Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T20:38:15.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Students, residents, and conscience-based exemptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Mark R. Wicclair
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
Get access

Summary

Just as practitioners can object to providing services that are against their conscience, students and residents can have conscience-based objections to participating in educational activities. Among medical, nursing, and pharmacy students, the former have been in the forefront of efforts to secure exemptions from activities that violate their ethical or religious beliefs. Accordingly, their experience can serve as a model for students of nursing and pharmacy.

In 1996, the Medical Student Section of the American Medical Association (AMA) introduced a resolution calling on the AMA to adopt a policy in support of exemptions for students with ethical or religious objections. In that resolution, students identified abortion, sterilization, and procedures performed on animals as examples of activities that might prompt requests for conscience-based exemptions. In response to the student initiative, the Council on Medical Education (CME) recommended the adoption of seven “principles to guide exemption of medical students from activities based on conscience.” The House of Delegates adopted these principles in their entirety (AMA Policy H-295.896, “Conscience Clause: Final Report”).

Among residency programs, it is likely that obstetrics and gynecology programs generally have the most experience related to conscience-based exemptions. Although some family medicine residency programs provide abortion training, historically obstetrics and gynecology residency programs have been the primary providers of graduate medical training pertaining to performing abortions. Since abortion has been a primary target of conscience-based refusals in health care, it is to be expected that some obstetrics and gynecology residents have ethical or religious objections to abortion training.

Type
Chapter
Information
Conscientious Objection in Health Care
An Ethical Analysis
, pp. 168 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×