Acheson, D., ‘Cuban quarantine: implications for the future: remarks by the Honourable Dean Acheson’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 57 (1963), 13–15.
Anderson, K., ‘Nuremberg sensibility: Telford Taylor’s memoir of the Nuremberg trials’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 7 (1994), 281–300.
Andō, N. (ed.), Japan and international law: past, present and future (The Hague: Kluwer, 1999).
Antonopoulos, C., ‘Whatever happened to crimes against peace?’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law 6 (2001), 33–62.
Appleman, J.A., Military tribunals and international crimes (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1954).
Baer, M. de, ‘No peace for war criminals’, News from Belgium 53 (19 February 1944), 53–56.
Baldwin, S.E., ‘The proposed trial of the former Kaiser’, Yale Law Journal 29 (1919), 75–82.
Barriga, S., and C. Kreß (eds.), The travaux préparatoires of the crime of aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Bass, G.J., Stay the hand of vengeance: the politics of war crimes tribunals (Princeton University Press, 2000).
Best, G., Nuremberg and after: the continuing history of war crimes and crimes against humanity (University of Reading, 1984).
Bial, L.C., ‘The Nurnberg judgment and international law’, Brooklyn Law Review 13 (1947), 34–49.
Biddle, F., In brief authority (Garden City: Doubleday, 1962).
Biddle, F., ‘Prosecution of major Nazi war criminals’, Department of State Bulletin 15 (1946), 954–957.
Birkett, N., ‘International legal theories evolved at Nuremberg’, International Affairs (London) 23 (1947), 317–325.
Blewett, G.F., ‘Victor’s injustice: The Tokyo war crimes trial’, American Perspective (1950), 282–292.
Blum, J.M., Roosevelt and Morgenthau: revision and condensation of ‘From the Morgenthau diaries’ (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970).
Boister, N., and R. Cryer (eds.), Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: charter, indictment and judgments (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Boister, N., and R. Cryer (eds.), The Tokyo International Military Tribunal: a reappraisal (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Borchard, E.M., ‘The impracticality of “enforcing” peace’, Yale Law Journal 55 (1946), 966–973.
Borchard, E.M., ‘The multilateral treaty for the renunciation of war’, American Journal of International Law 23 (1929), 116–120.
Borgwardt, E., A new deal for the world: America’s vision for human rights (Cambridge MA: Belknap, 2005).
Brierly, J.L., ‘International law and resort to armed force’, Cambridge Law Journal 4 (1932), 308–319.
Brierly, J.L., ‘International law: its actual part in world affairs’, International Affairs (London) 20 (1944), 381–389.
Brierly, J.L., ‘The nature of war crimes jurisdiction’, TheNorseman 2 (1944), 2–8.
Brierly, J.L., H. Lauterpacht and C.H.M. Waldock (eds.), The basis of obligation in international law and other papers (Oxford: Clarendon, 1958).
Broms, B., The definition of aggression in the United Nations (Turku: Turun Yliopiston Julkaisuja, 1968).
Brown, B.F., Review of Legalism by J.N. Shklar, University of Toronto Law Journal 17 (1967), 218–225.
Brownlie, I., Principles of public international law, 6th edn (Oxford University Press, 2003).
Bush, J.A., ‘“The supreme… crime” and its origins: the lost legislative history of the crime of aggressive war’, Columbia Law Review 102 (2002), 2324–2423.
Churchill, W.S., The world crisis: the aftermath (London: Thornton Butterworth, 1929).
Claude Jr, I.L., ‘Just wars: doctrines and institutions’, Political Science Quarterly 95 (1980), 3–96.
Comyns Carr, A.S., ‘The Tokyo war crimes trial’, Far Eastern Survey 18 (1949), 109–114.
Conot, R.E., Justice at Nuremberg (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1983).
Danner, A.M., ‘Beyond the Geneva Conventions: lessons from the Tokyo tribunal in prosecuting war and terrorism’, Vanderbilt University Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper 05–26 (2005), 1–43.
Deák, I., J.T. Gross and T. Judt (eds.), The politics of retribution in Europe: World War II and its aftermath (Princeton University Press, 2000).
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and self defence, 3rd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Eagleton, C., ‘The attempt to define aggression’, International Conciliation 264 (1930), 577–650.
The Economist, ‘The Disarmament conference’, 4668 (11 February 1933), 284–285.
‘The Nuremberg judgment’, 5380 (5 October 1946), 530–532.
Ehard, H., ‘The Nuremberg trial against the major war criminals and international law’, American Journal of International Law 43 (1949), 223–245.
Falk, R.A., ‘Quincy Wright: on legal tests of aggressive war’, American Journal of International Law 66 (1972), 560–571.
Falk, R.A., ‘Telford Taylor and the legacy of Nuremberg’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 37 (1999), 693–723.
Ferencz, B.B., Defining international aggression: the search for world peace – a documentary history and analysis, 2 vols. (Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 1975).
Ferrell, R.H., Peace in their time: the origins of the Kellogg-Briand Pact (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952).
Finch, G.A., ‘The Nuremberg trial and international law’, American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), 20–37.
Finch, G.A., Review of The Nuremberg trial and aggressive war by S. Glueck, American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), 334.
Flanner, J., and I. Drutman (ed.), Janet Flanner’s world: uncollected writings 1932–1975 (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1979).
Forsythe, D.P., Review essay, ‘Law, morality, and war after Vietnam’, World Politics 28 (1976), 450–472.
Franck, T.M., ‘Who killed Article 2(4)? Or: changing norms governing the use of force by states’, American Journal of International Law 64 (1970), 809–837.
Gaddis, J.L., Strategies of containment: a critical appraisal of postwar American national security policy (Oxford University Press, 1982).
Gareau, F.H., ‘Morgenthau’s plan for industrial disarmament in Germany’, Western Political Quarterly 14 (1961), 517–534.
Garner, J.W., ‘Punishment of offenders against the laws and customs of war’, American Journal of International Law 14 (1920), 70–94.
Ginsburgs, G., Moscow’s road to Nuremberg: the Soviet background to the trial (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1996).
Ginsburgs, G., and V.N. Kudriavtsev (eds.), The Nuremberg trial and international law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1990).
Glueck, S., ‘The Nuernberg trial and aggressive war’, Harvard Law Review 59 (1946), 396–456.
Glueck, S., The Nuremberg trial and aggressive war (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1946).
Glueck, S., War criminals: their prosecution and punishment (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1944).
Gross, L., ‘The criminality of aggressive war’, American Political Science Review 41 (1947), 205–225.
Hall, W.E., and A.P. Higgins (ed.), A treatise on international law, 7th edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 1917).
Harries, M., and S. Harries, Sheathing the sword: the demilitarisation of Japan (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1987).
Hart, H.L.A., The concept of law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1961).
Heller, K.J., The Nuremberg military tribunals and the origins of international criminal law (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Henkin, L., ‘The reports of the death of Article 2(4) are greatly exaggerated’, American Journal of International Law 65 (1971), 544–548.
Hesse, C., and R. Post (eds.), Human rights in political transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia (New York: Zone Books, 1999).
Hindmarsh, A.E., ‘Self-help in time of peace’, American Journal of International Law 26 (1932), 315–326.
Hirsch, F., ‘The Soviets at Nuremberg: international law, propaganda and the making of the postwar order’, American Historical Review 113 (2008), 701–731.
Hockett, J.D., ‘Justice Robert H Jackson, the Supreme Court, and the Nuremberg trial’, Supreme Court Review 1990 (1990), 257–299.
Horwitz, S., ‘The Tokyo trial’, International Conciliation 465 (1950), i–584.
HosoyaC., N. Andō, Y. Ōnuma and R. Minear (eds.), The Tokyo war crimes trial: an international symposium (Tokyo: Kodansha, 1986).
House, E.M., and C. Seymour (eds.), What really happened at Paris: The story of the Peace Conference, 1918–1919 (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1921).
Hula, E., ‘Punishment for war crimes’, Social Research 13 (1946), 1–23.
Hyde, C.C., ‘The United States as a neutral’, Yale Law Journal 45 (1936), 608–621.
Hyde, H.M., Norman Birkett: the life of Lord Birkett of Ulverston (London: Penguin, 1989).
International Law Association, Briand-Kellogg Pact of Paris (August 27, 1928) Articles of interpretation as adopted by the Budapest conference 1934 (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1934).
Jackson, R.H., ‘Address of Robert H. Jackson, Attorney General of the United States, Inter-American Bar Association, Havana, Cuba, March 27, 1941’, American Journal of International Law 35 (1941), 348–359.
Jackson, R.H., ‘Some problems in developing an international legal system’, Temple Law Quarterly 22 (1948), 147–158.
Jackson, R.H., ‘The challenge of international lawlessness’, American Bar Association Journal 27 (1941), 690–693.
Jackson, R.H., ‘The law under which Nazi organizations are accused of being criminal’, Temple Law Quarterly 19 (1946), 371–389.
Jackson, R.H., ‘The rule of law among nations’, American Bar Association Journal 31 (1945), 290–294.
Jackson, R.H., ‘The significance of the Nuremberg trials to the armed forces’, Military Affairs 10 (1946), 3–15.
Jackson, R.H., ‘The United Nations Organization and war crimes’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 46 (1952), 196–203.
Keenan, J.B., ‘Trial of Far Eastern war criminals’, Department of State Bulletin 14 (1946), 846–848, 853.
Keenan, J.B., and B.F. Brown, Crimes against international law (Washington DC: Public Affairs Press, 1950).
Kellogg, F.B., Remarks, American Society of International Law Proceedings 22 (1928), 141–145.
Kelsen, H., ‘Collective and individual responsibility in international law with particular regard to the punishment of war criminals’, California Law Review 31 (1943), 530–571.
Kelsen, H., General theory of law and state, Anders Wedberg (tr.), (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1946).
Kelsen, H., Peace through law (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1944).
Kelsen, H., ‘The rule against ex post facto laws and the prosecution of the axis war criminals’, Judge Advocate Journal 3 (1945), 8–12.
Kelsen, H., ‘Will the judgment in the Nuremberg trial constitute a precedent in international law?’, International Law Quarterly 1 (1947), 153–171.
Kintner, E.W. (ed.), Trial of Alfons Klein, Adolf Wahlmann, Heinrich Ruoff, Karl Willig, Adolf Merkle, Irmgard Huber, and Philipp Blum: the Hadamar trial (London: William Hodge, 1949).
Kirchheimer, O., Political justice: the use of legal procedures for political ends (Princeton University Press, 1961).
Kochavi, A.J., Prelude to Nuremberg: Allied war crimes policy and the question of punishment (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998).
Kopelman, E.S., ‘Ideology and international law: the dissent of the Indian justice at the Tokyo war crimes trial’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 23 (1991), 373–444.
Koskenniemi, M., The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Kranzbühler, O., ‘Nuremberg eighteen years afterwards’, DePaul Law Review 14 (1965), 333–347.
Kreß, C., and L. von Holtzendorff, ‘The Kampala compromise on the crime of aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 8 (2010), 1179–1217.
Kunz, J.L., ‘Bellum justum and bellum legale’, American Journal of International Law 45 (1951), 528–534.
Kunz, J.L., ‘The swing of the pendulum: from overestimation to underestimation of international law’, American Journal of International Law 44 (1950), 135–140.
Langhorne, R. (ed.), Diplomacy and intelligence during the Second World War: essays in honour of F.H. Hinsley (Cambridge University Press, 1985).
Lauterpacht, E., The life of Hersch Lauterpacht (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Lauterpacht, H., An international bill of the rights of man (New York: Columbia University Press, 1945).
Lauterpacht, H., ‘The Grotian tradition in international law’, British Year Book of International Law 23 (1946), 1–53.
Lauterpacht, H., ‘The law of nations and the punishment of war crimes’, British Year Book of International Law 21 (1944), 58–95.
Lauterpacht, H., ‘The limits of the operation of the law of war’, British Year Book of International Law 30 (1953), 206–243.
Lauterpacht, H., ‘The Pact of Paris and the Budapest Articles of Interpretation’, Transactions of the Grotius Society 20 (1934), 178–204.
Lauterpacht, H., and E. Lauterpacht (ed.), International law, being the collected papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, 5 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 2004), vol. 5.
Lawrence, Justice [G.], ‘The Nuremberg trial’, International Affairs (London) 23 (1947), 151–159.
Leonhardt, H., ‘The Nuremberg trial: a legal analysis’, Review of Politics 11 (1949), 449–476.
Leventhal, H., and others, ‘The Nuernberg verdict’, Harvard Law Review 60 (1947), 857–907.
Levy, A.G.D., ‘The law and procedure of war crime trials’, American Political Science Review 37 (1943), 1052–1081.
Lippman, M., ‘The history, development, and decline of crimes against peace’, George Washington International Law Review 36 (2004), 957–1056.
Luban, D., ‘The legacies of Nuremberg’, Social Research 54 (1987), 779–829.
Luban, D., Legal modernism (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994).
Manner, G., ‘The legal nature and punishment of criminal acts of violence contrary to the laws of war’, American Journal of International Law 37 (1943), 407–435.
Mantoux, P. (note-taker and interpreter), Proceedings of the Council of Four, March 24–April 18 [Paris Peace Conference, 1919], J.B. Whitton (tr.) (Geneva: Institut Universitaire de Hautes Études Internationales, 1964).
Marrus, M.R., The Nuremberg war crimes trial, 1945–46: a documentary history (Boston: Bedford, 1997).
May, L., Aggression and crimes against peace (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Meltzer, B.D., ‘A note on some aspects of the Nuremberg debate’, University of Chicago Law Review 14 (1947), 455–469.
Mettraux, G. (ed.), Perspectives on the Nuremberg trial (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Middlebush, F.A., ‘Non-recognition as a sanction of international law’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 27 (1933), 40–54.
Miller, D.H., The drafting of the Covenant, 2 vols. (New York: GP Putnam’s Sons, 1928).
Miller, D.H., The peace pact of Paris: a study of the Kellogg-Briand Treaty (New York:G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1928).
Moore, J.N. (ed.), Law and civil war in the modern world (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1974).
Nandy, A., ‘The other within: the strange case of Radhabinod Pal’s judgment on culpability’, New Literary History 23 (1992), 45–67.
O’Brien, W.V., ‘The Nuremberg precedent and the Gulf War’, Virginia Journal of International Law 31 (1991), 391–401.
Oppenheim, L., and A.D. McNair (ed.), International law – a treatise, 4th edn, 2 vols. (London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1926 & 1928).
Oppenheim, L., and A.D. McNair (ed.), International law – a treatise, 5th edn, 2 vols. (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1935 & 1937).
Oppenheim, L., and A.D. McNair (ed.), International law – a treatise, 6th edn, 2 vols. (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1940 & 1947).
Oppenheim, L., and H. Lauterpacht, International law – a treatise, 7th edn, 2 vols. (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1948 & 1952).
Orlando, V.E., ‘On the aborted decision to bring the German Emperor to trial’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007), 1015–1028.
Osiel, M., Mass atrocity, collective memory and the law (New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1997).
Overy, R., Interrogations: the Nazi elite in Allied hands, 1945 (London: Allen Lane, 2001).
Pal, R., International Military Tribunal for the Far East: dissentient judgment of Justice R.B. Pal (Calcutta: Sanyal, 1953).
Paulson, S.L., ‘Classical legal positivism at Nuremberg’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (1975), 132–158.
Petrie, C., The life and letters of the Right Hon. Sir Austen Chamberlain, 2 vols. (London: Cassell & Co, 1940).
Poelgeest, L. van, The Netherlands and the Tokyo tribunal (London: Suntory-Toyota International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines, September 1991), Pt 2, Aspects of the Allied Occupation of Japan.
Politi, M., and G. Nesi (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the crime of aggression (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).
Politis, N., The new aspects of international law (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1928).
Pompe, C.A., Aggressive war: an international crime (’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff, 1953).
Pritchard, R.J., ‘An overview of the historical importance of the Tokyo war trial’, Nissan Occasional Papers Series, 5 (1987), 1–51.
Pritchard, R.J., and S.M. Zaide (eds.), The Tokyo war crimes trial: index and guide, 5 vols. (New York: Garland, 1981–87).
Radin, M., ‘Justice at Nuremberg’, Foreign Affairs 24 (1946), 369–384.
Reisman, W.M., ‘The cult of custom in the late 20th century’, California Western International Law Journal 17 (1987), 133–145.
Rheinstein, M., Review of The Nuremberg trial and aggressive war by S. Glueck, University of Chicago Law Review 14 (1947), 319–321.
Röling, B.V.A., and A. Cassese (ed.), The Tokyo trial and beyond: reflections of a peacemonger (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993).
Röling, B.V.A., and C.F. Rüter (eds.), The Tokyo judgment: The International Military Tribunal for the Far East, 2 vols. (Amsterdam: University Press Amsterdam BV, 1977).
Rosenman, S.I., Working with Roosevelt (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1952).
Ruys, T., ‘Armed attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: evolutions in customary law and practice (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Schachter, O., ‘In defense of international rules on the use of force’, University of Chicago Law Review 53 (1986), 113–146.
Schick, F.B., ‘The Nuremberg trial and the international law of the future’, American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), 770–794.
Schick, F.B., ‘War criminals and the law of the United Nations’, University of Toronto Law Journal 7 (1947), 27–67.
Schmitt, C., Writings on war, T. Nunan (tr.), (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011).
Schwarzenberger, G., ‘War crimes and the problem of an international criminal court’, Czechoslovak Yearbook of International Law (1942), 67–88.
Schwebel, S.M., ‘Aggression, intervention and self-defence in modern international law’, Recueil des Cours /Academie de Droit International 136 (1972– II), 411–497.
Sebald, W.J., and R. Brines, With MacArthur in Japan: a personal history of the occupation (London: Cresset, 1967).
Sellars, K., ‘Delegitimizing aggression: first steps and false starts after the First World War’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 10 (2012), 7–40.
Sellars, K., Review essay, ‘Imperfect justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo’, European Journal of International Law 21 (2010), 1085–1102.
Sellars, K., The rise and rise of human rights (Stroud: Sutton, 2002).
Sellars, K., ‘William Patrick and “crimes against peace” at the Tokyo tribunal, 1946–1948’, Edinburgh Law Review 15 (2011), 166–196.
Shklar, J.N., Legalism (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1964).
Shotwell, J.T., War as an instrument of national policy and its renunciation in the Pact of Paris (London: Constable, 1929).
Silber, N., and G. Miller, ‘Toward “neutral principles” in the law: selections from the oral history of Herbert Wechsler’, Columbia Law Review 43 (1993), 854–931.
Smith, B.F., The American road to Nuremberg: the documentary record 1944–1945 (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1982).
Smith, B.F., Reaching judgment at Nuremberg (London: Andre Deutsch, 1977).
Smith, B.F., The road to Nuremberg (London: Andre Deutsch, 1981).
Stimson, H.L., ‘The Nuremberg trial: landmark in law’, Foreign Affairs 25 (1947), 179–189.
Stimson, H.L., ‘The Pact of Paris: three years of development’, Foreign Affairs 11 (1932–1933), vii–xv.
Stimson, H.L., and M. Bundy, On active service in peace and war (New York: Harper & Bros, 1948).
Stone, J., Conflict through consensus: United Nations approaches to aggression (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).
Stone, J., ‘Hopes and loopholes in the 1974 definition of aggression’, American Journal of International Law 71 (1977), 224–246.
Stone, J., Legal controls of international conduct: a treatise on the dynamics of disputes and war-law (London: Stevens & Sons, 1954).
Tanaka, Y., T. McCormack and G. Simpson (eds.), Beyond victor’s justice? The Tokyo war crimes trial revisited (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).
Taylor, T., An anatomy of the Nuremberg trials: a personal memoir (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992).
Taylor, T., ‘The Nuremberg trials’, Columbia Law Review 55 (1955), 488–525.
Taylor, T., ‘The Nuremberg war crimes trial’, International Conciliation 450 (1949), 241–371.
Totani, Y., The Tokyo war crimes trial: the pursuit of justice in the wake of World War II (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008).
Trainin, A.N., and A.Y. Vishinski (ed.) Hitlerite responsibility under criminal law, A. Rothstein (tr.) (London: Hutchinson, 1945).
Tucker, R.W., The inequality of nations (London: Martin Robertson, 1977).
Tucker, R.W., The just war: a study in contemporary American doctrine (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1960).
Vyshinsky, A.Y., For peace and security of the peoples against the threat of a new war (London: Soviet News Booklet, 1950).
Waldock, C.H.M., ‘The regulation of the use of force by individual states in international law’, Recueil des Cours/Academie de Droit International 81 (1952 – II), 455–515.
Walzer, M., Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1992).
Wehberg, H., The outlawry of war, E.H. Zeydel (tr.) (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1931).
Wheeler-Bennett, J., and A. Nicholls, The semblance of peace: the political settlement after the Second World War (London: Macmillan, 1972).
Whiteman, M.M., (ed.), Digest of international law (Washington DC: Department of State, 1965), vol. 5.
Wickersham, G.W., ‘The Pact of Paris, a gesture or a pledge?’, Foreign Affairs 7 (1929), 356–371.
Williams, J.F., and others, ‘Recent interpretations of the Briand-Kellogg Pact’, International Affairs (London) 14 (1935), 346–368.
Willis, J.F., Prologue to Nuremberg: the politics and diplomacy of punishing war criminals of the First World War (Westport: Greenwood, 1982).
Woetzel, R.K., The Nuremberg trials in international law, 2nd impression, revised (London: Stevens & Sons, 1962).
Wolfe, R. and others, Symposium, ‘1945–1995: Critical perspectives on the Nuremberg trials and state accountability’, New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 12 (1995), 453–544.
Wright, Q., ‘The concept of aggression in international law’, American Journal of International Law 29 (1935), 373–395.
Wright, Q., ‘Human rights and the world order’, International Conciliation 389 (1943), 238–262.
Wright, Q., ‘Legal positivism and the Nuremberg judgment’, American Journal of International Law 42 (1948), 405–414.
Wright, Q., ‘The law of the Nuremberg trial’, American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), 38–72.
Wright, Q., ‘The meaning of the Pact of Paris’, American Journal of International Law 27 (1933), 39–61.
Wright, Q., ‘The outlawry of war’, American Journal of International Law 19 (1925), 76–103.
Wright, R.A., and UNWCC (eds.), History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the development of the laws of war (London: HMSO, 1948).
Wyzanski Jr, C.E., ‘Nuremberg – a fair trial?’, Atlantic Monthly 177 (1946), 66–70.
Wyzanski Jr, C.E., ‘Nuremberg in retrospect’, Atlantic Monthly 178 (1946), 56–59.
YamaguchiS., (ed.) Buddhism and culture: dedicated to Dr. Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki in commemoration of his ninetieth birthday (Kyoto: Nakano Press, 1960).
Zorya, Y., and N. Lebedeva, ‘The year 1939 in the Nuremberg trials’, International Affairs (Moscow) 10 (1989), 117–129.
