The Collective Jury Right and the Sixth Amendment

Laura I Appleman

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107338630.003

2 - The Collective Jury Right and the Sixth Amendment

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2015

Laura I Appleman

Show author details

Laura I Appleman: Affiliation:
Willamette University College of Law

Book contents

Get access

Summary

When we discuss the role of juries and the rights of the community in modern criminal justice, we must understand the precise contours of our modern jury trial right. Our historical Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial has been misapplied and misunderstood, and, as a result, too easily dismissed. Contrary to popular understanding, the original jury trial right was not an individual right, but a community one. We need a proper understanding of the Sixth Amendment jury trial right to provide both historical and constitutional justification for the community’s involvement in criminal justice. Thus, fully comprehending the collective nature of the jury trial right is critical to our project of incorporating the community right into current criminal process.

Much of our current understanding of the community jury trial right relies on a recent spate of Supreme Court decisions revitalizing the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial and making the jury trial right central to criminal justice. Although these recent decisions reinvigorating the collective right to jury trial have prompted a large-scale rethinking of sentencing and punishment, we are still lacking proper historical and scholarly support for these changes. In response, Part I of the book provides a missing historical and constitutional justification for the Court’s fidelity to the community as arbiter of punishment and traces the evolution of the jury trial right through the modern day. First, Chapter 2 offers a textual-historical reading of the Sixth Amendment based on seventeenth- and eighteenth-century legal theory, linguistic usage, and colonial and Revolutionary practices, and concludes that the jury trial right was originally the community’s right, not an individual right. Bringing the discussion to the modern day, Chapter 3 provides an overview of why the Sixth Amendment jury trial right has recently reassumed great importance in criminal procedure and explains how and why the Court’s primary focus has been on the role of the jury as a critical voice of the community.

Type: Chapter
Information: Defending the Jury
Crime, Community, and the Constitution
, pp. 13 - 38

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338630.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Langbein, John H., The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial 64 (2003)

The English Bill of Rights (Dec.16, 1689), available at

The English Bill of Rights (Dec.16, 1689), available at .

Langbein, John H., Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: A View from the Ryder Sources, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1, 2 (1983)CrossRef Google Scholar

Langbein, John H., Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining, 13 Law & Soc’y Rev. 261, 262 (1979)CrossRef Google Scholar

Hall, Kermit L., Finkelman, Paul & Ely, James W., American Legal History 23 (1996)

Boorstin, Daniel J., The Americans: The Colonial Experience 27 (1958)

Greenberg, Douglas, Crime, Law Enforcement, and Social Control in Colonial America, 26 Am. J. Legal Hist. 293, 296 (1982)CrossRef Google Scholar

Pole, J. R., Reflections on American Law and the American Revolution, 50 Wm. & Mary Q., 123, 126 (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Fairfax, Roger A., The Grand Jury’s Jurisdictional Heritage, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 398 (2006)Google Scholar

Washburn, Kevin, Restoring the Grand Jury, 76 Fordham L. Rev., 2333, 2387 (2008)Google Scholar

Nelson, William E. & Palmer, Robert C., Liberty and Community: Constitution and Rights in the Early American Republic 20 (1987)

Nelson, William E., Americanization of the Common Law: The Impact of Legal Change on Massachusetts Society, 1760–1830, at 29 (1994)

Pole, J. R., Reflections on American Law and the American Revolution, 50 Wm. & Mary Q., 123, 132 (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M., Crime and Punishment in American History 25 (1993)

Billings, Warren M., Law in Colonial America: The Reassessment of Early American Legal History, 81 Mich. L. Rev. 953, 956 (1983)CrossRef Google Scholar

McManus, Edgar J., Law and Liberty in Early New England: Criminal Justice and Due Process, 1620–1692, at 99 (1993)

Goebel, Julius, King’s Law and Local Custom in 17th Century New England, 31 Colum. L. Rev. 416, 436 (1931)CrossRef Google Scholar

Mann, Bruce H., Law, Legalism, and Community Before the American Revolution, 84 Mich. L. Rev. 1415, 1425 (1986)CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, William E., The Eighteenth-Century Background of John Marshall’s Constitutional Jurisprudence, 76 Mich. L. Rev. 893, 913–15 (1978)CrossRef Google Scholar

Tulchin, Matthew T., An Analysis of the Development of the Jury’s Role in a New York Criminal Trial, 13 J.L. & Pol’y425, 443 (2005)Google Scholar

Levy, Leonard W., Legacy of Suppression: Freedom of Speech and Press in Early American History 133 (1960)

Lepore, Jill, New York Burning: Liberty, Slavery and Conspiracy in Eighteenth-Century Manhattan72–7 (Knopf 2005)Google Scholar

Abramson, Jeffrey, We, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal Democracy 22–24, 68–75 (1994)

Stimson, Shannon C., The American Revolution in the Law: Anglo-American Jurisprudence before John Marshall 59–61 (1990)

Carroll, Jenny E., Nullification as Law, 102 Geo. L.J. 579, 588, 590, 595 (2014)Google Scholar

Boyer, Allen D., Sir Edward Coke and the Elizabethan Age (2003)

Coke, Edward, Of Continuall Claime, in 2 The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary Upon Littleton261 (19th ed., Garland Publishing 1979)Google Scholar

Coke, Edward, Petit Treason, in The Third and Fourth Parts of the Institutes of the Laws of England19, 26 (19th ed., Garland Publishing 1979)Google Scholar

Hale, III Matthew. Concerning the Common Law of England, its Use and Excellence, and the Reason of its Denomination, in The History of the Common Law of England24, 27 (1713)Google Scholar

Hale, XII Matthew. Touching Trial by Jury in The History of the Common Law of England and an analysis of the civil part of the law336, 336 (Charles Runnington, ed., 6th ed. 1820) (1713)Google Scholar

Beccaria, Cesare B., An Essay on Crimes and Punishments 30 (Philadelphia, R. Bell 1778)CrossRef Google Scholar

Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Law of England (Philadelphia, Robert Bell 1772) (1765)Google Scholar

Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Law of England342 (Philadelphia, Robert Bell 1772) (1765)Google Scholar

U.S. Cont’l Cong., Journal of the Proceedings of the Congress, Held at Philadelphia, September 5, 1774 121 (Philadelphia, William and Thomas Bradford 1774)

Engel, Steven, The Public’s Vicinage Right: A Constitutional Argument, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1658, 1673 (2000)Google Scholar

Saladino, Gaspare J., Synthesizing the Origins of the Bill of Rights, H-Net Reviews3 (1999)Google Scholar

Levy, Leonard W., The Origins of the Bill of Rights (1999)), available at

The Federal and State Constitutions Colonial Charters, and Other Organic Laws of the States, Territories, and Colonies Now or Heretofore Forming the United States of America 777, 783 (Thorpe, Francis Newton, ed.) (1909) [hereinafter Federal and State Constitutions], available at

Langhofer, Kory A., Comment, Unaccountable at the Founding: The Originalist Case for Anonymous Juries, 115 Yale L.J. 1823, 1826 (2006)CrossRef Google Scholar

Bibas, Stephanos, Originalism and Formalism in Criminal Procedure: The Triumph of Justice Scalia, the Unlikely Friend of Criminal Defendants? 94 Geo. L.J. 183, 196–97 (2005)Google Scholar

Connor, Henry G., The Constitutional Right to a Trial by a Jury of the Vicinage, 57 U. Pa. L. Rev. 197, 197–98 (1909)Google Scholar

The Address and Reasons of the Dissent of the Minority of the Convention of Pennsylvania to Their Constituents, Pa. Packet & Daily Advertiser, Dec. 18, 1787

Cornell, Saul, The Other Founders: Anti-Federalism and the Dissenting Tradition in America, 1788–1828, at 32 (1999)

New York Ratification Convention (July 26, 1788)

Founding America: Documents from the Revolution to the Bill of Rights 600–604 (Rakove, Jack N., ed., 2006)

Debates in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on the Adoption of The Federal Constitution, in 2 The Debates in the Several State Conventions, on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia, in 1787, at 1, 109–12 (Elliot, Jonathan, ed., 1836)

The Essential Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers 42, 46 (Wootton, David, ed., 2003)

Krauss, Stanton D., The Original Understanding of the Seventh Amendment Right to Jury Trial, 33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 407, 426 (1999)Google Scholar

Akhil Reed Amar, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (1998))

Amar, Akhil Reed, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction 11 (1998)

de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Bowen, Francis, trans., Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 4th prtg. 1948) (1835)Google Scholar

Kurland, Adam H., Providing a Federal Criminal Defendant with a Unilateral Right to a Bench Trial: A Renewed Call to Amend Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23(a), 26 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 309, 320 (1993)Google Scholar

Bodenhamer, David J., Fair Trial: Rights of the Accused in American History 86 (1992)

Wright, Ron, Trial Distortion and the End of Innocence in Federal Criminal Justice, 154 U. Penn. L. Rev. 79, 90–91 (2005)CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

2 - The Collective Jury Right and the Sixth Amendment

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive