjorth-Hansen, H, Seifert, MF et al. (1999) Marked osteoblastopenia and reduced bone formation in a model of multiple myeloma bone disease in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. J Bone Miner Res. 14: 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T, Kronenberg, H (2005) Minireview: transcriptional regulation in development of bone. Endocrinology. 146: 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, N, Colla, S et al. (2005) Myeloma cells block RUNX2/CBFA1 activity in human bone marrow osteoblast progenitors and inhibit osteoblast formation and differentiation. Blood. 106: 2472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirunavukkarasu, K, Halladay, DL et al. (2000) The osteoblast-specific transcription factor Cbfa1 contributes to the expression of osteoprotegerin, a potent inhibitor of osteoclast differentiation and function. J Biol Chem. 275: 25163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SK, Kalinowski, JF et al. (2006) Interleukin-7 influences osteoclast function in vivo but is not a critical factor in ovariectomy-induced bone loss. J Bone Miner Res. 21: 695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toraldo, G, Roggia, C et al. (2003) IL-7 induces bone loss in vivo by induction of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand and tumor necrosis factor alpha from T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100: 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westendorf, JJ, Kahler, RA et al. (2004) Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and bone diseases. Gene. 341: 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, E, Zhan, F et al. (2003) The role of the Wnt-signaling antagonist DKK1 in the development of osteolytic lesions in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 349: 2483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Politou, MC, Heath, DJ et al. (2006) Serum concentrations of Dickkopf-1 protein are increased in patients with multiple myeloma and reduced after autologous stem cell transplantation. Int J Cancer. 119: 1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshima, T, Abe, M et al. (2005) Myeloma cells suppress bone formation by secreting a soluble Wnt inhibitor, sFRP-2. Blood. 106: 3160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, DA 2nd, Bialek, P et al. (2005) Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev Cell. 8: 751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, GJ, Utting, JC et al. (2006) Wnt signalling in osteoblasts regulates expression of the receptor activator of NFkappaB ligand and inhibits osteoclastogenesis in vitro. J Cell Sci. 119: 1283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, CD (2004) Multiple myeloma. In Imaging in Oncology, vol. 2, Husband, JE, Resnik, RH, eds. London; Boca Raton, Taylor & Francis, pp. 875–89.Google Scholar
Snapper, I, Khan, A (1971) Myelomatosis: Fundamentals and Clinical Features. Baltimore, University Park Press.Google Scholar
Kimmel, DB (2007) Mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, and clinical applications of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. J Dent Res. 86: 1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, LS, Gordon, D et al. (2001) Zoledronic acid versus pamidronate in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with breast cancer or osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma: a Phase III, double-blind, comparative trial. Cancer J. 7: 377.Google ScholarPubMed
Kyle, RA, Yee, GC et al. (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 clinical practice guideline update on the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 25: 2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyngaert, T, Huizing, MT et al. (2007) Osteonecrosis of the jaw related to the use of bisphosphonatesCurr Opin Oncol. 19: 315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khosla, S, Burr, D et al. (2007) Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 22: 1479.CrossRef
Lacy, MQ, Dispenzieri, A et al. (2006) Mayo Clinic consensus statement for the use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 81: 1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomer, LN, Silverstein, MB et al. (1982) Bone involvement in Hodgkin's disease. Cancer. 49: 338.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, H (1980) Hodgkin's Disease. 2nd ed. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 121.Google ScholarPubMed
Borg, MF, Chowdhury, AD et al. (1993) Bone involvement in Hodgkin's disease. Australas Radiol. 37: 63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franczyk, J, Samuels, T et al. (1989) Skeletal lymphoma. Can Assoc Radiol J. 40: 75.Google ScholarPubMed
Firkin, F, Seymour, JF et al. (1996) Parathyroid hormone-related protein in hypercalcaemia associated with haematological malignancy. Br J Haematol. 94: 486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seymour, JF, Gagel, RF (1993) Calcitriol: the major humoral mediator of hypercalcemia in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Blood. 82: 1383.Google ScholarPubMed
Beachley, MC, Lau, BP et al. (1972) Bone involvement in Hodgkin's disease. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 114: 559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fucilla, IS, Hamann, A (1961) Hodgkin's disease in bone. Radiology. 77: 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hustu, HO, Pinkel, D (1967) Lymphosarcoma, Hodgkin's disease and leukemia in bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 52: 83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieta, J, Friedell, H et al. (1942) A survey of Hodgkin's disease and lymphosarcoma in bone. Radiology. 39: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pear, BL (1974) Skeletal manifestations of the lymphomas and leukemias. Semin Roentgenol. 9: 229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngan, H, Preston, BJ (1975) Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma presenting with osseous lesions. Clin Radiol. 26: 351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, SA, Diamond, HD et al. (1961) Lymphosarcoma: a review of 1269 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 40: 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braunstein, EM, White, SJ (1980) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma of bone. Radiology. 135: 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajima, K (1990) The 4th nation-wide study of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) in Japan: estimates of risk of ATL and its geographical and clinical features. The T- and B-cell Malignancy Study Group. Int J Cancer. 45: 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiyokawa, T, Yamaguchi, K et al. (1987) Hypercalcemia and osteoclast proliferation in adult T-cell leukemia. Cancer. 59: 1187.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okada, Y, Tsukada, J et al. (2004) Macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha induces hypercalcemia in adult T-cell leukemia. J Bone Miner Res. 19: 1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roodman, GD (1997) Mechanisms of bone lesions in multiple myeloma and lymphoma. Cancer. 80: 1557.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×