Allen, William T., and Kraakman, Reinier, 2003. Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organizations. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

American Bar Association, Committee on Corporate Laws, Section of Business Law, 2008. Model Business Corporation Act Annotated. 4th edn., Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2002. 4th edn., Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Amit, Raphael H. et al., 2010. “The Role of Institutional Development in the Prevalence and Value of Family Firms,” Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 1507823, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1507823.Google Scholar

Anderson, Ronald C. et al., 2003. “Founding Family Ownership and the Agency Cost of Debt,” Journal of Financial Economics 68: 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Ronald C., and Reeb, David M., 2003. “Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500,” Journal of Finance 58: 1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Sarah, Cavanagh, John, Collins, Chuck, Pizzigati, Sam, and Lapham, Mike, 2007. Executive Excess 2007: The Staggering Social Cost of US Business Leadership, Institute for Policy Studies, 14th Annual CEO Compensation Survey, available at www.ips-dc.org/reports/.Google Scholar

Armour, John, 2005. “Who Should Make Corporate Law? EU Legislation versus Regulatory Competition,” Current Legal Problems 58: 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armour, John, 2006. “Legal Capital: An Outdated Concept?,” European Business Organization Law Review 7: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armour, John, Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2009a. “What Is Corporate Law?,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 1.Google Scholar

Armour, John, Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2009b. “Agency Problems and Legal Strategies,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 35.Google Scholar

Armour, John, Hertig, Gerard, and Kanda, Hideki, 2009. “Transactions with Creditors,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 115.Google Scholar

Armour, John, and Skeel, David A., 2007. “Who Writes the Rules for Hostile Takeovers, and Why? The Peculiar Divergence of US and UK Takeover Regulation,” Georgetown Law Journal 95: 1727.Google Scholar

Armour, John, and Whincop, Michael J., 2007. “Proprietary Foundations of Corporate Law,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27: 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronoff, Craig E., and Ward, John L., 1995. “Family-Owned Businesses: A Thing of the Past or a Model of the Future?,” Family Business Review 8: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachmann, Gregor, Baums, Theodor, Habersack, Mathias, Henssler, Martin, Lutter, Marcus, Oetker, Hartmut, and Ulmer, Peter, 2009. “Entwurf einer Regelung zur Mitbestimmungsvereinbarung sowie zur Größe des mitbestimmten Aufsichtsrats,” ZIP 19: 885.Google Scholar

Baird, Douglas G., 2006. “Legal Approaches to Restricting Distributions to Shareholders: The Role of Fraudulent Transfer Law,” European Business Organization Law Review 7: 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, Douglas G., and Jackson, Thomas H., 1985. “Fraudulent Conveyance and Its Proper Domain,” Vanderbilt Law Review 38: 829.Google Scholar

Ballantine, Henry Winthrop, 1946. Ballantine on Corporations. Chicago: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Balotti, R. Franklin, and Finkelstein, Jesse A., 2008. Delaware Law of Corporation and Business Organizations. 3rd edn., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bank, Steven A., Cheffins, Brian R., and Wells, Harwell, 2006. “Executive Pay: What Worked?,” Journal of Corporation Law 42: 59.Google Scholar

Banks, R. C. l’Anson, 2002. Lindley and Banks on Partnership. 18th edn., London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Barca, Fabrizio, and Becht, Marco, 2001. The Control of Corporate Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barclay, Michael J., Holderness, Clifford G., and Sheehan, Dennis P., 2003. Dividends and Dominant Corporate Shareholders, AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=472201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barontini, Roberto, and Caprio, Lorenzo, 2006. “The Effect of Family Control on Firm Value and Performance: Evidence from Continental Europe,” European Financial Management 12: 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baums, Theodor, 1993. “Takeovers versus Institutions in Corporate Governance in Germany,” in Prentice, Daniel and Holland, Peter (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Corporate Governance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, p. 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baums, Theodor, 1996. “Personal Liabilities of Company Directors in German Law,” ICCLR 9: 318.Google Scholar

Baums, Theodor, 1999. “Germany,” in Baums, Theodor and Wymeersch, Eddy (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States. London: Wolters Kluwer, p. 109.Google Scholar

Baums, Theodor, 2002. Company Law Reform in Germany, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Institute for Banking Law, Working Paper No. 100, available at www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/42780841/arbeitspapiere.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baums, Theodor, 2005. “Zur Offenlegung von Vorstandsvergütungen,” ZHR 169: 299, also in Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Institute for Banking Law, Working Paper No. 122, available at www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/42780841/arbeitspapiere.Google Scholar

Baums, Theodor, 2007. European Company Law Beyond the Action Plan, European Corporate Governance Institute, Law Working Paper No. 81/2007.Google Scholar

Baums, Theodor, and Andersen, Paul Krüger, 2008. The European Model Company Law Act Project, ILF Working Paper No. 78, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1115737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baums, Theodor, and Drinhausen, Florian, 2008. “Weitere Reform des Rechts der Anfechtung von Hauptversammlungsbeschlüssen,” ZIP 145, also available as ILF Working Paper No. 70, www.ilf-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/ILF_WP_070.pdf.Google Scholar

Baums, Theodor, Keinath, Astrid, and Gajek, Daniel, 2007. “Fortschritte bei Klagen gegen Hauptversammlungsbeschlüsse? Eine empirische Studie,” ZIP 1629, also available as ILF Working Paper No. 65, www.ilf-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/ILF_WP_065.pdf.Google Scholar

Baums, Theodor, and von Randow, Philipp, 1995. “Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance: The German Experience and a New Approach,” in Aoki, Masahiko and Kim, Hyung-Ki (eds.), Corporate Governance in Transitional Economies: Insider Control and the Role of Banks. Washington DC: World Bank, p. 435.Google Scholar

Baums, Theodor, and Thoma, Georg F., 2015. Kommentar zum Wertpapiererwerbs und Übernahmegesetz. Cologne: RWS.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucien Arye, 1989. “Limiting Contractual Freedom in Corporate Law: The Desirable Constraints on Charter Amendments,” Harvard Law Review 102: 1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucien Arye, 1992. “Federalism and the Corporation: The Desirable Limits on State Competition in Corporate Law,” Harvard Law Review 105: 1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucien Arye, 2005. “The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power,” Harvard Law Review 118: 833.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Fried, Jesse M., 2003. “Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Fried, Jesse M., 2004. Pay without Performance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, Grinstein, Yaniv, and Peyer, Urs, 2006. Lucky Directors, Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 573, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=952239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Roe, Mark J., 1999. “A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance,” Stanford Law Review 52: 127, also published in Gordon, Jeffrey N. and Roe, Mark (eds.), 2004. Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becht, Marco, Bolton, Patrick, and Röell, Ailsa, 2011. “Why Bank Governance is Different,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 27: 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon, 2005a. “What Property Is,” Cornell Law Review 90: 3.Google Scholar

Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon, 2005b. “A Theory of Property,” Cornell Law Review, Virginia Law Review 90: 531, also available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=509862.Google Scholar

Bennedsen, Morten, and Fan, Joseph P.H., 2014. The Family Business Map: Assets and Roadblocks in Long-Term Planning. London: Palgrave MacMillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkowitz, Daniel, Pistor, Katharina, and Richard, Jean-Francois, 2003. “The Transplant Effect,” American Journal of Comparative Law 51: 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berle, Adolf A., and Means, Gardiner C., 1968. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. 8th edn., New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Bettis, J. Carr, Bizjak, John M., and Lemmon, Michael L., 1999. “Insider Trading in Derivative Securities: An Empirical Examination of the Use of Zero-Cost Collars and Equity Swaps by Corporate Insiders,” available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=167189 or DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.167189/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bezzenberger, Tilman, 2005. Das Kapital der Aktiengesellschaft. Cologne: Dr. Otto Schmidt.Google Scholar

Black’s Law Dictionary, 1999. Garner, Bryan A. (ed.), Black’s Law Dictionary. 7th edn., St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Blair, Margaret M., and Stout, Lynn A., 1999. “A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law,” Virginia Law Review 85: 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, Margaret M., and Stout, Lynn A., 2001. “Director Accountability and the Mediating Role of the Corporate Board,” Washington University Law Quarterly 79: 403.Google Scholar

Blumberg, Phillip I., Strasser, Kurt, and Georgakopoulos, Nicholas, 2004. Blumberg on Corporate Groups. 2nd edn., New York, Aspen Law & Business.Google Scholar

Blumberg, Phillip I., Strasser, Kurt, and Georgakopoulos, Nicholas, 2005. “The Transformation of Modern Corporation Law: The Law of Corporate Groups,” Connecticut Law Review 37: 605.Google Scholar

Bratton, William W., and McCahery, Joseph A., 2006. “The Equilibrium Content of Corporate Federalism,” Wake Forest Law Review 41: 619.Google Scholar

Brealey, Richard A., Myers, Stewart C., and Allen, Franklin, 2006. Principles of Corporate Finance. 8th edn., Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar

Booth, Richard A., 2000. “A Chronology of the Evolution of the MBCA,” Business Law 56: 63.Google Scholar

Booth, Richard A., 2002. Financing the Corporation. St. Paul, MN: Clark Boardman Callaghan/West Publishing.Google Scholar

Booth, Richard A., 2006. Give Me Equity or Give Me Death – The Role of Competition and Compensation in Building Silicon Valley, University of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2006–44, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=940022.Google Scholar

Butzke, Volker, 2011. Die Hauptversammlung der Aktiengesellschaft. 5th edn., Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar

Buxbaum, Richard M., 1987. “The Threatened Constitutionalization of the Internal Affairs Doctrine in Corporation Law,” California Law Review 75: 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabrelli, David, and Siems, Mathias, 2015. “Convergence, Legal Origins, and Transplants in Comparative Corporate Law: A Case-Based and Quantitative Analysis,” American Journal of Comparative Law 63: 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, 1998. Kapitalerhaltung im Konzern. Cologne: Carl HeymannsGoogle Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, 2007a. “Eigene Aktien und gegenseitige Beteiligungen,” in Bayer, Walter and Habersack, Mathias (eds.), Aktienrecht im Wandel. Vol. II, p. 763, also available as ILF Working Paper No. 50: www.ilf-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/ILF_WP_050.pdf.Google Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, 2007b. “Die Auswirkungen der Kapitaländerungsrichtlinie auf den Erwerb eigener Aktien,” Der Konzern 5: 385.Google Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, 2009a. “Das Zahlungsverbot nach § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 3 AktG – aktien- und konzern-rechtliche Aspekte des neuen Liquiditätsschutzes,” Der Konzern 7.Google Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, 2009b. “Kredite an Gesellschafter – zugleich Anmerkung zur MPS-Entscheidung des BGH,” Der Konzern 7: 67.Google Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, 2012. “Beratungsverträge mit Aufsichtsratsmitgliedern – zugleich Anmerkung zu BGH II ZR 48/11, Der Konzern 2012, 420 »Fresenius« –,” Der Konzern 10: 501.Google Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, 2015. “Business Judgment Rule und Rechtsfragen”, Der Konzern 13: 105.Google Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, and Kenadjian, Patrick, 2015: “Contingent Convertible Securities – From Theory to CRD IV,” in Busch, Danny and Ferrarini, Guido (eds.), European Banking Union. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, p. 217.Google Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, and Ostler, Nicolas, 2008. “Eigene Aktien und Wertpapierleihe,” Die AG 53: 221.Google Scholar

Cahn, Andreas, Simon, Stefan, and Theiselmann, Rüdiger, 2010. “Forderungen gegen die Gesellschaft als Sacheinlage,” Corporate Finance law 1: 238.Google Scholar

Calamari, John D., and Perillo, Joseph M., 1998. The Law of Contracts. 4th edn., St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Cao, Jerry, and Lerner, Josh, 2009. “The Performance of Reverse Leveraged Buyouts,” Journal of Financial Economics 91: 139.Google Scholar

