Anderson, G. W., “Societal Constitutionalism, Social Movements, and Constitutionalism from Below,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 881–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, P., “The ‘Not-a-Cat’ Syndrome: Can the International Human Rights Regime Accommodate Non-State Actors?” in Alston, P. (ed.) Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 3–36.Google Scholar

Anghie, A., Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Bailey, S., and Mattei, U., “Social Movements as Constituent Power: The Italian Struggle for the Commons,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 965–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backer, L. C., “The 3rd UN Forum on Business and Human Rights: Streaming Live With Thoughts on the Forum as Estates General,” Law at the End of the Day, December 2, 2014, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-3rd-un-forum-on-business-and-human.html.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “The 2nd UN Forum on Business and Human Rights: Live Streaming and Thoughts on Trends in Managing Business Behaviors,” Law at the End of the Day, December 3, 2013, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-2nd-un-forum-on-busness-and-human.html.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “A Conversation About Polycentricity in Governance Systems Beyond the State,” Law at the End of the Day November 11, 2013, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.de/2013/11/a-conversation-about-polycentricity-in.html.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Sovereign Investing and Markets-Based Transnational Rule of Law Building: The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund in Global Markets,” American University International Law Review 29 (2013), pp. 1–121.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Transnational Constitutions’ Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple Inc.,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20 (2013), p. 805–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backer, L. C., “The Structural Characteristics of Global Law for the 21st Century: Fracture, Fluidity, Permeability, and Polycentricity,” Tilburg Law Review 17 (2012), pp. 177–99.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Governance without Government: An Overview and Application of Interactions Between Law-State and Governance-Corporate System,” in Handl, G., Zekoll, J. and Zumbansen, P. (eds.) Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden, Netherlands & Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), pp. 87–123.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Private Actors and Public Governance Beyond the State: The Multinational Corporation, the Financial Stability Board, and the Global Governance Order,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18 (2011), pp. 751–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Rights and Accountability in Development v. DAS Air and Global Witness v. Afrimex: Small Steps towards an Autonomous Transnational Legal System for the Regulation of Multinational Corporations,” Melbourne Journal of International Law 10 (2009), pp. 258–307.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “From Moral Obligation to International Law: Disclosure Systems, Markets and the Regulation of Multinational Corporations,” Georgetown Journal of International Law, 39 (2008), pp. 591–653.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “The Autonomous Global Corporation: On the Role of Organizational Law Beyond Asset Partitioning and Legal Personality,” Tulsa Law Review 41 (2006), pp. 541–71.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Retaining Judicial Authority: A Preliminary Inquiry on the Dominion of Judges,” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 12 (2003), p. 117.Google Scholar

Bernstein, L., “Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code's Search for Immanent Business Norms,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (1996), p. 1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calliess, G.-P., and Zumbansen, P., Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Claire Cutler, A., Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, J., “Constitutionalization of Nongovernmental Certification Programs,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20 (2013), pp. 1035–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, R., Predatory Globalization: A Critique (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Final Statement by the UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from Survival International Against Vedanta Resources Plc, Urn 09/1373. Available at www.oecd.org/investment/mne/43884129.pdf.Google Scholar

Final Statement By The UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from the International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations against Unilever Plc on Pakistan’s Khanewal Factory, 2009, (UK). Available at www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/44478619.pdf.Google Scholar

Final Statement by The UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from the International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations against Unilever Plc on Pakistan’s Rahim Yar Khan Factory, 2009, Urn 09/1221, At 1 (UK). Available at www.oecd.org/investment/mne/44478663.pdf.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., “Global Constitutional Struggles: Human Rights between Colère Publique and Colère Politique” in Kaleck, W., Ratner, M., Singelnstein, T. and Weiss, P. (eds.) International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), pp. 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law,” Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (2003–2004), pp. 999–1046.Google Scholar

Foster, L. A., “Critical Cultural Translation: A Socio-Legal Framework for Regulatory Orders,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 21 (2014), pp. 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J., “A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society?” in Habermas, J. (ed.) Between Naturalism and Religion (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008), pp. 312–52.Google Scholar

Hamann, A., and Fabri, H. R., “Transnational networks and constitutionalism,’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (2008), pp. 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Initial Assessment by the UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Survival International and Vedanta Resources Plc, March 27, 2009. Available at www.business-humanrights.org/Links/Repository/969215/jump.Google Scholar

Johns, F. E., “The Invisibility of the Transnational Corporation: An Analysis of International Law and Legal Theory,” Melbourne University Law Review, 19 (1994), pp. 893–923.Google Scholar

Joint IOE-ICC-BIAC Comments on the Draft Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Geneva, January 26, 2011. Available at www.iccwbo.org/Data/Policies/2011/ICC-IOE-BIAC-joint-recommendations-to-the-UN-Working-Group-on-Business-Human-Rights/.Google Scholar

Kjaer, P., “Transnational Normative Orders: The Constitutionalism of Intra- and Trans-Normative Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 777–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, H. H., “Transnational Legal Process,” Nebraska Law Review, 75 (1996), pp. 181.Google Scholar

Kumm, M., “The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis,” European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), pp. 907–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mollers, C., “Transnational Governance without Public Law?” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 329–38.Google Scholar

OECD, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2011), OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. Available at www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/48004323.pdf.Google Scholar

OECD, Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2013 Responsible Business Conduct in Action, Executive Summary. Available at http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/MNE-Annual-Report-2013-Summary.pdfGoogle Scholar

O’Neill, J., “The Disciplinary Society: From Weber to Foucault,” The British Journal of Sociology, 37 (1986), pp. 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, A., “Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (2006), pp. 579–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Queinnec, Y., “The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: An Evolving Legal Status” (Association Sherpa Report, June 2007).Google Scholar

Renner, M., “Occupy the System! Societal Constitutionalism and Transnational Corporate Accounting,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 941–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riles, A., “The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State,” The American Journal of Comparative Law, 56 (2008), pp. 605–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rödl, F., “Fundamental Rights, Private Law, and Societal Constitution: On the Logic of the So-Called Horizontal Effect,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 1015–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruggie, J. G., Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: W. W. Norton 2013).Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G., Letter, “Bizarre Response by Human Rights Groups to UN Framework Plan,” Financial Times, January 19, 2011. Available at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/629fbcd0-2361-11e0-8389-00144feab49a.html#axzz2ngb0wGXd.Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G., Opening remarks by UN Special Representative John Ruggie, October 5, 2009. Available at www.business-humanrights.org/Documents/Ruggie-speech-to-Geneva-consultation-Oct-2009.pdf.Google Scholar

Sachs, N., “Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law,” University of California Law Review, 55 (2008), pp. 837–904.Google Scholar

Sand, I.-J., “Polycontextuality as an Alternative to Constitutionalism” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 41–66.Google Scholar

Shamir, R., “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case of Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony” in de Sousa Santos, B. and Rodríguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.) Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, G., McCorquodale, R., and De Schutter, O., “The Third Pillar: Access to Judicial Remedies for Human Rights Violations by Transnational Business” (ICAR, CORE ECCJ, December 2013).Google Scholar

Special Representative of the Secretary-General, “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework,” UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31 (March 21, 2011). Available at www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., “Self-Constitutionalizing TNCs?: On the Linkage of ‘Private’ and ‘Public’ Corporate Codes of Conduct,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18 (2011), pp. 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., “The Corporate Codes of Multinationals: Company Constitutions Beyond Corporate Governance and Co-Determination” in Nikel, R. (ed.), Conflict of Laws and Laws of Conflict in Europe and Beyond: Patterns of Supranational and Transnational Juridification (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar

Teubner, G., “Societal Constitutionalism: An Alternative to State Centered Constitutional Theory” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 2–28.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., “Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Differences,” in Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties Of Capitalism (Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 417–41.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., “The King’s Many Bodies: The Self-Deconstruction of Law's Hierarchy,” Law & Society Review, 31 (1997), pp. 763–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society,” in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996), pp. 3–28.Google Scholar

Thornhill, C., “A Sociology of Constituent Power: The Political Code of Transnational Societal Constitutions,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 551–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

United Nations Human Rights Council Res. 17/4, 17th Sess., July 6, 2011, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/17/4 (July 6, 2011). Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G11/144/71/PDF/G1114471.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Council, Forum on Business and Human Rights, Second session, 3 and 4 December 2013, Background note by the Secretariat A/HRC/FBHR/2013/2 (24 September 2013).Google Scholar

Ward, H., “Securing Transnational Corporate Accountability through National Courts: Implications and Policy Options,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 24 (2001), pp. 451–74.Google Scholar

Watt, H. M., “Private International Law Beyond the Schism,” Transnational Legal Theory, 3 (2011), pp. 347–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weissbrodt, D., “Keynote Address: International Standard-Setting on the Human Rights Responsibilities of Businesses,” Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26 (2008), pp. 373–91.Google Scholar

Wiener, A., and Liste, P., “Lost without Translation?: Cross-Referencing and a New Global Community of Courts,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 21 (2014), pp. 263–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, H., “Amnesty Criticises UN Framework for Multinationals,” Financial Times, January 17, 2011.Google Scholar

Zürn, M., “Sovereignty and Law in a Denationalised World” in Appelbaum, R. P., Felstiner, W. L. F. and Gessner, V. (eds.) Rules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar