Book contents
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Constitution Writing and Religion under Limited Sovereignty
- Part II Postcolonial French-Influenced Constitution Writing and Religion
- 5 Secularism in a Sectarian Society? The Divisive Drafting of the 1926 Lebanese Constitution
- 6 The Constitution of a “Laïc” African and Muslim Country
- 7 Constitution Writing and Religious Divisions in Turkey
- Part III Postcolonial South Asian Constitution Drafting and Religion
- Part IV Constitution Writing and Religion in Contemporary Middle East
- Part V Lessons from the Cases
- Index
- References
7 - Constitution Writing and Religious Divisions in Turkey
from Part II - Postcolonial French-Influenced Constitution Writing and Religion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2017
Book contents
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Constitution Writing and Religion under Limited Sovereignty
- Part II Postcolonial French-Influenced Constitution Writing and Religion
- 5 Secularism in a Sectarian Society? The Divisive Drafting of the 1926 Lebanese Constitution
- 6 The Constitution of a “Laïc” African and Muslim Country
- 7 Constitution Writing and Religious Divisions in Turkey
- Part III Postcolonial South Asian Constitution Drafting and Religion
- Part IV Constitution Writing and Religion in Contemporary Middle East
- Part V Lessons from the Cases
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy , pp. 153 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Almond, Gabriel. A. 1956. “Comparative Political Systems.” Journal of Politics 18 (3) August: 391–409.Google Scholar
Burton, M, Gunther, R, and Higley, J. 1992. “Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe: An Overview,” in Higley, J. and Gunther, R. (eds.). Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Çarkoğlu, A. 2008. “Ideology or Economic Pragmatism? Profiling Turkish Voters in 2007.” Turkish Studies 9 (2) June: 317–344.Google Scholar
Choudry, Sujit. 2008. “Bridging Comparative Politics and Comparative Constitutional Law: Constitutional Design in Divided Societies,” in Choudry, S. (ed.). Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation? New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. A. 1975. “Governments and Political Oppositions,” in Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W. (eds.). Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 3: Macropolitical Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights. 2007. Case of Hasan and Eylem Zengin v. Turkey. Application no. 1448/04. 9 October 2007.Google Scholar
Genç, R. 1998. Türkiye’yi Lâikleştiren Yasalar: 3 Mart 1924 Tarihli Meclis Müzakereleri ve Kararları. Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi.Google Scholar
Gökalp, A. 1980. Tétes rouges et bouches noires: Une congrérie tribale de l’ouest anatolien. Paris: Recherches sur la Haute Asie.Google Scholar
Göktaş, Kemal. 2014. “Yargitay’dan tarihi cemevi karari” [Historic decision on cemevi by Court of Cassation] Milliyet (Turkish daily), December 4, 2014. Available at www.milliyet.com.tr/yargitay-dan-tarihi-cemevi-karari-gundem-1979090/.Google Scholar
Gözaydın, İ. 2009. Diyanet: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde Dinin Tanzimi. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Hale, W. and Özbudun, E. 2010. Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the AKP. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanioğlu, M. Ş. 2012. “The Historical Roots of Kemalism,” in Kuru, A. and Stepan, A. (eds.). Democracy, Islam, and Secularism in Turkey. New York: Columbia University Press: 32–60.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1994. “Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Society.” Political Theory 22 (2): 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuru, Ahmet T. 2009. Secularism and State Policies Toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. “Consociational Democracy.” World Politics 21 (2) January: 207–225.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2004. “Constitutional Design for Divided Societies.” Journal of Democracy 15 (2) April: 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardin, Ş. 1973. “Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?” Deadalus 102 (1) Winter: 169–190. Reprinted in Akarlı, E. D. and Ben-Dor, G. (eds.). 1975. Political Participation in Turkey: Historical Background and Present Problems. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Publications: 7–32.Google Scholar
Olsson, T., Özdalga, E., and Raudvere, C. (eds.). 1988. Alevi Identity: Cultural, Religious and Social Perspectives. İstanbul: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.Google Scholar
Oran, B. 2004. Türkiye’de Azınlıklar: Kavramlar, Lozan, İç Mevzuat, İçtihat, Uygulama. İstanbul: TESEV.Google Scholar
Öz, E. 1996. Otoriterizm ve Siyaset: Türkiye’de Tek-parti Rejimi ve Siyasal Katılma, 1923–1945. Ankara: Yetkin.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. 1970. “Established Revolution versus Unfinished Revolution: Contrasting Patterns of Democratization in Mexico and Turkey,” in Huntington, S. P. and Moore, C. H. (eds.). Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems. New York and London: Basic Books, 380–405.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. 1981. “The Nature of the Kemalist Political Regime,” in Kazancıgil, A. and Özbudun, E. (eds.). Atatürk: Founder of a Modern State. London: Hurst, 79–102.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. 2013. Party Politics and Social Cleavages in Turkey. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. 2014. “AKP at the Crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian Drift.” South European Society and Politics 19 (2) June: 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbudun, E. and Gençkaya, Ö. F. 2009. Democratization and the Politics of Constitution-Making in Turkey. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Parla, T. 1992. Türkiye’de Siyasal Kültürün Resmî Kaynakları, Vol. 3: Kemalist Tek Parti İdeolojisi ve CHP’nin Altı Ok’u. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Shankland, D. 1999. Islam and Society in Turkey. Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire: The Eothen Press.Google Scholar
Tunçay, M. 1981. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde Tek-Parti Yönetiminin Kurulması, 1923–1931. Ankara: Yurt Yayınları.Google Scholar
Tunçay, M. 2012. “Yargitay’dan Cemevi karari” [Cassation decision on cemevi], Bugun (Turkish daily), 25 July 2012. Available at www.bugun.com.tr/gundem/yargitaydan-cemevi-karari-haberi/199827.Google Scholar