Cary, William L., 1974. “Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections on Delaware,” Yale Law Journal 83: 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, Alfred D., 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheffins, Brian R., 2009. Corporate Ownership and Control: British Business Transformed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Robert Charles, 1986. Corporate Law. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Coffee, John C. Jr., 1983. “Rescuing the Private Attorney General: Why the Model of the Lawyer as Bounty Hunter Is Not Working,” Maryland Law Review 42: 215.Google Scholar

Coffee, John C., 1984. “Market Failure and the Economic Case for a Mandatory Disclosure System,” Virginia Law Review 70: 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffee, John C., 1999a. “The Direction of Corporate Law: The Scholar’s Perspective,” Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 25: 79.Google Scholar

Coffee, John C., 1999b. “The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications,” Northwestern University Law Review 93: 641.Google Scholar

Coffee, John C., 2001. “The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control,” Yale Law Journal 111: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffee, John C., 2002. “Racing Towards the Top?: The Impact of Cross-Listing and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance,” Columbia Law Review 102: 1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffee, John C., 2004a. “Gatekeeper Failure and Reform: The Challenge of Fashioning Relevant Reforms,” Boston University Law Review 84: 301.Google Scholar

Coffee, John C., 2004b. “What Caused Enron? A Capsule Social and Economic History of the 1990s,” Cornell Law Review 89: 269.Google Scholar

Coffee, John C., 2007. “Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 156: 229.Google Scholar

Committee on the Global Financial System of the Bank for International Settlements, 2008. Private Equity and Leveraged Finance Markets. CGFS Papers No. 30.Google Scholar

Cools, Sofie, 2005. “The Real Difference in Corporate Law Between the United States and Continental Europe: Distribution of Powers,” Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 30: 697.Google Scholar

Cox, James D., and Hazen, Thomas Lee, 2002. Cox and Hazen on Corporations. 2nd edn., New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul, and de Búrca, Gráinne, 2008. EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials. 4th edn., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Daily, Catherine M. and Dollinger, Marc J., 1992. “An Empirical Examination of Ownership Structure in Family and Professionally Managed Firms,” Family Business Review 5: 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Paul L., 2003. Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law. 7th edn., London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Davies, Paul L., and Worthington, Sarah, 2016. Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law. 10th edn., London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Davies, Paul, Enriques, Luca, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2009. “Beyond the Anatomy,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 305.Google Scholar

Davies, Paul, and Hopt, Klaus, 2009. “Control Transactions,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 225.Google Scholar

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), 2008. “Reform of Limited Partnership Law: Legislative Reform Order to repeal and replace the Limited Partnerships Act 1907, A Consultation Document.”Google Scholar

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), 2009. “The Legislative Reform (Limited Partnerships) Order 2009, Explanatory Document.”Google Scholar

Doidge, Craig, Karolyi, G. Andrew, and Stulz, René M., 2004. “Why Are Foreign Firms That Are Listed in the US Worth More?,” Journal of Financial Economics 71: 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donahue, Charles, 2006. “Comparative Law Before the Code Napoléon,” in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Donald, David C., 2005. “Shareholder Voice and Its Opponents,” Journal of Corporate Law Studies 5: 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donald, David C., 2008. “Approaching Comparative Company Law,” Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law 14: 83.Google Scholar

Donald, David C., 2011. “Heart of Darkness: The Problem at the Core of the US Proxy System and Its Solution,” Virginia Law & Business Review 6: 41.Google Scholar

Donald, David C., 2014. A Financial Centre for Two Empires: Hong Kong’s Corporate, Securities and Tax Laws in its Transition from Britain to China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donald, David C., 2015. “Bridging Finance without Fragmentation: A Comparative Look at Market Connectivity in the US, Europe and Asia,” European Business Organization Law Review 16: 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donald, David C., 2016. “Conceiving Corporate Governance for an Asian Environment,” University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review 12: 88.Google Scholar

Donald, David C., and Cheuk, Paul WH, 2017. “Hong Kong’s Public Enforcement Model of Investor Protection,” Asian Journal of Law and Society 4(2) (forthcoming, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drury, R. R., 1985. “Nullity of Companies in English Law,” Modern Law Review 48: 644CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterbrook, Frank H., and Fischel, Daniel R., 1985. “Limited Liability and the Corporation,” University of Chicago Law Review 52: 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterbrook, Frank H., and Fischel, Daniel R., 1996. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, Vanessa, 1999. EC Company Law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eidenmüller, Horst, Engert, Andreas, and Hornuf, Lars, 2009. “Incorporating under European Law: The Societas Europaea as a Vehicle for Legal Arbitrage,” European Business Organization Law Review 10: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, Melvin Aron, 1976. The Structure of the Corporation. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Melvin Aron, 1993. “The Divergence of Standards of Conduct and Standards of Review in Corporate Law,” Fordham Law Review 62: 437.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Melvin Aron, 2005. Corporations and Other Business Organizations: Cases and Materials. Concise 9th edn., New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Enriques, Luca, and Gatti, Matteo, 2007. “Is There a Uniform EU Securities Law After the Financial Services Action Plan?,” Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance 14: 43.Google Scholar

Enriques, Luca, Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2009a. “The Basic Governance Structure: The Interests of Shareholders as a Class,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 55.Google Scholar

Enriques, Luca, Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2009b. “The Basic Governance Structure: Minority Shareholders and Non-Shareholder Constituencies,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 89.Google Scholar

Enriques, Luca, Hertig, Gerard, and Kanda, Hideki, 2009. “Related-Party Transactions,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 153.Google Scholar

Enriques, Luca, and Macey, Jonathan R., 2001. “Creditors v. Capital Formation: The Case Against the European Legal Capital Rules,” Cornell Law Review 86: 1165.Google Scholar

Enriques, Luca, and Tröger, Tobias H., 2007. “Issuer Choice in Europe,” European Business Organization Law Review 8: 58.Google Scholar

EY, 2016, FTSE 350 Executive and Board Remuneration Report.Google Scholar

Fabbri, Francesca, and Marin, Dalia, 2016. “What Explains the Rise in Executive Pay in Germany? A Panel Data Analysis for 1977–2009”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 118(2), pp. 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Niall, 1998. The House of Rothschild: Money’s Prophets: 1798–1848. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall, 2008. The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Ferran, Eilís, 1999. Company Law and Corporate Finance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ferran, Eilís, 2004. Building an EU Securities Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferran, Eilís, 2007. Regulation of Private Equity-Backed Leveraged Buyout Activity in Europe, European Corporate Governance Institute, Law Working Paper No. 84/2007, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=989748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferran, Eilís, 2008. Principles of Corporate Finance Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ferran, Eilís, 2012. “New Regulation of Remuneration in the Financial Sector in the EU,” ECFR 9: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferran, Eilís, and Ho, Look Chan 2014. Principles of Corporate Finance Law. 2nd edn, New York: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisch, Jill E., 1993. “From Legitimacy to Logic: Reconstructing Proxy Regulation,” Vanderbilt Law Review 46: 1129.Google Scholar

Fischer, Robert, 1969. “Zur Methode revisionsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung auf dem Gebiet des Gesellschaftsrechts – dargestellt an Hand der Rechtsprechung zu den Stimmrechtsbindungsverträgen,” in Ballerstedt, Kurt (ed.), Festgabe für Otto Kunze. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, p. 95.Google Scholar

Fletcher, William Meade, 2005. Fletcher Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Beule, Dirk, 2013. “Grundzüge des Börsenwesens,” in Hellner, Thorwald and Steuer, Stephan (eds.), Bankrecht und Bankpraxis. Cologne: Bank Verlag, Vol. 4.Google Scholar

Forelle, Charles, 2007. “Executives Get Bonuses As Firms Reprice Options,” Wall Street Journal, January 20, 2007, p. A1.Google Scholar

Forelle, Charles, and Banler, James, 2006. “The Perfect Payday,” Wall Street Journal, March 18, 2006, p. A1.Google Scholar

Fox, Meritt B., 1998. “The Political Economy of Statutory Reach: US Disclosure Rules in a Globalizing Market for Securities,” Michigan Law Review 97: 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankel, Tamar, 1983. “Fiduciary Law,” California Law Review 71: 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frésard, Laurent, and Salva, Carolina, 2007. Does Cross-listing in the US Really Improve Corporate Governance? Evidence from the Value of Corporate Liquidity, EFA 2007 Ljubljana Meetings Paper, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=958506.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M., 2002. American Law in the 20th Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M., 2005. A History of American Law. 3rd edn., New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar

Friedman, Thomas, 2005. The World Is Flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Gall, Lothar, 2001. Bismarck: Der weiße Revolutionär. Berlin: Propyläen Verlag.Google Scholar

Geismann, Maria , 2015. “Grundsätze,” in Groeben, Hans von der, Schwarze, Jürgen, and Hatje, Armin (eds.), Europäisches Unionsrecht. 7th edn., Baden-Baden: Nomos, vol. 1, p. 574.Google Scholar

Gelter, Martin, 2005. “The Structure of Regulatory Competition in European Corporate Law,” Journal of Corporate Law Studies 5: 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gevurtz, Franklin A., 2000. Corporation Law. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Gevurtz, Franklin A., 2004. “The Historical and Political Origins of the Corporate Board of Directors,” Hofstra Law Review 33: 89.Google Scholar

Gilson, Ronald J., 1999. “The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete,” New York University Law Review 74: 575.Google Scholar

Gilson, Ronald J., 2001. “Globalizing Corporate Governance, Convergence of Form or Function,” American Journal of Comparative Law 49: 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, Ronald J., and Gordon, Jeffrey N., 2005. “Controlling Controlling Shareholders,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152: 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glenn, H. Patrick, 2010. On Common Laws. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goode, Roy, 2004. Commercial Law. 3rd edn., Toronto: Penguin.Google Scholar

Gordon, Jeffrey N., 1989. “The Mandatory Structure of Corporate Law,” Columbia Law Review 89: 1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sir Gore-Browne, Francis, 2004. Gore-Browne on Companies. 45th edn., Bristol: Jordans.Google Scholar

Groeben, Hans von der, Schwarze, Jürgen, and Hatje, Armin, 2015–. Europäisches Unionsrecht. 7th edn., Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Großkommentar zum Aktiengesetz. Hopt, Klaus J., and Wiedemann, Herbert (eds.), 1992–. 4th edn., Berlin: de Gruyter (cited as GroßkommAktG).Google Scholar

Großkommentar zum Aktiengesetz, Hopt, Klaus J., (ed.), 2015–. 5th edn., Berlin: de Gruyter (cited as GroßkommAktG).Google Scholar

Großkommentar zum GmbH-Gesetz. Ulmer, Peter, Habersack, Mathias, and Winter, Martin (eds.), 2005–. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (cited as GroßkommGmbHG).Google Scholar

Grundfest, Joseph, 2003. Legal Problems in Designing a Shareholder Access Rule, Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 448, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=471640.Google Scholar

Grundmann, Stefan, 2004. “The Structure of European Company Law: From Crisis to Boom,” European Business Organization Law Review 5: 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grundmann, Stefan, 2011. European Company Law: Organization, Finance, and Capital Markets. 2nd edn., Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar

Gruson, Michael, Jánszky, Andrew B., and Weld, Jonathan M., 2005. “Issuance and Listing of Securities by Foreign Banks and the US Securities Laws,” in Gruson, Michael and Reisner, Ralph (eds.), Regulation of Foreign Banks. 4th edn., Newark, NJ: LexisNexis, vol. 1, p. 353, Ch. 7.Google Scholar

Gunlicks, Arthur B., 2005. “German Federalism and Recent Reform Efforts,” German Law Journal 6: 1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttman, Egon, 2007. Modern Securities Transfers. 3rd edn., looseleaf volume, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Habbershon, Timothy G. et al., 2003. “A Unified Systems Perspective of Family Firm Performance,” Journal of Business Venturing 18: 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habbershon, Timothy G. and Willams, Mary L., 1999. “A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms,” Family Business Review 12: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habersack, Mathias, Mülbert, Peter O., and Schlitt, Michael, 2008. Unternehmensfinanzierung am Kapitalmarkt. 2nd edn., Munich: C. H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 1991. “Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts,” Yale Law Journal 100: 1879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2000. “The Essential Role of Organizational Law,” Yale Law Journal 110: 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2001. “The End of History for Corporate Law,” Georgetown Law Journal 89: 439.Google Scholar

Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2002. “Property, Contract and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights,” Journal of Legal Studies 31: 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2004. “What Is Corporate Law?,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 1.Google Scholar

Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2012. “Reflections on the End of History for Corporate Law,” in Rasheed, Abdul and Yoshikawa, Toru (eds.), Convergence of Corporate Governance: Promise and Prospects. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan, p. 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, Henry, Kraakman, Reinier, and Squire, Richard, 2006. “Law and the Rise of the Firm,” Harvard Law Review 119: 1333.Google Scholar

Henseler, Natascha, 2006. “Beiräte in Familienunternehmen: Eine kritische Betrachtung der Ausgestaltung der Beiratsarbeit.” Dissertation: Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar

Harris, Lawrence E., 2004. Unofficial Transcript of SEC Roundtable on Proposed Security Holder Director Nominations Rule, available at www.sec.gov/spotlight/dir-nominations/transcript03102004.txt.Google Scholar

Harris, Ron, 2004. The Formation of the East India Company as a Deal Between Entrepreneurs and Outside, Working Paper, Boalt Hall School of Law, UC Berkeley, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=567941 or DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.567941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Ron, 2005. The Formation of the East India Company as a Cooperation-Enhancing Institution, Working Paper Series, Buchmann Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=874406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Ron, 2008. The Institutional Dynamics of Early Modern Eurasian Trade: The Commenda and the Corporation, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1294095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hass, Jeffrey J., 1996. “Directorial Fiduciary Duties in a Tracking Stock Equity Structure: The Need for a Duty of Fairness,” Michigan Law Review 94: 2089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hazen, Thomas Lee, 2006. Treatise on the Law of Securities Regulation. 6th edn., St. Paul, MN: West. Publishing.Google Scholar

Henn, Günter, Frodermann, Jürgen, and Jannott, Dirk, 2009. Handbuch des Aktienrechts. 8th edn., Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O., 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Holderness, Clifford G., 2009. “The Myth of Diffuse Ownership in the United States,” Review of Financial Studies 22: 1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hommelhoff, P., 1987. “Machtbalancen im Aktienrecht,” in Schubert, Werner, and Hommelhoff, Peter (eds.), Die Aktienrechtsreform am Ende der Weimarer Republik. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, p. 71.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), 2015. Hong Kong Yearbook 2015. Hong Kong Information Services Department.Google Scholar

Honoré, A. M., 1961. “Ownership,” in Guest, Anthony Gordon (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. London: Oxford University Press, p. 107.Google Scholar

Hopt, Klaus, 1997. “The German Two-Tier Board (Aufsichtsrat): A German View on Corporate Governance,” in Hopt, Klaus and Wymeersch, Eddy (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopt, Klaus, 2006. “Comparative Company Law,” in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 1161.Google Scholar

Horn, Norbert, 1995. Heymann, Handelsgesetzbuch, Kommentar. 2nd edn., Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hu, Henry T. C., and Black, Bernard, 2006. “Empty Voting and Hidden Ownership: Taxonomy, Implications and Reform,” Business Lawyer 61: 1011.Google Scholar

Hu, Henry T. C., and Black, Bernard, 2008. “Equity and Debt Decoupling and Empty Voting II: Importance and Extensions,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 156: 625.Google Scholar

Hueck, Alfred, and Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm, 1986. Recht der Wertpapiere. 12th edn., Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Hüffer, Uwe, and Koch, Jens, 2018. Aktiengesetz. 13th edn., Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

International Family Enterprise Research Academy, 2003. “Family Businesses Dominate,” Family Business Review 16: 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Monetary Fund, 2009. Lessons of the Financial Crisis for Future Regulation of Financial Institutions and Markets and for Liquidity Management, February 4, 2009.Google Scholar

Jackson, Howell, and Pan, Eric J., 2008. “Regulatory Competition in International Securities Markets: Evidence from Europe – Part II,” Virginia Law & Business Review 3: 207.Google Scholar

Jackson, Howell E., and Roe, Mark J., 2009. “Public and Private Enforcement of Securities Laws: Resource-based Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics 93: 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jennings, Philip, 2007. Speech on behalf of UNI Global Union at the Davos World Economic Forum, January 27, 2007, available at www.uni-americas.org/es/node/29245.Google Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H., 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305, also reprinted in Jensen, Michael C. (ed.), 2000. A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., Murphy, Kevin J., and Wruck, Eric G., 2004. Remuneration: Where We’ve Been, How We Got to Here, What Are the Problems, and How to Fix Them, European Corporate Governance Institute, Finance Working Paper No. 44/2004, also in Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 04–28, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=561305 or DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.561305/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Simon, and Kwak, James, 2010. 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Judt, Tony, 2005. Postwar. London: Random House.Google Scholar

Kahan, Marcel, and Rock, Edward, 2004. Our Corporate Federalism and the Shape of Corporate Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Institute for Law and Economics, Research Paper No. 04–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karmel, Roberta S., 2003. “Reconciling Federal and State Interests in Securities Regulation in the United States and Europe,” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 28: 495.Google Scholar

Karmel, Roberta S., 2004. “Should a Duty to the Corporation Be Imposed on Institutional Shareholders?,” Business Lawyer 60: 1.Google Scholar

Karolyi, G. Andrew, 1998. “Why Do Companies List Shares Abroad? A Survey of the Evidence and Its Managerial Implications,” Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 7: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, John. 2015. Other People's Money: Masters of the Universe or Servants of the People? (Profile Books. Kindle Edition)Google Scholar

Kim Kulick, Sandie and Kesner, Michael S., 2018. “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” in Goodman, Amy, Olson, John and Fontenot, Lisa (eds.), A Practical Guide to SEC Proxy and Compensation Rules. 5th edn., New York: Wolters Kluwer, p. 8–1.Google Scholar

Kirchner, Christian, Painter, Richard, and Kaal, Wulf, 2004. “Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art: Unbundling Delaware’s Product for Europe,” European Company and Financial Law 2: 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Sabine B., 2004. Familienunternehmen: Theoretische und empirische Grundlagen. 2nd edn., Wiesbaden: Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Stefan, 2004. Die Rechtsstellung auswärtiger Gesellschaften im deutschen und US-amerikanischen Recht. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Klein, William A., and Coffee, John C. Jr., 2007. Business Organization and Finance: Legal and Economic Principles. 9th edn., Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Kölner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz. 2004–. Zöllner, Wolfgang, and Noack, Ulrich (eds.). 3rd edn., Cologne: Carl Heymanns (cited as KölnKommAktG).Google Scholar

Kölner Kommentar zum WpHG, 2014–. Hirte, Heribert, and Möllers, Thomas M. J. (eds.). 2nd edn., Cologne: Carl Heymanns (cited as KölnKommWpHG).Google Scholar

Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), 2017. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, Rüdiger, 2015. Note, ZIP 36: 636.Google Scholar

Kübler, Friedrich, and Assmann, Heinz-Dieter, 2006. Gesellschaftsrecht. 6th edn., Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar

Kümpel, Siegfried, 2005. “Kapitalmarktrecht – Eine Einführung,” in Kümpel, Siegfried, Hammen, Horst and Ekkenga, Jens (eds.), Kapitalmarktrecht Handbuch für die Praxis. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar

La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-De-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei, 2006. “What Works in Securities Laws?,” Journal of Finance 61: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langenbucher, Katja, 2015. Aktien- und Kapitalmarktrecht. 3rd edn., Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Langevoort, Donald C., 1987. “The Supreme Court and the Politics of Corporate Takeovers: A Comment on CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America,” Harvard Law Review 101: 96.Google Scholar

Langevoort, Donald C., 2001. “Seeking Sunlight in Santa Fe’s Shadow: The SEC’s Pursuit of Managerial Accountability,” Washington University Law Quarterly 79: 449.Google Scholar

Lipton, Martin, and Rosenblum, Steven A., 2003. “Election Contests in the Company’s Proxy: An Idea Whose Time Has Not Come,” Business Lawyer 59: 67.Google Scholar

Loss, Louis, Seligman, Joel, and Paredes, Troy, 2004. Fundamentals of Securities Regulation. 5th edn., New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Lower, Michael, 2000. “Good Faith and the Partly Owned Subsidiary,” Journal of Business Law 232.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, 1968. Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, 2004. Law as a Social System. Zeigert, K. A. (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lumpkin, G.T. et al., 2010. “Long-Term Orientation: Implications for the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Family Businesses,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macey, Jonathan R., 2002. Macey on Corporation Law. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Macey, Jonathan R., and Miller, Geoffrey P., 1987. “Toward an Interest-Group Theory of Delaware Corporate Law,” Texas Law Review 65: 469.Google Scholar

Macey, Jonathan R., and Miller, Geoffrey P., 1991. “The Plaintiffs’ Attorney’s Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation: Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform,” University of Chicago Law Review 58: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, Paul G., 2000. “Contract or Concession? An Essay on the History of Corporate Law,” Georgia Law Review 34: 873.Google Scholar

Manne, Henry, 1966. Insider Trading and the Stock Markets. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Manne, Henry, 2007. “The ‘Corporate Democracy’ Oxymoron” Wall Street Journal, January 2, 2007, p. A23.Google Scholar

Manning, Bayless, 1958. “Book Review of J. A. Livingstone, The American Stockholder,” Yale Law Journal 67: 1475.Google Scholar

Manning, Bayless, 1962. “The Shareholder’s Appraisal Remedy: An Essay for Frank Coker,” Yale Law Journal 72: 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manning, Bayless, 1981. A Concise Textbook on Legal Capital. 2nd edn., Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Manning, Bayless, 1990. Legal Capital. 3rd edn., St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Martin, Jill E., 2008. Hanbury and Martin: Modern Equity. 18th edn., London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

McConnell, Michael W., 1987. “Federalism: Evaluating the Founders’ Design,” University of Chicago Law Review 54: 1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W., 2000. “The Landscape of Constitutional Property,” Virginia Law Review 86: 885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merryman, John Henry, and Pérez-Perdomo, R., 2007. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mertens, Hans-Joachim, 1994. “Satzungs- und Organisationsautonomie im Aktien- und Konzernrecht,” ZGR 426.Google Scholar

Michaels, Ralf, 2006. “The Functional Method of Comparative Law,” in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 339.Google Scholar

Milhaupt, Curtis J., 1998. “Property Rights in Firms,” Virginia Law Review 84: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Danny, et al., 2007. “Are Family Firms Really Superior Performers?,” Journal of Corporate Finance 13: 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mischel, Lawrence and Schieder, Jessica, 2016. “Stock market headwinds meant less generous year for some CEOs: CEO pay remains up 46.5% since 2009,” Economic Policy Institute, available at www.epi.org/publication/ceo-and-worker-pay-in-2015/.Google Scholar

Modigliani, Franco, and Miller, Merton H., 1958. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment,” American Economic Review 48: 461.Google Scholar

Monks, Robert A. G., and Minow, Nell, 2004. Corporate Governance. 3rd edn., Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Morse, Geoffrey (ed.), 2003. Palmer’s Company Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Morse, Geoffrey 2006. Partnership Law. 6th edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mossoff, Adam, 2003. “What Is Property, Putting the Pieces Back Together,” Arizona Law Review 45: 371.Google Scholar

Mülbert, Peter O., 2006. “A Synthetic View of Different Concepts of Creditor Protection, or: A High-Level Framework for Corporate Creditor Protection,” European Business Organization Law Review 7: 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mülbert, Peter O., and Birke, Max 2002: “Legal Capital – Is There a Case against the European Legal Capital Rules?,” European Business Organization Law Review 3: 695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 2000–. Kropff, Bruno, and Semler, Johannes (eds.). 2nd edn., Munich: C. H. Beck (cited as MünchKommAktG).Google Scholar

Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 2014–. Habersack, Mathias (ed.). 4th edn., Munich: C. H. Beck (cited as MünchKommAktG).Google Scholar

Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, 2015–. Säcker, Franz Jürgen, Rixecker, Roland, Oetker, Hartmut, and Limperger, Jutta (eds.). 7th edn., Munich: C.H. Beck (cited as MünchKommBGB).Google Scholar

Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch, 2010–. Schmidt, Karsten (ed.). 3rd edn., Munich: C. H. Beck (cited as MünchKommHGB).Google Scholar

Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch, 2016–. Schmidt, Karsten (ed.). 4th edn., Munich: C.H. Beck (cited as MünchKommHGB).Google Scholar

Myers, Stewart C., 1984. “The Capital Structure Puzzle,” Journal of Finance 39: 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myners, Paul, 2004. Review of the Impediments to Voting UK Shares, available at www.theinvestmentassociation.org/assets/components/ima_filesecurity/secure.php?f=press/2007/20070730-01.pdf.Google Scholar

Noack, U., 2003. “Das neue Recht der Gegenanträge nach § 126 AktG,” Betriebs-Berater 1393.Google Scholar

Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, 2009. The Takeover Code. 9th edn., available at www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code/.Google Scholar

Pennington, Robert R., 2001. Pennington’s Company Law. 8th edn., London: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Pistor, Katharina, 2005. “Legal Ground Rules in Coordinated and Liberal Market Economies,” European Corporate Governance Inst., Law Working Paper No. 30, 2005, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=695763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pistor, Katharina, 2006. “Legal Ground Rules in Coordinated and Liberal Market Economies,” in Hopt, Klaus, Wymeersch, Eddy, Kanda, Hideki and Baum, Harald (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context: Corporations, States, and Markets in Europe, Japan, and the US. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 249, also as European Corporate Governance Institute, Law Working Paper No. 30/2005.Google Scholar

Poser, Norman S., 2003. Broker-Dealer Law and Regulation. 3rd edn., New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Pound, John, 1993. “The Rise of the Political Model of Corporate Governance and Corporate Control,” New York University Law Review 68: 1003.Google Scholar

Quinn, Linda C., and Jarmel, Ottilie L., 2006. “The Shareholder Proposal Process,” in Goodman, Amy and Olson, John (eds.), A Practical Guide to SEC Proxy and Compensation Rules. 3rd edn., New York: Aspen, p. 15–1.Google Scholar

Raiser, Thomas, Veil, Rüdiger, and Jacobs, Matthias, 2015. Mitbestimmungsgesetz und Drittelbeteiligungsgesetz. 6th edn., Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, Stanley Foster, Lajoux, Alexandra Reed, and Nesvold, H. Peter, 2007. The Art of M&A: A Merger Acquisition Buyout Guide. 4th edn., New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Reese, Willis L. M., and Kaufman, Edmund M., 1958. “The Law Governing Corporate Affairs: Choice of Law and the Impact of Full Faith and Credit,” Columbia Law Review 58: 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reimann, Mathias, and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), 2006. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisberg, Arad, 2007. Derivative Actions and Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ribstein, Larry E., 2003. “Making Sense of Entity Rationalization,” Business Lawyer 58: 1023.Google Scholar

Rock, Edward, Davies, Paul, Kanda, Hideki, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2009. “Fundamental Changes,” in Kraakman, Reinier, Davies, Paul, Luca, Enriques, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg and Rock, Edward with Cools, Sofie and Goto, Gen (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 183.Google Scholar

Roe, Mark J., 1996a. Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance. 2nd edn., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Roe, Mark J., 1996b. “Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics,” Harvard Law Review 109: 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roe, Mark J., 2003. “Delaware’s Competition,” Harvard Law Review 117: 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roe, Mark J., 2006. “Legal Origins, Politics, and Modern Stock Markets,” Harvard Law Review 120: 460.Google Scholar

Romano, Roberta, 1993. The Genius of American Corporate Law. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar

Romano, Roberta, 2002. The Advantage of Competitive Federalism for Securities Regulation, Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar

Romano, Roberta, 2004. “The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance,” Yale Law Journal 114: 1521.Google Scholar

Romano, Roberta, 2005. The States as a Laboratory: Legal Innovation and State Competition for Corporate Charters, Yale University International Center for Finance (ICF) Working Paper No. 05–08, also as European Corporate Governance Institute, Law Working Paper No. 34/2005, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=706522.Google Scholar

Romano, Roberta, 2006. “The States as a Laboratory: Legal Innovation and State Competition for Corporate Charters,” Yale Journal on Regulation 23: 209.Google Scholar

Roth, Wulf-Henning, 2003. “From Centros to Ueberseering: Free Movement of Companies, Private International Law, and Community Law,” ICLQ 52: 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santella, Paolo, and Turrini, Riccardo, 2008. “Capital Maintenance in the EU: Is the Second Company Law Directive Really That Restrictive?,” European Business Organization Law Review 9: 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schanz, Kay-Michael, 2002. Börseneinführung. 2nd edn., Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Karsten, 2002. Gesellschaftsrecht. 4th edn., Cologne: Carl Heymanns.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Karsten, and Lutter, Marcus, 2015. Aktiengesetz, Kommentar. 3rd edn., Cologne: Dr. Otto Schmidt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Reinhard H., and Spindler, Gerald, 2004. “Path Dependence and Complementarity in Corporate Governance,” in Gordon, Jeffrey N. and Roe, Mark (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwalbach, Joachim, 2009. Vergütungsstudie 2009 Vorstandsvergütung und Personalkosten DAX30-Unternehmen 1987–2008, available at http://lehre.wiwi.huberlin.de/Professuren/bwl/management/.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Robert A., and Francioni, Reto, 2004. Equity Markets in Action. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Scoles, Eugene F., Hay, Peter, Borchers, Patrick J., and Symeonides, Symeon C., 2000. Conflicts of Laws. 3rd edn., St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Seifert, Bruce, and Gonenc, Halit, 2008. “The International Evidence on the Pecking Order Hypothesis,” Journal of Multinational Financial Management 18: 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seligman, Joel, 1986. “Equal Protection in Shareholder Voting Rights: The One Common Share, One Vote Controversy,” George Washington Law Review 54: 687.Google Scholar

