Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T15:46:50.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - National Security Surveillance

from Part Three - Policy Challenges: Contours of Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David P. Auerswald
Affiliation:
National War College
Colton C. Campbell
Affiliation:
National War College
Get access

Summary

Presidential authority to engage in national security surveillance has been shaped by executive initiatives, congressional statutes, and judicial decisions. After the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the Bush administration decided to authorize warrantless national security surveillance in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The operation remained secret until disclosed by the New York Times in December 2005. Pressured by the administration, Congress passed legislation in 2008 to give retroactive immunity to the telecoms that assisted with the surveillance. In so doing, Congress gave a green light to executive agencies and private companies that act against the law. In defense, administration officials claimed that the president has certain “inherent” powers under Article II of the Constitution that may not be limited by congressional statutes or judicial rulings. Efforts to challenge the Bush surveillance policy in court have been difficult because federal judges are reluctant to dispute national security claims by the executive branch, especially when private parties seek access to information the government regards as “state secrets.”

Some Early Precedents

On May 21, 1940, on the eve of World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt sent a confidential memo to Attorney General Robert H. Jackson, authorizing and directing him to obtain information “by listening devices” to monitor the conversations or other communications “of persons suspected of subversive activities against the Government of the United States, including suspected spies.” Roosevelt told Jackson to keep these investigations “to a minimum and to limit them in so far as possible to aliens” (Fisher and Harriger 2011, 740). No specific law in 1940 prohibited Roosevelt from taking this initiative.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×