Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General Editors' Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Letters before 1770
- Letters 1770–1780
- Letters 1781–1789
- Letters 1790–1794
- Letters 1795–1800
- 1795
- 1796
- 1797
- 1798
- 1800
- Public Declaration concerning Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre, August 7, 1799
- Biographical Sketches
- Glossary
- Index of Persons
1797
from Letters 1795–1800
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General Editors' Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Letters before 1770
- Letters 1770–1780
- Letters 1781–1789
- Letters 1790–1794
- Letters 1795–1800
- 1795
- 1796
- 1797
- 1798
- 1800
- Public Declaration concerning Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre, August 7, 1799
- Biographical Sketches
- Glossary
- Index of Persons
Summary
In a letter dated Greifswald, May 11, 1797, a letter recently made public, which is distinguished by its singular tone, Herr Johann August Schlettwein demands that I engage in an exchange of letters with him on the critical philosophy. He indicates that he already has various letters prepared on the subject and adds that he believes himself to be in a position to overthrow completely my whole philosophical system, both its theoretical and its practical parts, an event that should be pleasing to every friend of philosophy. But as for the proposed method whereby this refutation is to be carried out, namely, in an exchange of letters, either handwritten or printed, I must answer curtly: Absolutely not. For it is absurd to ask a man in his seventy-fourth year (when “packing one's bags” [sarcinas colligere] is really of the highest importance) to engage in a project that would take many years, just to make even tolerable progress with the criticisms and rejoinders. But the reason why I am making public this declaration (which I have already sent to him) is that his letter clearly had publicity as its object, and since his attack may be broadcast by word of mouth, those people who are interested in such a controversy would otherwise be left waiting empty-handed. Since Herr Schlettwein will not let this difficulty halt his projected overthrow of my system.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Correspondence , pp. 510 - 540Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999