Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:28:28.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Regime collisions from a perspective of global constitutionalism

from Part I - Between collisions and interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

By
Stefan Oeter
Edited by
Kerstin Blome ,
Andreas Fischer-Lescano ,
Hannah Franzki ,
Nora Markard  and
Stefan Oeter
Kerstin Blome
Affiliation:
Universität Bremen
Andreas Fischer-Lescano
Affiliation:
Universität Bremen
Hannah Franzki
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Nora Markard
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Stefan Oeter
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Contested Regime Collisions
Norm Fragmentation in World Society
 , pp. 21 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B. A., We the People ,Vol. II: Transformations. (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Ben-Naftali, O. (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, E., and Downs, G. W., ‘The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law’, Stanford Law Review, 60 (2007), pp. 595–631.Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., and Venzke, I., In wessen Namen? Internationale Gerichte in Zeiten globalen Regierens (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2014).Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A. and Venzke, I., ‘In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification’, European Journal of International Law, 23 (2012), pp. 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R., von Bernstorff, J., Dann, P., and Goldmann, M. (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions (Heidelberg et al.: Springer, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongiovanni, G., ‘Rechtsstaat and Grundnorm in the Kelsenian Theory’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 70 Beiheft (1997), pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
Brown, G. W., ‘The Constitutionalization of What?’, Global Constitutionalism, 1 (2012), pp. 201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunkhorst, H., Legitimationskrisen. Verfassungsprobleme der Weltgesellschaft (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2012).Google Scholar
Brunnée, J., and Toope, S. J., ‘Constructivism and International Law’ in Dunoff, J. L. and Pollack, M. A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 119–45.Google Scholar
Brunnée, J. and Toope, S. J., Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A., and Keohane, R. O., ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, Ethics and International Affairs, 20 (2006), pp. 405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calliess, G.-P., and Zumbansen, P., Rough Consensus and Running Code. A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar
Cass, D. Z., Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, H., ‘Book Review – Eric A. Posner’s The Perils of Global Legalism (2009)’, German Law Journal, 13 (2012), pp. 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. L., Globalization and Sovereignty. Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, R., and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order (London: Routledge, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, X., International Institutions and National Policies (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Diggelmann, O., and Altwicker, T., ‘Is There Something Like a Constitution of International Law? A Critical Analysis of the Debate on World Constitutionalism’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 68 (2008), pp. 623–50.Google Scholar
Dobner, P., and Loughlin, M. (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, J. L., and Trachtmann, J. P. (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassbender, B., The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassbender, B., ‘We the Peoples of the United Nations: Constituent Power and Constituent Form in International Law’ in Walker, N. and Loughlin, M. (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 269–90.Google Scholar
Fassbender, B., and Siehr, A. (eds.), Suprastaatliche Konstitutionalisierung: Perspektiven auf die Legitimität, Kohärenz und Effektivität des Völkerrechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006).Google Scholar
Forst, R., Kritik der Rechtfertigungsverhältnisse. Perspektiven einer kritischen Theorie der Politik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2011).Google Scholar
Forst, R., Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung – Elemente einer konstruktivistischen Theorie der Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2007).Google Scholar
Forsythe, D. P., and Rieffer-Flanagan, B., The International Committee of the Red Cross: A Neutral Humanitarian Actor (London: Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, T. M., The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frowein, J. A., ‘Konstitutionalisierung des Völkerrechts’ in Dicke, K. et al. (eds.), Völkerrecht und Internationales Privatrecht in einem sich wandelnden internationalen System, Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht Vol. XXXIX (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2000), pp. 427–47.Google Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Conflict or Convergence’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 43 (2010), pp. 491–512.Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Zur Verfassung Europas. Ein Essay (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2011).Google Scholar
Halberstam, D., ‘Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States’ in Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. B. (eds.), Ruling the World? (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 326–55.Google Scholar
Hambler, C., and Canney, S. M., Conservation (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldmann, S., Das Reziprozitätsprinzip im Humanitären Völkerrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R., ‘Fragmentation and Utopia: Towards an Equitable Integration of Finance, Trade, and Sustainable Development’ in Cassese, A. (ed.), Realizing Utopia. The Future of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 427–41.Google Scholar
Joyner, C. C., and Tyler, Z., ‘Marine Conservation versus International Free Trade: Reconciling Dolphins with Tuna and Sea Turtles with Shrimp’, Ocean Development and International Law, 31 (2000), pp. 127–50.Google Scholar
Kälin, W., ‘Universal Human Rights Bodies and International Humanitarian Law’ in Kolb, R. and Gaggioli, G. (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 441–65.Google Scholar
Kälin, W., and Künzli, J., The Law of International Human Rights Protection (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Kalshoven, F., ‘The International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission – a Sleeping Beauty?’, Humanitäres Völkerrecht – Informationsschriften, 15 (2002), pp. 213–16.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J., Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., and Stewart, R. B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law & Contemporary Problems, 68 (2005), pp. 15–61.Google Scholar
Kjaer, P. F., Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach (London: Routledge, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J., An Introduction to International Institutional Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J., Peters, A., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinlein, T., Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht: Konstruktion und Elemente einer idealistischen Völkerrechtslehre (Heidelberg et al.: Springer, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, R., and Gaggioli, G. (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ‘Legal Fragmentation(s)’ in Calliess, G.-P. et al. (eds.), Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009), pp. 795–810.Google Scholar
Kotzur, M., ‘“Constitutional Moments” in globaler Perspektive’, Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, 62 (2014), pp. 445–58.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F., The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, F., ‘Leaving Sovereignty Behind? An Inquiry into the Politics of Post-Modernity’ in Falk, R., Juergensmeyer, M. and Popovski, V. (eds.), Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 127–48.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F., Rules, Norms, and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘Article 39 UN Charter’ in Simma, B., Nolte, G., Khan, D.-E. and Paulus, A. (eds.), The United Nations Charter: A Commentary, 3rd edn, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 1272–96.Google Scholar
Krisch, N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order’, European Journal of International Law, 16 (2005), pp. 369–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M., ‘How Does European Union Law Fit into the World of Public Law? Costa, Kadi and Three Conceptions of Public Law’ in Neyer, J. and Wiener, A. (eds.), Political Theory of the European Union (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 111–38.Google Scholar
Kuo, M.-S., ‘Between Fragmentation and Unity: The Uneasy Relationship between Global Administrative Law and Global Constitutionalism’, San Diego International Law Journal, 10 (2009), pp. 439–67.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., and Walker, N. (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
MacDonald, T., Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, R., ‘The Law of Armed Conflict and International Human Rights Law: Some Paradigmatic Differences and Operational Implications’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 13 (2011), pp. 213–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliken, J., ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5 (1999), pp. 225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möllers, C., ‘“We Are (Afraid of) the People”. Constituent Power in German Constitutionalism’ in Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
Moos, L., Individualrechtsschutz gegen menschenrechtswidrige hoheitliche Maßnahmen von Übergangsverwaltungen der Vereinten Nationen am Beispiel der United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, T., ‘International Ethics and International Law’ in Frost, M. (ed.), International Ethics, Vol. III: The Changing Constitution of Global Politics – Ethical Issues (Los Angeles: Sage, 2011), pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
Niesen, P. (ed.), Transnationale Gerechtigkeit und Demokratie (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2012).Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, A., Constitutionalism in Global Constitutionalisation (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oeter, S., ‘Fortschrittsnarrative im Humanitären Völkerrecht – Vom Kriegsvölkerrecht zu Menschenrechten in bewaffneten Konflikten’ in Calliess, C. (ed.), Liber amicorum für Torsten Stein (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), pp. 1002–26.Google Scholar
Oeter, S., ‘Vom Völkerrecht zum transnationalen Recht – “Transnational Administrative Networks” und die Bildung hybrider Akteursstrukturen’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 387–402.Google Scholar
Oeter, S., ‘The Openness of International Organisations for Transnational Public Rule-Making’ in Dilling, O., Herberg, M. and Winter, G. (eds.), Transnational Administrative Rule-Making: Performance, Legal Effects, and Legitimacy (Oxford: Hart, 2011), pp. 235–51.Google Scholar
Oeter, S., ‘Verkoppelung von Recht und Politik im europäischen Verfassungsdenken’ in Franzius, C., Mayer, F. and Neyer, J. (eds.), Strukturfragen der Europäischen Union (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010), pp. 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oeter, S., ‘Theorising the Global Legal Order – An Institutionalist Perspective’ in Halpin, A. and Roeben, V. (eds.), Theorising the Global Legal Order (Oxford: Hart, 2009), pp. 61–83.Google Scholar
Oeter, S., ‘Chancen und Defizite internationaler Verrechtlichung: Was das Recht jenseits des Nationalstaates leisten kann’ in Zangl, B. and Zürn, M. (eds.), Verrechtlichung – Baustein für Global Governance? (Bonn: Dietz, 2004), pp. 46–73.Google Scholar
Onuf, N., ‘The Constitution of International Society’, European Journal of International Law, 5 (1994), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, A., ‘Notes sur la “fragmentation” du droit international’ in Alland, D. (ed.), Unité et diversité du droit international (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014), pp. 757–84.Google Scholar
Pernice, I. (ed.), Konstitutionalisierung jenseits des Staates: Zur Verfassung der Weltgemeinschaft und den Gründungsverträgen internationaler Organisationen (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2012).Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Global Constitutionalism’ in Gibbons, M. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014), Online resource,available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0421/pdf, accessed on 6 February 2015.Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Are We Moving towards Constitutionalization of the World Community?’ in Cassese, A. (ed.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 118–35.Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Conclusions’, in Klabbers, J., Peters, A. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 342–51.Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘The Merits of Global Constitutionalism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 16 (2009), pp. 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Compensatory Constitutionalism’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (2006), pp. 579–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., Koechlin, L., Förster, T., and Fenner Zinkernagel, G. (eds.), Non-State Actors as Standard Setters (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., and Armington, K., ‘Global Constitutionalism from an Interdisciplinary Perspective’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 16 (2009), pp. 385–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U., ‘From State-Centered towards Constitution “Public Reason” in Modern International Economic Law’ in Bongiovanni, G. (ed.), Reasonableness and Law (Dordrecht and Heidelberg: Springer, 2009), pp. 421–58.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U., ‘Human Rights, Constitutionalism, and the World Trade Organization: Challenges for World Trade Organization Jurisprudence and Civil Society’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (2006), pp. 633–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poiares Maduro, M., ‘Courts and Pluralism: Essay on a Theory of Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Legal and Constitutional Pluralism’ in Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. B. (eds.), Ruling the World? (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 356–80.Google Scholar
Posner, E. A., The Perils of Global Legalism (University of Chicago Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, C., ‘The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions’, International Organization, 51 (1997), pp. 555–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwöbel, C., Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., A New World Order (Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Teubner, G., and Korth, P., ‘Two Kinds of Legal Pluralism: Collision of Transnational Regimes in the Double Fragmentation of World Society’ in Young, M. A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 23–54.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C., ‘Contemporary Constitutionalism and the Dialectic of Constituent Power’, Global Constitutionalism, 1 (2012), pp. 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, J. P., ‘Fragmentation, Coherence and Synergy in International Law’, Transnational Legal Theory, 2 (2011), pp. 505–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J., ‘On Local and Global Citizenship: An Apprenticeship Manual’ in Tully, J., Public Philosophy in a New Key, 2 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 2008), Vol. II, pp. 243–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J., Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidmar, J., ‘Norm Conflicts and Hierarchy in International Law: Towards a Vertical International Legal System?’ in de Wet, E. and Vidmar, J. (eds.), Hierarchy in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 13–40.Google Scholar
Walker, N., ‘Flexibility within a Metaconstitutional Frame: Reflections on the Future of Legal Authority in Europe’ in De Burca, G. and Scott, J. (eds.), Constitutional Change in the EU: From University to Flexibility? (Oxford: Hart, 2000), pp. 9–30.Google Scholar
Webb, P., International Judicial Integration and Fragmentation (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., and Wind, M. (eds.), European Constitutionalism Beyond the State (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
de Wet, E. and Vidmar, J. (eds.), Hierarchy in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Wiener, A., A Theory of Contestation (Heidelberg: Springer, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, A., The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters (Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, A., ‘Global Constitutionalism’ in Oxford Bibliographies Online: International Relations, available at www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292-0092.xml?rskey=CnfQ7M&result=1&q=antje%20wiener#firstMatch.Google Scholar
Wiener, A., ‘Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 10 (2004), pp. 189–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, A., Lang, A. F., Tully, J., Maduro, M. P., and Kumm, M., ‘Why a New Journal on Global Constitutionalism? Editorial’, Global Constitutionalism, 1 (2012), pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willets, P., Non-Governmental Organizations in World Politics: The Construction of Global Governance (London, Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Young, M. A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. A., ‘Introduction’ in Young, M. A., (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. A. ‘Regime Interaction in Creating, Implementing and Enforcing International Law’ in Young, M. A., (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×