Book contents
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction/Description of the Problem
- Part II Solutions
- Part III Psychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
- Part IV Nonpsychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
- Chapter 21 Neurocognition and Social Cognition Training as Treatments for Violence and Aggression in People with Severe Mental Illness
- Chapter 22 Examining Violence Among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity State Hospital Inpatients Across Multiple Time Points: The Roles of Criminogenic Risk Factors and Psychiatric Symptoms
- Chapter 23 Criminogenic Risk and Mental Health: A Complicated Relationship
- Chapter 24 Implementation of a Specialized Treatment Program to Reduce Violence in a Forensic Population
- Chapter 25 From Trauma-Blind to Trauma-Informed: Rethinking Criminalization and the Role of Trauma in Persons with Serious Mental Illness
- Chapter 26 The Indistinguishables: Determining Appropriate Environments for Justice-Involved Individuals
- Chapter 27 Breaking Down Long-Term Chronic Aggression Within a Forensic Hospital System
- Part V Criminal Justice and Social Considerations
- Index
- References
Chapter 22 - Examining Violence Among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity State Hospital Inpatients Across Multiple Time Points: The Roles of Criminogenic Risk Factors and Psychiatric Symptoms
from Part IV - Nonpsychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2021
Book contents
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction/Description of the Problem
- Part II Solutions
- Part III Psychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
- Part IV Nonpsychopharmacological Treatment Considerations
- Chapter 21 Neurocognition and Social Cognition Training as Treatments for Violence and Aggression in People with Severe Mental Illness
- Chapter 22 Examining Violence Among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity State Hospital Inpatients Across Multiple Time Points: The Roles of Criminogenic Risk Factors and Psychiatric Symptoms
- Chapter 23 Criminogenic Risk and Mental Health: A Complicated Relationship
- Chapter 24 Implementation of a Specialized Treatment Program to Reduce Violence in a Forensic Population
- Chapter 25 From Trauma-Blind to Trauma-Informed: Rethinking Criminalization and the Role of Trauma in Persons with Serious Mental Illness
- Chapter 26 The Indistinguishables: Determining Appropriate Environments for Justice-Involved Individuals
- Chapter 27 Breaking Down Long-Term Chronic Aggression Within a Forensic Hospital System
- Part V Criminal Justice and Social Considerations
- Index
- References
Summary
Institutional violence and associated risk factors within state hospitals have largely remained unexamined in the literature in spite of high violence prevalence rates: almost one-third (31.4%) of state hospital inpatients will engage in a violent assault during their hospitalization course. This dearth of research is particularly true for state hospital inpatients adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). An NGRI status indicates that an individual has been evaluated and deemed guilty of a criminal act but, due to mental disease or defect, was incapable of either knowing or understanding the nature of their act or was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong at the time of their crime.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Decriminalizing Mental Illness , pp. 231 - 240Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Broderick, C, Azizian, A, Kornbluh, R, Warburton, K. Prevalence of physical violence in a forensic psychiatric hospital system during 2011–2013: patient assaults, staff assaults, and repeatedly violent patients. CNS Spectr. 2015; 20(3): 319–330.Google Scholar
§CA Penal Code 1026.Google Scholar
Vitacco, MJ, Balduzzi, E, Rideout, K, Banfe, S, Britton, J. Reconsidering risk assessment with insanity acquittees. Law Hum Behav. 2018; 42(5): 403.Google Scholar
Almeida, F, Moreira, D, Moura, H, Mota, V. Psychiatric monitoring of not guilty by reason of insanity outpatients. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016; 38: 58–63.Google Scholar
McDermott, BE, Edens, JF, Quanbeck, CD, Busse, D, Scott, CL. Examining the role of static and dynamic risk factors in the prediction of inpatient violence: variable- and person-focused analyses. Law Hum Behav. 2008; 32(4): 325–338.Google Scholar
Grevatt, M, Thomas-Peter, B, Hughes, G. Violence, mental disorder and risk assessment: can structured clinical assessments predict the short-term risk of inpatient violence? J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2004; 15(2): 278–292.Google Scholar
Ross, D, Hart, S, Webster, C. Aggression in Psychiatric Patients: Using the HCR-20 to Assess Risk for Violence in Hospital and in the Community. Port Coquitlam, Canada: Riverview Hospital; 1998.Google Scholar
Douglas, KS, Guy, LS, Hart, SD. Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135(5): 679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iozzino, L, Ferrari, C, Large, M, Nielssen, O, De Girolamo, G. Prevalence and risk factors of violence by psychiatric acute inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6): e0128536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flannery, RB, Wyshak, G, Tecce, JJ, Flannery, GJ. Characteristics of American assaultive psychiatric patients: review of published findings, 2000–2012. Psychiatr Q. 2014; 85(3): 319–328.Google Scholar
Schenk, AM, Fremouw, WJ. Individual characteristics related to prison violence: a critical review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012; 17(5): 430–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, RD, Flora, DB, Kroner, DG, et al. Treating offenders with mental illness: a research synthesis. Law Hum Behav. 2012; 36(1): 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skeem, JL, Steadman, HJ, Manchak, SM. Applicability of the risk-need-responsivity model to persons with mental illness involved in the criminal justice system. Psychiatr Serv. 2015; 66(9): 916–922.Google Scholar
Draine, J, Salzer, MS, Culhane, DP, Hadley, TR. Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2002; 53(5): 565–573.Google Scholar
Andrews, DAB. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 5th edn. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company; 2010.Google Scholar
Dack, C, Ross, J, Papadopoulos, C, Stewart, D, Bowers, L. A review and meta-analysis of the patient factors associated with psychiatric inpatient aggression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013; 127(4): 255–268.Google Scholar
Walters, GD. Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the psychopathy checklist factor scores: a meta-analysis. Law Hum Behav. 2003; 27(5): 541–558.Google Scholar
Douglas, KS, Strand, S, Belfrage, H, Fransson, G, Levander, S. Reliability and validity evaluation of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV) in Swedish correctional and forensic psychiatric samples. Assessment. 2005; 12(2): 145–161.Google Scholar
Loza, W. Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): a tool for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. In: Handbook of Recidivism Risk/Needs Assessment Tools. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2018: 165.Google Scholar
Loza, W, Conley, M, Warren, B. Concurrent cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism and institutional adjustment on a sample of North Carolina offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2004; 48(1): 85–95.Google Scholar
Mitchell, O, Caudy, MS, MacKenzie, DL. A reanalysis of the Self Appraisal Questionnaire: psychometric properties and predictive validity. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013; 57(4): 445–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loza, W, Neo, LH, Shahinfar, A, Loza-Fanous, A. Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism with female offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2005; 49(5): 547–560.Google Scholar
Derogatis, LR, Melisaratos, N. The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983; 13(3): 595–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, LR. BSI Brief Symptom Inventory. Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems (NCS); 1993.Google Scholar
Mills, JF, Kroner, DG. Measures of criminal attitudes and associates: user guide. Unpublished instrument and user guide; 1999.Google Scholar
Mills, JF, Kroner, DG, Forth, AE. Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Assessment. 2002; 9(3): 240–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, BG, Fidell, LS. Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th edn. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2013.Google Scholar
Lussier, P, Verdun-Jones, S, Deslauriers-Varin, N, Nicholls, T, Brink, J. Chronic violent patients in an inpatient psychiatric hospital: prevalence, description, and identification. Crim Justice Behav. 2010; 37(1): 5–29.Google Scholar
Broderick, C. Violence report: DSH violence 2010–2017. Sacramento, CA: Department of State Hospitals; 2019.Google Scholar
Warburton, K. The new mission of forensic mental health systems: managing violence as a medical syndrome in an environment that balances treatment and safety. CNS Spectr. 2014; 19(5): 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, RD, Fisher, WH, Duan, N, Mandracchia, JT, Murray, D. Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law Hum Behav. 2010; 34(4): 324–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skeem JL, Winter E, Kennealy PJ, Louden JE, Tatar I, Joseph R. Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: toward recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav. 2014;38(3):212.Google Scholar
Bjørkly S,Hartvig P,HeggenF-A,BrauerH,MogerT.Developmentofa brief screen for violence risk (V-RISK-10) in acute and general psychiatry: an introduction with emphasis on findings from a naturalistic test of interrater reliability. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24(6):388–394.Google Scholar
Douglas KS, Hart SD, Webster CD, Belfrage H. HCR-20V3: Assessing Risk for Violence: User Guide. British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University; 2013.Google Scholar
Webster C, Martin M, Brink J, Nicholls T, Desmarais S. Manual for the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START; Version 1.1). Coquitlam, Canada: British Columbia Mental Health & Addiction Services; 2009.Google Scholar
Morgan RD, Kroner D, Mills JF. A Treatment Manual for Justice Involved Persons with Mental Illness: Changing Lives and Changing Outcomes: Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2017.
Google Scholar
Morgan RD, Kroner DG, Mills JF, Bauer RL, Serna C. Treating justice involved persons with mental illness: preliminary evaluation of a comprehensive treatment program. Crim Justice Behav. 2014;41 (7):902–916.Google Scholar
Gaspar M, Brown L, Ramler T, et al. Therapeutic outcomes of changing lives and changing outcomes for male and female justice involved persons with mental illness. Crim Justice Behav. 2019: 0093854819879743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeem JL, Schubert C, Odgers C, Mulvey EP, Gardner W, Lidz C. Psychiatric symptoms and community violence among high-riskGoogle Scholar