Seligman, Joel, 1993. "The New Corporate Law," Brooklyn Law Review 59: 1.Google Scholar

Seligman, Joel, 2003. The Transformation of Wall Street. 3rd edn., New York: AspenGoogle Scholar

Seligman, Joel, 2005. “A Modest Revolution in Corporate Governance,” Notre Dame Law Review 80: 1159.Google Scholar

Shivdasani, Anil, and Wang, Yihui, 2009. “Did Structured Credit Fuel the LBO Boom?” (April 24, 2009). AFA 2010 Atlanta Meetings Paper, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1285058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shue, Kelly, and Townsend, Richard R., 2017. “Growth through Rigidity: An Explanation for the Rise in CEO Pay,” Journal of Financial Economics 123 (2017) 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siems, Mathias M., 2008. Convergence in Shareholder Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simmons, Omari Scott, 2009. “Taking the Blue Pill: The Imponderable Impact of Executive Compensation Reform,” Southern Methodist University Law Review 62: 299.Google Scholar

Skeel, David A., and Krause-Vilmar, Georg, 2006. “Recharacterization and the Nonhindrance of Creditors,” European Business Organization Law Review 7: 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slater, John Jr., 1984. “Publicly Traded Limited Partnership: An Emerging Financial Alternative to the Public Corporation,” Business Lawyer 39: 709.Google Scholar

Smith, D. Gordon, 2002. “The Critical Resource Theory of Fiduciary Duty,” Vanderbilt Law Review 55: 1399.Google Scholar

Smithers, Andrew, 2013. The Road to Recovery: How and Why Economic Policy Must Change. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spindler, Gerald, and Stilz, Eberhard, 2015. Aktiengesetz, Kommentar. 3rd edn., Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Staub, H., 2009. Handelsgesetzbuch, Großkommentar, Canaris, , Habersack, , and Schäfer, (eds.). 5th edn., Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Stecklow, Steve, 2008. “On the Lam and Living Large: Comverse Ex-CEO Parties in Namibia,” Wall Street Journal, June 12, 2008, p. A1.Google Scholar

Stout, Lynn A., 2002. “Lecture and Commentary on the Social Responsibility of Corporate Entities: Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy,” Southern California Law Review 75: 1189.Google Scholar

Stout, Lynn A., 2003. “Symposium on Entity Rationalization,” Business Lawyer 58: Nos. 3 and 4.Google Scholar

Task Force on Shareholder Proposals of the Committee on Federal Regulation of Securities, Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association, 2003. “Report on Proposed Changes in Proxy Rules and Regulations Regarding Procedures for the Election of Corporate Directors,” Business Lawyer 59: 109.Google Scholar

Thel, Steve, 1994. “$850,000 in Six Minutes – The Mechanics of Securities Manipulation,” Cornell Law Review 79: 219.Google Scholar

Thomas, Randall S., and Dixon, Catherine T., 1998. Aranow and Einhorn on Proxy Contests for Corporate Control. 3rd edn., New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Thompson, Robert B., 1993. “The Shareholder’s Cause of Action for Oppression,” Business Lawyer 48: 699.Google Scholar

Thompson, Robert B., 2003. “Collaborative Corporate Governance: Listing Standards, State Law and Federal Regulation,” Wake Forest Law Review 38: 961.Google Scholar

Thompson, Robert B., 2004. “Delaware, the Feds, and the Stock Exchange: Challenges to the First State as First in Corporate Law,” Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 29: 779.Google Scholar

Thompson, Robert B., 2005. “The Changing Face of Parent and Subsidiary Corporation: Entity vs. Enterprise Liability,” Connecticut Law Review 37: 619.Google Scholar

Thompson, Robert B., and Thomas, Randall S., 2004. “The New Look of Shareholder Litigation: Acquisition-Oriented Class Actions,” Vanderbilt Law Review 57: 133.Google Scholar

Timmermans, Christiaan, 2003. “Harmonization in the Future Company Law in Europe,” in Hopt, Klaus and Wymeersch, Eddy (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tröger, Tobias H., 2005. “Choice of Jurisdiction in European Corporate Law – Perspectives of European Corporate Governance,” European Business Organization Law Review 6: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark V., 2000. “Globalization and Federalism in a Post-Printz World,” Tulsa Law Journal 36: 11.Google Scholar

Vahtera, Veikko 2008. “Capital Structure and Corporate Governance,” in Andersen, Paul Krüger and Sørensen, Karsten Engsig (eds.), Company Law and Finance. 1st edn., Copenhagen: Thomson, p. 63.Google Scholar

Vaines, J. Crossley, 1962. Personal Property. 3rd edn., London: ButterworthsGoogle Scholar

Villalonga, Belen, and Amit, Raphael, 2006. “How do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value?,” Journal of Financial Economics 80: 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, Jiangyu, 2014. Company law in China: Regulation of Business Organizations in a Socialist Market Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, Alan, 1974. Legal transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Watson, Alan, 2001. The Evolution of Western Private Law. Baltimore, OH: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Hansjörg, 2002. Kreditsicherheiten. Recht der Sicherungsgeschäfte. 7th edn., Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Wiedemann, Herbert, 1980. Gesellschaftsrecht. Band I – Grundlagen. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E., 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E., 1991. “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolf, Manfred, 2001. “Der Ausschluß vom Neuen Markt und die Aufnahme von Ausschlußgründen in das Regelwerk Neuer Markt,” WM 38: 1785.Google Scholar

Wood, Philip R., 1995. Comparative Financial Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Wood, Philip R., 2007. Regulation of International Finance. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Wymeersch, Eddy, 2006. Reforming the Second Company Law Directive, available from SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=957981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zellweger, Thomas Markus et al., 2012. “From Longevity of Firms to Transgenerational Entrepreneurship of Families: Introducing Family Entrepreneurial Orientation,” Family Business Review 25: 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, Reinhard, 2006. “Comparative Law and the Europeanization of Private Law,” in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zweigert, Konrad, and Kötz, Hein, 1996. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung. 3rd edn., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Zweigert, Konrad, and Kötz, Hein, 1998. An Introduction to Comparative Law (trans. Weir, T.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar