Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:10:14.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Kevin R. Crooks
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
M. Sanjayan
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Virginia
Get access

Summary

For the first time in Earth's long history, one species – Homo sapiens – completely dominates the globe. Over 6 billion people now inhabit the planet, and that number is growing at an alarming rate. In sharp contrast to previous eras, we drive, fly, telephone, and e-communicate from even the most remote regions of Earth. With the aid of technology, no significant segment of our population is truly isolated. Today, it is possible to make a cell phone call from the Serengeti, or live “off the grid” from in-holdings within the midst of national forests or wilderness areas in North America. With the notable exception of weedy species that thrive amidst the disturbances we create, predictably, the more “connected” we become, non-human life with which we share this planet becomes increasingly disconnected.

The vast reach of humans and the resulting parcelization of natural landscapes are of major concern to conservation scientists. Indeed, horror stories about habitat fragmentation appear in every book about conservation biology, make appearances in high-school textbooks, and are featured regularly in our leading newspapers and magazines. And conservation biologists are not alone in their concern about massive habitat destruction and fragmentation. Members of the public also have been inspired to promote special efforts for connecting landscapes in our increasingly dissected world.

While the vision of connected landscapes may be compelling, the practice of preventing fragmentation and conserving connectivity is not a simple matter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beier, P., and Noss, R. F.. 1998. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?Conservation Biology 12:1241–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. F. 1999. Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
Dayton, P. K. 1998. Reversal of the burden of proof in fisheries management. Science 279:821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A., K. Ralls, M. Foster, et al. 1999. Corridors: reconnecting fragmented landscapes. Pp. 129–170 in Soulé, M. E. and Terborgh, J. (eds.) Continental Conservation: Scientific Foundations of Regional Reserve Networks. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, M. E., and M. E. Soulé. 1996. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Pp. 19–34 in Soulé, M. E., (ed.) Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Gurd, D. B., Nudds, T. D., and Rivard, D. H.. 2001. Conservation of mammals in Eastern North American wildlife reserves: how small is too small?Conservation Biology 15:1355–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddad, N. 2000. Corridor length and patch colonization by a butterfly, Junonia coenia. Conservation Biology 14:738–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, M. S., Lurz, P. W. W., Shirley, M. D. F., et al. 2001. Impact of landscape management on the genetic structure of red squirrel populations. Science 293:2246–2248CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanksi, I., and Gilpin, M. E.. 1997. Metapopulation Biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. 1992. The role of corridors in conservation: solution or bandwagon?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7:389–392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, W. E. 1991. Landscape Linkages and Biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
McEuen, A. 1993. The wildlife corridor controversy: a review. Endangered Species Update 10:1–12Google Scholar
Merriam, G. 1984. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. Pp. 5–15 in Brandt, J. and Agger, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Seminar on Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University.Google Scholar
Moilanen, A., and Hanski, I.. 2001. On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Oikos 95:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, W. D. 1987. Mammalian extinctions in western North American parks: a landbridge perspective. Nature 325:430–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, W. D. 1995. Extinction of mammal populations in western North American national parks. Conservation Biology 9:512–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, R. F. 1987. Corridors in real landscapes: a reply to Simberloff and Cox. Conservation Biology 1:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, R. F., and Soulé, M.. 1998. Rewilding and biodiversity: complementary goals for continental conservation. Wild Earth 8:18–28Google Scholar
Noss, R. F., Quigley, H. B., Hornocker, M. G., Merrill, T., and Paquet, P. C.. 1996. Conservation biology and carnivore conservation in the Rocky Mountains. Conservation Biology 10:949–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 158:87–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, D. K., Noon, B. R., and Meslow, E. C.. 1997. Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy. BioScience 47:677–687Google Scholar
Saunders, D. A., and Hobbs, R. J.. 1991. Nature Conservation: The Role of Corridors. Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia: Surrey Beatty and Sons.Google Scholar
Schultz, C. B. 1995. Corridors, islands and stepping stones: the role of dispersal behavior in designing reserves for a rare Oregon Butterfly. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 76:240–261Google Scholar
Simberloff, D., and Cox, J.. 1987. Consequences and costs of corridors. Conservation Biology 1:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D., Farr, J. A., Cox, J., and Mehlman, D. W.. 1992. Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments?Conservation Biology 6:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M. E. 1991. Conservation corridors: countering habitat fragmentation: theory and strategy. Pp. 91–104 in Hudson, W. E. (ed.) Landscape Linkages and BiodiversityWashington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Soulé, M. E., and Simberloff, D.. 1986. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves?Biological Conservation 35:19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M. E., and Terborgh, J.. 1999. Continental Conservation: Scientific Foundations of Regional Reserve Networks. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., and Merriam, G.. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tischendorf, L., and Fahrig, L.. 2000. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tischendorf, L., and Fahrig, L.. 2001. On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology: a reply. Oikos 95:152–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 20:171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., and O'Neill, R. V.. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. A. 1989. The Ecology of Bird Communities, vol 2, Processes and Variations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., and Losos, E.. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winker, K., D. W. Warner, and A. R. Weisbrod. 1992. The northern waterthrush and Swainson's thrush as transients at a temperate inland stopover site. Pp. 384–402 in Hagan, J. M., and Johnston, D. W., (eds.) Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
With, K. A., Gardner, R. H., and Turner, M. G.. 1997. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78:151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×