Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T13:54:07.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Broad Insights from Political Science to Molecular Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Walter Wilczynski
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Sarah F. Brosnan
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cooperation and Conflict
The Interaction of Opposites in Shaping Social Behavior
, pp. 5 - 86
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alleyne, R. (2012) Famous reconciliations sealed with a handshake. [online] Telegraph.co.uk. Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9359476/Famous-reconciliations-sealed-with-a-handshake.html [Accessed October 23, 2018].Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1989) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (2006) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Azar, E. (1991) Protracted social conflict: Theory and practice in the Middle East. Journal of Palestinian Studies, 8(1): 4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., eds. (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, D. S., and Stam, A. C. (1996) The duration of interstate wars, 1816–1985. American Political Science Review, 90(2): 239257.Google Scholar
Brahm, E. (2009) What is a truth commission and why does it matter? Peace and Conflict Review, 3(2): 114.Google Scholar
Cederman, L. E., Gleditsch, K. S., and Buhaug, H. (2013) Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
von Clausewitz, C. (1989) On War, indexed edition. Trans. Michael Eliot Howard and Peter Paret. Reprint edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, P., and Hoeffler, A. (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4): 563595.Google Scholar
Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., and Soderbom, M. (2001) On the Duration of Civil War. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2681. The World Bank.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. J., and Harrington, A., eds. (2002) Visions of Compassion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Waal, F. (1989) Peacemaking among Primates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, M. W. (1997) Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D. (2004) Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others? Journal of Peace Research, 41(3): 275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J. D., and Laitin, D. D. (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1): 7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 3(6): 167191.Google Scholar
Hendrikson, R. (1989) Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651/1979) Leviathan. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1978) Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2): 167214.Google Scholar
Kaldor, M. (2006) The “New War” in Iraq. Theoria, 53(109): 127.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1983) Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Moral Practice. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Keen, D. (1998) The economic functions of violence in civil wars. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies. Adelphi Paper, 320: 119–150.Google Scholar
Lebow, R. N. (2010) Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, W., and Brecke, P. (2003) War and Reconciliation: Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. G. 2013. Major Episodes of Political Violence (MEPV) and Conflict Regions, 1946–2012. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. (1949) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Onuf, N. G. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and Its Causes. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Smith, H. (1979) Treaty impact still unknown. New York Times, March 17, p. A1.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1992) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walter, B. F. (2009) Bargaining failures and civil war. Annual Review of Political Science, 12: 243261.Google Scholar
Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2): 391425.Google Scholar
World Bank (2011) World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security and Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

References

Akçay, E., Van Cleve, J., Feldman, M. W., and Roughgarden, J. (2009) A theory for the evolution of other-regard integrating proximate and ultimate perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 106(45): 1906119066.Google Scholar
Akçay, E., and Van Cleve, J. (2012) Behavioral responses in structured populations pave the way to group optimality. The American Naturalist, 179(2): 257269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alger, I., and Weibull, J. W. (2013) Homo Moralis – Preference evolution under incomplete information and assortative matching. Econometrica, 81(6): 22692302.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1986) An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80(4): 10951111.Google Scholar
Battigalli, P., and Dufwenberg, M. (2007) Guilt in games. American Economic Review 97(2): 170176.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2005) The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2010) Norms, preferences, and conditional behavior. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 9(3): 297313.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (1998) Game Theory and the Social Contract, Volume Two: Just Playing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bisin, A., and Verdier, T. (2001) The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2): 298319.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. (1992) Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13(3): 171195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudek, M., and Henrich, J. (2011) Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5): 218226.Google Scholar
