Book contents
- Cicero and Roman Education
- Cicero and Roman Education
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Cicero Presents Himself
- Chapter 2 Beyond the Author
- Chapter 3 Between Praise and Blame
- Chapter 4 Teaching Cicero
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2019
Book contents
- Cicero and Roman Education
- Cicero and Roman Education
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Cicero Presents Himself
- Chapter 2 Beyond the Author
- Chapter 3 Between Praise and Blame
- Chapter 4 Teaching Cicero
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cicero and Roman EducationThe Reception of the Speeches and Ancient Scholarship, pp. 338 - 383Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abbamonte, G., Miletti, L., Spina, L. (2009) (eds.) Discorsi alla prova, Naples: Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II.Google Scholar
Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R., Sluiter, I. (1995) (eds.) Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle, Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
Achard, G. (2000) “L’influence des jeunes lecteurs sur la redaction des discours cicéroniens,” in Achard, and Ledentu, (2000): 75–88.Google Scholar
Achard, G., Ledentu, M. (2000) (eds.) Orateur, auditeurs, lecteurs: à propos de l’éloquence romaine à la fin de la République et au début du Principat, Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N., Janse, M., Swain, S. (2002) (eds.) Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Word, Oxford.Google Scholar
Adkin, N. (1992) “Hieronymus Ciceronianus: the Catilinarians in Jerome,” Latomus 51:408–20.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1985) Metaformations. Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von(2014) “Seneca’s Language and Style,” in Damschen, and Heil, (2014): 699–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrete, G. (1999) Gestures and Acclamations in Ancient Rome, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. J. G., Gibson, M. T. (1976) (eds.) Medieval Learning and Literature: Essays Presented to Richard William Hunt, Oxford.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C.(2002) The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C.(2007) “Oratory, Rhetoric, and Politics in the Republic,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007): 98–108.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C.(2009a) “The Commentariolum Petitionis as an Attack on Election Campaigns,” Athenaeum 97: 31–57; 369–95.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C.(2009b) “Locating the Trial of Plancius between Rules and Persuasion,” in Santalucia, (2009):339–55.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. (2015) (ed.) Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Amato, E., Citti, F., Huelsenbeck, B. (2015) (eds.) Law and Ethics in Greek and Roman Declamation, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ammirati, S. (2015a) “Leggere Cicerone in Egitto: osservazioni paleografiche (e filologiche),” in Paolis, De (2015): 11–29.Google Scholar
Ammirati, S.(2015b) Sul libro latino antico. Ricerche bibliologiche e paleografiche, Pisa, Rome: Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Ancona, R. (2007) (ed.) A Concise Guide to Teaching Latin Literature, Norman: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Andrisano, A. M. (2007) (ed.) Biblioteche del mondo antico. Dalla tradizione orale alla cultura de ll’impero, Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Arena, V.(2013) “The Orator and his Audience: the Rhetorical Perspective in the Art of Deliberation,” in Steel, and Blom, (2013): 195–209.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989) Sapientiae facies. Étude sur les images de Sénèque, Paris.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M.(2015) “Seneca’s Images and Metaphors,” in Bartsch, and Schiesaro, (2015):150–60.Google Scholar
Ash, R., Mossman, J., Titchener, F. B. (2015) (eds.) Fame and Infamy. Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography, Oxford.Google Scholar
Astarita, M. L. (1993) La cultura nelle Noctes Atticae, Catania: Centro di studi sull’antico cristianesimo, Università di Catania.Google Scholar
Astarita, M. L.(1997) Frontone oratore, Catania: Centro di studi sull’antico cristianesimo, Università di Catania.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C., Delattre, D. (2001) (eds.) Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie, Paris: Rue d’Ulm.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (2011a) “Quintilian’s Grammar (Inst. 1.4–8) and Its Importance for the History of Roman Grammar,” in Matthaios, , Montanari, , and Rengakos, (2011):331–46.Google Scholar
Ax, W.(2011b) Quintilians Grammatik (Inst. orat. 1, 4–8): Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Axer, J. (1983) “Reedition of the Viennese Fragments of Cicero, In Catilinam I (P. Vindob. G. 30885 a+e),” in Harrauer, (1983):468–82.Google Scholar
Axer, J.(1989) “Tribunal-Stage-Arena: Modelling of the Communication Situation in M. Tullius Cicero’s Judicial Speeches,” Rhetorica 7: 299–311.Google Scholar
Axer, J.(1992) “Un’edizione bilingue di In Catilinam I di Cicerone della fine del IV secolo. Problemi paleografici,” in Capasso, (1992):253–64.Google Scholar
Bagnal, R. S., Browne, G. M., Hanson, A. E., Koenen, L. (1981) (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Congress of Papyrology, Chico, CA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Baiter, J. G. (1863) “Über Handschriften des Cicero. I: Der alte Ambrosianus C 29,” Philologus 20:335–50.Google Scholar
Balbo, A. (1996) “La presenza di Cicerone nel trattato De verborum Graeci et Latini differentiis vel societatibus,” in De tuo tibi. Omaggio degli allievi a I. Lana, Bologna, Pàtron:439–50.Google Scholar
Balbo, A.(2013a) “Sulla presenza ciceroniana nella Gratiarum Actio di Ausonio,” Aevum 87.1:157–67.Google Scholar
Balbo, A.(2013b) “Marcus Junius Brutus the Orator: Between Philosophy and Rhetoric,” in Steel, and Blom, (2013):315–28.Google Scholar
Ballaira, G. (1993) Esempi di scrittura latina dell’età romana. Vol. I: Dal III-II secolo a.C. al I secolo d.C., Turin: Edizioni dell’ Orso.Google Scholar
Balot, R. K. (2009) (ed.) A Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought, Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
Barabino, G. (1990) “L’auctoritas di Cicerone nei grammatici tardo-antichi,” in Tradizione dell’antico nelle letterature e nelle arti d’Occidente. Studi in memoria di M. Bellincioni Scarpat, Rome, Bulzoni: 90–103.Google Scholar
Barabino, G.(2003) “Il tema dell’auctoritas in Nonio Marcello,” in Bertini, (2003): 81–108.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., Scheidel, W. (2010) (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1986) “The Significance of Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus,” HSCP 90:225–44.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S., Schiesaro, A. (2015) (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Seneca, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barwick, K. (1922) Remmius Palaemon und die römische Ars grammatica, Leipzig: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G., Lapini, W., Tulli, M. (eds.) (2012) Harmonia, Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Batinski, E. E. (2003) “In Cynthiam/Pro Cynthia: Propertius 2.32,” Latomus 62.3:616–26.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (1994) “Cicero’s Construction of Consular Ethos in the First Catilinarian,” TAPhA 124:211–66.Google Scholar
Beall, S. M. (2001) “Homo fandi dulcissimus: the Role of Favorinus in the Attic Nights of Aulus Gellius,” AJPh 122.1: 87–106.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2002) “Ciceronian Correspondences: Making a Book out of Letters,” in Wiseman, (2002),103–44.Google Scholar
Beier, C. (ed.) (1825) M.Tulli Ciceronis In P.Clodium et Curionem Orationis Fragmenta, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Benz, L. (ed.) (2001) ScriptOralia Romana: Die römische Literatur zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit, Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Berg, C. S. van den (2014a) “Intratext, Declamation and Dramatic Argument in Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus,” CQ 64.1: 398–415.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. (1993) “Pompey’s Legal Knowledge – or Lack of It. Cic. Mil. 70 and the Date of pro Milone,” Historia 42, 4:502–4
.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H.(1996b) “The Value of Prose Rhythm in Questions of Authenticity: the Case of the De Optimo Genere Oratorum Attributed to Cicero,” PLLS 9: 47–74.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H.(2004a) “The Publication of Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino,” Mnemosyne 57.1:80–7
.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H.(2004b) “Literature and Persuasion in Cicero’s Pro Archia,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004): 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, D. H.(2016) “Neglected and Unnoticed Additions in the Text of Three Cicero Speeches (In Verrem II.5, pro Murena, pro Milone),” in Hunter, and Oakley, (2016): 10–21.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H., Erskine, A. (eds.) (2010) Form and Function of Roman Oratory, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (2007) Scholasticorum Studia. Seneca il Vecchio e la cultura retorica e letteraria della prima età imperiale, Pisa: Giardini.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. (2001) (ed.) Poikilma. Studi in onore di M.R. Cataudella, La Spezia: Agorà.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2015) “Roman Plato or Roman Demosthenes? The Bifurcation of Cicero in Ancient Scholarship,” in Altman (2015): 283–306.Google Scholar
Bishop, C.(2015–16) “How to Make a Roman Demosthenes: Self-Fashioning in Cicero’s Brutus and Orator,” CJ 111.2:167–92Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J.(2001) “Cicero auf dem Forum und im Senat: Zur Mündlichkeit der Reden Ciceros,” in Benz, (2001):205–28.Google Scholar
Blockley, R. (1998) “Ammianus and Cicero: The Epilogue of the History as a Literary Statement,” Phoenix 52.3–4: 305–14.Google Scholar
Blösel, W., Hölkeskamp, K. J. (2011) (eds.) Von der militia equestris zur milita urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Van der Blom, H. (2010) Cicero’s Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (1997a) “A Preface to the History of Declamation: Whose Speech? Whose History?,” in Habinek, and Schiesaro, (1997): 199–215.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M(1997b) “Schooling in Persona: Imagination and Subordination in Roman Education,” ClAnt 16: 57–78.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M(2007) “Roman Declamation: The Elder Seneca and Quintilian,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007): 297–306.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M(2011a) “Quintilian on the Child as a Learning Subject,” CW 105.1:109–37.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M(2011b) The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M(2013) “The Ancient Child in School,” in Grubbs, and Parkin, (2013): 444–461.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M(2015) (ed.) A Companion to Ancient Education, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire, Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool .Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F.(1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Booth, J. (2007) (ed.) Cicero on the Attack. Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Borgo, A. (2014) “Tra storia e retorica: il contrasto tra Cicerone-Antonio nella settima suasoria di Seneca il Vecchio,” in Grisolia, and Matino, (2014): 9–24.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1997) Tragic Seneca. An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition, London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brashear, W. (1981) “A Greek-Latin Vocabulary,” in Bagnall, , Browne, , Hanson, , and Koenen, (1981): 31–41.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. (1997) “Declamation and Contestation in Satire,” in Dominik, (1997):120–35.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M.(2012) “Praise and Protreptic in Early Imperial Panegyric: Cicero, Seneca, Pliny,” in Rees, (2012): 85–108.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M., Gill, Chr. (1997) (eds.) The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J., Roodenburg, H. (1991) (eds.) A Cultural History of Gesture: From Antiquity to the Present Day, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bright, D. F., Ramage, E. S. (eds.) Classical Texts and Their Traditions, Chicago: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1989) “Quintilian’s De causis corruptae eloquentiae and Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus,” CQ 39: 472–503.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O.(1994) “Can Tacitus’ Dialogus be dated? Evidence and Historical Conclusions,” HSPh 96:251–80.Google Scholar
Brook, A. (2016) “Cicero’s Use of Aeschylus’ Oresteia in the Pro Milone,” Ramus 45.1: 45–73.Google Scholar
Brugnoli, G.(1961) “I Synonyma Ciceronis,” in Atti I Congresso Internazionale di Studi Ciceroniani, Rome, I:283–99.Google Scholar
Bücher, F., Uwe, W. (2006) “Mit Manuskript in den Senat? Zu Cic. Planc. 74,” RhM 149:237–40.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, L. (1990) “The Political Elite of the Roman Republic: Comments on Recent Discussion of the Concepts Nobilitas and Homo Novus,” Historia 39, 1: 77–99.Google Scholar
Burnand, Chr. (2004) “The Advocate as a Professional: the Role of the Patronus in Cicero’s Pro Cluentio,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004): 277–289.Google Scholar
Buzi, P. (2005) Manoscritti latini nell’Egitto tardo-antico, Imola: Editrice La Mandragora.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L., Fulkerson, L. (2015) (eds.) Emotions between Greece & Rome, BICS Supplement 125, London.Google Scholar
Cairns, F., Fantham, E. (2003) (eds.) Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on His Autocracy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1978) Oratio Pro Rhodiensibus. Catone, l’Oriente greco e gli imprenditori romani, Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Calboli Montefusco, L.(1988) Exordium Narratio Epilogus. Studi sulla teoria retorica greca e romana delle parti del discorso, Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Calboli Montefusco, L.(1996) “Quintilian and the Function of the Oratorical Exercitatio,” Latomus 55.3:615–25.Google Scholar
Calboli Montefusco, L.(2007) (ed.) Papers on Rhetoric VIII, Declamation, Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Canfora, L.(1984) “Altri riferimenti ai poemi ciceroniani nell’Invectiva in Ciceronem,” Ciceroniana 5:101–9
.Google Scholar
Canobbio, A. (2011) M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton Liber Quintus, Naples : Loffredo.Google Scholar
Capasso, M.(1998) (ed.) Ricerche di papirologia letteraria e documentaria, Galatina : Congedo Editore.Google Scholar
Cape, R. W., Jr. (1995) “The Rhetoric of Politics in Cicero’s Fourth Catilinarian,” AJPh 116.2:255–77.Google Scholar
Cape, R. W.(1997) “Persuasive History: Roman Rhetoric and Historiography,” in Dominik, (1997a):212–28.Google Scholar
Caplan, H. (2004) [Cicero] Rhetorica ad Herennium, reprinted (originally published 1954). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carcopino, J. (1947) Les secrets de la correspondance de Cicéron, 2 vols., Paris : L’Artisan du Livre.Google Scholar
Casamento, A. (2004a) “Clienti, patroni, parricidi e declamatori. Popillio e Cicerone (Sen. Contr. 7, 2),” P&P 59:361–77.Google Scholar
Casamento, A.(2004b) “Parlare e lagrimar vedrai insieme. Le lacrime dell’oratore,” in Petrone, (2004): 41–62.Google Scholar
Casamento, A.(2010) “La Pro Milone dopo la Pro Milone,” in Montefusco, Calboli (2010): 39–58.Google Scholar
Casamento, A., van Mal Maeder, D., Pasetti, L. (2016) (eds.) Le declamazioni minori dello Pseudo-Quintiliano. Discorsi immaginari tra letteratura e diritto, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Castagna, L., Lefévre, E. (2003) (eds.) Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit, Munich, Leipzig: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Castagna, L., Riboldi, C. (2008) (eds.) Amicitiae templa serena. Studi in onore di G. Aricò, 2 vols., Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P., Giardina, A. (1990) (eds.) Lo Spazio Letterario di Roma Antica, 1–5, Rome: Salerno Editrice.Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A.(2011) Gli arcani dell’oratore. Alcuni appunti sull’actio dei Romani, Rome: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Cavazza, F. (1987) “Gellio grammatico e i suoi rapporti con l’ars grammatica romana,” in Taylor, (1987): 85–105.Google Scholar
Cavazza, F.(1995) “Gli aggettivi in –ĭ-tĭmus e il rapporto fra aedituus e aeditumus,” Latomus 54: 577–91; 784–92.Google Scholar
Cecchini, E. (2000) “Citazioni ciceroniane in lessici e glossari medievali,” Ciceroniana 11: 69–78.Google Scholar
Celentano, M. S. (2006) “Dalla scrittura all’eloquenza: le regole e i modelli nel decimo libro dell’Institutio Oratoria,” in Montefusco, Calboli (2006): 31–47.Google Scholar
Celentano, M. S.(2010) “L’oratore impara a scrivere. Principi di scrittura professionale nell’Institutio Oratoria di Quintiliano,” in Galand, , Hallyn, , Lévy, , and Verbaal, (2010): 47–66.Google Scholar
Cerutti, S. M. (1994) “Further Discussion on the Delivery and Publication of Cicero’s Second Philippic,” CB 70:23–8
.Google Scholar
Cerutti, S. M.(1996) Cicero’s Accretive Style. Rhetorical Strategies in the Exordia of the Judicial Speeches, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2007) “Antiquity and Authority in Nonius Marcellus,” in Scourfield, (2007): 69–96.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. (1980) Fronto and Antonine Rome, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chlup, J. T. (2004) “Vir magnus et memorabilis fuit: Livy on the Death of Cicero,” in Egan, and Joyal, (2004): 21–32.Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. (1964) Untersuchungen zu Lucilius, Zurich, Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Cipriani, G. (1977) “La Pro Marcello e il suo significato come orazione politica,” A & R 22:113–25.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2005) “Finalità e struttura della rassegna degli scrittori greci e latini in Quintiliano,” in Gasti, and Mazzoli, (2005): 15–38.Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. (2000) Amicizia e potere nelle lettere di Cicerone e nelle elegie ovidiane dall’esilio, Florence: Università degli Studi di Firenze.Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S.(2009) “Words and Silence: Atticus and the Dedicatee of De Amicitia,” CW 103.1: 93–99.Google Scholar
Clackson, J., Horrocks, G. (2007) The Blackwell History of the Latin Language, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, A. C.(1905) The Vetus Cluniacensis of Poggio Being a Contribution to the Textual Criticism of Cicero Pro Sex.Roscio, Pro Cluentio, Pro Murena, Pro Caelio and Pro Milone, Anecdota Oxoniensia, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, M., Ruebel, J. (1985) “Philosophy and Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Milone,” RhM 128: 57–72.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1965) “Cicero Pro Cluentio 1–11 im Licht der rhetorischen Theorie und Praxis,” RhM 108:104–42.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J.(1985) Recht-Rhetorik-Politik. Untersuchungen zu Ciceros rhetorischer Strategie, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. (2000) “Quintilian 1.6 and the Definition of Latinitas,” in Moussy, 2000:917–30.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007a) The State of Speech. Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, J.(2007b) “Virile Tongues: Rhetoric and Masculinity,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007): 83–97.Google Scholar
Connolly, J.(2009) “The Politics of Rhetorical Education,” in Gunderson, (2009):126–41.Google Scholar
Connolly, J.(2011) “Fantastical Realism in Cicero’s Postwar Panegyric,” in D’Urso, (2011):161–78.Google Scholar
Cook, B. L. (2009) “Tully’s Late Medieval Life: the Roots of the Renaissance in Cicero’s Biography” C & M 60:347–70.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996) Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A.(2001) “Education in the Roman Republic: Creating Traditions,” in Too, (2001):261–88.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A.(2004) Nature embodied. Gesture in Ancient Rome, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A.(2007) “Rhetorical Education and Social Reproduction in the Republic and Early Empire,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007): 69–82.Google Scholar
Cox, Ward (2006) (eds.) The Rhetoric of Cicero in its Medieval and Early Renaissance Commentary Tradition, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P. (1981) “The Accusator as Amicus: an Original Roman Tactic of Ethical Argumentation,” TAPhA 111: 31–7
.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P.(1986) “Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena,” TAPhA 116:229–39.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P.(1990) “Cicero’s Strategy of Embarrassment in the Speech for Plancius,” AJPh 111.1: 75–81.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P.(1993a) “Three Simple Questions for Teaching Cicero’s ‘First Catilinarian’,” CJ 88.3: 255–267.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P.(2002) “A Survey of Selected Recent Work on Cicero’s Rhetorica and Speeches,” in May (2002a): 503–531.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P.(2004) “Audience, Expectations, Invective, and Proof,” in Powell and Paterson (2004): 187–213.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P.(2008) “Treating oratio figurata in Cicero’s Speeches: the Case of pro Marcello,” in Montefusco, Calboli (2008): 91–106.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P.(2010) “Means and Ends of indignatio in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino,” in Berry, and Erskine, (2010): 75–91.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P.(2014) “Rhetorical Expectations and Self-Fashioning in Cicero’s Speech Pro Sulla, §§ 18–19,” Rhetorica 32.3:211–21.Google Scholar
Craik, E. M. (1990) (ed.) “Owls to Athens”: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cramer, A. G., Heinrich, C. F. (1816) M.Tullii Ciceronis Orationum Pro Scauro, Pro Tullio, Pro Flacco partes ineditae cum scholiis ad orationem pro Scauro item ineditis, Kiel: Apud. A. Hesse.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. (1984) M. Tullius Cicero. The Lost and Unpublished Orations, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W.(1994) M. Tullius Cicero. The Fragmentary Speeches, Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (1996) Writing, Teachers, and Students in Graeco-Roman Egypt, Atlanta: Scholars Press..Google Scholar
Cribiore, R.(2001) Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (2003a) “Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane: Epistulae 1, 20 e 9, 26,” in Castagna, and Lefévre, (2003): 95.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P.(2003b) “Lucio Anneo Cornuto esegeta di Virgilio,” in Gualandri, and Mazzoli, (2003):211–44.Google Scholar
Czapla, B., Lehmann, T., Liell, S. (1997) (eds.) Vir bonus dicendi peritus. Festschrift f. Alfons Weische zum 65. Geburtstag, Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, P. (1997) (ed.) MOYSA. Scritti in onore di Giuseppe Morelli, Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Damschen, G., Heil, A. (2014) (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Seneca Philosopher and Dramatist, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Danesi Marioni, G. (2001) “All’ombra di un grande padre: Asinio Gallo in Seneca retore e in Tacito,” in Bianchetti, (2001):323–31.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1980) “Maiorum exempla sequi: l’exemplum historique dans les discours judiciaires de Cicéron,” MEFRM 92.1: 67–87.Google Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (2003) “Cicerone nella prima età imperiale. Luci e ombre su un martire della Repubblica,” in Narducci, (2003): 3–54.Google Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R.(2013) “Seneca, Mecenate e il ritratto in movimento,” in Gasti, (2013): 45–66.Google Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R.(2014) “Cicerone a Tomi? Rileggendo Ov. Trist. 3.9,” Prometheus 40:215–23.Google Scholar
Del Vigo, M. L. (1990) “L’emendatio del filologo, del critico, dell’autore: tre modi di correggere il testo? (I),” MD 24: 71–110.Google Scholar
Del Vigo, M. L.(1995) “Ambiguità dell’emendatio: edizioni, riedizioni, edizioni postume,” in Pecere, and Reeve, (1995): 7–38.Google Scholar
De Marco, M. (1991) M. Tulli Ciceronis opera omnia quae exstant. Orationes spuriae, I: Oratio pridie quam in exilium iret; Quinta Catilinaria; Responsio Catilinae, Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
De Nonno, M. (1990) “Le citazioni dei grammatici,” in Cavallo, Fedeli, and Giardina (1990): 3. 597–646.Google Scholar
De Nonno, M.(2003) “Grammatici, eruditi, scoliasti: testi, contesti, tradizioni,” in Gasti, (2003): 13–28.Google Scholar
De Nonno, M.(2010) “Transmission and Textual Criticism,” in Barchiesi, and Scheidel, (2010): 31–48.Google Scholar
De Paolis, P. (2000) “Cicerone nei grammatici tardoantichi e altomedievali,” Ciceroniana 11: 37–67.Google Scholar
De Paolis, P.(2012) (ed.) Manoscritti e lettori di Cicerone tra Medioevo e Umanesimo, Cassino: Università Cassino.Google Scholar
De Paolis, P.(2013a) (ed.) Le Filippiche di Cicerone tra storia e modello letterario, Cassino: Università Cassino.Google Scholar
De Paolis, P.(2015) (ed.) Dai papiri al XX secolo. L’eternità di Cicerone, Cassino: Università Cassino.Google Scholar
Deroux, C. (1994) (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VII, Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
De Trizio, M. S. (2006) “Echi ciceroniani nel panegirico di Mamertino per l’imperatore Massimiano (289 d.C.),” InvLuc 28: 61–74.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2007) Ancient Greek Scholarship: a Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from Their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period, Oxford.Google Scholar
Diggle, J., Hall, J. B., Jocelyn, H. D. (1989) (eds.) Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T., Guérin, C., Martinho, M. (2016) (eds.) Reading Roman Declamation. The Declamations Ascribed to Quintilian, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J. (1997a) (ed.) Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J.(1997b) “The Style is the Man: Seneca, Tacitus, and Quintilian’s Canon,” in Dominik, (1997a): 42–56.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J.(2007) “Tacitus and Pliny on Oratory,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007):323–38.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., Roche, P. A. (2009) (eds.) Writing Politics in Ancient Rome, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J., Hall, J. (2007) (eds.) A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2007) Nell’officina dei classici. Come lavoravano gli autori antichi, Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Dortmund, A. (2001) Römisches Buchwesen um die Zeitenwende. War T. Pomponius Atticus (110–32 v.Chr.) Verleger?, Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1957) “A Ciceronian Contribution to Rhetorical Theory,” Eranos 55: 18–26.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E.(1973) “The Intellectual Background of Cicero’s Rhetorica: A Study in Method,” ANRW 1.3: 95–138.Google Scholar
Dozier, C. (2014) “Quintilian’s ratio discendi (Institutio 12.8) and the Rhetorical Dimension of the Institutio Oratoria,” Arethusa 47.1: 71–88.Google Scholar
Dozier, C.(2015) “Innovative Invective: Strength and Weakness in Horace’s Epodes and Quintilian’s Institutio Oratoria,” AJPh 136.2:313–52.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. (2015) “Cicero’s Quarrels. Reception and Modernity from Horace to Tacitus,” in Altman, (2015):144–71.Google Scholar
Dubischar, M. (2010) “Survival of the Most Condensed? Auxiliary Texts, Communications Theory, and Condensation of Knowledge,” in Horster and Reitz (2010): 39–67.Google Scholar
Duffalo, B. (2001) “‘Appius’ Indignation: Gossip, Tradition, and Performance in Republican Rome,” TAPhA 131: 119–42Google Scholar
Duffalo, B.(2003) “Propertian Elegy as Restored Behavior: Evoking Cynthia and Cornelia,” Helios 30.2:163–79.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2001a) “Preventing Ciceronianism: C. Licinius Calvus Regimens for Sexual and Oratorical Self-Mastery,” CPh 96:400–28.Google Scholar
Dugan, J.(2001b) “How to Make (and Break) a Cicero: ‘Epideixis’, Textuality, and Self-Fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem,” CA 20.1: 35–77.Google Scholar
Dugan, J.(2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dugan, J.(2013) “Cicero and the Politics of Ambiguity: Interpreting the Pro Marcello,” in Steel, and Blom, (2013):211–25.Google Scholar
Dugan, J.(2014) “Non sine causa sed sine fine: Cicero’s Compulsion to Repeat his Consulate,” CJ 110.1: 9–22.Google Scholar
Dupont, F. (1997) “Recitatio and the Reorganization of the Space of Public Discourse,” in Habinek, and Schiesaro, (1997): 44–59Google Scholar
D’Urso, G. (2011) (ed.) Dicere laudes: elogio, comunicazione, creazione del consenso, Pisa: ETS Edizioni.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R.(1998) “Narrative Obfuscation, Philosophical Topoi, and Tragic Patterning in Cicero’s Pro Milone,” HSPh 98:219–41.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R.(2001) “Dressing to Kill: Attire as a Proof and Means of Characterization in Cicero’s Speeches,” Arethusa 34.1:119–30.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R.(2003) “Evidence and Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino: the Case against Sex. Roscius,” CQ 53.1:235–46.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R.(2004) “Cicero’s Devotio: the Roles of Dux and Scape-Goat in His Post-Reditum Speeches,” HSPh 102: 299–314.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R.(2008b) “Rivals into Partners: Hortensius and Cicero,” Historia 57.2:142–73.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R.(2010b) “Cicero’s Abridgment of His Speeches for Publication,” in Horster, and Reitz, (2010):369–74.Google Scholar
Easterling, P., Hall, E. (2002) (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Egan, R. B., Joyal, M. (2004) (eds.) Daimonopylai: Essays in Classics and the Classical Tradition Presented to Edmund G. Berry, Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Centre for Hellenic Civilization.Google Scholar
Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., Walter, U. (2003) (eds.) Formen romischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Enders, J. (1997) “Delivering Delivery: Theatricality and the Emasculation of Eloquence,” Rhetorica 15.3:253–78.Google Scholar
Enos, R. L. (1988) The Literate Mode of Cicero’s Legal Rhetoric, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, P. (2004) “La morte di Cicerone da Livio a Fruttero & Lucentini,” in Narducci, (2004): 82–104.Google Scholar
Esposito, P., Walde, Ch. (2015) (eds.) Letture e lettori di Lucano, Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Estèves, A. (2013) “Seditione potens: le discours de Drancès, de l’altercation personnelle comme stratégie de subversion politique (Énéide XI 336–375),” Exercices de rhétorique 183.2Google Scholar
Fantham, E.(1978a) “Imitation and Evolution: the Discussion of Rhetorical Imitation in Cicero de Oratore 2.87–97 and Some Related Problems in Ciceronian Theory,” CPh 73.1: 1–16.Google Scholar
Fantham, E.(1978b) “Imitation and Decline: Rhetorical Theory and Practice in the First Century after Christ,” CPh 73.2:102–16.Google Scholar
Fantham, E.(1982) “Quintilian on Performance. Traditional and Personal Elements in Institutio 11.3,” Phoenix 36:243–63.Google Scholar
Fantham, E.(1996) Roman Literary Culture: from Cicero to Apuleius, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fantham, E.(2003) (ed.) Caesar against Liberty. Perspectives on His Autocracy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feddern, S. (2013) Die Suasorien des älteren Seneca. Einleitung, Text und Kommentar, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1982) M. Tulli Ciceronis In M. Antonium Orationes Philippicae XIV, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2003) “Cicero and the Invention of Literary History,” in Eigler, , Gotter, , Luraghi, , and Walter, (2003): 196–212.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A.(2013) “Free Spirits: Sallust and the Citation of Catiline,” AJPh 134.1: 49–66.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (2009) “Lois et procès maiestatis dans la Rome républicaine,” in Santalucia, (2009):223–49.Google Scholar
Ferreres, L. (1995) “Deux reminiscences des Catilinaires dans saint Jérome et Saint Augustine,” Faventia 17:119–20.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. (2011a) (ed.) The Latin of Roman Lexicography, Pisa, Rome: Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Ferri, R.(2011b) “Hermeneumata Celtis. The Making of a Late-Antique Bilingual Glossary,” in Ferri, (2011a):141–69.Google Scholar
Ferriss-Hill, J. L. (2012) “‘Talis oratio qualis vita’: Literary Judgments as Personal Critiques,” in Sluiter, and Rosen, (2012):365–91.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. B. A. (1937) “Stylistic Borrowings and Parallels in Ammianus Marcellinus,” RPh 63:377–95.Google Scholar
Fohlen, J. (1979) “Recherches sur le manuscript palimpseste Vatican, Pal. Lat. 24,” S & C 3: 195–222.Google Scholar
Foster, F. (2017) “Teaching Language through Virgil in Late Antiquity,” CQ 67.1:270–83.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, L. S. (2007) “Having Your Cake and Eating It: How Cicero Combines Arguments,” in Powell, (2007): 69–90.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, L. S.(2013a) Persuasive Language in Cicero’s Pro Milone: A Close Reading and Commentary, BICS Supplement 121, London.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, L. S.(2013b) “Twentieth/Twenty-First-Century Cicero(s),” in Steel, (2013a):350–73.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, L. S.(2015) “Plutarch and Dio on Cicero at the Trial of Milo,” in Ash, , Mossman, , and Titchener, (2015): 193–207.Google Scholar
Frazel, T. D. (2004) “The Composition and Circulation of Cicero’s In Verrem,” CQ 54.1:128–42.Google Scholar
Friedrich, A. (2002), Das Symposium der XII Sapientes. Kommentar und Verfasserfrage, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frier, B. W. (1983) “Urban Praetors and Rural Violence: The Legal Background of Cicero’s Pro Caecina” TAPhA 113: 221–241.Google Scholar
Frier, B. W.(1985) The Rise of the Roman Jurists: Studies in Cicero’s Pro Caecina, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, U. (2011) “Nulla salus bello: Vergil’s Drances,” in Heil, , Korn, , and Sauer, (2011): 15–20.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1990) “Mündlichkeit und fictive Mündlichkeit in den von Cicero veröffentlichten Reden,” in Vogt-Spira, (1990): 53–62.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. (2013) “Cicero’s Palinode: Inconsistency in the Late Republic,” G & R 60.2:246–61.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1957) “Note sulla polemica anticiceroniana di Asinio Pollione,” RSI 69:317–41.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, P. (1997) Il dissenso e l’ironia. Per una rilettura delle orazioni ‘cesariane’ di Cicerone, Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Galand, P., Hallyn, F., Lévy, C., Verbaal, W. (2010) (eds.) Quintilien Ancien et Moderne, Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.Google Scholar
Galewicz, C. (2006) (ed.) Texts of Power. The Power of the Text. Readings in Textual Authority across History and Cultures, Kraków: Nydawn.Google Scholar
Gallazzi, C. (1984) “P. Mil. Vogl. Inv. 1190: Frammento di Cicero, in C. Verrem Act. Sec. Lib. V,” ZPE 54:21–6
.Google Scholar
Gamberale, L.(1977) “Autografi Virgiliani e movimento arcaizzante,” in Atti del Convegno Virgiliano sul Bimillenario delle Georgiche, Naples:359–67.Google Scholar
Gamberale, L.(1989) “Gli Annali di Ennio alla scuola del grammaticus,” RFIC 117: 49–56.Google Scholar
Gamberale, L.(1997) “Dal falso al vero Cicerone. Note critiche all’orazione Pridie quam in exilium iret e alla Pro Rabirio perduellionis reo, 31,” in D’Alessandro, (1997):331–43.Google Scholar
Gamberale, L.(1998) “Dalla retorica al centone nell’Oratio Pridie quam in exilium iret. Aspetti della fortuna di Cicerone tra III e IV secolo,” in AA.VV., Cultura latina pagana tra terzo e quinto secolo dopo Cristo, Florence: 53–75.Google Scholar
Gamberale, L.(2013) San Gerolamo intellettuale e filologo, Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Gamberini, F. (1983) Stylistic Theory and Practice in the Younger Pliny, Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Gambet, D. G. (1963) Cicero’s Reputation from 43 B.C. to A.D. 79, Dissertation University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Gasti, F. (2003) (ed.) Grammatica e grammatici latini: teoria ed esegesi, Atti I Giornata Ghisleriana, Pavia: Ibis.Google Scholar
Gasti, F.(2013) (ed.) Seneca e la letteratura greca e latina, Atti IX Giornata Ghisleriana, Pavia: Ibis.Google Scholar
Gasti, F.(2016) “Aspetti della presenza di Cicerone nella tarda antichità latina,” in Paolis, De (2016): 27–54.Google Scholar
Gasti, F., Mazzoli, G. (2005) (eds.) Modelli letterari e ideologia nell’età flavia, Pavia: Ibis.Google Scholar
Gatti, P. (2011) “Nonio Marcello e la Compendiosa Doctrina,” in Ferri, (2011a): 49–62.Google Scholar
Gatti, P.(2017) “Cicerone nella Controriforma. Girolamo Ragazzoni umanista e vescovo,” Acme 2:113–30.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1985a) Cornelius Nepos and Ancient Political Biography, Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Gelzer, Th. (1970) “Quintilians Urteil über Seneca. Eine rhetorische Analyse,” MH 27:212–23.Google Scholar
Gerstinger, H. (1937) “Ein neuer lateinischer Papyrus aus der Sammlung Papyrus Erzherzog Rainer,” WS 55: 95–106.Google Scholar
Giardina, A. (1986) (ed.) Società romana e impero tardoantico, 4 vols., Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. A. (2004) “Learning Greek History in the Ancient Classroom: the Evidence of the Treatises on Progymnasmata,” CPh 99.2:103–29.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. A.(2014) “Better Living through Prose Composition? Moral and Compositional Pedagogy in Ancient Greek and Roman Progymnasmata,” Rhetorica 32.1: 1–30.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., Steel, C. (2010) “The Indistinct Literary Careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger,” in Hardie, and Moore, (2010):118–37.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K., Kraus, Christina Shuttleworth (2002) (eds.) The Classical Commentary. Histories, Practices, Theory, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I.(2011a) Creative Eloquence. The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches, Oxford.Google Scholar
Giomini, R. (1975) M. Tullius Cicero De Divinatione De Fato Timaeus, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Gioseffi, M. (2014) “A Very Long Engagement. Some Remarks on the Relationship between Marginalia and Commentaries in the Virgilian Tradition,” in Montana, and Porro, (2014):176–91.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glinister, F., Woods, C. (2007) (eds.) Verrius, Festus, & Paul. Lexicography, Scholarship, & Society, London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Goetz, G. (1891) “Zu den Gronovscholiasten des Cicero,” Jahrb. Klass. Philol. 143:429–32.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1999) “Appreciating Aper: the Defence of Modernity in Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus,” CQ 49.1:224–37 (= Ash 2012: 155–79).Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (1979) Cicero’s Elegant Style. An Analysis of the Pro Archia, Urbana, Chicago, London: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C.(1993a) Cicero’s Caesarian Speeches. A Stylistic Commentary, Chapel Hill, London: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gotzes, P. (1914) De Ciceronis Tribus Generibus Dicendi in Orationibus pro A. Caecina, de imperio Cn. Pompei, pro C. Rabirio perduellionis reo adibiti, Rostock.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (1998) “Greek Advice for a Roman Senator: Cassius Dio and the Dialogue between Philiscus and Cicero (38.18–29),” PLLS 10:373–90Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M.(2005) Empire and Memory: the Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M.(2013) “Tully’s Boat: Responses to Cicero in the Imperial Period,” in Steel, (2013a):233–50.Google Scholar
Gozzoli, S. (1990) “La In Pisonem di Cicerone: un esempio di polemica politica,” Athenaeum 78: 451–463.Google Scholar
Gräfenhan, A. (1850) Geschichte der Klassischen Philologie im Altertum, Bonn: H.B. Koenig.Google Scholar
Graf, F. (1991) “Gestures and Conventions: the Gestures of Roman Actors and Orators,” in Bremmer and Roodenburg, (1991): 36–58.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. (2004) “Conflict and Harmony in the Collegium Gellianum,” in Holford, , Strevens, , and Vardi, (2004):318–42.Google Scholar
Grattarola, P. (1988) Un libello antiaugusteo. La lettera dello pseudo Cicerone a Ottaviano, Genoa: Tilgher.Google Scholar
Grebe, S. (2001) “Views of Correct Speech in Varro and Quintilian,” in Calboli, (2001):135–64.Google Scholar
Greetham, D. C. (1995) (ed.) Scholarly Editing. A Guide to Research, New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. P., Hunt, A. S. (1914) The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, X, London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2001) “Piso, Cicero and their Audience,” in Auvray, -Assayas, , and Delattre, (2001): 85–99.Google Scholar
Griffin, M.(2003) “Clementia and Caesar: from Politics to Philosophy,” in Cairns, and Fantham, (2003):157–83.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (2014) “A Double Sermocinatio and a Resolved Dilemma in Cicero’s Pro Plancio,” CQ 64.1:214–25.Google Scholar
Grimal, P.(1991) (ed.) Sénèque et la prose latine, Entretiens 36, Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Grisolia, R., Matino, G. (2014) (eds.) Arte della parola e parole della scienza. Tecniche della comunicazione letteraria nel mondo antico, Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Grubbs, J. E., Parkin, T. (2013) (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Childhood and Education in the Classical World, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gualandri, I., Mazzoli, G. (2003) (eds.) Gli Annei. Una famiglia nella storia e nella cultura di Roma imperiale, Como: New Press.Google Scholar
Guérin, Ch. (2006) “Cicero as User and Critic of Traditional Rhetorical Patterns: Structural Authority from de Inventione to de Oratore,” in Galewicz, (2006): 61–86.Google Scholar
Guérin, Ch(2009) “Philosophical Decorum and the Literarization of Rhetoric in Cicero’s Orator,” in Woerther, (2009):119–39.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2000) Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E.(2003) Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity. Authority and the Rhetorical Self, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gurd, S.(2012) Work in Progress: Literary Revision as Social Performance in Ancient Rome, New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Haarhoff, T. (1920) Schools of Gaul. A Study of Pagan and Christian Education in the Last Century of the Western Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (1985) The Colometry of Latin Prose, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T.(1998) The Politics of Roman Literature. Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T.(2009) “Situating Literacy at Rome,” in Johnson, and Parker, (2009): 114–140.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, D. (1969) “Neue Bruchstüche aus dem Cicerokodex Pack2 2918 (De imp. Cn. Pomp. 62–65.68–69; Verr. II 1, 1–3.7–9),” ZPE 4: 73–80.Google Scholar
Hagen, J. (2016) “Emotions in Roman Historiography: the Rhetorical Use of Tears as a Means of Persuasion,” in Sanders, and Johncock, (2016): 199–212.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. (1958) Latin Fathers and the Classics: a Study on the Apologists, Jerome, and Other Christian Writers, Stockholm: Almqwist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Haines, C. R. (1920) Fronto Correspondence, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J.(2004) “Cicero and Quintilian on the Oratorical Use of Hand Gestures,” CQ 54:143–60.Google Scholar
Hall, J.(2007) “Oratorical Delivery and the Emotions: Theory and Practice,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007):218–34.Google Scholar
Hall, J.(2009) “Serving the Times: Cicero and Caesar the Dictator,” in Dominik, , Garthwaite, , and Roche, (2009): 89–110.Google Scholar
Hall, J.(2013) “Saviour of the Republic and Father of the Fatherland: Cicero and Political Crisis,” in Steel, (2013a):215–29.Google Scholar
Hall, J.(2014a) Cicero’s Use of Judicial Theater, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J.(2014b) “ Cicero’s Brutus and the Criticism of Oratorical Performance,” CJ 110.1: 43–59.Google Scholar
Hammar, I. (2013) Making Enemies. The Logic of Immorality in Ciceronian Oratory, Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Hanchey, D. (2014) “Days of Future Passed: Fiction Forming Fact in Cicero’s Dialogues,” CJ 110.1: 61–75.Google Scholar
Hardie, P., Moore, H. (2010) (eds.) Classical Literary Careers and their Reception, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrauer, H. (1982) “Ein neues bilingues Cicero-Fragment auf Papyrus (P. Vindob. L 127),” WS 95:212–19.Google Scholar
Harrauer, H.(1983) (ed.) Papyrus Erzherzog Rainer (P. Rainer Cent.), Vienna: Brüder Hollinek.Google Scholar
Harries, B. (2007) “Acting the Part: Techniques of the Comic Stage in Cicero’s Early Speeches,” in Booth, (2007):129–47.Google Scholar
Harries, J.(2006) Cicero and the Jurists: From Citizens’ Law to the Lawful State, London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1989) Ancient Literacy, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haverling, G. V. M. (2015) (ed.) Latin Linguistics in the Early 21st Century, Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1994) “The Substructure of Stasis-Theory from Hermagoras to Hermogenes,” CQ 44:114–29.Google Scholar
Heil, A., Korn, M., Sauer, J. (2011) (eds.) Noctes Sinenses. Festschrift f. F.-H. Mutschler, Heidelberg: Univeritätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Helm, C. (1979) Zur Redaktion der Ciceronischer Konsulatsreden, Göttingen: Georg-August-Universität zu Göttingen.Google Scholar
Henderson, C., Jr. (1964) (ed.) Classical, Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies in Honor of B.L. Ullman, 2 vols., Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Herzog, R., Schmidt, P. L. (1989) (eds.) Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike, V, Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Herzog, R., Schmidt, P. L.(1997) (eds.) Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike, IV, Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Heusch, C. (2011) Die Macht der Memoria. Die Noctes Atticae des Aulus Gellius im Licht der Erinnerungskuktur des 2. Jahrhunderts n. Chr., Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2007) (ed.) Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean, Oxford.Google Scholar
Highet, G. (1972) The Speeches in Vergil’s Aeneid, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, J. P. (1894) De Scholiis Ciceronis Bobiensibus Dissertatio Inauguralis, Berlin: Mayer & Mueller.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, J. P.(1907) Scholia in Ciceronis Orationes Bobiensia, Leipzig: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hodge, H., Grose, , (1927) Cicero Orations. Pro lege Manilia, pro Caecina, pro Cluentio, pro Rabirio perduellionis reo, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoeltermann, A. (1913) De Flavio Capro grammatico, Dissertatio Universitatis Bonnensis: Bonn.Google Scholar
Hömke, N. (2007) “Not to Win, but to Please: Declamation beyond Education,” in Montefusco, Calboli (2007):103–27.Google Scholar
Hoffer, S. E. (2007) “Cicero’s ‘Stomach’: Political Indignation and the Use of Repeated Allusive Expressions in Cicero’s Correspondence,” in Morello, and Morrison, (2007): 87–106.Google Scholar
Hofmann, J. B., Szantyr, A. (1963) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik, Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L.(2003) Aulus Gellius. An Antonine Scholar and his Achievements, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holtz, L. (1981) Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical. Étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe–IXe siècle) et édition critique, Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Homeyer, H. (1964) Die antiken Berichte über den Tod Ciceros und ihre Quellen, Baden-Baden: Grimm.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1989) Cornelius Nepos. A Selection, Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Horster, M., Reitz, Chr. (2010) (eds.) Condensing Texts-Condensed Texts, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Houston, G. W. (2002) “The Slave and Freedman Personnel of Public Libraries in Ancient Rome,” TAPhA 132:139–76.Google Scholar
Houston, G. W.(2009) “Papyrological Evidence for Book Collections and Libraries in the Roman Empire,” in Johnson, and Parker, (2009):233–67.Google Scholar
Hout, M. P. J. van den (1999) A Commentary on the Letters of M. Cornelius Fronto, Leiden, Boston, Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Howley, J. A. (2014) “Valuing the Mediators of Antiquity in the Noctes Atticae,” in Ker and Pieper (2014):465–84.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Th. (2008) “Getting the Last Word: Publication of Political Oratory as an Instrument of Historical Revisionism,” in Mackay, (2008): 185–202.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M. (1939) Cicero. Orator, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M.(1949) Cicero. De inventione De optimo genere oratorum Topica, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Humbert, J. (1925) Les plaidoyers écrits et les plaidoyers réelles de Cicéron, Paris: Olms.Google Scholar
Hunter, R., Oakley, S. P. (2016) (eds.) Latin Literature and its Transmission, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1995) “Rhythm, Style, and Meaning in Cicero’s Prose,” CQ 45.2:485–99.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O.(2011) “Politics and the Sublime in the Panegyricus,” in Roche, (2011):125–41.Google Scholar
Innocenti, B. (1994) “Towards a Theory of Vivid Description as Practised in Cicero’s Verrine Orations,” Rhetorica 12.4:355–81.Google Scholar
Internullo, D. (2011–12) “Cicerone latino-greco. Corpus dei papiri bilingui delle Catilinarie di Cicerone,” PapLup 20–21:25–150.Google Scholar
Internullo, D.(2016) “P.Vindob. L17 identificato: Cicerone In Catilinam I, 14–15 + 27,” ZPE 199: 36–40.Google Scholar
Jahn, O. (1851) “Über die Subscriptionen in den Handschriften römischer Classiker,” Berichten der sächs. Ges. der Wissenschaft zu Leipzig, Phil.-Hist. Klasse 3:327–72.Google Scholar
Jakobi, R. (2005) Grillius. Überlieferung und Kommentar, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Janeras, S. (1987) (ed.) Miscellània Papirològica Ramon Roca-Puig, Barcelona: Fundacio Salvador Vives Casajuana.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1964) “Ancient Scholarship and Virgil’s Use of Republican Latin Poetry,” I CQ 14:280–95.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D.(1985b) “The Annotations of M. Valerius Probus, III: Some Virgilian Scholia,” CQ 35.2:466–74.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. P. (2004) “The Dilemma of Cicero’s Speech for Ligarius,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004):371–99.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2010), Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: a Study of Elite Communities, Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A., Parker, H. N. (2009) (eds.) Ancient Literacies. The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Karbaum, H. (1885) De auctoritate ac fide grammaticorum Latinorum in constituendo lectione Ciceronis orationum in Verrem, in Dissertatio Philologicae Halenses VI.1: Halis Saxonum, 71–110.Google Scholar
Karbaum, H.(1889) De origine exemplorum, quae ex Ciceronis scriptis a Charisio, Diomede, Arusiano Messio, Prisciano Caesariensi, aliis grammaticis Latinis allata sunt, Wernigerode: B. Angerstein.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A.(1980) “Macrobius and Servius: Verecundia and the Grammarian’s Function,” HSPh 84:219–62.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A.(1983) “Notes on ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Schools in Late Antiquity,” TAPhA 113:323–46.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A.(1988) Guardians of Language: the Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A.(2001) “Controlling Reason: Declamation in Rhetorical Education at Rome,” in Too, (2001):317–37.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A.(2006) Marcus Tullius Cicero. Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A.(2009) “Some Passionate Performances in Late Republican Rome,” in Balot, (2009):308–20.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A.(2011) Macrobius Saturnalia, 3 vols., Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kasulke, C. T. (2005) Fronto, Marc Aurel und kein Konflikt zwischen Rhetorik und Philosophie im 2. Jh.n.Chr., Munich, Leipzig: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Katula, R. A. (2003) “Emotion in the Courtroom. Quintilian’s Judge – Then and Now,” in Tellegen, and Couperus, (2003):145–56.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. (2008) “Publishing the Philippics, 44–43 BC,” in Stevenson, and Wilson, (2008): 22–38.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. (2014) Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severians. Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kendeffy, G. (2015) “Lactantius as Christian Cicero, Cicero as Shadow-like Instructor,” in Altman, (2015): 56–92.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 BC–AD 300, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A.(2002) “Cicero’s Oratorical and Rhetorical Legacy,” in May, (2002a): 481–502.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1982) “Books and Readers in the Roman World,” in Kenney, and Clausen, (1982): 3–32.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J., Clausen, W. V. (1982) (eds.) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. 2. Latin Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kenty, J. (2017) “Cicero’s Representation of an Oral Community in De Oratore,” in Slater, (2017):351–76.Google Scholar
Ker, J., Pieper, Chr. (2014) (eds.) Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. (2009) Gellius the Satirist. Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Keyser, P. T. (1994) “Late Authors in Nonius Marcellus and Other Evidence of his Date,” HSPh 96:369–89.Google Scholar
Kiessling, A., Schoell, R. (1875) Q. Asconii Pediani orationum Ciceronis quinque enarratio, Berlin: Wiedmann.Google Scholar
Kirchner, R. (2007) “Elocutio: Latin Prose Style,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007):181–94.Google Scholar
Klotz, A.(1919–23) M. Tulli Ciceronis Scripta quae manserunt omnia, 7 vols., Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Knox, P., Foss, C. (1998) (eds.) Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of W. Clausen, Stuttgart, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Koster, S. (1980) Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur, Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain.Google Scholar
Kramer, B., Hübner, R. (1976) Kölner Papyri, Bd. 1, Opladen Westdeutscher Verlag R. Habelt.Google Scholar
Kramer, J.(2013) “Les glossaires bilingues sur papyrus,” in Marganne, and Rochette, (2013): 43–56.Google Scholar
Kremmydas, Chr., Powell, J., Rubinstein, L. (2013) (eds.) Profession and Performance. Aspects of Oratory in the Greco-Roman World, BICS Supplement 123, London.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2001) Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance, Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A.(2005) “Style and Ideology in the pro Marcello,” in Welch, and Hillard, (2005): 279–312.Google Scholar
Kühnert, F. (1962) “Quintilians Erörterung über den Witz (Inst. Or. 6.3),” Philologus 106: 29–59;305–14.Google Scholar
Kumaniecki, K. (1970) “Les discours égarés de Cicéron pro Cornelio,” Med. Kon. Vlaam. Acad. Belg. 32: 3–36.Google Scholar
La Bua, G. (2001) “Sulla pseudo-ciceroniana Si eum P. Clodius legibus interrogasset e sull’ordine delle orazioni negli Scholia Bobiensia,” RFIC 129.2:161–91.Google Scholar
La Bua, G.(2005) “Obscuritas e dissimulatio nella pro Tullio di Cicerone,” Rhetorica 23.3:261–80.Google Scholar
La Bua, G.(2006) “Diritto e retorica: Cicerone iure peritus in Seneca retore e Quintiliano” Ciceroniana 12, Rome: 181–203.Google Scholar
La Bua, G.(2010a) “Aiebat se in animo scribere (Sen. Contr. 1 praef. 18): Writing in Roman Declamations,” in Montefusco, Calboli (2010):183–99.Google Scholar
La Bua, G.(2010b) “Patronage and Education in Third-Century Gaul: Eumenius’ Panegyric for the Restoration of the Schools,” JLA 3.2:300–15.Google Scholar
La Bua, G.(2013a) “Quo usque tandem cantherium patiemur istum? (Apul. Met. 3.27): Lucius, Catiline and the ‘Immorality’ of the Human Ass’,” CQ 63.2:854–59.Google Scholar
La Bua, G.(2013b) “Mastering Oratory: the Mock-Trial in Apuleius Metamorphoses 3.3.1–7.1,” AJPh 134.4: 675–701.Google Scholar
La Bua, G.(2014a) “Cicero’s Pro Milone and the Demosthenic Style: De optimo genere oratorum 10,” G & R 61.1: 29–37.Google Scholar
La Bua, G.(2014b) “Medicina consularis: Cicerone e la cura dello stato,” in Paolis, De (2014): 29–51.Google Scholar
Lacey, W. K. (1986) Cicero: Second Philippic Oration, Warminster: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Laird, W. (2009) “The Rhetoric of Roman Historiography,” in Feldherr, (2009): 197–213.Google Scholar
Lakmann, M. L. (1997) “Favorinus von Arelate: Aulus Gellius über seinen Lehrer,” in Czapla, , Lehmann, , and Liell, (1997):233–43.Google Scholar
Lamacchia, R. (1968) [M. Tulli Ciceronis] Epistula ad Octavianum, Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R., Keaney, J. J. (1992) (eds.) Homer’s Ancient Readers: the Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H., Madsen, J. M. (2016) (eds.) Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Lardet, P. (1993) L’Apologie de Jérôme contre Rufin. Un commentaire, Leiden, New York, Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. (2008) “Cicero, Antony and the Senatus Consultum Ultimum in the Second Philippic,” in Stevenson, and Wilson, (2008):168–80.Google Scholar
Laudizi, G. (2004) “Seneca (ep. 114) e la corruzione dello stile,” BStudLat 34: 39–56.Google Scholar
Laurand, L. (1936–1938) Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron, 3 vols., 4th ed., Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Laureys, M. (1991) “Quintilian’s Judgment of Seneca and the Scope and Purpose of Inst. 10.1,” A & A 37:100–25.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1998) Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study, Leiden, Boston, Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Law, V. (1987) “Late Latin Grammars in the Early Middle Ages: a Typological History,” in Taylor, (1987): 191–204.Google Scholar
Laws, J. (2004) “Epilogue: Cicero and the Modern Advocate,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004):401–16.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1990) “The Politics of Self-Presentation: Pliny’s Letters and Roman Portrait Sculpture,” ClAnt 9: 14–39.Google Scholar
Ledentu, M. (2000) “L’orateur, la parole et le texte,” in Achard, and Ledentu, (2000): 57–73.Google Scholar
Ledentu, M.(2007) (ed.) Parole, media, pouvoir dans l’Occident romain, Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis Ratio. The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers, 2 vols., Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D.(1982) “The Technique of Persuasion in Cicero’s Pro Murena” in Ludwig, (1982): 193–236.Google Scholar
Leesen, T. G. (2010) Gaius Meets Cicero: Law and Rhetoric in the School Controversies, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Leigh, M.(2004b) “Quintilian on the Emotions: Institutio Oratoria 6 preface and 1–2,” JRS 94:122–40.Google Scholar
Lennon, J. (2010) “Pollution and Ritual Impurity in Cicero’s De domo sua,” CQ 60.2:427–45.Google Scholar
Lentano, M. (2014) “La città dei figli. Pensieri di un declamatore ai funerali di Cicerone,” in Pepe, and Moretti, (2014):223–44.Google Scholar
Lentano, M.(2016) “Parlare di Cicerone sotto il governo del suo assassino. Una lettura della controversia VII, 2 di Seneca e la politica augustea della memoria,” in Poignault, and Schneider, (2016):375–91.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (1997) “God and Man in the Classical Latin Panegyric,” PCPhS 43: 66–103.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S.(2004) “Reading Cicero’s Narratives,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004):117–46.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G. (2006) Asconius Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero, revised edition, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lhommé, M.-K. (2011) “De l’encyclopédie au glossaire: Festus et son adaptation par Paul Diacre,” in Ferri, (2011a): 29–47.Google Scholar
Licandro, O. (2017) Cicerone alla corte di Giustiniano. “Dialogo sulla scienza politica” (Vat. gr. 1298), Rome: L‘ERMA di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Lichtenfeldt, C. (1888) De Q. Asconii Pediani fontibus ac fide, Diss. Breslau: Vratislaviae, apud G. Koebner.Google Scholar
Lintott, A.(2004) “Legal Procedure in Cicero’s Time,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004): 61–78.Google Scholar
Liou-Gille, B. (1994) “La perduellio: Le process d’Horace et de Rabirius,” Latomus 58: 3–58.Google Scholar
Lloyd, R. B. (1961) “Republican Authors in Servius and Scholia Danielis,” HSPh 65: 291–341.Google Scholar
Lomanto, V. (1996) “Cedant arma togae,” in De tuo tibi. Omaggio degli allievi a I. Lana, Bologna: Pàtron, 115–41.Google Scholar
Lomas, K. (2004) “A Volscian Mafia? Cicero and his Italian Clients in the Forensic Speeches,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004): 97–116.Google Scholar
Lo Monaco, F. (1990) “Lineamenti per una storia delle raccolte antiche di orazioni ciceroniane,” Aevum(ant) 3:169–85.Google Scholar
Lo Monaco, F.(1995) “Paralipomeni alle collezioni antiche di orazioni ciceroniane,” in Pecere, and Reeve, (1995): 39–61.Google Scholar
Lo Monaco, F.(1996) “In codicibus … qui Bobienses inscribuntur: scoperte e studio di palinsesti bobbiesi in Ambrosiana dalla fine del Settecento ad Angelo Mai (1819),” Aevum 96.3: 657–719.Google Scholar
López, J. F. (2007) “Quintilian as Rhetorician and Teacher,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007):307–22.Google Scholar
Loutsch, C.(2007) “Remarques sur la publication du Pro Caelio de Cicéron,” in Ledentu, (2007): 53–74.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2007) “Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus,” in Heyworth, (2007): 91–112.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1993) “Reading and Response in the Dialogus,” in Luce, and Woodman, (1993): 11–38.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J., Woodman, A. J. (1993) (eds.) Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. (1982) (ed.) Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 28, Vandoeuvres- Genève: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Luhtala, A. (2010) “Latin Schulgrammatik and the Emergence of Grammatical Commentaries,” in Horster, and Reiz, (2010):209–43.Google Scholar
MacDonald, C. (1976) Cicero Orations. In Catilinam 1–4. Pro Murena. Pro Sulla. Pro Flacco, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mackay, E. A. (2008) (ed.) Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Madvig, J. N. (1828) De Q. Asconii Pediani et aliorum veterum interpretum in Ciceronis orationes commentariis disputatio critica, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Maggiulli, G. (1980) “Il numero dei libri nelle citazioni di Nonio,” Studi Noniani 6:117–22.Google Scholar
Magnaldi, G. (2002) “Lezioni genuine e glosse nelle Filippiche di Cicerone,” Lexis 20: 61–78.Google Scholar
Magnaldi, G.(2004) Parole d’autore, parola di copista. Usi correttivi ed esercizi di scuola nei codici di Cic. Phil. 1.1 13.10, Alessandria: Edizioni dell‘Orso.Google Scholar
Magnaldi, G.(2013) “Cicerone a scuola di grammatica: la tradizione manoscritta delle Filippiche,” in Paolis, De (2013a): 27–44.Google Scholar
Maguiness, W. S. (1932) “Some Methods of the Latin Panegyrists,” Hermathena 47: 42–61.Google Scholar
Maier-Eichhorn, U. (1989) Die Gestikulation in Quintilians Rhetorik, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Manfredi, M. (1995) “Lessico a Cic. In Cat. I 5,” in Dai Papiri della Società Italiana, Florence: 5–9.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G.(2008) “Cicero Versus Antonius: On the Structure and Construction of the Philippics Collection,” in Stevenson, and Wilson, (2008): 39–61.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G.(2011) “Ciceronian Praise as a Step towards Pliny’s Panegyricus,” in Roche, (2011): 85–103.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G.(2016) (ed.) The Afterlife of Cicero, BICS Supplement 135, London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Marache, R. (1952) La critique littéraire de langue latine et le development du gout archaisant au II siècle de notre ère, Rennes: Plihon.Google Scholar
Marache, R.(1957) Mots nouveaux et mots archaïques chez Fronton et Aulu-Gelle, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2008) The Art of Pliny’s Letters. A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marciniak, K. (2008) “Cicero und Caesar. Ein Dialog der Dichter,” Philologus 152.2:212–22.Google Scholar
Marciniak, K.(2011a) (ed.) Birthday Beasts’ Book: Where Human Roads Cross Animal Trails …, Warsaw: Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies “Artes Liberales”.Google Scholar
Marciniak, K.(2011b) “Cicero’s Crow in a Brave New World,” in Marciniak, (2011a): 193–206.Google Scholar
Marek, V. (1983) M. Tullius Cicero Orationes De Lege Agraria Oratio Pro C. Rabirio Perduellionis Reo, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Marganne, M. H., Rochette, B. (2013) (eds.) Bilinguisme et digraphisme dans le monde gréco-romain, Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2007) (ed.) A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, 2 vols., Malden, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marinone, N. (1946) Elio Donato, Macrobio e Servio commentatori di Virgilio, Vercelli: Presso l’Autore.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A.(1985) A Historical Commentary on Asconius, Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A.(1987) “Excepta Oratio, the Other Pro Milone and the Question of Shorthand,” Latomus 46:730–36.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. K. (1977) The Manuscript Tradition of Cornelius Nepos, London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Martin, D. E. (1984) “The Statilius-Subscription and the Editions of Late Antiquity,” in Bright, and Ramage, (1984):147–54.Google Scholar
Martin, G. (2011) “Meorum periculorum rationes utilitas rei publicae vincat. Zur Historizität der vierten Catilinaria,” Philologus 155.2:307–25.Google Scholar
Maslowski, T. (1981) M. Tullius Cicero Orationes Cum senatui gratias egit Cum populo gratias egit De domo sua De haruspicum responsis, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Maslowski, T.(1995) M. Tullius Cicero Orationes in P. Vatinium testem pro M. Caelio, Stuttgart, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Maslowski, T.(2007) M. Tullius Cicero Oratio De Provinciis Consularibus Oratio pro L. Cornelio Balbo, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maslowski, T., Rouse, R. H. (1984) “The Manuscript Tradition of Cicero’s Post-Exile Orations I: The Medieval History,” Philologus 128: 60–104.Google Scholar
Massa, G. (2006) “Sallustio contro Cicerone? I falsi d’autore e la polemica anticiceroniana di Asinio Pollione,” Athenaeum 94:415–66.Google Scholar
Matthaios, S., Montanari, F., Rengakos, A. (2011) (eds.), Ancient Scholarship and Grammar. Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mazzarino, A. (1955) Grammaticae Romanae Fragmenta Aetatis Caesareae, I, Turin: Loescher.Google Scholar
Mazzoli, G.(2006) “La guerra civile nelle declamazioni di Seneca il Retore,” Ciceroniana 12, Rome: 45–57.Google Scholar
May, J. M. (1979) “The ethica digressio and Cicero’s pro Milone: a Progression of Intensity from logos to ethos to pathos,” CJ 74.3:240–46.Google Scholar
May, J. M.(1981) “The Rhetoric of Advocacy and Patron-Client Identification: Variation on a Theme,” AJPh 102:308–15Google Scholar
May, J. M.(1988) Trials of Character: the Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos, Chapel Hill, New York, London: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
May, J. M.(2001) “Cicero’s Pro Milone: an Ideal Speech of an Ideal Orator,” in Wooten, (2001):123–34.Google Scholar
May, J. M.(2002a) (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
May, J. M.(2007b) “Ciceronian Scholarship in the Latin Classroom,” in Ancona, (2007): 71–89.Google Scholar
May, R. (2010) “The Function of Verse Quotations in Apulius’ Speeches: Making the Case with Plato,” in Berry, and Erskine, (2010): 175–192.Google Scholar
Mayer, R.(2003) “Plinius and the Gloria Dicendi,” in Morello, and Gibson, (2003):227–34.Google Scholar
McCormick, S. (2014) “Argument by Comparison: an Ancient Typology,” Rhetorica 32.2:148–64.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. C.(1972a) “Cicero’s Publication of his Consular Orations,” Philologus 116:277–84.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. (1996) “Writing, Copying, and Autograph Manuscripts in Ancient Rome,” CQ 46.2:469–91.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2005) “Seneca the Elder on Plagiarizing Cicero’s Verrines,” Rhetorica 23.4:337–46.Google Scholar
McGill, S.(2010) “Plagiarism as Imitation? The Case of Abronius Silo in Seneca’s the Elder’s Suasoriae 2.19-20,” Arethusa 43.1:113–31.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (1989) Ovid: Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary, Leeds: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
McNelis, C. (2007) “Grammarians and Rhetoricians,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007):285–96.Google Scholar
Melchior, A. (2008) “Twinned Fortunes and the Publication of Cicero’s Pro Milone,” CPh 103.3:282–97.Google Scholar
Merello, M. (1977) “Statilio Massimo,” Studi e Ricerche dell’Istituto di Latino Facoltà di Lettere Università di Genova 1:113–36.Google Scholar
Mertens, P. (1987) “Les papyrus littéraires latins d’auteurs classiques durant les deux dernières décennies,” in Janeras, (1987): 189–204.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1992) “Aulu-Gelle et Cicéron,” in AA.VV. Au miroir de la culture antique, Mélanges offerts au prèsident Renè Marache, Rennes Presses Universitaires de Rennes:355–60.Google Scholar
Migliario, E. (2007) Retorica e Storia. Una lettura delle Suasoriae di Seneca Padre, Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Millar, F.(1988) “Cornelius Nepos, Atticus and the Roman Revolution,” G & R 35: 40–55.Google Scholar
Miller, J., Prosser, M. H., Benson, T. W. (1973) (eds.) Readings in Medieval Rhetoric, Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F., Damon, C., Myers, K. S. (2002) (eds.) Vertis in usum. Studies in Honor of E. Courtney, Munich: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2015) “Placing the Self in the Field of Truth: Irony and Self-Fashioning in Ancient and Postmodern Rhetorical Theory,” Arethusa 48.3:313–37.Google Scholar
Mindt, N. (2014) “Cicero und Seneca d. J. in den Epigrammen Martials,” Gymnasium 121: 69–89.Google Scholar
Minnen, van P., Worp, K. A. (1993) “The Greek and Latin Literary Texts from Hermopolis,” GRBS 34.2:151–86.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2015) The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome, New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Möller, M. (2004) Talis oratio-qualis vita. Zu Theorie und Praxis mimetischer Verfahren in der griechisch-römischen Literaturkritik, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1988) Plutarch. The Life of Cicero, Warminster: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Montague, H. W. (1992) “Advocacy and Politics: the Paradox of Cicero’s pro Ligario,” AJPh 113.4:559–74.Google Scholar
Montana, F. (2011) “The Making of Greek Scholiastic Corpora,” in Montanari, and Pagani, (2011):105–61.Google Scholar
Montana, F., Porro, A. (2014) (eds.) The Birth of Scholiography. From Types to Texts, Trends in Classics 6.1, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. (1993) (ed.) La philologie grecque à l’èpoque Hellénistique et Romaine, Entretiens 40, Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Montanari, F.(2011) “Correcting a Copy, Editing a Text. Alexandrian Ekdosis and Papyri,” in Montanari, and Pagani, (2011): 1–15.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., Rengakos, A. (2015) (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, 2 vols., Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Pagani, L. (2011) (eds.) From Scholars to Scholia. Chapters in the History of Ancient Greek Scholarship, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Montecalvo, M. S. (2014) Cicerone in Cassio Dione. Elementi biografici e fortuna dell’opera, Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.Google Scholar
Mordeglia, C. (2016) “I Synonyma Ciceronis. Storia di una falsa attribuzione e aggiornamenti critici,” in Paolis, De (2016): 55–77.Google Scholar
Morello, R., Gibson, R. (2003) (eds.) “Re-Imagining Pliny the Younger,” Arethusa 36.2: 110–262.Google Scholar
Morello, R., Morrison, A. D. (2007) (eds.) Ancient Letters. Classical and Late Antique Epistolography, Oxford.Google Scholar
Moretti, G. (2009) “Cicerone allegorico: la metamorfosi del personaggio storico in paradigma dell’eloquenza romana,” in Pernot, (2009):153–65.Google Scholar
Moretti, G., Torre, C., Zanetto, G. (2009) (eds.) Debita dona. Studi in onore di I. Gualandri, Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Morgan, L.(2007) “Natura narratur: Tullius Laurea’s Elegy for Cicero (Pliny, Nat. 31.8),” in Heyworth, (2007):113–40.Google Scholar
Morgan, T.(1998b) “A Good Man Skilled in Politics: Quintilian’s Political Theory,” in Too, and Livingstone, (1998):245–62.Google Scholar
Moroni, B. (2009) “Lettori di Cicerone nella cancelleria imperiale tra IV e V secolo,” in Moretti, , Torre, , and Zanetto, (2009):349–71Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mountford, J. F. (1925) Quotations from Classical Authors in Medieval Latin Glossaries, New York, London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mountford, J. F., Schultz, J. T. (1930) Index rerum et nominum in scholiis Servii et Aelii Donati tractatorum, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2015) (ed.) Conflict/Dialogue? Augustine’s Engagement with Cultures in “De civitate Dei,” Würzburg: Augustinus bei echter.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J. (1987) Quintilian on the Teaching of Speaking and Writing, Translations from Books One, Two, and Ten of the Institutio Oratoria, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J.(1990a) (ed.) A Short History of Writing Instruction from Ancient Greece to Twentieth-Century America, Davis: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J.(1990b) “Roman Writing Instruction as Described by Quintilian,” in Murphy, (1990a): 19–76.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. (1998) “Cicero’s First Readers: Epistolary Evidence for the Dissemination of His Works,” CQ 48.2: 492–505.Google Scholar
Narducci, E.(1997b) “Perceptions of Exile in Cicero: the Philosophical Interpretation of a Real Experience,” AJPh 118: 55–73.Google Scholar
Narducci, E.(1998) Marco Tullio Cicerone. La casa, Milan: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Narducci, E.(2002a) “Brutus: the History of Roman Eloquence,” in May, (2002a): 401–425.Google Scholar
Narducci, E.(2002b) “Orator and the Definition of the Ideal Orator,” in May, (2002a): 427–443.Google Scholar
Narducci, E.(2003a) (ed.) Aspetti della fortuna di Cicerone nella cultura latina, Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Narducci, E.(2003b) “Cicerone nella Pharsalia di Lucano,” in Narducci, (2003a): 78–91.Google Scholar
Narducci, E.(2006) (ed.) Cicerone nella tradizione europea. Dalla tarda antichità al Settecento, Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Nesholm, E. J. (2009–2010) “Language and Artistry in Cicero’s Pro Archia,” CW 103:477–90.Google Scholar
Neumeister, Chr. (1964) Grundsätze der forensischen Rhetorik gezeigt an Gerichtsreden Ciceros, Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar
Nicolai, R.(2007) “The Place of History in the Ancient World,” in Marincola, (2007): 13–26.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. (1992) Cicero’s Return from Exile. The Orations Post Reditum, New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.(1994) “The Delivery and Confidentiality of Cicero’s Letters,” CJ 90: 33–63.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, B. G. (1820) M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationum pro M. Fonteio et pro C. Rabirio fragmenta, Rome.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M.(1990) “Cola and Clausulae in Cicero’s Speeches,” in Craik, (1990):349–59.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M.(1992) “The Orator and the Reader: Manipulation and Response in Cicero’s Fifth Verrine,” in Woodman, and Powell, (1992): 1–18.Google Scholar
Nixon, C. V. E., Rodgers, B. S. (1994) In Praise of Later Roman Emperors. The Panegyrici Latini, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nocchi, F. R. (2013) Tecniche teatrali e formazione dell’oratore in Quintiliano, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nótári, T. (2008) Law, Religion and Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Murena, Passau: Schenk Verlag.Google Scholar
Novokhatko, A. A. (2009) The Invectives of Sallust and Cicero, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009), The Ancient Critic at Work. Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Olechowska, E. (1984) Pro Plancio et Pro Rabirio Postumo. La transmission des textes, Wroclaw: Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Orelli, J. C., Baiter, J. G. (1833) M.Tulli Ciceronis opera quae supersunt omnia ac deperditorum fragmenta, V.2, Zurich: Io. Mueller.Google Scholar
Orelli, J. C., Baiter, J. G., Halm, C. (1845) M.Tulli Ciceronis opera quae supersunt omnia ac deperditorum fragmenta, Zurich: Io. Mueller.Google Scholar
Ott, F.-T. (2013) Die Zweite Philippica als Flugschrift in der späten Republik, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pack, R. A. (1965) The Greek and Latin Literary Texts from Graeco-Roman Egypt, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. (2015) “Language Correctness (Hellenismos) and Its Criteria,” in Montanari, , Matthaios, , and Rengakos, (2015): I. 798–849.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S., Serafim, A., Da Vela, B. (2017) (eds.) The Theatre of Justice. Aspects of Performance in Greco-Roman Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (2009) “Books and Reading Latin Poetry,” in Johnson, and Parker, (2009): 186–229.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1952) Storia della tradizione e critica del testo, Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Paterson, J. (2004) “Self-Reference in Cicero’s Forensic Speeches,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004): 79–95.Google Scholar
Patimo, V. M. (2009) La Pro Cluentio di Cicerone. Introduzione e commento dei §§ 1–81, Nordhausen: Verlag T. Bautz.Google Scholar
Pecere, O. (1982) “La subscriptio di Statilio Massimo e la tradizione delle Agrarie di Cicerone,” IMU 25: 73–123.Google Scholar
Pecere, O.(1986) “La tradizione dei testi latini tra IV e V secolo attraverso i libri sottoscritti,” in Giardina, (1986), 4: 19–81; 210–46.Google Scholar
Pecere, O.(2010) “Il manoscritto dell’autore latino: un sondaggio,” in Perrin, (2010): 79–90.Google Scholar
Pecere, O., Reeve, M. D. (1995) (eds.) Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2012) The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake. Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pellizzari, A. (2003) Servio. Storia, cultura e istituzioni nell’opera di un grammatico tardoantico, Florence: L. S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Pepe, C., Moretti, G. (2014) (eds.) Le parole dopo la morte. Forme e funzioni della retorica funeraria nella tradizione greca e romana, Trento: Università degli Studi di Trento.Google Scholar
Perlwitz, O. (1992) Titus Pomponius Atticus. Untersuchungen zur Person eines Einflussreichen Ritters in der Ausgehenden Römischen Republik, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2009) (ed.) New Chapters in the History of Rhetoric, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Perrin, Y. (2010) (ed.) Neronia VIII. Bibliothèques, livres et culture écrite dans l’empire romain de César à Hadrien, Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Perry, E. E. (2000) “Notes on Diligentia as a Term of Roman Art Criticism,” CPh 95.4:445–58.Google Scholar
Peterson, W. (1901) Collations from the Codex Cluniacensis s. Holkhamicus, a Ninth-Century Manuscript of Cicero, Anecdota Oxoniensia, Oxford.Google Scholar
Peyron, A. (1824) M. Tulli Ciceronis orationum pro Scauro, pro Tullio et in Clodium fragmenta inedita, Stuttgart: Libraria Joannis Georgii Cottae.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship. From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. J. (1986) “Atticus and the Publication of Cicero’s Works,” CW 79.4:227–37.Google Scholar
Piacente, L. (2014) Cicerone a riflettori spenti. Episodi della tradizione testuale di orazioni ed epistole, Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Picone, G. (2008) (ed.) Clementia Caesaris. Modelli etici, parenesi, e retorica dell’esilio, Palermo: Palumbo.Google Scholar
Pieroni, P. (2004) Marcus Verrius Flaccus De significatu verborum in den Auszügen von Sextus Pompeius Festus und Paulus Diaconus: Einleitung und Teilkommentar (154, 19–186, 29 Lindsay), Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pingoud, J. (2016) “Le théâtre dans les Petites Déclamations,” in Casamento, , Mal, , Maeder, , and Pasetti, (2016):157–89.Google Scholar
Piras, G. (2017) “La prosopopea di Appio Claudio Cicero (Cic. Cael. 33–34): tradizione letteraria, memoria familiare e polemica politica,” in Paolis, De (2017): 63–100.Google Scholar
Pizzani, U. (1968) Fulgenzio. Definizione di parole antiche, Rome: Edizioni dell‘Ateneo Roma.Google Scholar
Plasberg, O. (1926) Cicero in seinem Werken und Briefen, Leipzig: Wissenschaftlische Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Poel (van der), M. (2009) “The Use of Exempla in Roman Declamation,” Rhetorica 27.3:332–53.Google Scholar
Poignault, R., Schneider, C. (2016) (eds.) Fabrique de la declamation antique (controverses et suasoires), Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, A. J. (1991) The Appropriate Comment. Death Notices in the Ancient Historians, Frankfurt am Main, Bern, New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Porter, J. J. (1992) “Hermeneutic Lines and Circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the Exegesis of Homer,” in Lamberton, and Keaney, (1992): 67–114.Google Scholar
Porter, J. J.(1999) (ed.) Constructions of the Classical Body, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. J.(2009) “Rhetoric, Aesthetics, and the Voice,” in Gunderson, (2009): 92–108.Google Scholar
Porter, S. E. (1997) (ed.) Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C. –A.D. 400, Leiden, Boston, Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2007) (ed.) Logos. Rational Argument in Classical Rhetoric, BICS Supplement 76, London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F.(2010a) “Court Procedure and Rhetorical Strategy in Cicero,” in Berry, and Erskine, (2010): 21–36.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F.(2010b) “Hyperbaton and Register in Cicero,” in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010):163–85.Google Scholar
Prill, P. (1986) “Cicero in Theory and Practice: the Securing of Good Will in the Exordia of Five Forensic Speeches,” Rhetorica 4.2: 93–109.Google Scholar
Prost, F. (2017) Quintus Cicéron Petit manuel de la campagne électorale. Marcus Cicéron Lettres à son frère Quintus I, 1 et 2, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Puccioni, G. (1960) “Prolegomeni ad una nuova edizione dei frammenti delle orazioni perdute di Cicerone,” Ciceroniana 2: 97–124.Google Scholar
Pugliarello, M. R. (2009) “A lezione dal grammaticus: la lettura degli auctores,” Maia 61: 592–610.Google Scholar
Querzoli, S. (2009) “Giuristi ed esperti di diritto nelle Notti Attiche di Gellio,” in Andrisano, (2009):146–62.Google Scholar
Rabbie, E. (2007) “Wit and Humor in Roman Rhetoric,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007):207–17.Google Scholar
Raccanelli, R. (2012) Cicerone, Post Reditum in Senatu e Ad Quirites. Come disegnare una mappa di relazioni, Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (1938–43) Pliny Natural History, 10 vols., Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radice, B. (1969) Pliny Letters and Panegyricus, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radiciotti, P. (1998) “Manoscritti digrafici grecolatini e latinogreci nell’antichità,” in Capasso, (1998):107–46.Google Scholar
Radiciotti, P.(2013) “Digrafismo nei papiri latini,” in Marganne, and Rochette, (2013): 57–69.Google Scholar
Raina, G. (2008) “Contendere potius quam sequi (Inst. Or. 10, 2, 9). Dinamiche del rapporto con i grandi del passato in Quintiliano,” in Castagna, and Riboldi, (2008): 1387–1409.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. S. (1973) Urbanitas. Ancient Sophistication and Refinement, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T.(2014) “The Recovery of More Ennius from a Misinformed Ciceronian Scholiast,” CQ 64.1:160–5
.Google Scholar
Rees, R. (2004) (ed.) Romane Memento. Virgil in the Fourth Century, London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D.(1984) “Before and after Poggio: Some manuscripts of Cicero’s Speeches,” RFIC 112.3: 266–284.Google Scholar
Remer, G. (2017) Ethics and the Orator: the Ciceronian Tradition of Political Morality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Renda, C.(2009) “I riceventi della pro Sestio: tre livelli di struttura, lettura, ricezione del testo ciceroniano,” in Abbamonte, , Miletti, , and Spina, (2009): 375–389.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. (1976) “A Traditional Pattern of Imitation in Sallust and His Sources,” CPh 71: 97–105.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1983) Texts and Transmission. A Survey of the Latin Classics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., Wilson, N. G. (1974) Scribes and Scholars. A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature, 2nd ed., Oxford.Google Scholar
Ricchieri, T. (2017) “Emendazioni alle Verrine di Cicerone alla luce del commento dello Ps.-Asconio (Div. Caec.-Verr. 1),” RFIC 145: 75–105.Google Scholar
Ricci, S. (1910) “Un fragment en onciale du ‘Pro Plancio’ de Cicéron,” in Mèlanges offerts à M. Emile Chatelain, Paris:442–47.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1997) “Gender and Rhetoric: Producing Manhood in the Schools,” in Dominik, (1997): 74–90.Google Scholar
Richter, W. (1968) “Das Cicerobild der römischen Kaiserzeit,” in Radke, (1968):161–97.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T. (2013) “Death and the Historian: Livy’s Benignitas,” Latomus 72.3: 689–710.Google Scholar
Riedl, P. (2016) “Das Spiel mit der Wirklichkeit. Der Irrealis in Ciceros Pro Milone,” RhM 159.3–4:369–91.Google Scholar
Riesenweber, T. (2015) C. Marius Victorinus Commenta in Ciceronis Rhetorica. Bd. 1: Prolegomena; Bd. 2: Kritischer Kommentar und Indices, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (1995a) “Self-Fashioning in the Public Eye: Pliny on Cicero and Oratory,” AJPh 116:123–35.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M.(1995b) “Appropriation and Reversal as a Basis for Oratorical Proof,” CPh 90:245–56.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M.(1999) Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Roca-Puig, R. (1977) (ed.) Cicerò. Catilinàries (I et II in Cat.): Papyri Barcinonenses, Barcelona: Grafos.Google Scholar
Rochette, B.(1997) Le latin dans le monde grec. Recherches sur la diffusion de la langue et des lettres latines dans les provinces hellénophones de l’Empire romain, Brussels: Peeters.Google Scholar
Rochette, B.(2013) “Papyrologie latine et bilinguisme gréco-latin: des perspectives nouvelles,” in Marganne, and Rochette, (2013): 11–20.Google Scholar
Rochette, B.(2015) “L’enseignement du Latin à Costantinople: une mise au point,” in Haverling, (2015):626–39.Google Scholar
Rochlitz, S. (1993) Das Bild Caesars in Ciceros “Orationes Caesarianae.” Untersuchungen zur “clementia” und “sapientia Caesaris,” Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J. C. (1927) The Attic Nights of Aulus Gellius, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J. C., Ramsey, J. T. (2013) Sallust I: the War with Catiline; the War with Jugurtha, edited and revised, first published 1921, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (1997) “Color-Blindness: Cicero’s Death, Declamation, and the Production of History,” CPh 92.2:109–30.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B.(2004) “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: the Case of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia,” CPh 99.1: 1–56.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B.(2009) “The Exemplary Past in Roman Historiography and Culture,” in Feldherr, (2009):214–30.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B.(2011) “To Whom Am I Speaking? The Changing Venues of Competitive Eloquence in the Early Empire,” in Blösel, and Hölkeskamp, (2011): 197–221.Google Scholar
Romano, E. (2003) “Il ruolo di Cicerone nella formazione di una cultura tecnica,” in Narducci, (2003a): 92–111.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (2012) “Mecenate senza poeti, poeti senza Mecenate: la distruzione di un mito augusteo,” in Bastianini, , Lapini, , and Tulli, (2012):405–24Google Scholar
Rosellini, M. (2011) “Le citazioni latine nel lessico sintattico del libro XVIII di Prisciano (GL, III, 278, 13–377, 18),” MD 67:183–99.Google Scholar
Rosillo López, C. (2013), “The Common (Mediocris) Orator of the Late Republic: the Scribonii Curiones,” in Steel, and Blom, (2013):287–98.Google Scholar
Rosillo López, C.(2017) (ed.) Political Communication in the Roman World, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rouse, R. H., Rouse, M. A. (1976) “The Florilegium Angelicum: its Origin, Content, and Influence,” in Alexander, and Gibson, (1976): 66–114.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A.(2001) Quintilian. The Orator’s Education, 5 vols., Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rutella, F. (1977) “Chi fu Flavio Capro,” Studi e Ricerche Istituto Latino Genova, 1:143–59.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. H. (2012) “Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus: A Socio-Cultural History,” in Págan, (2012): 62–83.Google Scholar
Salomies, O. (1997) “Quotations from Cicero’s Speeches in the Commentaires of Donatus and Servius,” in Vaahtera, and Vainio, (1997):126–35.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Ostiz, A. (2013) “Cicero Graecus: Notes on Ciceronian Papyri from Egypt,” ZPE 187:144–53.Google Scholar
Sanders, E., Johncock, M. (2016) (eds.) Emotion and Persuasion in Classical Antiquity, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Santalucia, B. (2009) (ed.) La repressione criminale nella Roma repubblicana fra norma e persuasione, Pavia: IUSS Press.Google Scholar
Santini, P. (2006) L’auctoritas linguistica di Cicerone nelle “Notti Attiche” di Aulo Gellio, Naples: Loffredo.Google Scholar
Scappaticcio, M. C. (2015) Artes Grammaticae in frammenti. I testi grammaticali latini e bilingui greco-latini su papiro, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. (1966–71) Geschichte der römischen Literatur bis zum Gesetzgebungswerk des Kaisers Justinian, 4th ed. revised by C. Hosius and G. Krüger, 4 vols, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M.(2004) A Rhetorical Grammar. C. Iulius Romanus, Introduction to the Liber De Adverbio as Incorporated in Charisius’ Ars Grammatica II.13, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. (1989) “Volcacius? Commentarii in Orationes Ciceronis (Scholia Bobiensia),” in Herzog, and Schmidt, (1989):140–42 (§ 526.1).Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L.(1993) “De honestis et nove veterum dictis: die Autorität der veteres von Nonius Marcellus bis zu Matheus Vindocinensis,” in Vosskamp, (1993):366–88.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L.(1997b) “Statilius Maximus,” in Herzog, and Schmidt, (1997):256–8
(§ 445.3).Google Scholar
Schmiedeberg, P. (1905) De Asconii codicibus et de Ciceronis scholiis Sangallensibus, Vratislaviae: Grass.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, U. (2000) Velleius Paterculus und das Interesse an der Geschichte im Zeitalter des Tiberius, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Schubert, P. (2012) “L’apport des papyrus grecs et latins d’Égypte romaine,” in Schubert, (2012a):243–71.Google Scholar
Schubert, P.(2012a) (ed.) Les Grecs hèritiers des Romains, Entretiens 59, Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Schulz, V. (2016) “Rhetoric and Medicine – The Voice of the Orator in Two Ancient Discourses,” Rhetorica 34.2:141–62.Google Scholar
Schurgacz, K. (2004) Die Declamatio in L. Sergium Catilinam, Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Schütz, Ch. G. (1823) M.Tullii Ciceronis Opera quae supersunt omnia ac deperditorum fragmenta, 16.3, Leipzig: Gerhard Fleischer.Google Scholar
Schwerdtner, K. (2015) Plinius und seine Klassiker. Studien zur literarischen Zitation in den Pliniusbriefen, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2004) “Putting Cato the Censor’s Origines in Its Place,” ClAnt 23.2:323–57.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E.(2007) “Roman Oratory before Cicero: the Elder Cato and Gaius Gracchus,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007): 54–66.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E.(2011) Cato the Censor and the Beginnings of Latin Prose: From Poetic Translation to Elite Transcription, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Scourfield, D. (2007) (ed.) Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity. Inheritance, Authority, and Change, Wales: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Seider, R. (1975) Zur Paläographie des Giessener Ciceropapyrus, Giessen: Universitätsbibliothek Giessen.Google Scholar
Seider, R.(1979) “Beiträge zur Geschichte und Paläographie der antiken Cicerohandschriften,” B&W 13:101–49.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. (1976) “On the Date of Publication of Cicero’s Letters to Atticus,” SO 51:105–20.Google Scholar
Settle, J. N. (1962) The Publication of Cicero’s Orations, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–1970) (ed. and comm.) Cicero’s Letters to Atticus, 7 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R.(1991) Cicero Back from Exile: Six Speeches upon his Return, Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R.(2009) (ed.) Cicero Orations Philippics, revised by J. T. Ramsey and G. Manuwald, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966) The Letters of Pliny. A Historical and Social Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Shipley, F. W. (1924) Velleius Paterculus. Compendium of Roman History, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sidwell, K. (2002) (ed.) Pleiades Setting. Essays for Pat Cronin on his 65th Birthday, Cork: Department of Ancient Classics, University College Cork.Google Scholar
Sinclair, P. (1994) “Political Declensions in Latin Grammar and Oratory 55 BCE–CE 39,” Ramus 23.1–2:92–109.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I., Rosen, R. M. (2012) (eds.) Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Small, J. P. (2007) “Memory and the Roman Orator,” in Dominik and Hall (2007): 195–206.Google Scholar
Smith, , Chr.-Covino, R. (2011) (eds.) Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Sommer, R. (1926) “T. Pomponius Atticus und die Verbreitung von Ciceros Werken,” Hermes 61: 389–422.Google Scholar
Springer, C. P. E. (2017) Cicero in Heaven: the Roman Rhetor and Luther’s Reformation, Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Squillante Saccone, M. (1985) Le Interpretationes Vergilianae di Tiberio Claudio Donato, Naples: Società Editrice Napoletana.Google Scholar
Stangl, Th. (1884a) “Zur Textkritik der Scholiasten ciceronischer Reden,” RhM 39: 231–238; 428–445;566–80.Google Scholar
Stangl, Th(1884b) Der sogennante Gronovscholiast zu elf ciceronischen Reden, Leipzig: Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar
Stangl, Th(1905–1906) “Zur Textkritik des Gronovoschen Ciceroscholiasten,” Wochenschr. Klass. Philol. 1905:443–5
; 1906:360–66; 382–391; 471–77.Google Scholar
Stangl, Th(1909) Pseudoasconiana. Textgestaltung und Sprache der anonymen Scholien zu Cicero vier ersten Verrinen, Paderborn: F. Schöningh.Google Scholar
Stangl, Th(1910) “Bobiensia. Neue Beiträge zu den Bobiensier Cicero-Scholien 1.,” RhM 65: 88–120.Google Scholar
Starr, R. J. (1987) “The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World,” CQ 37:213–23.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W.(2003) “Cicero’s Brutus: the End of Oratory and the Beginning of History?,” BICS 46: 195–211.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W.(2005) Reading Cicero. Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome, London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W.(2012) “Cicero’s Autobiography: Narratives of Success in the Pre-Consular Orations,” Cahiers Glotz 23:251–66.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W.(2017a) “Speech without Limits: Defining Informality in Republican Oratory,” in Papaioannou, , Serafim, , and Vela, Da (2017): 75–88.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W.(2017b) “Defining Public Speech in the Roman Republic: Occasion, Audience and Purpose,” in Rosillo, and López, (2017): 17–33.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W., Blom, H. van der (2013) (eds.) Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stella, C., Valvo, A. (1996) (eds.) Studi in onore di A. Garzetti, Brescia: Ateneo di Brescia.Google Scholar
Stem, R. (2012), The Political Biographies of Cornelius Nepos, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. J. (2004) “Gellius and the Roman Antiquarian Tradition,” in Holford-Strevens, and Vardi, (2004):118–55.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T., Wilson, M. (2008) (eds.) Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric, and Ideology, Auckland, N.Z.: Polygraphia.Google Scholar
Stok, F. (2013) (ed.) Totus scientia plenus. Percorsi dell’esegesi virgiliana antica, Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Stramaglia, A. (2016) “The Hidden Teacher. Metarhetoric in Ps.-Quintilian’s Major Declamations,” in Dinter, , Guérin, , and Martinho, (2016): 25–48.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1975) Taxis und Taktik. Die advokatische Dispositionkunst in Ciceros Gerichtreden, Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Stroh, W.(2004) “De Domo Sua: Legal Problem and Structure,” in Powell, and Paterson, (2004):313–70.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. (2003) “Adulta Virgo: the Personification of Textual Eloquence in Cicero’s Brutus,” MD 50: 115–140.Google Scholar
Stucchi, S. (2013) “Notazioni sul concetto di elegantia in Cicerone,” Latomus 72.3:642–59.Google Scholar
Suringar, W. H. D. (1834) Historia critica scholiastarum Latinorum, Leiden: S. J. Luchtmans.Google Scholar
Sutton, E. W., Rackham, H. (1942) Cicero. On the Orator Books 1–2, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (2004) “Bilingualism and Biculturalism in Antonine Rome. Apuleius, Fronto, and Gellius,” in Holford, , Strevens, , and Vardi, (2004): 3–40.Google Scholar
Taifacos, I. G. (1983) “The Lexicographical Work of Caesellius Vindex and its Arrangement,” Hermes 111–4: 501–5
.Google Scholar
Takàcs, L. (2005) “Metamorphosis and Disruption. Comments on Seneca’s 114th Epistula Moralis,” AAH 45: 399–411.Google Scholar
Tamburi, F. (2013) Il ruolo del giurista nelle testimonianze della letteratura romana. I. Cicerone, Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Tandoi, V. (1992) “Medicina e politica (da Platone a Cic. De rep. IV 1 e all’Epistola ad Octavianum),” in Id., Scritti di filologia, Pisa, I:287–98Google Scholar
Taoka, Y. (2011) “Quintilian, Seneca, Imitatio: Re-Reading Institutio Oratoria 10. 1.125-131,” Arethusa 44:123–37.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J.(1999) The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. J. (1987) (ed.) The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. H. (1952) “Political Motives in Cicero’s Defense of Archias,” AJPh 73.1: 62–70.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1964) “Cornelius Nepos and the Publication of Cicero’s Letters to Atticus,” in Renard, and Schilling, (1964):678–81.Google Scholar
Taylor-Briggs, R. (2006) “Reading Between the Lines: the Textual History and Manuscript Transmission of Cicero’s Rhetorical Works,” in Cox, and Ward, (2006): 77–108.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, A. (2005) Lezione di buon governo per un dittatore. Cicerone, Pro Marcello: saggio di commento, Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Tellegen-Couperus, O. (2003) (ed.) Quintilian and the Law. The Art of Persuasion in Law and Politics, Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. L. (2007) “Cicero and the Art of Dispositio: the Structure of the Verrines,” LICS 6.02.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. L.(2011) “Combating the Odium of Self-Praise: the Divinatio in Q. Caecilium,” in Smith, and Covino, (2011):145–63.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. L.(2013) “Staging a Prosecution: Aspects of Performance in Cicero’s Verrines,” in Kremmydas, , Powell, , and Rubinstein, (2013): 41–71.Google Scholar
Testard, M. (1985) “Observations sur la rhétorique d’une harangue au peuple dans le Sermo contra Auxentium de Saint Ambroise,” REL 63: 123–209.Google Scholar
Thilo, G. (1881) Servi Grammatici qui feruntur in Vergilii Carmina Commentarii, Lipsiae (repr. Hildesheim 1961): Teubner.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (1988) Virgil Georgics, 2 vols., Cambridge, New York, Sydney: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Titchener, F. (2003) “Cornelius Nepos and the Biographical Tradition,” G & R 50.1: 85–99.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L., Livingstone, N. (1998) (eds.) Pedagogy and Power. Rhetorics of Classical Learning, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, B. W. M. (1978) A Legal and Historical Commentary to Cicero’s Oratio Pro C. Rabirio Perduellionis Reo, Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, R. Y., Purser, L. C. (1901–33) The Correspondence of M. Tullius Cicero, 7 vols, Dublin: Hodges, Foster, & Figgis.Google Scholar
Uhl, A. (1998) Servius als Sprachlehrer: zur Sprachrichtigkeit in der exegetischen Praxis des spätantiken Grammatikerunterrichts, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Urìa, J. (2012), “Iulius Romanus and Statilius Maximus (Char. Gramm. 252, 14–31): A Reappraisal,” MD 69.2:225–38.Google Scholar
Vaahtera, J., Vainio, R. (1997) (eds.) Utriusque linguae peritus. Studia in honorem Toivo Viljamaa, Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Vainio, R. (2000) “Use and Function of Grammatical Examples in Roman Grammarians,” Mnemosyne 53.1: 30–48.Google Scholar
Van der Wal, R. L. (2007) “What a Funny Consul We Have! Cicero’s Dealings with Cato Uticensis and Prominent Friends in Opposition,” in Booth, (2007): 183–205.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (1985) “The Masks of Rhetoric: Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino,” Rhetorica 3.1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A.(1993) Representations. Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A.(2009) “Cicero, Domestic Politics, and the First Action of the Verrines,” CA 28.1:101–37.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A.(2015) Livy’s Political Philosophy. Power and Personality in Early Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1994) “Aulus Gellius and the Cult of the Past,” ANRW II.34.2:1863–917.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1982) (ed.) Rhetoric Revalued, Binghamton, New York: Center for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Vitale, M. T. (1977) “Cesellio Vindice,” Studi e Ricerche Istituto Latino Genova, 1:221–58.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vössing, K. (2008) “Mit Manuskript in den Senat!: zu Cic. Planc. 74,” RhM 151, 1:143–50.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. (1990) Strukturen der Mündlichkeit in der römischen Literatur, Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Volk, K., Zetzel, J. E. G. (2015) “Laurel, Tongue and Glory (Cicero De Consulatu Suo Fr. 6 Soubiran),” CQ 65.1:204–23.Google Scholar
Vosskamp, W. (1993) (ed.) Klassik im Vergleich: Normativität und Historizität europäischer Klassiken, Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Vretska, K. (1976) C. Sallustius Crispus De Catilinae Coniuratione, 2 vols., Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag.Google Scholar
Walters, B. (2017) “The Circulation and Delivery of Cicero’s Post Reditum ad Populum,” TAPhA 147: 79–99.Google Scholar
Ward, J. O. (2015) “What the Middle Ages Missed of Cicero, and Why?,” in Altman, (2015):307–26.Google Scholar
Watts, N. H. (1979) Cicero Pro Archia Post Reditum ad Quirites Post Reditum in Senatu De Domo Sua De Haruspicum Responsis Pro Plancio, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (1997a) “Imagination and the Arousal of the Emotions in Greco-Roman Rhetoric,” in Braund, and Gill, (1997):112–27.Google Scholar
Weische, A. (1972) Ciceros Nachahmung der attischen Redner, Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag.Google Scholar
Weische, A.(1989) “Plinius d. J. und Cicero. Untersuchungen zur römischen Epistolographie in Republik und Kaiserzeit,” ANRW II 33/1 (1989):375–86.Google Scholar
Welch, K., Hillard, T. W. (2005) (eds.) Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. (2010) “The Grammarian C. Iulius Romanus and the Fabula Togata,” HSCP 105:255–85.Google Scholar
Whitbread, L. G. (1971) Fulgentius the Mythographer, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
White, D. C. (1980) “The Method of Composition and Sources of Nonius Marcellus,” Studi Noniani 8: 111–211.Google Scholar
White, P. (2009) “Bookshops in the Literary Culture of Rome,” in Johnson, and Parker, (2009):268–87.Google Scholar
Williams, Gareth D(2015) “Style and Form in Seneca’s Writings,” in Bartsch, and Schiesaro, (2015):135–49.Google Scholar
Williams, Gordon (1978) Change and Decline. Roman Literature in the Early Empire, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Megan Hale (2006) The Monk and the Book. Jerome and the Making of Christian Scholarship, Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2007) “Rhetoric and the Younger Seneca,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2007):425–38.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2007) “Rhetoric and the Younger Seneca,” in Dominik, and Hall, (2008) “Your Writings or Your Life: Cicero’s Philippics and Declamation,” in Stevenson, and Wilson, 2008:305–34.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M.(1974) Seneca the Elder. Declamations, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M.(1984) The Minor Declamations Ascribed to Quintilian, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M.(1989) “Cicero and the Middle Style,” in Diggle, , Hall, , and Jocelyn, (1989):125–31.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M.(2002) “Believing the pro Marcello,” in Miller, , Damon, , and Myers, (2002): 24–38.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P.(2002) (ed.) Classics in Progress. Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wisse, J.(1995) “Greek, Romans, and the Rise of Atticism,” in Abbenes, , Slings, , and Sluiter, (1995): 65–82.Google Scholar
Wisse, J.(2002a) “The Intellectual Background of Cicero’s Rhetorical Works,” in May (2002a):331–74.Google Scholar
Wisse, J.(2002b) “De Oratore: Rhetoric, Philosophy, and the Making of the Ideal Orator,” in May, (2002a): 375–400Google Scholar
Wisse, J.(2007) “The Riddle of the pro Milone; the Rhetoric of Rational Argument,” in Powell, (2007): 35–68.Google Scholar
Wisse, J.(2013) “The Bad Orator: Between Clumsy Delivery and Political Danger,” in Steel, and Blom, (2013):163–94.Google Scholar
Woerther, F. (2009) (ed.) Literary and Philosophical Rhetoric in the Greek, Roman, Syriac, and Arabic Worlds, Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wolverton, R. E. (1964) “The Encomium of Cicero in Pliny the Elder,” in Henderson, (1964): 1. 159–64.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1983) Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J.(2011) “Cicero and the Writing of History,” in Marincola, (2011):241–90.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J., Powell, J. G. F. (1992) (eds.) Author & Audience in Latin Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. (1983) Cicero’s Philippics and their Demosthenic Model, Chapel Hill, London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W.(2001) (ed.) The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome, Leiden, Boston, Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (2007) (ed.) A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, Malden, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wright, A. (2001) “The Death of Cicero. Forming a Tradition: The Contamination of History,” Historia 50.4:436–52.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (2010) “Traditional Political Culture and the People’s Role in the Roman Republic,” Historia 59.3: 282–302.Google Scholar
Yon, A. (1964) Cicéron. L’Orateur. Du meilleur genre d’orateurs, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. (1982) “Asinio Pollione: dall’attività politica alla riflessione storiografica,” ANRW II 30.2:1265–96.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1973) “Emendavi ad Tironem: Some Notes on Scholarship in the Second Century A.D.,” HSPh 77:225–43.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G.(1974) “Statilius Maximus and Ciceronian Studies in the Antonine Age,” BICS 21:107–23.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G.(1980) “The Subscriptions in the Manuscripts of Livy and Fronto and the Meaning of Emendatio,” CPh 75.1: 38–59.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G.(2005) Marginal Scholarship and Textual Deviance. The Commentum Cornuti and the Early Scholia on Persius, BICS Supplement 84, London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G.(2009) Marcus Tullius Cicero. Ten Speeches, Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. M., Putnam, M. (2008) (eds.) The Virgilian Tradition. The First Fifteen Hundred Years, New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar