Book contents
- Defending Biodiversity
- Defending Biodiversity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Biodiversity and the Environmentalist Agenda
- Part I Instrumental Value Defenses
- Part II Intrinsic Value Defenses
- 7 Methodology in Philosophical Ethics
- 8 Extensionism in Environmental Ethics
- 9 Ecoholism: Do Ecological Wholes Have Intrinsic Value?
- 10 Ecoholism 2: Callicott on the Leopold Land Ethic
- 11 Should Biodiversity Be Conserved for Its Aesthetic Value?
- 12 How Far Do Intrinsic Value Defenses Get Environmentalists?
- 13 Conclusions and Personal Reflections
- References
- Index
- References
13 - Conclusions and Personal Reflections
from Part II - Intrinsic Value Defenses
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 October 2017
Book contents
- Defending Biodiversity
- Defending Biodiversity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Biodiversity and the Environmentalist Agenda
- Part I Instrumental Value Defenses
- Part II Intrinsic Value Defenses
- 7 Methodology in Philosophical Ethics
- 8 Extensionism in Environmental Ethics
- 9 Ecoholism: Do Ecological Wholes Have Intrinsic Value?
- 10 Ecoholism 2: Callicott on the Leopold Land Ethic
- 11 Should Biodiversity Be Conserved for Its Aesthetic Value?
- 12 How Far Do Intrinsic Value Defenses Get Environmentalists?
- 13 Conclusions and Personal Reflections
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Defending BiodiversityEnvironmental Science and Ethics, pp. 397 - 417Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Regan, T. (ed.). 1984. Earthbound: Introductory Essays in Environmental Ethics. Prospect Heights, IL, Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Kirkman, R. 2002. Skeptical Environmentalism: The Limits of Philosophy and Science. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, D.S. 2012. What’s So Good about Biodiversity? A Call for Better Reasoning about Nature’s Value. New York, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. (ed.) 2000. Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle. Oxford. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. 1982. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Bryan. 1988. Why Preserve Natural Variety? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Varner, Gary. 1998. In Nature’s Interests: Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varner, Gary. 2012. Personhood, Ethics and Animal Cognition: Situating Animals in Hare’s Two-Level Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronon, W. 1983/2003. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. 1998. The trouble with wilderness, or getting back to the wrong nature. In Callicott, J.B. and Nelson, M.P. (eds.) The Great New Wilderness Debate, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, pp. 414–442.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. 1994. Not with my tax money: The problem of justifying government subsidies for the arts. Public Affairs Quarterly 8:101–123.Google Scholar
Levinson, J. 1998. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, R.N. 1994. Intrinsic value and overcoming Feinberg’s Benefit Principle. Public Affairs Quarterly 8:125–140.Google Scholar
Takacs, D. 1996. The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Worster, D., 1977/1994. Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar