Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 20
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Lamb, Carolyn Brown, Daniel G. and Clarke, Charles L. A. 2018. Evaluating Computational Creativity. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 1.

    Jacobs, Arthur M. and Kinder, Annette 2018. What makes a metaphor literary? Answers from two computational studies. Metaphor and Symbol, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 85.

    Kaakinen, Johanna K. Papp-Zipernovszky, Orsolya Werlen, Egon Castells, Nuria Bergamin, Per Baccino, Thierry and Jacobs, Arthur M. 2018. Learning to Read in a Digital World. Vol. 17, Issue. , p. 141.

    Jacobs, Arthur M. and Lüdtke, Jana 2017. Narrative Absorption. Vol. 27, Issue. , p. 69.

    van Krieken, Kobie Hoeken, Hans and Sanders, José 2017. Evoking and Measuring Identification with Narrative Characters – A Linguistic Cues Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, Issue. ,

    Ullrich, Susann Aryani, Arash Kraxenberger, Maria Jacobs, Arthur M. and Conrad, Markus 2017. On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, Issue. ,

    Jacobs, Arthur M. Schuster, Sarah Xue, Shuwei and Lüdtke, Jana 2017. What’s in the brain that ink may character ….. Scientific Study of Literature, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 4.

    Willems, Roel M. Frank, Stefan L. Nijhof, Annabel D. Hagoort, Peter and van den Bosch, Antal 2016. Prediction During Natural Language Comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 26, Issue. 6, p. 2506.

    Jacobs, Arthur M. Lüdtke, Jana Aryani, Arash Meyer-Sickendieck, Burkhard and Conrad, Markus 2016. Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 87.

    Di Dio, Cinzia Ardizzi, Martina Massaro, Davide Di Cesare, Giuseppe Gilli, Gabriella Marchetti, Antonella and Gallese, Vittorio 2016. Human, Nature, Dynamism: The Effects of Content and Movement Perception on Brain Activations during the Aesthetic Judgment of Representational Paintings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Kraxenberger, Maria and Menninghaus, Winfried 2016. Emotional effects of poetic phonology, word positioning and dominant stress peaks in poetry reading. Scientific Study of Literature, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 298.

    Jacobs, Arthur Hofmann, Markus J. and Kinder, Annette 2016. On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, Issue. ,

    Auracher, Jan and Bosch, Hildegard 2016. Showing with words. Scientific Study of Literature, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 208.

    Froehlich, Eva Liebig, Johanna Ziegler, Johannes C. Braun, Mario Lindenberger, Ulman Heekeren, Hauke R. and Jacobs, Arthur M. 2016. Drifting through Basic Subprocesses of Reading: A Hierarchical Diffusion Model Analysis of Age Effects on Visual Word Recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, Issue. ,

    Jacobs, Arthur M. 2016. The scientific study of literary experience. Scientific Study of Literature, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 139.

    Burke, Michael 2015. The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: pitfalls, parameters and prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Jacobs, Arthur M. Võ, Melissa L.-H. Briesemeister, Benny B. Conrad, Markus Hofmann, Markus J. Kuchinke, Lars Lüdtke, Jana and Braun, Mario 2015. 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6, Issue. ,

    Lüdtke, Jana and Jacobs, Arthur M. 2015. The emotion potential of simple sentences: additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives?. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6, Issue. ,

    Jacobs, Arthur M. 2015. Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Omigie, Diana 2015. Music and literature: are there shared empathy and predictive mechanisms underlying their affective impact?. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6, Issue. ,

  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: February 2015

7 - Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading

<target id='c04201-1303'></target>Abstract

A neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading is presented in the light of experimental data and ideas from neuroscience, rhetoric, poetics, and aesthetics which should facilitate a more realistic and natural approach towards a special use of language, i.e. the reading of fiction and poetry.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use
  • Online ISBN: 9781107323667
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *


Addis, D. R., Pan, L., Vu, M.-A., Laiser, N., & Schacter, D. L. (2009). Constructive episodic simulation of the future and the past: distinct subsystems of a core brain network mediate imagining and remembering. Neuropsychologia, 47(11), 2222–2238.
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012a). The power of emotional valence: from cognitive to affective processes in reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 01/2012; 6:192. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00192.
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012b). Fact versus fiction: how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 09/12.
Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 33, 245–266; discussion 266–313.
Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M., & Groeben, N. (2002). Aspekte des Leseerlebens. Skalenentwicklung [Aspects of the reading experience: scale development]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14, 149–154.
Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: a mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13(2), 101–135.
Aryani, A., Conrad, A. M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2013). Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: ‘Emophon’, a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 654. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00654.
Bartsch, A., Vorderer, P., Mangold, R., & Viehoff, R. (2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: toward a process model of meta-emotions and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11, 7–27.
Bestgen, Y. (1994). Can emotional valence in stories be determined from words?Cognition and Emotion, 8(1), 21–36. doi:10.1080/02699939408408926.
Bleich, D. (1978). Subjective Criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012a). Old proverbs in new skins: an FMRI study on defamiliarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 204.
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012b). Looking at the brains behind figurative language: a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2669–2683.
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2013). When we like what we know: a parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain and Language, 124, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003.
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Stimuli Instruction and Affective Ratings, Technical Report No. C-1. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: a structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473–486.
Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011a). Discrete Emotion Norms for Nouns: Berlin Affective Word List (DENN-BAWL). Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 441–448. doi:10.3758/s13428–011-0059-y
Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011b). Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23743. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023743.
Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Emotion word recognition: discrete information effects first, continuous later?Brain Research, 1564, 62–71.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.
Carminati, M. N., Stabler, J., Roberts, A. M., & Fischer, M. H., (2006). Readers’ responses to sub-genre and rhyme scheme in poetry. Poetics, 34, 204–218.
Citron, F. M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: a review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122, 211–226.
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: a theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264.
Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Syllables and bigrams: orthograpic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 461–479.
Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2010). Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 861–893.
Conrad, M., Recio, G., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). The time course of emotion effects in first and second language processing: across cultural ERP study with German–Spanish bilinguals. Frontiers in Language Sciences, December, Vol. 2, Article 351, 1–16.
Cornelissen, P. L., Hansen, P. C., Kringelbach, M. L., & Pugh, K. (2009). The Neural Basis of Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coulson, S. (2006). Constructing meaning. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 245–266.
Cupchik, G. C. (1994). Emotion in aesthetics: reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23, 177–188.
Dehaene, S. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: the “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In From Monkey Brain to Human Brain, eds. S. Dehaene, J. R. Duhamel, M. D. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 133–157.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.
Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008). The extended language network: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29(5), 581–593.
Fitch, W. T., Graevenitz, A. V., & Nicolas, E. (2009). Bio-aesthetics and the aesthetic trajectory: a dynamic cognitive and cultural perspective. In Neuroaesthetics, eds. M. Skov & O. Vartanian. Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 59–102.
Forgacs, B., Bohrn, I. C., Baudewig, J., Hofmann, M. J., Pleh, C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun‒noun compound words. NeuroImage, 63, 1432–1442.
Gerrig, R. (1998). Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 183–206.
Glicksohn, J., & Goodblatt, C. (1993). Metaphor and gestalt: interaction theory revisited. Poetics Today, 14, 83–97.
Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose Comprehension beyond The Word. New York: Springer.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
Hanauer, D. (1997). Poetic text processing. Journal of Literary Semantics, 26(3), 157–172.
Hofmann, M. J., Kuchinke, L., Tamm, S., Vo, M. L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: high arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 389–397.
Hofmann, M. J., Kuchinke, L., Biemann, C., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Remembering words in context as predicted by an Associative Read-Out Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 252, 1–11.
Hsu, C. T., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014a). Fiction feelings in Harry Potter: haemodynamic response in the mid-cingulate cortex correlates with immersive reading experience. NeuroReport, 10. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000272.
Hsu, C. T., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2014b). Can Harry Potter still put a spell on us in a second language? An fMRI study on reading emotion-laden literature in late bilinguals. Cortex (in press.) doi:10.1016/d.cortex.2014.og.002.
Iser, W. (1976). Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. Munich: Fink Verlag.
Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren, eds. R. Schrott & A. M. Jacobs. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, pp. 492–520.
Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Comment on Walter’s “Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: concepts, circuits, and genes.”Emotion Review, 4, 20–21.
Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1311–1334.
Jakobson, R. (1979). Hölderlin, Klee, Brecht: Zur Wortkunst dreier Gedichte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Ästhetische Erfahrung und literarische Hermeneutik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 641–661.
Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 512–518.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixation to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
Kagan, J. (2010). Once more into the breach. Emotion Review, 2, 91–99.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
Kneepkens, L. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Emotion and cognition in literary understanding. Poetics, 23, 125–138.
Koerner, K. (1984). Karl Bühler’s theory of language and Ferdinand de Saussure’s Cours, Lingua, 62(1–2), 3–24.
Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2005). Some like it bad: testing a model on perceiving and experiencing fictional characters. Media Psychology, 7, 107–144.
Kringelbach, M. L., Vuust, P., & Geake, J. (2008). The pleasure of reading. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33, 321–335.
Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., Grubich, C., , M. L.-H., Conrad, M., & Herrmann, M. (2005). Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 28(4), 1022–1032.
Kutas, M. (2006). One lesson learned: frame language processing – literal and figurative – as a human brain function. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 285–325.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective rating of measures and instruction manual, Technical Report No. A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
Limbach, J. (2006). Das schönste deutsche Wort. Freiburg: Verlag Herder.
Lüdtke, J., Meyer-Sickendieck, B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 363–377.
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173–192.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition and Emotion, 25(5), 818–833. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.515151.
Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2009). The role of the theory-of-mind cortical network in the comprehension of narratives. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 157–174.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1998). The form of reading: empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25, 327–341.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2002). A feeling for fiction: becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30, 221–241.
Miller, G. A. (1993). Wörter: Streifzüge durch die Psycholinguistik. Frankfurt: Zweitausendeins.
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.
Oatley, K. (1994). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23, 53–74.
Oatley, K., & Olson, D. (2010). Cues to the imagination in memoir, science, and fiction. Review of General Psychology, 14(1), 56–64.
Osgood, C. E. (1969). On the why’s and wherefore’s of E, P, and A. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 194–199.
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ponz, A., Montant, M., Liegeois-Chauvel, C., Silva, C., Braun, M., Jacobs, A. M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2013). Emotion processing in words: a test of the neural re-use hypothesis using surface and intracranial EEG. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 619–627.
Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage, 62, 816–847.
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(2), 676–682.
Raposo, A., Vicens, L., Clithero, J. A., Dobbins, I. G., & Huettel, S. A. (2010). Contributions of frontopolar cortex to judgments about self, others and relations. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(3), 260–269.
Schwarz-Friesel, M. (2007). Sprache und Emotion (Language and Emotion). Tübingen: Francke.
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poetry: How We Construct Our Realities). Munich: Hanser.
Smallwood, J., Brown, K., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Cooperation between the default mode network and the frontal-parietal network in the production of an internal train of thought. Brain Research, 1428, 60–70.
Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., & Zacks, J. M. (2007). Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychological Science, 18, 449–455.
Thoma, P., & Daum, I. (2006). Neurocognitive mechanisms of figurative language processing: evidence from clinical dysfunctions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 1182–1205.
Van Holt, N., & Groeben, N. (2005). Das Konzept des Foregrounding in der modernen Textverarbeitungspsychologie. Journal für Psychologie, 13, 311–332.
Van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J. (2006). Foregrounding. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. K. Brown. Oxford: Elsevier.
Vo, M. L.-H., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2006). Crossvalidating the Berlin Affective Word List (BAWL). Behavior Research Methods, 38, 606–609.
Vo, M. L.-H., Jacobs, A. M., Kuchinke, L., Hofmann, M., Conrad, M., Schacht, A., & Hutzler, F. (2008). The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology, 45(1),130–140.
Vo, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, L., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R). Behavior Research Methods, 41, 534–539.
Walter, H. (2012). Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: concepts, circuits, and genes. Emotion Review, 4, 9–17.
Whissell, C. (1994). A computer program for the objective analysis of style and emotional connotations of prose: Hemingway, Galsworthy, and Faulkner compared. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 815–824.
Whissell, C., Fournier, M., Pelland, R., Weir, D., & Makarec, K. (1986). A dictionary of affect in language: IV. Reliability, validity, and applications. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 875–888.
Willems, R. M., & Casasanto, D. (2011). Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 116. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00116.
Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the Squid:The Story and Science of the Reading Brain. New York: Icon Books.
Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 327–340.
Zillmann, D. (1991). Empathy effect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (eds.), Responding to the Screen: Reception and Reaction Processes (pp. 135–166). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of Literary Comprehension: A Cognitive Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933.