Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Map of Indonesia
- Glossary
- 1 A Distinctive Path
- 2 Democratization Before Renovation
- 3 Creeping Reform
- 4 A Game of Inches
- 5 Anomalies, Ironies, Regularities, and Surprises
- 6 The Shape of the New System
- 7 Low-Quality Democracy and Its Discontents
- 8 Causes, Consequences, and the Consequences of the Consequences
- Index
- References
7 - Low-Quality Democracy and Its Discontents
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Map of Indonesia
- Glossary
- 1 A Distinctive Path
- 2 Democratization Before Renovation
- 3 Creeping Reform
- 4 A Game of Inches
- 5 Anomalies, Ironies, Regularities, and Surprises
- 6 The Shape of the New System
- 7 Low-Quality Democracy and Its Discontents
- 8 Causes, Consequences, and the Consequences of the Consequences
- Index
- References
Summary
By the time of the 2009 elections or earlier, most close observers believed Indonesian democracy to be consolidated. By then, it seemed clear that no significant group in the country threatened the democratic order. Yet there was a price to be paid for gradualism in the creation of a constitutional democracy. The post-1998 changes did not entail complete uprooting of the personnel or the practices of the previous regime. And so there was unfinished business with respect to the armed forces, corruption, the rule of law, and ethnic and religious tolerance. As I shall point out after a review of these deficiencies, some of them have connections to fundamental aspects of the new political system. Their amelioration could actually alter the shape of that system.
THE QUALITY-OF-DEMOCRACY ISSUE
Within a few years of the democratic transition, it had become customary to refer to Indonesia as a low-quality democracy. The bill of particulars for this indictment was far-reaching. Indonesia had “an extremely weak rule of law”; a surfeit of corruption and a lack of transparency; local elites that thwarted the rights of ethnic minorities in various regions; grave defects in religious liberty and the oppression of certain religious minorities, in violation of the constitution; military leaders who openly condoned the army’s murder of a nonviolent separatist; human rights violations by the armed forces that were habitually unpunished; legislators willing to accept bribes in exchange for their support of legislation; gangsters occasionally able to win local office, with help from voter intimidation by thugs, some of them affiliated with political parties; restricted access of citizens to the political process; and generally “weak popular participation” – to name just a few commonly cited defects.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia , pp. 207 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
and , Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
, “What Is Democratic Consolidation?” Journal of Democracy, vol. 9, no. 2 (April 1998), pp. 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Indonesian Democracy: From Transition to Consolidation,” in and , eds., Indonesian Democratization and Islam (forthcoming, New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), MS p. 27Google Scholar
, From Rebellion to Riot: Collective Violence in Indonesian Borneo (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2008), p. 209Google Scholar
, “Religious Liberty in Indonesia and the Rights of ‘Deviant’ Sects,” Asian Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 3, no. 1, art. 3 (2008), pp. 1–27;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Indonesia’s Year of Living Normally,” in and , eds., Southeast Asian Affairs 2008 (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2009), pp. 135–36Google Scholar
, The Indonesian Presidency: The Shift from Personal Toward Constitutional Rule (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005), p. 246Google Scholar
, The Indonesian Parliament and Democratization (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008), pp. 166–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Power and Politics in North Sumatra: The Uncompleted Reformasi,” in and , eds., Local Power and Politics in Indonesia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2003), pp. 119–31, at pp. 126–29Google Scholar
, “Indonesia’s Held-Back Democracy and Beyond,” in and , eds., Democracy-Building on the Sand: Advances and Setbacks in Indonesia (Jakarta: Demos, 2008), pp. 1–17, at p. 10Google Scholar
et al., Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996–2007 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2008), pp. 16, 33, 80, 83, 86, 92, 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Indonesia’s Democratic Stagnation: Anti-Reformist Elites and Resilient Civil Society,” Democratization, vol. 19, no. 2 (April 2012), pp. 209–29, at p. 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Introduction,” in and , eds., Assessing the Quality of Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), pp. ix–xliii.Google Scholar
, Political Reform in Indonesia after Soeharto (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2010), pp. 127–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Military Politics, Islam, and the State in Indonesia: From Turbulent Transition to Democratic Consolidation (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2009)Google Scholar
, “From Soeharto to Habibie: The Indonesian Armed Forces and Political Islam during the Transition,” in , ed., Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Renewal or Chaos (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), pp. 65–102, at pp. 75–83Google Scholar
, “Faith and Politics: The Rise of the Laskar Jihad in the Era of Transition in Indonesia,” Indonesia, no. 73 (April 2002), pp. 145–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Indonesian Parliament and Democratization (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008), p. 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Indonesia’s Constitutional Change Reviewed,” in and , eds., Indonesia: Democracy and the Promise of Good Governance (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2007), pp. 19–40, at p. 30Google Scholar
, “The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance,” Washington, DC, East-West Center Policy Studies, no. 23, 2006, pp. 40–42Google Scholar
and , “Evaluating the Quality of Democracy in Latin America,” in and , eds., The Quality of Democracy in Latin America (Boulder: Lynne Reinner, 2011), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
, “Commercial Law Enforcement in Indonesia: The Manulife Case,” in , ed., Indonesia: Law and Society (2d ed.; Sydney: Federation Press, 2008), pp. 596–619Google Scholar
, The Indonesian Supreme Court: A Study of Institutional Collapse (Ithaca: Cornell University Souteast Asia Program, 2005), pp. 278, 338–41;Google Scholar
has noted. “Indonesia: The Irony of Success,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 21, no. 2 (April 2010), pp. 20–34, at p. 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Corruption,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, no. 3 (August 1993), pp. 599–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Does Democracy Check Corruption? Insights from China and India,” Comparative Politics, vol. 42, no. 1 (October 2009), pp. 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Linkages between Corruption and Democracy,” in and , eds., Democratic Deficits (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2009), pp. 149–50Google Scholar
, The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962), pp. 438–39.Google Scholar
, “The Politics of Reform: Political Scandals, Elite Resistance, and Presidential Leadership in Indonesia,” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, vol. 29, no. 1 (2010), pp. 79–94Google Scholar
, quoted in Jakarta Globe, October 17, 2010.
, “Legal Means for Eliminating Corruption in the Public Service,” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 11, no. 3 (December 2007), available at .Google Scholar
, “The Problem of Knowledge,” in , ed., Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006), pp. 15–28Google Scholar
, “How Constitutions Constrain,” Comparative Politics, vol. 41, no. 2 (January 2009), pp. 127–43;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Why Democracies Fail,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 19, no. 4 (October 2008), pp. 57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , On Law, Politics, and Judicialization (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Building the Rule of Law: Francis Nyalali and the Road to Judicial Independence in Africa (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach,” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 23, no. 2 (June 1994), pp. 721–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
l, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962).Google Scholar
, “Comments on the Judicial Reform Program in Indonesia,” in International Monetary Fund, Legal Dept., IMF Institute, Current Developments in Monetary and Financial Law, Volume 4 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2005), pp. 761–66, at pp. 763–65.Google Scholar
, “Judicial Reform in Indonesia, 1998–2006,” in Naoyuki Sakumoto and Hikmahanto Juwana, eds., Reforming Laws and Institutions in Indonesia: An Assessment (Chiba-Shi, Japan: Institute of Developing Economies, 2007), pp. 11–44.Google Scholar
and , “Indonesia: General Elections Test the Amended Constitution and the New Constitutional Court,” International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 4, no. 1 (January 2006), pp. 138–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An early draft (ca. 2000) of a bill on the Supreme Court by distinguished Indonesian lawyers envisioned that it would have the power of judicial review. F.N. 2:57
, “Constitutional Courts: A Primer for Decision Makers,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 17, no. 4 (October 2006), pp. 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Indonesia: General Elections Test the Amended Constitution and the New Constitutional Court,” International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 4, no. 1 (January 2006), pp. 138–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: A Reform Over-Achiever?” Inside Indonesia, no. 87 (July–September 2006), pp. 10–11.
, Challenging the Secular State: The Islamization of Law in Modern Indonesia (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008), p. 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Sharia and National Law in Indonesia,” in , ed., Sharia Incorporated: A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries Past and Present (Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2010), pp. 433–90, at p. 454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Islam and the Secular State in Indonesia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Indonesia in 2008: Democratic Consolidation in Soeharto’s Shadow,” in , ed., Southeast Asian Affairs 2009 (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2009), p. 109.Google Scholar
, Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, Jakarta Post, April 15, 2012
, “The Making of the Indonesian Multiparty System: A Cartelized Party System and Its Origin,” Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, 2008, p. 180
, “Parties and Decision-making in the Indonesian Parliament: A Case Study of RUU APP, the Anti-Pornography Bill,” Australian Journal of Asian Law, vol. 10, no. 2 (December 2008), pp. 159–83Google Scholar
, “Muslim Politics in Indonesia’s Democratization: The Religious Majority and the Rights of Minorities in the Post-New Order Era,” in and , eds., Indonesia, pp. 115–37, at pp. 122–26
, “Challenging Diversity? Indonesia’s Anti-Pornography Bill,” Asian Studies Review, vol. 31, no. 2 (June 2007), pp. 101–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Challenge to Implement Religious Freedom for the Minority in Indonesia as a Multicultural State,” paper presented at the Southeast Asian Human Rights Network Conference, Bangkok, October 14, 2010
, PDI-P member of the DPR, quoted in the Jakarta Globe, September 10, 2009.
, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), p. 59Google Scholar
, Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), p. 240Google Scholar
, “Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis,” American Political Science Review, vol. 61, no. 2 (June 1967), pp. 417–27, at p. 420CrossRefGoogle Scholar