Dekel, E., Ely, J. C., and Yılankaya, O. (2007) Evolution of preferences. Review of Economic Studies, 74: 685704.Google Scholar
Dufwenberg, M., Gächter, S., and Hennig-Schmidt, H. (2011) The framing of games and the psychology of play. Games and Economic Behavior, 73(2): 459478.Google Scholar
Ely, J. (2001) Nash equilibrium and the evolution of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2): 255272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and Gachter, S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4): 980994.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., and Schurtenberger, I. (2018) Normative foundations of human cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7): 458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S., and Richerson, P. J. (2017) Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23): 60686073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gintis, H. (2000) Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(2): 169179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gintis, H. (2003) The hitchhiker’s guide to altruism: Gene-culture coevolution and the internalization of norms. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 220(4): 407418.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2010) Social norms as choreography. Politics, Philosophy, & Economics, 9(3): 251264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H., and Helbing, D. (2015) Homo Socialis: An analytical core for sociological theory. Review of Behavioral Economics, 2(1–2): 159.Google Scholar
Güth, W. (1995) An evolutionary approach to explaining cooperative behavior by reciprocal incentives. International Journal of Game Theory, 24(4): 323344.Google Scholar
Heckathorn, D. D. (1989) Collective action and the second-order free-rider problem. Rationality and Society, 1(1): 78100.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R. et al. (2010) Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327(5972): 14801484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimbrough, E. O., and Vostroknutov, A. (2016) Norms make preferences social. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(3): 608638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morsky, B., and Akçay, E. (2019) Evolution of social norms and correlated equilibria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(18): 88348839.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3): 137158.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Walker, J., and Gardner, R. (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86(2): 404417.Google Scholar
Spitzer, M., Fischbacher, U., Herrnberger, B., Grön, G., and Fehr, E. (2007) The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron, 56(1): 185196.Google Scholar
Ty, A., Mitchell, D. G. V., and Finger, E. (2017) Making amends: Neural systems supporting donation decisions prompting guilt and restitution. Personality and Individual Differences, 107: 2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleve, J., and Akçay, E. (2014) Pathways to social evolution: Reciprocity, relatedness, and synergy. Evolution, 68: 22452258.Google Scholar
Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., and Schulz, R. (2003) The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity, 2(1): 120.Google Scholar

References

Abrahao, B., Parigi, P., Gupta, A., and Cook, K. S. (2017) Reputation offsets trust judgments based on social biases among Airbnb users. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114: 98489853.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., and Shirako, A. (2008) Are individuals’ reputations related to their history of behavior? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94: 320333.Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H., and Christakis, N. A. (2012) Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature, 481: 497501.Google Scholar
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., and Meier, S. (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99: 544555.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2011) Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137: 594615.Google Scholar
Balliet, D., Wu, J., and De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014) Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140: 15561581.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. (2006) Reputational benefits for altruistic punishmentEvolution and Human Behavior27: 325344.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. (2012) Harnessing the power of reputation: Strengths and limits for promoting cooperative behaviors. Evolutionary Psychology, 10: 868883.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. (2013) Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34: 164175.Google Scholar
Barclay, P., and Raihani, N. (2016) Partner choice versus punishment in human prisoner’s dilemmasEvolution and Human Behavior, 37: 263271.Google Scholar
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., and Roberts, G. (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2: 412414.Google Scholar
Bromley, D. B. (1993) Reputation, Image and Impression Management. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bshary, R., and Grutter, A. S. (2006) Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature, 441: 975978.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Capraro, V., Giardini, F., Vilone, D., and Paolucci, M. (2016) Partner selection supported by opaque reputation promotes cooperative behavior. Judgment and Decision Making, 11: 589600.Google Scholar
Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M., and Pagliaro, S. (2015) Who cares for reputation? Individual differences and concern for reputation. Current Psychology, 34: 164176.Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1980) Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 169193.Google Scholar
dos Santos, M., Rankin, D. J., and Wedekind, C. (2013) Human cooperation based on punishment reputation. Evolution, 67: 24462450.Google Scholar
dos Santos, M., and Wedekind, C. (2015) Reputation based on punishment rather than generosity allows for evolution of cooperation in sizable groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36: 5964.Google Scholar
Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., and Nowak, M. A. (2008) Winners don’t punish. Nature452: 348351.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004) Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8: 100110.Google Scholar
Durand, J. D. (1977) Historical estimates of world population: An evaluation. Population and Development Review, 3: 253296.Google Scholar
Egas, M., and Riedl, A. (2008) The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperationProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences275: 871878.Google Scholar
Emler, N. (1990) A social psychology of reputation. European Review of Social Psychology, 1: 171193.Google Scholar
Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., and Tomasello, M. (2012) Five-year olds, but not chimpanzees, attempt to manage their reputations. PLoS ONE, 7: e48433.Google Scholar
Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., and Tomasello, M. (2016) Preschoolers affect others’ reputations through prosocial gossipBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology34: 447460.Google Scholar
Engelmann, J. M., Over, H., Herrmann, E., and Tomasello, M. (2013) Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Developmental Science, 16: 952958.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415: 137140.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., Cheng, J. T., and Willer, R. (2012) Gossip as an effective and low-cost form of punishmentBehavioral and Brain Sciences35: 25.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., and Schultz, M. (2014) Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25: 656664.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., and Keltner, D. (2012) The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102: 10151030.Google Scholar
Gallo, E., and Yan, C. (2015) The effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112: 36473652.Google Scholar
Grimalda, G., Pondorfer, A., and Tracer, D. P. (2016) Social image concerns promote cooperation more than altruistic punishment. Nature Communications, 7: 12288.Google Scholar
Gross, T., and Blasius, B. (2008) Adaptive coevolutionary networks: A review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5: 259271.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1752.Google Scholar
Haux, L., Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., and Tomasello, M. (2017) Do young children preferentially trust gossip or firsthand observation in choosing a collaborative partner? Social Development, 26: 466474.Google Scholar
Hess, N. H., and Hagen, E. H. (2006) Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity. Human Nature, 17: 337354.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P., and Rand, D. G. (2016) Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature, 530: 473476.Google Scholar
Kato-Shimizu, M., Onishi, K., Kanazawa, T., and Hinobayashi, T. (2013) Preschool children’s behavioral tendency toward social indirect reciprocity. PLoS ONE, 8: e70915.Google Scholar
Kenward, B., and Dahl, M. (2011) Preschoolers distribute scarce resources according to the moral valence of recipients’ previous actions. Developmental Psychology, 47: 10541064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, N. L. (1989) Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 287313.Google Scholar
Khadjavi, M. (2016) Indirect reciprocity and charitable giving – Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science, 63: 37083717.Google Scholar
Kraft-Todd, G., Yoeli, E., Bhanot, S., and Rand, D. (2015) Promoting cooperation in the field. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3: 96101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlman, D. M., and Marshello, A. F. (1975) Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 922931.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., Burton-Chellew, M. N., and West, S. A. (2015) The evolution of altruism in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 66: 575599.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., and O’Brien, E. (2007) Audience effects on moralistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28: 7584.Google Scholar
Leimar, O., and Hammerstein, P. (2001) Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268: 745753.Google Scholar
Macfarlan, S. J., Quinlan, R., and Remiker, M. (2013) Cooperative behaviour and prosocial reputation dynamics in a Dominican village. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280: 20130557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manesi, Z., Van Lange, P. A. M., and Pollet, T. V. (2016) Eyes wide open: Only eyes that pay attention promote prosocial behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 14: 1474704916640780.Google Scholar
Meristo, M., and Surian, L. (2013) Do infants detect indirect reciprocity? Cognition, 129: 102113.Google Scholar
Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., and Yamagishi, T. (2010) Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31: 109117.Google Scholar
Milinski, M., Semmann, D., and Krambeck, H.-J. (2002) Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269: 881883.Google Scholar
Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., and Wilke, H. A. M. (2006) Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42: 147162.Google Scholar
Nelissen, R. M. A. (2008) The price you pay: Cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29: 242248.Google Scholar
Nettle, D., Nott, K., and Bateson, M. (2012) “Cycle thieves, we are watching you”: Impact of a simple signage intervention against bicycle theft. PLoS ONE, 7: 812.Google Scholar
Nikiforakis, N. (2008) Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves? Journal of Public Economics, 92: 91112.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., and Miyamoto, Y. (2005) The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 467473.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314: 15601563.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., and Sigmund, K. (1998a) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393: 573577.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., and Sigmund, K. (1998b) The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194: 561574.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., and Sigmund, K. (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 437: 129111298.Google Scholar
Ohtsuki, H., and Iwasa, Y. (2007) Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 244: 518531.Google Scholar
Olson, K. R., and Spelke, E. S. (2008) Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108: 222231.Google Scholar
Pacheco, J. M., Santos, F. C., and Chalub, F. A. C. (2006) Stern-judging: A simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity. PLoS Computational Biology, 2: e178.Google Scholar
Panchanathan, K., and Boyd, R. (2003) A tale of two defectors: The importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 224: 115126.Google Scholar
Panchanathan, K., and Boyd, R. (2004) Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problemNature432: 499502.Google Scholar
Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M., and Rand, D. G. (2014) Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Communications, 5: 4939.Google Scholar
Pfattheicher, S. (2015) A regulatory focus perspective on reputational concerns: The impact of prevention-focused self-regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 39: 932942.Google Scholar
Piazza, J., Bering, J. M., and Ingram, G. (2011) “Princess Alice is watching you”: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109: 311320.Google Scholar
Powell, K. L., Roberts, G., and Nettle, D. (2012) Eye images increase charitable donations: Evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket. Ethology, 118: 10961101.Google Scholar
Rand, D. G., Arbesman, S., and Christakis, N. A. (2011) Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108: 1919319198.Google Scholar
Rand, D. G., and Nowak, M. A. (2013) Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17: 413425.Google Scholar
Romano, A., Balliet, D., and Wu, J. (2017a) Unbounded indirect reciprocity: Is reputation-based cooperation bounded by group membership?  Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71: 5967.Google Scholar
Romano, A., Balliet, D., Yamagishi, T., and Liu, J. H. (2017b) Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114: 1270212707.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., and Royzman, E. B. (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5: 296320.Google Scholar
Russell, Y. I., Call, J., and Dunbar, R. I. (2008) Image scoring in great apes. Behavioural Processes, 78: 108111.Google Scholar
Semmann, D., Krambeck, H., and Milinski, M. (2005) Reputation is valuable within and outside one's own social group. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57: 611616.Google Scholar
Simpson, B., and Willer, R. (2008) Altruism and indirect reciprocity: The interaction of person and situation in prosocial behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71: 3752.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R., and Conrey, F. R. (2007) Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11: 87104.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., Semmann, D., and Milinski, M. (2007) Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104: 1743517440.Google Scholar
Sparks, A., and Barclay, P. (2013) Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: The limited effect of a false cue. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34: 317322.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., and Baumard, N. (2012) Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind and Language, 27: 495518.Google Scholar
Subiaul, F., Vonk, J., Okamoto-Barth, S., and Barth, J. (2008) Do chimpanzees learn reputation by observation? Evidence from direct and indirect experience with generous and selfish strangers. Animal Cognition, 11: 611623.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., and Akiyama, E. (2005) Reputation and the evolution of cooperation in sizable groups. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272: 13731377.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., and Akiyama, E. (2007) Evolution of indirect reciprocity in groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 245: 539552.Google Scholar
Swakman, V., Molleman, L., Ule, A., and Egas, M. (2016) Reputation-based cooperation: Empirical evidence for behavioral strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37: 230235.Google Scholar
Tazelaar, M. J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., and Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2004) How to cope with “noise” in social dilemmas: The benefits of communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 845859.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruismQuarterly Review of Biology, 46: 3557.Google Scholar
van Apeldoorn, J., and Schram, A. (2016) Indirect reciprocity: A field experiment. PloS ONE, 11: e0152076.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., and Van Dijk, E. (2013) The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120: 125141.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M., and Hardy, C. L. (2010) Cooperation for reputation: Wasteful contributions as costly signals in public goods. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13: 101111.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M., Roberts, G., and Hardy, C. (2007) Competitive altruism: Development of reputation-based cooperation in groups. In Dunbar, R., and Barrett, L., eds., Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 531540.Google Scholar
Vonasch, A. J., Reynolds, T., Winegard, B. M., and Baumeister, R. F. (2017) Death before dishonor: Incurring costs to protect moral reputation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9: 604613.Google Scholar
Wedekind, C., and Braithwaite, V. A. (2002) The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocityCurrent Biology12: 10121015.Google Scholar
Wedekind, C., and Milinski, M. (2000) Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science, 288: 850852.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015) When does gossip promote generosity? Indirect reciprocity under the shadow of the future. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6: 923930.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016a) Gossip versus punishment: The efficiency of reputation to promote and maintain cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6: 23919.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016b) Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37: 193201.Google Scholar
Wu, J. J., Zhang, B. Y., Zhou, Z. X., He, Q. Q., Zheng, X. D., Cressman, R., and Tao, Y. (2009) Costly punishment does not always increase cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106: 1744817451.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., and Kiyonari, T. (1999) Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. In Lawler, E. J. (Series ed.) and Thye, S. R., Lawler, E. J., Macy, M. W., and Walker, H. A. (Vol. eds.), Advances in Group Processes. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 161197.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., and Kiyonari, T. (2000) The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63: 116132.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., and Mifune, N. (2008) Does shared group membership promote altruism? Fear, greed, and reputation. Rationality and Society, 20: 530.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Li, Y. et al. (2013) Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120: 260271.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, H., Okada, I., Uchida, S., and Sasaki, T. (2017) A norm knockout method on indirect reciprocity to reveal indispensable normsScientific Reports7: 44146.Google Scholar
Yaniv, I., and Kleinberger, E. (2000) Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83: 260281.Google Scholar
Yoeli, E., Hoffman, M., Rand, D. G., and Nowak, M. A. (2013) Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110: 1042410429.Google Scholar
Yuan, M., Wu, J., and Kou, Y. (2018) Donors’ social class and their prosocial reputation: Perceived authentic motivation as an underlying mechanism. Social Psychology, 49: 205218.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A., and Zahavi, A. (1997) The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ågren, J. A. (2013) Selfish genes and plant speciation. Evolutionary Biology, 40(3): 439449.Google Scholar
Ågren, J. A., and Clark, A. G. (2018) Selfish genetic elements. PLoS Genetics, 14(11): e1007700.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. B., Marvig, R. L., Molin, S., Krogh, Johansen H., and Griffin, A. S. (2015) Long-term social dynamics drive loss of function in pathogenic bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112(34): 1075610761.Google Scholar
Araujo Casares, F., and Faugeron, S. (2016) Higher reproductive success for chimeras than solitary individuals in the kelp Lessonia spicata but no benefit for individual genotypes. Evolutionary Ecology, 30(5): 953972.Google Scholar
Bekof, M. (1992) Kin recognition and kin discrimination. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7(3): 100.Google Scholar
Ben-David, E., Burga, A., and Kruglyak, L. (2017) A maternal-effect selfish genetic element in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 356(6342): 10511055.Google Scholar
Birky, C. W. (1995) Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92(25): 1133111338.Google Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. (2011a) Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. (2011b) The validity and value of inclusive fitness theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Science, 278(1723): 33133320.Google Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G., and Ratnieks, F. L. W. (1999) Kin conflict over caste determination in social Hymenoptera. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46(5): 287297.Google Scholar
Brand, C. L., Larracuente, A. M., and Presgraves, D. C. (2015) Origin, evolution, and population genetics of the selfish Segregation Distorter gene duplication in European and African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 69(5): 12711283.Google Scholar
Bravo Núñez, M. A., Nuckolls, N. L., and Zanders, S. E. (2018) Genetic villains: killer meiotic drivers. Trends in Genetics, 34(6): 424433.Google Scholar
Burt, A., and Trivers, R. (2009) Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, L. W. (1982) Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 79(17): 53375341.Google Scholar
Buss, L. W. (1983) Evolution, development, and the units of selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 80(5): 13871391.Google Scholar
Buss, L. W. (1987) The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buttery, N. J., Rozen, D. E., Wolf, J. B., and Thompson, C. R. L. (2009) Quantification of social behavior in D. discoideum reveals complex fixed and facultative strategies. Current Biology, 19(16): 13731377.Google Scholar
Chang, E. S., Orive, M. E., and Cartwright, P. (2018) Nonclonal coloniality: Genetically chimeric colonies through fusion of sexually produced polyps in the hydrozoan Ectopleura larynx. Evolution Letters, 2(4): 442455.Google Scholar
Chapman, T. (2006) Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females. Current Biology, 16(17): R744R754.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, D. (2006) Balancing selection and its effects on sequences in nearby genome regions. PLoS Genetics, 2(4): e64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, C. D. (2007) Cytoplasmic male sterility: A window to the world of plant mitochondrial–nuclear interactions. Trends in Genetics, 23(2): 8190.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, C. K., West, S. A., and Griffin, A. S. (2009) Routes to indirect fitness in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: Kin discrimination and limited dispersal. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22(12): 24452457.Google Scholar
Crespi, B., and Nosil, P. (2013) Conflictual speciation: Species formation via genomic conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28(1): 4857.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1861) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 3rd ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2006) The Selfish Gene: With a New Introduction by the Author. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Tomaso, A. W., Nyholm, S. V., Palmeri, K. J., Ishizuka, K. J., Ludington, W. B., Mitchel, K., and Weissman, I. L. (2005) Isolation and characterization of a protochordate histocompatibility locus. Nature, 438(7067): 454459.Google Scholar
Didion, J. P., Morgan, A. P., Yadgary, L. et al. (2016) R2d2 drives selfish sweeps in the house mouse. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33(6): 13811395.Google Scholar
Dobata, S. (2012) Arms race between selfishness and policing: Two-trait quantitative genetic model for caste fate conflict in eusocial Hymenoptera. Evolution, 66(12): 37543764.Google Scholar
Dobata, S., Sasaki, T., Mori, H., and Hasegawa, E. (2011) Persistence of the single lineage of transmissible “social cancer” in an asexual ant. Molecular Ecology, 20(3): 441455.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1998) Nutritional interactions in insect-microbial symbioses: Aphids and their symbiotic bacteria Buchnera. Annual Review of Entomology, 43: 1737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flack, J. C., de Waal, F. B. M., and Krakauer, D. C. (2005) Social structure, robustness, and policing cost in a cognitively sophisticated species. The American Naturalist, 165(5): E126E139.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. A., and Doebeli, M. (2009) A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Science, 276(1654): 1319.Google Scholar
Foster, K. R., and Ratnieks, F. L. (2000) Facultative worker policing in a wasp. Nature, 407(6805): 692693.Google Scholar
Foster, K. R., Ratnieks, F. L. W., and Wenseleers, T. (2000) Spite in social insects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15(11): 469470.Google Scholar
Foster, K. R., Wenseleers, T., and Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2001) Spite: Hamilton’s unproven theory. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 38(3/4): 229238.Google Scholar
Frank, S. A. (1991) Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution, 45(2): 262267.Google Scholar
Frank, S. A. (1996) Host-symbiont conflict over the mixing of symbiotic lineages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Science, 263(1368): 339344.Google Scholar
Frank, S. A. (2003) Repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution, 57(4): 693705.Google Scholar
Gardner, A., and West, S. A. (2004) Spite and the scale of competition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17(6): 11951203.Google Scholar
Gardner, A., West, S. A., and Wild, G. (2011) The genetical theory of kin selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24(5): 10201043.Google Scholar
Geist, K. S., Strassmann, J. E., and Queller, D. C. (2019) Family quarrels in seeds and rapid adaptive evolution in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 116(19): 94639468.Google Scholar
Ghoul, M., Andersen, S. B., and West, S. A. (2017) Sociomics: Using omic approaches to understand social evolution. Trends in Genetics, 33(6): 408419.Google Scholar
Ghoul, M., Griffin, A. S., and West, S. A. (2014) Toward an evolutionary definition of cheating. Evolution, 68(2): 318331.Google Scholar
Greiner, S., Sobanski, J., and Bock, R. (2015) Why are most organelle genomes transmitted maternally? BioEssays, 37(1): 8094.Google Scholar
Grosberg, R. K., and Strathmann, R. R. (1998) One cell, two cell, red cell, blue cell: The persistence of a unicellular stage in multicellular life histories. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13(3): 112116.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1955) Population genetics. New Biology, 18: 3451.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1): 116.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1): 1752.Google Scholar
Harrison, E., MacLean, R. C., Koufopanou, V., and Burt, A. (2014) Sex drives intracellular conflict in yeast. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27(8): 17571763.Google Scholar
Hepper, P. G. (2005) Kin Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillesland, K. L. (2018) Evolution on the bright side of life: Microorganisms and the evolution of mutualism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1422(1): 88103.Google Scholar
Hirose, S., Benabentos, R., Ho, H.-I., Kuspa, A., and Shaulsky, G. (2011) Self-recognition in social amoebae is mediated by allelic pairs of tiger genes. Science, 333(6041): 467470.Google Scholar
Hjort, K., Goldberg, A. V., Tsaousis, A. D., Hirt, R. P., and Embley, T. M. (2010) Diversity and reductive evolution of mitochondria among microbial eukaryotes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 365(1541): 713727.Google Scholar
Hughes, W. O. H., and Boomsma, J. J. (2008) Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105(13): 51505153.Google Scholar
Hurst, L. D. (1998) Selfish genes and meiotic drive. Nature, 391(6664): 223.Google Scholar
Hurst, L. D., Atlan, A., and Bengtsson, B. O. (1996) Genetic conflicts. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 71(3): 317364.Google Scholar
Ingvarsson, P. K., and Taylor, D. R. (2002) Genealogical evidence for epidemics of selfish genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99(17): 1126511269.Google Scholar
Jordan, L. A., Allsopp, M. H., Oldroyd, B. P., Wossler, T. C., and Beekman, M. (2008) Cheating honeybee workers produce royal offspring. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Science, 275(1632): 345351.Google Scholar
Keller, L., and Ross, K. G. (1998) Selfish genes: A green beard in the red fire ant. Nature, 394(6693): 573575.Google Scholar
Khare, A., Santorelli, L. A., Strassmann, J. E., Queller, D. C., Kuspa, A., and Shaulsky, G. (2009) Cheater-resistance is not futile. Nature, 461(7266): 980982.Google Scholar
Kiers, E. T., Rousseau, R. A., West, S. A., and Denison, R. F. (2003) Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism. Nature, 425(6953): 7881.Google Scholar
Lakkis, F. G., Dellaporta, S. L., and Buss, L. W. (2008) Allorecognition and chimerism in an invertebrate model organism. Organogenesis, 4(4): 236240.Google Scholar
Larracuente, A. M., and Presgraves, D. C. (2012) The selfish Segregation Distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 192(1): 3353.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L., Ravigné, V., and Keller, L. (2008) Population viscosity can promote the evolution of altruistic sterile helpers and eusociality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Science, 275(1645): 18871895.Google Scholar
Leigh, E. G., Jr. (2010) The evolution of mutualism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23(12): 25072528.Google Scholar
León-Avila, G., and Tovar, J. (2004) Mitosomes of Entamoeba histolytica are abundant mitochondrion-related remnant organelles that lack a detectable organellar genome. Microbiology, 150(Pt 5): 12451250.Google Scholar
Levin, S. R., Brock, D. A., Queller, D. C., and Strassmann, J. E. (2015) Concurrent coevolution of intra-organismal cheaters and resisters. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28(4): 756765.Google Scholar
Lindholm, A. K., Dyer, K. A., Firman, R. C. et al. (2016) The ecology and evolutionary dynamics of meiotic drive. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 31(4): 315326.Google Scholar
Litman, G. W. (2006) How Botryllus chooses to fuse. Immunity, 25(1): 1315.Google Scholar
Manhes, P., and Velicer, G. J. (2011) Experimental evolution of selfish policing in social bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108(20): 83578362.Google Scholar
Mank, J. E. (2017) Population genetics of sexual conflict in the genomic era. Nature Reviews Genetics, 18(12): 721730.Google Scholar
Morandin, C., Tin, M. M. Y., Abril, S. et al. (2016) Comparative transcriptomics reveals the conserved building blocks involved in parallel evolution of diverse phenotypic traits in ants. Genome Biology, 17: article number 43.Google Scholar
Nicotra, M. L. (2019) Invertebrate allorecognition. Current Biology, 29(11): R463R467.Google Scholar
Nielsen, R. (2005) Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annual Review of Genetics, 39: 197218.Google Scholar
Okada, Y., Watanabe, Y., Tin, M. M. Y., Tsuji, K., and Mikheyev, A. S. (2017) Social dominance alters nutrition-related gene expression immediately: Transcriptomic evidence from a monomorphic queenless ant. Molecular Ecology, 26(11): 29222938.Google Scholar
Ostrowski, E. A. (2019) Enforcing cooperation in the social amoebae. Current Biology, 29(11): R474R484.Google Scholar
Ostrowski, E. A., Katoh, M., Shaulsky, G., Queller, D. C., and Strassmann, J. E. (2008) Kin discrimination increases with genetic distance in a social amoeba. PLoS Biology, 6(11): e287.Google Scholar
Ostrowski, E. A., and Shaulsky, G. (2009) Learning to get along despite struggling to get by. Genome Biology, 10(5): 218.Google Scholar
Ostrowski, E. A., Shen, Y., Tian, X. et al. (2015) Genomic signatures of cooperation and conflict in the social amoeba. Current Biology, 25(12): 16611665.Google Scholar
Patten, M. M. (2018) Selfish X chromosomes and speciation. Molecular Ecology, 27: 37723782.Google Scholar
Phadnis, N., and Orr, H. A. (2009) A single gene causes both male sterility and segregation distortion in Drosophila hybrids. Science, 323(5912): 376379.Google Scholar
Pizzari, T., and Foster, K. R. (2008) Sperm sociality: Cooperation, altruism, and spite. PLoS Biology, 6(5): e130.Google Scholar
Queller, D. C. (2000) Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 355(1403): 16471655.Google Scholar
Queller, D. C., and Strassmann, J. E. (2018) Evolutionary conflict. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 49(1): 7393.Google Scholar
Rainey, P. B., and Rainey, K. (2003) Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations. Nature, 425(6953): 7274.Google Scholar
Rainey, P. B., and Travisano, M. (1998) Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature, 394(6688): 6972.Google Scholar
Rankin, D. J., and Taborsky, M. (2009) Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity. Evolution, 63(7): 19131922.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F. L. W. (1988) Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. The American Naturalist, 132(2): 217236.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F. L. W., Foster, K. R., and Wenseleers, T. (2006) Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology, 51: 581608.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F. L. W., and Wenseleers, T. (2005) Policing insect societies. Science, 307(5706): 5456.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Grozinger, C. M., and Whitfield, C. W. (2005) Sociogenomics: Social life in molecular terms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(4): 257270.Google Scholar
Rosengarten, R. D., and Nicotra, M. L. (2011) Model systems of invertebrate allorecognition. Current Biology, 21(2): R82R92.Google Scholar
Ross, K. G., and Keller, L. (1998) Genetic control of social organization in an ant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95(24): 1423214237.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. L., Quides, K. W., and Wendlandt, C. E. (2018) Legumes versus rhizobia: A model for ongoing conflict in symbiosis. The New Phytologist, 219(4): 11991206.Google Scholar
Sandler, L., and Novitski, E. (1957) Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. The American Naturalist, 91(857): 105110.Google Scholar
Santorelli, L. A., Thompson, C. R. L., Villegas, E. et al. (2008) Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae. Nature, 451(7182): 11071110.Google Scholar
Städler, T., and Delph, L. F. (2002) Ancient mitochondrial haplotypes and evidence for intragenic recombination in a gynodioecious plant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99(18): 1173011735.Google Scholar
Stoner, D. S., and Weissman, I. L. (1996) Somatic and germ cell parasitism in a colonial ascidian: Possible role for a highly polymorphic allorecognition system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93(26): 1525415259.Google Scholar
Strassmann, J. E., Zhu, Y., and Queller, D. C. (2000) Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature, 408(6815): 965967.Google Scholar
Sucgang, R., Kuo, A., Tian, X. et al. (2011) Comparative genomics of the social amoebae Dictyostelium discoideum and Dictyostelium purpureum. Genome Biology, 12(2): R20.Google Scholar
Tao, Y., Hartl, D. L., and Laurie, C. C. (2001) Sex-ratio segregation distortion associated with reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98(23): 1318313188.Google Scholar
Tarnita, C. E., Washburne, A., Martinez-Garcia, R., Sgro, A. E., and Levin, S. A. (2015) Fitness tradeoffs between spores and nonaggregating cells can explain the coexistence of diverse genotypes in cellular slime molds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112(9): 27762781.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D. (1992) Altruism in viscous populations – An inclusive fitness model. Evolutionary Ecology, 6(4): 352356.Google Scholar
Toth, A. L. (2017) To reproduce or work? Insect castes emerge from socially induced changes in nutrition-related genes. Molecular Ecology, 26(11): 28392841.Google Scholar
Touzet, P., and Budar, F. (2004) Unveiling the molecular arms race between two conflicting genomes in cytoplasmic male sterility? Trends in Plant Science, 9(12): 568570.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1): 3557.Google Scholar
Van Dyken, J. D., and Wade, M. J. (2012) Detecting the molecular signature of social conflict: Theory and a test with bacterial quorum sensing genes. The American Naturalist, 179(4): 436450.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Wurm, Y., Nipitwattanaphon, M., Riba-Grognuz, O., Huang, Y.-C., Shoemaker, D., and Keller, L. (2013) A Y-like social chromosome causes alternative colony organization in fire ants. Nature, 493(7434): 664668.Google Scholar
Wenseleers, T., Hart, A. G., Ratnieks, F. L. W., and Quezada-Euan, J. J. G. (2004) Queen execution and caste conflict in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii. Ethology, 110(9): 725736.Google Scholar
Werren, J. H. (2011) Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108 (Suppl. 2): 1086310870.Google Scholar
Wielgoss, S., Wolfensberger, R., Sun, L., Fiegna, F., and Velicer, G. J. (2019) Social genes are selection hotspots in kin groups of a soil microbe. Science, 363(6433): 13421345.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Pollock, G. B., and Dugatkin, L. A. (1992) Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? Evolutionary Ecology, 6(4): 331341.Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Gladieux, P., Hutchison, E., Bueche, J., Hall, C., Perraudeau, F., and Glass, N. L. (2015) Identification of allorecognition loci in Neurospora crassa by genomics and evolutionary approaches. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32(9): 24172432.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×