Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:25:30.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - The Sociology of Decadence

from Part II - Developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2019

Jane Desmarais
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London
David Weir
Affiliation:
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art
Get access

Summary

In sociological terms, decadence serves as a classifier for categorizing pathological social conditions that catalyse ‘decline.’ While the term ‘decadence’ itself has not been explicitly used in much sociological scholarship, the structure of decadence has been deployed to situate related concepts like anomie and alienation in narratives of decline. With respect to artistic production, the ‘decadent role’ may be such that pathological attributes become accepted or expected to the point that they confer artistic legitimacy. Hence the decadent role becomes acceptable under a creative mandate; that is, individual artists may present the pathological features of social decline so long as they connect those decadent attributes to creative output. This sociological dynamic helps to explain why the work of certain nineteenth-century decadents ? such as Oscar Wilde ? is now held in high artistic regard. In the case of Wilde, his reputation as an artist has survived efforts to label him as pathological, so he has posthumously ‘lived up’ to the creative mandate his decadence entailed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, Howard S. (1982). Art Worlds, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bourget, Paul (2013). On Flaubert. Nancy O’Connor, trans., New England Review, 33(4), 1030.Google Scholar
Bukowski, Charles (1969). Notes of a Dirty Old Man, San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1990). Gender Trouble, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile (1979). Suicide: A Study in Sociology, Simpson, George, ed., Spaulding, John A., trans., New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile (1982). The Rules of Sociological Method, Lukes, Steven, ed., Halls, W. D., trans., New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan (1985). The Goliath Effect: Corporate Dominance and Mercantile Legends. The Journal of American Folklore, 98(387), 6384.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley (1982). Is There a Text in this Class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave (1982). The Letters of Gustave Flaubert, 1857–1880, Steegmuller, Francis, trans., Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hemingway, Ernest (2006). The Sun Also Rises, New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Janus, Samuel S. (1975). The great comedians: personality and other factors. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35, 169–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marx, Karl (1990). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. I, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mayor, John E. B. (1871). Decadence. Journal of Philology, 3, 347–8.Google Scholar
Peterson, Richard A. (1997). Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, Allison J. (2009). Longing and Belonging: Parents, Children, and Consumer Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Salinger, J. D. (1946). Slight Rebellion off Madison. The New Yorker, 21 December, 82–6.Google Scholar
Snipes, Lucas (2015). Why comedians are prone to addiction (and why comedy is the best medicine). The Guff, http://guff.com/why-comedians-are-prone-to-drug-addiction-and-why-comedy-is-the-best-medicine.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein (2009). The Theory of the Leisure Class, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×