Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’, Yale Law Journal, 96 (1987), pp. 943–1005.Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert, Theorie der Grundrechte (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1985).Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, transl. Rivers, Julian (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Alkema, Evert, ‘The European Convention as a Constitution and Its Court as a Constitutional Court’ in Mahoney, P. et al. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective (Studies in memory of Rolf Ryssdal) (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000), pp. 41–63.Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘Out of the Abyss: The Challenges Confronting the New UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 9 (1987), pp. 332–381.Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ in Alston, Philip (ed.), The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 473–508.Google Scholar

Alston, Philip and Quinn, Gerard, ‘The Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 9 (1987), pp. 156–229.Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Yukata, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002).Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, Equality and Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, ‘Discrimination as a Magnifying Lens: Scope and Ambit under Art. 14 and Protocol No. 12’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 330–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 15 (2017), pp. 9–35.Google Scholar

Barak, Aharon, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Bates, Ed, ‘The Birth of the European Convention on Human Rights – and the European Court of Human Rights’ in Christoffersen, J. and Madsen, M.R. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Bates, Ed, ‘Analysing the Prisoner Voting Saga and the British Challenge to Strasbourg’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2014), pp. 503–540.Google Scholar

Bendor, Ariel L. and Sela, Tal, ‘How Proportional Is Proportionality’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13 (2015), pp. 530–544.Google Scholar

Bennett, Robert W. and Solum, Lawrence, Constitutional Originalism: A Debate (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Berchtold, Klaus, ‘Council of Europe Activities in the Field of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ in Matscher, F. (ed.), The Implementation of Economic and Social Rights, National, International and Comparative Aspects (Kehl: N.P. Engel Verlag, 1991), pp. 355–370.Google Scholar

Bettinson, Vanessa and Jones, Alwyn, ‘The Integration or Exclusion of Welfare Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: The Removal of Foreign National with HIV after N v UK (Application No. 26565/05; decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, 27 May 2008)’, Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 31 (2009), pp. 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickel, Alexander, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Bilchitz, David, ‘Towards a Reasonable Approach to the Minimum Core: Laying the Foundations for Future Socio-Economic Rights Jurisprudence’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 19 (2003), pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilchitz, David, Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Bilchitz, David, ‘Does Sandra Liebenberg’s New Book Provide a Viable Approach to Adjudication Socio-Economic Rights?’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 27 (2011), pp. 546–557.Google Scholar

Bilchitz, David, ‘Necessity and Proportionality: Towards a Balanced Approach’ in Lazarus, L., McCrudden, Ch., and Bowles, N. (eds.), Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 41–62.Google Scholar

Bilchitz, David, ‘Socio-Economic Rights, Economic Crisis, and Legal Doctrine’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12 (2014), pp. 710–739.Google Scholar

Bittner, Claudia, ‘Casenote – Human Dignity as a Matter of Legislative Consistency in an Ideal World: The Fundamental Right to Guarantee a Subsistence Minimum in the German Federal Constitutional Court’s Judgment of 9 February 2010’, German Law Journal, 12 (2011), pp. 1941–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco, Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Borowski, Martin, Grundrechte als Prinzipien, 2nd ed., (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007).Google Scholar

Bossuyt, Marc, ‘Should the Strasbourg Court Exercise More Self-Restraint? On the Extension of the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights to Social Security Regulations’, Human Rights Law Journal, 28 (2007), pp. 321–332.Google Scholar

Bossuyt, Marc, ‘The Court of Strasbourg Acting as an Asylum Court’, European Constitutional Law Review, 8 (2012), pp. 2013–2245.Google Scholar

Brand, Danie, ‘The Minimum Core Content of the Right to Food in Context: A Response to Rolf Künneman’ in Brand, D. and Russell, S. (eds.), Exploring the Core Content of Economic and Social Rights: South African and International Perspectives (Pretoria: Protea Book House, 2002), pp. 99–108.Google Scholar

Brand, Danie, ‘Socio-Economic Rights and the Courts in South Africa: Justiciability on a Sliding Scale’ in Coomans, F. (ed.) Justiciability of Economic and Social Rights: Experiences from Domestic Systems (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2006), pp. 207–236.Google Scholar

Brand, Danie and Russell, Sage (eds.), Exploring the Core Content of Economic and Social Rights: South African and International Perspectives (Pretoria: Protea Book House, 2002).Google Scholar

Brems, Eva, ‘Indirect Protection of Social Rights by the European Court of Human Rights’ in Barak-Erez, D. and Gross, A.M. (eds.), Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007), pp. 135–167.Google Scholar

Brüning, Christoph, ‘Art. 19’ in Stern, Klaus and Becker, Florian (eds.), Grundrechte-Kommentar: Die Grundrechte des Grundgesetzes mit ihren europäischen Bezügen (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar

Budlender, Geoff, ‘The Role of the Courts in Achieving the Transformative Potential of Socio-Economic Rights’, ESR Review, 8 (2007), pp. 9–11.Google Scholar

Byrne, Iain, ‘Sandra Liebenberg, Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution’, (Book review), Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2012), pp. 183–186.Google Scholar

Callewaert, Johan, ‘The Judgments of the Court, Background and Content’ in Macdonald, R.S.J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993), pp. 713–731.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, ‘Are Human Rights Truly Universal’ in Savić, O. (ed.), The Politics of Human Rights (London and Brooklyn: Verso Books, 1999), pp. 149–165.Google Scholar

Chapman, Audrey R., ‘A “Violations Approach” for Monitoring the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 18 (1996), pp. 23–66.Google Scholar

Chapman, Audrey R., ‘Core Obligations Related to the Right to Health’ in Chapman, Audrey and Russell, Sage (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002), pp. 185–215.Google Scholar

Chapman, Audrey R. and Russell, Sage (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002).Google Scholar

Chapman, Audrey R. and Russell, Sage, ‘Introduction’ in Chapman, A.R. and Russell, S. (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Chlosta, Joachim, Der Wesensgehalt der Eigentumsgewährleistung. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Mitbestimmungsproblematik (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1975).Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas, Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar

Cleveland, Sarah H., Helfer, Laurence R., Neuman, Gerald L. and Orentlicher, Diane F., Human Rights, 2nd ed., (Eagan: Thomson Reuters Foundation Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo, ‘American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins’, International Constitutional Law Journal, 2 (2010), pp. 263–286.Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo, ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 59 (2011), pp. 463–490.Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo, ‘Proportionality and Justification’ (Article Review: Barak, Aharon, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations, Cambridge University Press 2012), University of Toronto Law Journal, 63 (2013), pp. 458–477.Google Scholar

Coomans, Fons, ‘In Search of the Core Content of the Right to Education’ in Chapman, A.R. and Russell, S. (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002), pp. 217–246.Google Scholar

Coomans, Fons, ‘In Search of the Core Content of the Right to Education’ in Brand, D. and Russell, S. (eds.), Exploring the Core Content of Economic and Social Rights: South African and International Perspectives (Pretoria: Protea Book House, 2002), pp. 159–182.Google Scholar

Cousins, Mel, The European Convention on Human Rights and Social Security Law, Social Europe Series (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2008), vol. XV.Google Scholar

Cousins, Mel, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights, Non-Discrimination and Social Security: Great Scope, Little Depth?’, Journal of Social Security Law, 16 (2009), pp. 118–136.Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew C.R., The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Crocquet, Nicolas A.J., ‘The European Court of Human Rights Norm-Creation and Norm-Limiting Processes: Resolving a Normative Tension’, Columbia Journal of European Law, 17 (2011), pp. 307–373.Google Scholar

Davis, Dennis, ‘The Case against the Inclusion of Socio-Economic Demands in a Bill of Rights Except as Directive Principles’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 8 (1992), pp. 475–490.Google Scholar

Debeljak, Julie, ‘Balancing Rights in a Democracy: The Problems with Limitations and Overrides of Rights under the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006’, Melbourne University Law Review, 32 (2008), pp. 422–469.Google Scholar

Dembour, Marie-Benedicte, ‘“Finishing Off” Cases: The Radical Solution to the Problem of the Expanding ECtHR Caseload’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2002), pp. 604–623.Google Scholar

De Schutter, Olivier and Tulkens, Françoise, ‘Rights in Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights as a Pragmatic Institution’ in Brems, E. (ed.), Conflicts between Fundamental Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2008), pp. 169–216.Google Scholar

De Vos, Pierre, ‘Pious Wishes or Directly Enforceable Human Rights? Social and Economic Rights in South Africa’s 1996 Constitution’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 13 (1997), pp. 67–101.Google Scholar

De Vos, Pierre, ‘Grootboom, The Right of Access to Housing and Substantive Equality as Contextual Fairness’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 17 (2001), pp. 258–276.Google Scholar

Dixon, Rosalind, ‘Creating Dialogue about Socio-Economic Rights: Strong Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5 (2007), pp. 391–418.Google Scholar

Dreier, Horst, ‘Art. 19 II’ in Dreier, H. (ed.), Grundgesetz Kommentar, Band I, 3rd ed. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag, 2013).Google Scholar

Drews, Claudia, Die Wesensgehaltgarantie des Art. 19 II GG, Diss. (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2005).Google Scholar

Dürig, Günter, ‘Der Grundrechtssatz von der Menschenwürde. Entwurf eines praktikablen Wertsystems der Grundrecte aus Art. 1 Abs. I in Verbindung mit Art. 19 Abs. II des Grundgesetzes’, Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, 81 (1956), pp. 117–157.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Rights as Trumps’ in Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 153–167.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik’s Conception of Legal Culture’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 14 (1998), pp. 11–37.Google Scholar

Edmundson, William, ‘Rethinking Exclusionary Reasons: A Second Edition of Joseph Raz’s Practical Reason and Norms’, Law and Philosophy, 12 (1993), pp. 329–343.Google Scholar

Egidy, Stefanie, ‘Casenote – The Fundamental Right to the Guarantee of a Subsistence Minimum in the Hartz IV Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court’, German Law Journal, 12 (2011), pp. 1961–1982.Google Scholar

Eide, Asbjørn, ‘Realization of Social and Economic Rights and the Minimum Threshold Approach’, Human Rights Law Journal, 10 (1989), pp. 35–50.Google Scholar

Eide, Asbjørn, ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Human Rights’ in Eide, A., Krause, C. and Rosas, A. (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001), pp. 9–28.Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Enders, Christoph, ‘Art. 19’ in Epping, Volker and Hillgruber, Christian (eds.), Beck’scher Online-Kommentar GG, 16th ed. (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2012).Google Scholar

Faigman, David L., ‘Reconciling Individual Rights and Government Interests: Madisonian Principles versus Supreme Court Practice’, Virginia Law Review, 78 (1992), pp. 1521–1580.Google Scholar

Fallon, Richard H. Jr., ‘Individual Rights and the Powers of Government’, Georgia Law Review, 27 (1993), pp. 343–390.Google Scholar

Feldman, David, ‘The Developing Scope of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (1997), pp. 25–247.Google Scholar

Ferraz, Octavio ‘Harming the Poor Through Social Rights Litigation: Lessons from Brazil’, Texas Law Review, 89 (2010), pp. 1643–1668.Google Scholar

Flegar, Veronika, ‘Vulnerability and the Principle of Non-Refoulement in the European Court of Human Rights: Towards an Increased Scope of Protection for Persons Fleeing from Extreme Poverty?’, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 8 (2016), pp. 148–169.Google Scholar

Foster, Steve, ‘Reluctancy Restoring Rights: Responding to the Prisoner’s Right to Vote’, Human Rights Law Review, 9 (2009), pp. 489–507.Google Scholar

Fredman, Sandra, Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Fried, Charles, Right and Wrong (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Frohwerk, Arno, Soziale Not in der Rechtsprechung des EGMR (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012).Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 92 (1978), pp. 353–394.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, 2nd ed. (London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 1989).Google Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen, ‘Limiting Constitutional Rights’, UCLA Law Review, 54 (2007), pp. 798–854.Google Scholar

Gearty, Conor and Mantouvalou, Virginia, Debating Social Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Intensity of Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases’, Netherlands International Law Review, 51 (2004), pp. 135–183.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Fundamental Rights and Other Interests: Should It Really Make a Difference?’ in Brems, E. (ed.), Conflicts between Fundamental Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2008), pp. 655–690.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights’ in Huls, N., Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Rulings. Judicial Deliberations and Beyond (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009), pp. 407–436.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Pluralism, Deference, and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, European Law Journal, 17 (2011), pp. 80–120.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘The Prism of Fundamental Rights’, European Constitutional Law Review, 8 (2012), pp. 173–202.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘How to Improve the Necessity Test of the European Court of Human Rights’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (2013), pp. 466–490.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘The Scope of ECHR Rights and Institutional Concerns: The Relationship between Proliferation of Rights and the Case Load of the ECtHR’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 84–105.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the National Courts: Giving Shape to the Notion of “Shared Responsibility”’ in Gerards, J.H. and Fleuren, J. (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Case Law of the ECtHR in National Case Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2014), pp. 13–93.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine, the Very Weighty Reasons Test and Grounds of Discrimination’ in Balboni, M. (ed.), The Principle of Non-Discrimination and the European Convention of Human Rights (forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2875230Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Case Law of the ECtHR in National Case Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2014).Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph, ‘The Netherlands’ in Gerards, J.H. and Fleuren, J. (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Case Law of the ECtHR in National Case Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2014), pp. 217–260.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke and Senden, Hanneke, ‘The Structure of Fundamental Rights and the European Court of Human Rights’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (2009), pp. 619–653.Google Scholar

Greer, Steven, The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Greer, Steven and Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2013), pp. 655–687.Google Scholar

Gunther, Gerald, ‘The Supreme Court, 1971 Term – Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection’, Harvard Law Review, 86 (1972), pp. 1–48.Google Scholar

Häberle, Peter, Die Wesensgehaltgarantie des Art. 19 II GG – zugleich ein Beitrag zum institutionellen Verständnis der Grundrecht und zur Lehre vom Gesetzesvorbehalt, 3rd ed. (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1983).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamel, Walter, Die Bedeutung der Grundrechte im sozialen Rechtsstaat. Eine Kritik an Gesetzgebung und Rechtsprechung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1957).Google Scholar

Harris, David J., O’Boyle, Michael, Bates, Edward P. and Buckley, Carla M., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Harris, David J., O’Boyle, Michael, Bates, Edward P. and Buckley, Carla M., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Haysom, Nicholas, ‘Constitutionalism, Majoritarian Democracy and Socio-Economic Rights’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 8 (1992), pp. 451–463.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107 (1997), pp. 273–392.Google Scholar

Hennette-Vauchez, Stéphanie, ‘Constitutional v. International? When Unified Reformatory Rationales Mismatch the Plural Paths of Legitimacy of ECHR Law’ in Christoffersen, J. and Rask Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 144–164.Google Scholar

Herbert, Georg, ‘Der Wesensgehalt der Grundrechte’, Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift, 12 (1985), pp. 321–335.Google Scholar

Hörmann, Jens-Hendrik, Rechtsprobleme des Grundrechts auf Gewährleistung eines menschenwürdigen Existenzminimums: Zu den Auswirkungen des ‘Regelleistungsurteils’ auf die ‘Hartz IV’-Gesetzgebung und andere Sozialgesetze (Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 2012).Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael, ‘Human Rights as Ideology’ in Ignatieff, M. (Gutmann, A. (ed.)), Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Jäckel, Hartmut, Grundrechtsgeltung und Grundrechtssicherung – eine rechtsdogmatische Studie zu Artikel 19 Abs. 2 GG (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1967).Google Scholar

Jakab, András, ‘Re-Defining Principles as “Important Rules” a Critique of Robert Alexy’ in Borowski, M. (ed.), On the Nature of Legal Principles (Proceedings of the Special Workshop ‘The Principles Theory’ held at the 23rd World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Science (IVR), Kraków, 2007) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag/Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010), pp. 145–160.Google Scholar

Jarass, Hans D., ‘Art. 19’ in Jarass, Hans D. and Pieroth, Bodo (eds.), GG. Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Kommentar, 14th ed. (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2012).Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Arthur, ‘Über den “Wesensgehalt” der Grund- und Menschenrechte’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 70 (1984), pp. 384–399.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen, Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act, (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Kende, Mark S., ‘The South African Constitutional Court’s Embrace of Socio-Economic Rights: A Comparative Perspective’, Chapman Law Review, 6 (2003), pp. 137–160.Google Scholar

Kende, Mark S., ‘The South African Constitutional Court’s Construction of Socio-Economic Rights: A Response to the Critics’, Connecticut Journal of International Law, 19 (2004), pp. 617–629.Google Scholar

Kenny, Jo, ‘European Convention on Human Rights and Social Welfare’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2010), pp. 495–503.Google Scholar

King, Jeff, Judging Social Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Kingreen, Thorsten, ‘Schätzungen “ins Blaue hinein”: Zu den Auswirkungen des Hartz IV-Urteils des Bundesverfassungsgerichts auf das Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (2010), pp. 558–562.Google Scholar

Klatt, Matthias and Meister, Moritz, The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Klug, Heinz Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa’s Political Reconstruction (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Knüllig, Werner, Bedeutung und Auslegung des Artikels 19 Abs. I und II des Grundgesetzes, doctoral thesis (Kiel, 1954).Google Scholar

Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘Social Rights as Components in the Civil Right to Personal Liberty – Another Possible Step Forward in the Integrated Human Rights Approach?’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 20 (2002), pp. 29–51.Google Scholar

Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘The Justiciability of Indivisible Rights’, Nordic Law Journal, 72 (2003), pp. 3–39.Google Scholar

Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘Dichotomies, Trichotomies or Waves of Duties’, Human Rights Law Review, 5 (2005), pp. 81–103.Google Scholar

Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Components in Civil and Political Rights: A Hermeneutic Perspective’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 10 (2006), pp. 405–430.Google Scholar

Koch, Ida Elisabeth, Human Rights as Indivisible Rights: The Protection of Socio-Economic Demands under the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar

Koch, Ida Elisabeth and Vested-Hansen, Jens, ‘International Human Rights and National Legislatures – Conflict or Balance’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 75 (2006), pp. 3–28.Google Scholar

Kratochvíl, Jan, ‘The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 29 (2011), pp. 324–357.Google Scholar

Krieger, Heike, ‘Positive Verpflichtungen unter der EMRK: Unentbehrliches Element einer gemeineuropäischen Grundrechtsdogmatik, leeres Versprechen oder Grenze der Justitiabilität?’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 74 (2014), pp. 187–213.Google Scholar

Krüger, Herbert, ‘Der Wesensgehalt der Grundrechte i.S. des Art. 19 GG’, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 8 (1955), pp. 597–602.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias, ‘Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2 (2004), pp. 574–596.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias, ‘Who Is Afraid of the Total Constitution? Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law’, German Law Journal, 7 (2006), pp. 341–369.Google Scholar

Künnemann, Rolf, ‘The Right to Adequate Food: Violations to Its Minimum core Content’ in Chapman, A.R. and Russell, S. (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002), pp. 163–183.Google Scholar

Landau, David, ‘The Promise of a Minimum Core Approach: The Colombian Model for Judicial Review of Austerity Measures’ in Nolan, A. (ed), Economic and Social Rights after the Global Crisis (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 276–298.Google Scholar

Langa, Pius, ‘The Vision of the Constitution’, South African Law Journal, 120 (2003), pp. 670–679.Google Scholar

Langford, Malcolm, ‘The Justiciability of Social Rights: From Practice to Theory’ in Langford, M. (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 3–45.Google Scholar

Lasser, Mitchel de S.-O.-l’E, Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Laurens, Lavrysen, Human Rights in a Positive State: Rethinking the Relationship between Positive and Negative Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar

Leckie, Scott, ‘The Human Right to Adequate Housing’ in Eide, A., Krause, C. and Rosas, A. (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001), pp. 149–168.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Karin, ‘In Defense of the Constitutional Court: Litigating Socio-Economic Rights and the Myth of the Minimum Core’, American University International Law Review, 22 (2006), pp. 163–197.Google Scholar

Leijten, Ingrid, ‘From Stec to Valkov: Possessions and Margins in the Social Security Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 13 (2013), pp. 309–349.Google Scholar

Leijten, Ingrid, ‘Social Security as a Fundamental Rights Issue in Europe: Ramaer and Van Willigen and the Development of Property Protection and Non-Discrimination under the ECHR’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 73 (2013), pp. 177–208.Google Scholar

Leijten, Ingrid, ‘Defining the Scope of Economic and Social Guarantees in the Case Law of the ECtHR’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 109–136.Google Scholar

Leijten, Ingrid, ‘The German Right to an Existenzminimum, Human Dignity, and the Possibility of Minimum Core Socioeconomic Rights Protection’, German Law Journal, 16 (2015), pp. 23–48.Google Scholar

Leijten, Ingrid, ‘Separation of Powers and the Limits to the “Constitutionalization” of Fundamental Rights Adjudication by the ECtHR and the CJEU’ in Ten Napel, H.M.Th.D. and Voermans, W.J.M. (eds.), The Powers that Be: Rethinking the Separation of Powers: A Leiden Response to Christoph Möllers (Leiden University Press, 2015) pp. 275–293.Google Scholar

Letsas, George, ‘The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the ECHR’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), pp. 279–305.Google Scholar

Letsas, George, ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (2006), pp. 705–732.Google Scholar

Letsas, George, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Letsas, George, ‘The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy’ in Ulfstein, Geir, Follesdal, Andreas and Peters, Birgit (eds), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 106–141.Google Scholar

Letsas, George, ‘The Scope and Balancing of Rights: Diagnostic or Constitutive?’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 38–64.Google Scholar

Leuprecht, Peter, ‘Innovations in the European System of Human Rights Protection: Is Enlargement Compatible with Reinforcement?’, Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 8 (1998), pp. 313–336.Google Scholar

Liebenberg, Sandra, ‘The Right to Social Assistance: The Implications of Grootboom for Policy Reform in South Africa’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 17 (2001), pp. 232–357.Google Scholar

Liebenberg, Sandra, ‘South Africa: Adjudicating Social Rights Under a Transformative Constitution’ in Longford, M. (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 75–101.Google Scholar

Liebenberg, Sandra, Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution (Cape Town: Juta and Company, 2010).Google Scholar

Lord, Hoffmann, ‘The Universality of Human Rights’, Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture (2009).Google Scholar

Lord Lester of Herne Hill, ‘Universality versus Subsidiarity: A Reply’, European Human Rights Law Review (1998), pp. 73–81.Google Scholar

Mahoney, Paul, ‘Judicial Activism and Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 11 (1990), pp. 57–88.Google Scholar

Mantouvalou, Virginia, ‘Work and Private Life: Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania’, European Law Review, 30 (2005), pp. 573–585.Google Scholar

Mantouvalou, Virginia, ‘N v UK: No Duty to Rescue the Nearby Needy?’, Modern Law Review, 72 (2009), pp. 815–828.Google Scholar

Mantouvalou, Virginia, ‘Labour Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: An Intellectual Justification for an Integrated Approach to Interpretation’, Human Rights Law Review, 13 (2013), pp. 529–555.Google Scholar

Masterman, Roger, ‘The United Kingdom’ in Gerards, J. and Fleuren, J. (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Case Law of the ECtHR in National Case Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2014), pp. 297–332.Google Scholar

Matscher, Franz, ‘Methods of Interpretation of the Convention’ in Macdonald, R.S.J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993), pp. 63–81.Google Scholar

Merrills, J.G., The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Manchester University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Miller, Bradley W., ‘Justification and Rights Limitations’ in Huscroft, G. (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Moellendorf, Darrel, ‘Reasoning about Resources: Soobramoney and the Future of Socio-Economic Rights Claims’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 14 (1998), pp. 327–333.Google Scholar

Möller, Kai, The Global Model of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Möller, Kai, ‘From Constitutional to Human Rights: On the Moral Structure of International Human Rights’, Global Constitutionalism, 3 (2014), pp. 373–403.Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Moseneke, Dikgang, ‘Transformative Adjudication’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 18 (2002), pp. 309–319.Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alastair, The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alastair, ‘The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 5 (2005), pp. 57–79.Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alistair, Cases, Materials and Commentary on the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Mureinik, Etienne, ‘Beyond a Charter of Luxuries: Economic Rights in the Constitution’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 8 (1992), pp. 464–474.Google Scholar

Mureinik, Etienne, ‘A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 10 (1994), pp. 31–48.Google Scholar

Neumann, Volker, ‘Menschenwürde und Existenzminimum’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (1995), pp. 426–432.Google Scholar

Nolette, Paul, ‘Lessons learned from the South African Constitutional Court: Toward a Third Way of Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights’, Michigan State Journal of International Law, 12 (2003), pp. 91–119.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha, Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Nussberger, Angelika, ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: View from the Court’, in Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 161–176.Google Scholar

O’Cinneide, Colm, ‘A Modest Proposal: Destitution, State Responsibility and the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (2008), pp. 583–605.Google Scholar

O’Cinneide, Colm, ‘The Problematic of Social Rights – Uniformity and Diversity in the Development of Social Rights Review’ in Lazarus, L., McCrudden, Ch. and Bowles, N. (eds.), Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 299–317.Google Scholar

O’Connell, Paul, Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights: International Standards and Comparative Experiences (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora, Towards Justice and Virtue (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Örücü, Esin, ‘The Core of Rights and Freedoms: The Limits of Limits’ in Campbell, Tom et al. (eds.), Human Rights: From Rhetoric to Reality (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, (1986), pp. 37–59.Google Scholar

Ost, François, ‘The Original Canons of Interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Chodkiewicz, Ch. (eds.), The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992), pp. 283–318.Google Scholar

Palmer, Ellie, ‘Protecting Socio-Economic Rights through the European Convention on Human Rights: Trends and Developments in the European Court of Human Rights’, Erasmus Law Review, 2 (2009), pp. 397–425.Google Scholar

Palmer, Ellie, ‘Beyond Arbitrary Interference: The Right to a Home? Developing Socio-Economic Duties in the European Convention on Human Rights’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 61 (2010), pp. 225–243.Google Scholar

Peroni, Lourdes and Timmer, Alexandra, ‘Vulnerable Groups: The Promise of an Emerging Concept in European Human Rights Convention Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (2013), pp. 1056–1058.Google Scholar

Petersen, Niels, ‘How to Compare the Length of Lines to the Weight of Stones’, German Law Journal, 14 (2013), pp. 1387–1408.Google Scholar

Pieterse, Marius, ‘Coming to Terms with Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 20 (2004), pp. 383–417.Google Scholar

Pieterse, Marius, ‘Resuscitating Socio-Economic Rights: Constitutional Entitlements to Health Care Services’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 22 (2006), pp. 473–502.Google Scholar

Pildes, Richard H., ‘Avoiding Balancing: The Role of Exclusionary Reasons in Constitutional Law’, Hastings Law Journal, 45 (1994), pp. 711–751.Google Scholar

Popelier, Patricia and Van de Heyning, Catherine, ‘Subsidiarity Post-Brighton: Procedural Rationality as Answer’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 30 (2017), pp. 5–23.Google Scholar

Popelier, Patricia, Lambrechts, Sarah and Lemmens, Koen (eds.), Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights: Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level (Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland: Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar

Porter, Bruce, ‘The Crisis of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and Strategies for Addressing it’ in Squires, J., Langford, M. and Thiele, B. (eds.), The Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in the Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Australian Human Rights Centre in collaboration with the Centre for Housing Rights and Evictions, 2005), pp. 43–69.Google Scholar

Prebensen, S.C., ‘Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Mahoney, P (ed.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective. Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000), pp. 1123–1137.Google Scholar

Rainey, Bernadette, Wicks, Elizabeth and Ovey, Clare, Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights, 6th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971) (1999).Google Scholar

Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, ‘On the Nature of Rights’, Mind, 93 (1984), pp. 194–214.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, Practical Reasons and Norms, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, ‘On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions’ in Alexander, L. (ed.), Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 152–193.Google Scholar

Remiche, Adélaide, ‘Yordanova and Others v. Bulgaria: The Influence of the Social Right to Adequate Housing on the Interpretation of the Civil Right to Respect for One’s Home’, Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2012), pp. 787–800.Google Scholar

Remmert, Barbara, ‘Art. 19’ in Maunz, Theodor and Dürig, Günther (eds.), Grundgesetz (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2012).Google Scholar

Ress, George, ‘The Effects of Decisions and Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Domestic Legal Order’, Texas International Law Journal, 40 (2005), pp. 359–382.Google Scholar

Rietiker, Daniel, ‘The Principle of “Effectiveness” in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Its Different Dimensions and Its Consistency with Public International Law – No Need for the Concept of Treaty Sui Generis’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 79 (2010), pp. 245–277.Google Scholar

Rivers, Julian, ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’, Cambridge Law Journal, 65 (2006), pp. 174–207.Google Scholar

Roux, Theunis, ‘Understanding Grootboom – A Response to Cass R. Sunstein’, Constitutional Forum, 12 (2002), pp. 41–51.Google Scholar

Ryssdal, Rolv, ‘The Coming of Age of the European Convention of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (1996), pp. 18–29.Google Scholar

Sachs, Albie, ‘The Judicial Eenforcement of Socio-Economic Rights’, Current Legal Problems, 56 (2003), pp. 579–601.Google Scholar

Sachs, Michael, ‘Art. 19’ in Sachs, Michael (ed.), GG. Grundgesetz Kommentar, 7th ed. (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2011).Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech, ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights Law Review, 9 (2009), pp. 397–453.Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech, Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Saul, Ben, Kinley, David and Mowbray, Jacqueline, The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Commentary, Cases, and Materials (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Categories and the First Amendment: A Play in Three Acts’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 34 (1981), pp. 265–307.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘A Comment on the Structure of Rights’, Georgia Law Review, 27 (1993), pp. 415–434.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Do Cases Make Bad Law?’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 73 (2006) pp. 883–918.Google Scholar

Scheinin, Martin, ‘Economic and Social Rights as Legal Rights’ in Eide, A. et al. (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001), pp. 29–54.Google Scholar

Schlag, Pierre, ‘Rules and Standards’, UCLA Law Review, 33 (1985), pp. 379–429.Google Scholar

Schlink, Bernhard, Abwägung im Verfassungsrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1976).Google Scholar

Schnath, Matthias, ‘Auswirkungen des neuen Grundrechts auf Gewährleistung des Existenzminimums auf die besonderen Hilfen nach dem Zwölften Sozialgesetzbuches (SGB XII)’, Sozialrecht aktuell (2010), pp. 173–176.Google Scholar

Schneider, Ludwig, Der Schutz des Wesensgehalts von Grundrechten nach Art. 19 Abs. 2 GG (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1983).Google Scholar

Scott, Craig, ‘The Interdependence and Permeability of Human Rights Norms: Towards a Partial Fusion of the International Covenants on Human Rights’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 27 (1989), pp. 769–877.Google Scholar

Scott, Craig, ‘Reaching Beyond (Without Abandoning) the Category of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 21 (1999), pp. 633–660.Google Scholar

Scott, Craig, ‘Towards a Principled, Pragmatic Judicial Role’, ESR Review, 1 (1999), pp. 4–7.Google Scholar

Scott, Craig and Alston, Philip, ‘Adjudicating Constitutional Priorities in a Transnational Context: A Comment on Soobramoney’s Legacy and Grootboom’s promise’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 16 (2000), pp. 206–268.Google Scholar

Seiler, Christian, ‘Das Grundrecht auf ein menschenwürdiges Existenzminimum: Zum Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 9.2.2010’, JuristenZeitung, 65 (2010), pp. 500–505.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, ‘The Standard of Living: Lives and Capabilities’ in Hawthorn, G. (ed.), The Standard of Living (Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 20–38.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, ‘Freedom and Needs’, New Republic (10 January and 17 January 1994), pp. 31–38.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Senden, Hanneke, Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System: An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, doctoral thesis (Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland: Intersentia, 2011).Google Scholar

Shue, Henry, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Smet, Stijn, ‘The “Absolute” Prohibition of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment in Article 3 ECHR: Truly a Question of Scope Only?’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 273–293.Google Scholar

Spielmann, Dean, ‘Wither the Margin of Appreciation’, Current Legal Problems, 67 (2014), pp. 49–65.Google Scholar

Steiner, Henry J., ‘Securing Human Rights: The First Half-Century of the Universal Declaration, and Beyond’, Harvard Magazine (September–October 1998), pp. 45–46.Google Scholar

Steiner, Henry J., Alston, Philip and Goodman, Ryan, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Steinberg, Carol, ‘Can Reasonableness Protect the Poor? A Review of South Africa’s Socio-Economic Rights Jurisprudence’, South African Law Journal, 123 (2006), pp. 264–284.Google Scholar

Stern, Klaus, Das Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Band III/2. Allgemeine Lehren der Grundrechte (Munich, Verlag C.H. Beck, 1994).Google Scholar

Stone-Sweet, Alec and Keller, Helen, ‘The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Orders’ in Stone-Sweet, A. and Keller, H. (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 11–36.Google Scholar

Stone-Sweet, Alec and Mathews, Jud, ‘All Things in Proportion? American Rights Doctrine and the Problem of Balancing’, Emory Law Journal, 60 (2011), pp. 711–751.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Kathleen M., ‘Post-Liberal Judging: The Roles of Categorization and Balancing’, University of Colorado Law Review, 63 (1992), pp. 293–317.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements’, Harvard Law Review, 108 (1995), pp. 1733–1772.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Social and Economic Rights? Lessons from South Africa’, Constitutional Forum, 11 (2000–2001), pp. 123–132.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law’, Social Research, 74 (2007), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Taskyrakis, Stavros, ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (2009), pp. 468–493.Google Scholar

Teitgen, Pierre-Henri, ‘Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Macdonald, R.S.J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Toebes, Brigit, The Right to Health as a Human Right in International Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia/Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Tulkens, Françoise, How Can We Ensure Greater Involvement of National Courts in the Convention System? Dialogue between Judges (European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe, 2012), pp. 6–10.Google Scholar

Urbina, Francisco J., ‘A Critique of Proportionality’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 57 (2012), pp. 49–80.Google Scholar

Van der Schyff, Gerhard, Limitation of Rights: A Study of the European Convention and the South African Bill of Right (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2005).Google Scholar

Van der Schyff, Gerhard, ‘Interpreting the Protection Guaranteed by Two-Stage Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: The Case for Wide Interpretation’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 65–83.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Pieter, Van Hoof, Fried, Van Rijn, Arjen and Zwaak, Leo (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 4th ed. (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2006).Google Scholar

Von Bernstorff, Jochen, ‘Kerngehaltsschutz durch den UN-Menschenrechtsausschuss und den EGMR: vom Wert Kategorialer Argumentationsformen’, Der Staat, 50 (2011), pp. 165–190.Google Scholar

Von Bernstorff, Jochen, ‘Proportionality Without Balancing: Why Judicial Ad Hoc Balancing in Unnecessary and Potentially Detrimental to the Realisation of Individual and Collective Self-Determination’ in Lazarus, L., McCrudden, Ch. and Bowles, N. (eds.), Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 63–86.Google Scholar

Von Hippel, Eike, Grenzen und Wesensgehalt der Grundrechte (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1965).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Liberal Rights: Two Sides of the Coin’ in Waldron, Jeremy, Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 (Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’, Yale Law Journal, 155 (2006), pp. 1346–1406.Google Scholar

Warbrick, Colin, ‘The Structure of Article 8’, European Human Rights Law Review (1998), pp. 32–44.Google Scholar

Warbrick, Colin, ‘Economic and Social Interests and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Baderin, M.A. and McCorquodale, R., Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Action (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 241–256.Google Scholar

Webber, Grégoire, The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Weinrib, Jacob, Dimensions of Dignity. The Theory and Practice of Modern Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Wesson, Murray, ‘Grootboom and Beyond’: Reassessing the Socio-Economic Jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 20 (2004), pp. 284–308.Google Scholar

Wesson, Murray, ‘The Emergence and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights’ in Lazarus, L., McCrudden, Ch. and Bowles, N. (eds.), Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 281–297.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘A Constitutional Future for the European Court of Human Rights?’, Human Rights Law Journal, 23 (2002), pp. 161–166.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘The European Court of Human Rights: The Past, The Present, The Future’, American University International Law Review, 22 (2007), pp. 521–538.Google Scholar

Wintemute, Robert, ‘“Within the Ambit”: How Big Is the “Gap” in Article 14 European Convention on Human Rights? Part 1’, European Human Rights Law Review (2004), pp. 366–382.Google Scholar

Wintemute, Robert, ‘Filling the Article 14 “Gap”: Government Ratification and Judicial Control of Protocol No. 12 ECHR: Part 2’, European Human Rights Law Review (2004), pp. 484–499.Google Scholar

Xenos, Dimitris, The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights (London/Oxford/Edinburgh: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Young, Katherine G., ‘The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content’, Yale Journal of International Law, 33 (2008), pp. 113–175.Google Scholar

Young, Katherine G., Constituting Socio-Economic Rights (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Young, Katherine G., ‘Proportionality, Reasonableness, and Socio-Economic Rights’ (20 January 2017) in Jackson, V.C. and Tushnet, M. (eds.) Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2017); Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 430. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2892707Google Scholar

Zivier, Ernst, Der Wesensgehalt der Grundrechte (Berlin: Ernst Reuter Gesellschaft der Förderer und Freunde der Freien Universität e.v.,1962).Google Scholar