ABBOTT, KENNETH W, “The Trading Nation's Dilemma: the Functions of the Law of International Trade”, Harvard International Law Journal, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Vol. 26, No. 2, Spring 1985, pp. 501–32.Google Scholar

AHO, C. MICHAEL and ARONSON, JONATHAN D, Trade Talks: America Better Listen! (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1985).Google Scholar

,Arusha Programme for Collective Self-reliance and Framework for Negotiations, United Nations Document TD/236 (1979) p. 35, reprinted in Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Fifth Session (Manila), United Nations Document TD/269, Vol. 1, 1981.

BALASSA, BELA, The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Economy (New York: Pergamon Press, 1981).Google Scholar

BALDWIN, ROBERT E and MURRAY, TRACY, “MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits under the GSP”, Economic Journal, Oxford, Vol. 87, March 1977, pp. 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BALDWIN, ROBERT E and KRUEGER, ANNE O (eds), The Structure and Evolution of Recent US Trade Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1984).Google Scholar

BALDWIN, ROBERT E, The Political Economy of US Import Policy (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1985).Google Scholar

BAUTISTA, ROMEO, Impediments to Trade Liberalization in the Philippines, Thames Essay No. 54 (Aldershot, Brookfield and Sydney: Gower, for the Trade Policy Research Centre, 1987).Google Scholar

BEDJAOUI, MOHAMMED, Towards a New International Economic Order (New York: Holmes & Meier, for the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 1979).Google Scholar

BENEDEK, WOLFGANG, “Stabilization of Export Earnings of Developing Countries”, in Progressive Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law Relating to the New International Economic Order: Analytical Papers and Analysis of Texts of Relevant Instruments, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/5 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1982) pp. 219–90.

BHAGWATI, JAGDISH N, Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1979).Google Scholar

BLACKHURST, RICHARD, MARIAN, NICOLAS and TUMLIR, JAN, Trade Liberalization, Protectionism and Interdependence: GATT Studies in International Trade No. 5 (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1977).Google Scholar

BLACKHURST, RICHARD, “Reciprocity in Trade Negotiations under Flexible Exchange Rates”, in Martin, John P and Smith, Alasdair (eds), Trade and Payments Adjustment under Flexible Exchange Rates (London: Macmillan, for the Trade Policy Research Centre, 1979) pp. 212–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BORRMANN, AXEL et al., The European Communities' General System of Preferences (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981).Google Scholar

BRONCKERS, MARCO G.E.J, Selective Safeguard Measures in Multilateral Trade Relations: Issues of Protectionism in GATT, European Community and United States Law (Deventer: Kluwer, for the T.M.C. Asser Instituut, 1985).Google Scholar

BROWN, WILLIAM ADAMS, The United States and the Restoration of World Trade: An Analysis and Appraisal of the ITO Charter and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Washington: Brookings Institution, 1950).Google Scholar

BULAJIC, MILAN, “Legal Aspects of a New International Order”, in Hossain, Kamal (ed.), Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order (London: Frances Pinter, 1980) pp. 45–67.Google Scholar

CHOWDBURY, SUBRATA ROY, “Legal Status of the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States”, in Hossain, Kama1 (ed.), Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order (London: Frances Pinter, 1980).Google Scholar

CLEMENTS, KENNETH W and SJAASTAD, LARRY A, How Protection Taxes Exporters, Thames Essay No. 39 (London: Trade Policy Research Centre, 1985).Google Scholar

CONGDON, T.G, Economic Liberalism in the Cone of Latin America, Thames Essay No. 40 (London: Trade Policy Research Centre, 1985).Google Scholar

CORDEN, W.M, Trade Policy and Economic Welfare (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974).Google Scholar

CURZON, GERARD, Multilateral Commercial Diplomacy: the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and its Impact on National Commercial Policies and Techniques (London: Michael Joseph, 1965).Google Scholar

DAM, KENNETH W, “Regional Economic Arrangements and the GATT: The Legacy of a Misconception”, University of Chicago Law Review, Chicago, Vol. 30, No. 4, Summer 1963, pp. 615–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DAM, KENNETH W, The GATT – Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970).Google Scholar

DAM, KENNETH W, The Rules of the Game: Reform and Evolution in the International Monetary System (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

DIEBOLD, WILLIAM JR, The End of the ITO, Princeton Essays in International Finance No. 16 (Princeton: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, 1952).Google Scholar

DORRIS, GREGORY C, “The Very Specialized United States Generalized System of Preferences”, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Athens, Georgia, Vol. 15, No. 1, Winter 1985, pp. 39–81.Google Scholar

DUPUY, RENE JEAN (ed.), The New International Economic Order: Commercial, Technological and Cultural Aspects (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981).Google Scholar

ERASMUS, MARTHINUS GERHARDUS, The New International Economic Order and International Organizations (Frankfurt-Main: Haag und Herchen, 1979).Google Scholar

ESPIRITU, AUGUSTO-CAESAR, “The Principle of the Right of Every State to Benefit from Science and Technology”, in Progressive Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law Relating to the New International Economic Order: Analytical Papers and Analysis of Texts of Relevant Instruments, second volume, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/6 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1983) pp. 1–153, European Parliament Documents, 1970–1971, No. 64.Google Scholar

EVANS, JOHN W, The Kennedy Round in American Trade Policy: The Twilight of the GATT? (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

FERNANDEZ, ROQUE and RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS, “Impediments to Trade Liberalization in Argentina”, in Sjaastad, Larry (ed.), Impediments to Trade Liberalization in Latin America (Aldershot, Brookfield and Sydney: Gower, for the Trade Policy Research Centre, forthcoming).

FINGER, J. MICHAEL, HALL, H. KEITH and NELSON, DOUGLAS R, “The Political Economy of Administered Protection”, American Economic Review, Menasha, Wisconsin, Vol. 72, June 1982, pp. 452–66.Google Scholar

FINGER, J. MICHAEL, “Ideas Count, Words Inform”, in Snape, R.H. (ed.), Issues in World Trade Policy: GATT at the Crossroads (London: Macmillan, 1986).Google Scholar

FRANCK, THOMAS M and MUNANSANGU, MARK M, The New International Economic Order: International Law in the Making, Policy and Efficacy Studies, No. 6 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1982).Google Scholar

GARDNER, RICHARD N, Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956).Google Scholar

The Role of the GATT in Relation to Trade and Development (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1964).

,The Tokyo Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Report by the Director-General of the GATT (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1979) and The Tokyo Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Supplementary Report by the Director-General of the GATT (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1980).

,GATT Activities in 1985 (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1986).

KENG-SWEE, GOH, “Public Administration and Economic Development in LDCs”, Fourth Harry G. Johnson Memorial Lecture, The World Economy, London, Vol. 6, Issue 3, September 1983, pp. 229–43.

HABERLER, GOTTFRIED et al., Trends in International Trade: Report by a Panel of Experts (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1958), known as the Haberler Report.Google Scholar

HAGGARD, STEPHAN, “The Politics of Adjustment: Lessons from the 3MF Extended Fund Facility”, International Organization, Madison, Wisconsin, Vol. 39, No. 3, Summer 1985, pp. 504–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

HOSSAIN, KAMAI (ed.), Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order (London: Frances Pinter, 1980).Google Scholar

HUBBARD, DAMIEN, “The International Law Commission and the New International Economic Order”, 1979 German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 22 (Berlin: Duncker und Hurnblot) pp. 80–99.

HUDEC, ROBERT E, “GATT or GABB? The Future Design of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade”, Yale Law Journal, New Haven, Connecticut, Vol. 80, No. 7, June 1971, pp. 1299–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

HUDEC, ROBERT E, The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy (New York: Praeger, 1975).Google Scholar

HUDEC, ROBERT E, Adjudication of International Trade Disputes, Thames Essay No. 16 (London: Trade Policy Research Centre, 1978).Google Scholar

HUDEC, ROBERT E, “GATT Dispute Settlement after the Tokyo Round: An Un-finished Business”, Cornell International Law Journal, Ithaca, Vol. 13, No. 2, Summer 1980, pp. 145–202.Google Scholar

HUGHES, HELEN and KRUEGER, ANNE O, “Effects of Protection in Developed Countries on Developing Countries' Exports of Manufactures”, in Baldwin, Robert E and Krueger, Anne O (eds), The Structure and Evolution of Recent US Trade Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1984) pp. 389–418.Google Scholar

,INTERNATIONAL LAW ASSOCIATION, “Third Report of the International Committee on Legal Aspects of a New International Economic Order”, in Report of the Sixty-first Conference (London: International Law Association, 1985) pp. 107–53.Google Scholar

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 1984–85 (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1985).

JACKSON, JOHN H, World Trade and the Law of GATT: A Legal Analysis of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969).Google Scholar

JACKSON, JOHN H, LOUIS, JEAN-VICTOR and MATSUSHITA, MITSUO, Implementing the Tokyo Round: National Constitutions and International Economic Rules (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1984).Google Scholar

JOHNSON, HARRY G, The Canadian Quandary: Economic Problems and Policies (Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1963).Google Scholar

JOHNSON, HARRY G, “Optimal Trade Intervention in the Presence of Domestic Distortion”, in Baldwin, Robert E (ed.), Trade, Growth and the Balance of Payments: Essays in Honor of Gottfried Haberler (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1965).Google Scholar

KEESING, DONALD B, “Manufactured Exports from Developing Countries”, in Haq, Khadija (ed.), Equality of Opportunity within and among Nations (New York: Praeger, 1977) pp. 98–103.Google Scholar

KEESING, DONALD B and WOLF, MARTIN, Textile Quotas against Developing Countries, Thames Essay No. 23 (London: Trade Policy Research Centre, 1980).Google Scholar

KOCK, KARIN, International Trade Policy and the GATT 1947–1967 (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1969).Google Scholar

KRUEGER, ANNE O, Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Liberalization Attempts and Consequences (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1978).Google Scholar

KRUEGER, ANNE O, “Trade Policies in Developing Countries”, in Jones, Ronald W and Kenen, Peter B (eds), Handbook of International Economics (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1984) pp. 519–69.Google Scholar

KRUEGER, ANNE O and MICHALOPOULOS, CONSTANTINE, “Developing-country Trade Policies and the International Economic System”, in Preeg, Ernest H (ed.), Hard Bargaining Ahead: US Trade Policy and Developing Countries (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, for the Overseas Development Council, 1985) pp. 39–57.Google Scholar

LAL, DEEPAK and RAJAPATIRANA, SARATH, Impediments to Trade Liberalization in Sri Lanka, Thames Essay No. 51 (Aldershot, Brookfield and Sydney: Gower, for the Trade Policy Research Centre, 1987).Google Scholar

LANGHAMMER, ROLF J, Ten Years of the EEC's Generalized System of Preferences for Developing Countries: Success or Failure?, Kiel Working Paper No. 183 (Kiel: Institut fur Weltwirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel, 1983).Google Scholar

LANGHAMMER, ROLF J and SAPIR, ANDRE, Economic Impact of Generalized Tariff Preferences, Thames Essay No. 49 (Aldershot, Brookfield and Sydney: Gower, for the Trade Policy Research Centre, 1987).Google Scholar

Recommendation of the Economic Committee Relating to Tariff Policy and MFN Clause, League of Nations Document Official No. E.805; 193 3, II. B.1 (Geneva: League of Nations, 1935).

LENWAY, STEPHANIE, The Politics of US International Trade (Boston: Pitman Publishing, 1985).Google Scholar

LEUTWILER, FRITZ et al., Trade Policies for a Better Future: Proposals for Action, the Leutwiler Report (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1985).Google Scholar

LINDERT, PETER H and KINDLEBERGER, CHARLES P, International Economics, 8th edition (Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1982).Google Scholar

LITTLE, I.M.D, ITOVSKY, TIBOR S.C and SCOTT, M.F.G, Industry and Trade in Some Developing Countries: A Comparative Study (London: Oxford University Press, for the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1970).Google Scholar

LITTLE, I.M.D, Economic Development: Theory, Policy and International Relations (New York: Basic Books, for the Twentieth Century Fund, 1982).Google Scholar

LONG, OLIVIER, Law and its Limitations in the GATT Multilateral Trade System (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985).Google Scholar

MAKIYAMA, HIDEKO (ed.), A New International Economic Order: Selected Documents 1976, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/2 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1980).Google Scholar

MAKIYAMA, HIDEKO (ed.), A New International Economic Order: Selected Documents 1977, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/3. (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1982).Google Scholar

MCGOVERN, EDMOND, International Trade Regulation: GATT, the United States and the European Community, 2nd edition (Exeter: Globefield Press, 1986).Google Scholar

MCCULLOCH, RACHEL, “United States Preferences: the Proposed System”, Journal of World Trade Law, Geneva, Vol. 8, No. 2, March-April 1974, pp. 216–26.Google Scholar

MEAGHER, ROBERT F, An International Redistribution of Wealth and Power: A Study of the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States (New York: Pergamon Press, 1979).Google Scholar

MENNES, L.B.M and KOT, JACOB (eds), European Trade Policies and the Developing World (London: Croom Helm, forthcoming).

MOSS, ALFRED GEORGE and WINTER, HARRY N.M (eds), A New International Economic Order: Selected Documents 1945–1975, in two volumes, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/1 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, no date).

MEIER, GERALD M, International Trade and Development, 2nd edition (New York: Harper & Row, 1968).Google Scholar

MURRAY, TRACY, Evaluation of the Trade Benefits under the United States Scheme of Generalized Preferences, United Nations Document TD/BlG. 5/66 (1980).

MUTHARIKA, A. PETER, “The Principle of Entitlement of Developing Countries to Development Assistance”, in Progressive Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law Relating to the New International Economic Order: Analytical Papers and Analysis of Texts of Relevant Instruments, second volume, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/6 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1983) pp. 154–351.Google Scholar

MYRDAL, GUNNAR, An International Economy: Problems and Prospects (New York: Harper & Row, 1956).Google Scholar

NAU, HENRY R, “The NICs in a New Trade Round”, in Preeg, Ernest H (ed.), Hard Bargaining Ahead: US Trade Policy and Developing Countries (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, for the Overseas Development Council, 1985) pp. 63–84.Google Scholar

NEMMERS, BARRY H and ROWLAND, TED, “The US Generalized System of Preferences: Too Much System, Too Little Preference”, Law and Policy in International Business, Washington, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1977, pp. 855–911.Google Scholar

OLSON, MANCUR, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

PATTERSON, GARDNER, Discrimination in International Trade: The Policy Issues 1945–1965 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

PEN, JAN, A Primer on International Trade (New York: Random House, 1967).Google Scholar

PENROSE, ERNEST F, Economic Planning for the Peace (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

PETERSMANN, ERNST-ULRICH, “International Trade and International Trade Law”, Discussion Paper for the International Law Association's International Committee on Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order, 1986.

PREBISCH, RAUL, The Economic Development of Latin America and Some of its Problems (New York: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America, 1949).Google Scholar

PREEG, ERNEST H, Traders and Diplomats: An Analysis of the Kennedy Round of Negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Washington: Brookings Institution, 1970).Google Scholar

PREEG, ERNEST H (ed.), Hard Bargaining Ahead: US Trade Policy and Developing Countries (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, for the Overseas Development Council, 1985).Google Scholar

RAMCHARAN, B.G, “Equality and Discrimination in International Economic Law (XII): The Proposed Global System of Trade Preferences among Developing Countries”, in The Yearbook of World Affairs 1984 (London: Stevens, for the London Institute of World Affairs, 1984) pp. 199–215.Google Scholar

RIVERO, OSWALDO, New Economic Order and International Development Law (New York: Pergamon Press, 1980).Google Scholar

ROESSLER, FRIEDER, “The Rationale for Reciprocity in Trade Negotiations under Floating Currencies”, Kyklos, Basel, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1978, pp. 258–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ROESSLER, FRIEDER, “The GATT Declaration on Trade Measures taken for Balance-of-payments Purposes: A Commentary”, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Cleveland, Ohio, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1980, pp. 383–403.Google Scholar

ROESSLER, FRIEDER, “The Scope, Limits and Function of the GATT Legal System”, The World Economy, London, Vol. 8, No. 3, September 1985, pp. 287–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

SAHOVIC, MILAN, “The Principle of Participatory Equality of Developing Countries in International Economic Relations: Analytical Paper”, United Nations Document UNITAR/DSI6/Add.1 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1984) pp. 1–54.

SAPIR, ANDRE and LUNDBERG, LARS, “The US Generalized System of Preferences and its Impacts”, in Baldwin, Robert E and Krueger, Anne O (eds), The Structure and Evolution of Recent US Trade Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1984) pp. 195–236.Google Scholar

SAUVANT, KARL P, The Group of 77: Evolution, Structure, Organization (New York: Oceana Publications, 1981).Google Scholar

SCOTT, BRIAN et al., Has the Cavalry Arrived? A Report on Trade Liberalisation and Economic Recovery, Special Report No. 6 (London: Trade Policy Research Centre, 1984).Google Scholar

VERLOREN, PIETERTHEMAAT, , The Changing Structure of International Economic Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981).Google Scholar

TOLLISON, ROBERT D, “Rent Seeking: a Survey”, Kyklos, Basel, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1982, pp. 575–602.

TUMLIR, JAN, Protectionism: Trade Policy in Democratic Societies (Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1985).Google Scholar

TUMLIR, JAN, Economic Policy as a Constitutional Problem, Fifteenth Wincott Memorial Lecture, Occasional Paper No. 70 (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1984).

The History of UNCTAD 1964–1984, United Nations Document UNCTAD/OSG/286 (New York: United Nations, 1985).

Towards a Global Strategy of Development, Report by the Secretary-General, United Nations Document TD/3/Rev. I (Geneva: UNCTAD Secretariat, 1964).

The Kennedy Round: Estimated Effects on Tariff Barriers, Report by the Secretary-General, United Nations Document TD/6/Rev. 1 (Geneva: UNCTAD Secretariat, 1968).

Assessment of the Results of the Multilateral Trade Negotiations, United Nations Document TD/B/778/Rev. 1 (Geneva: UNGTAD Secretariat, 1982).

Protectionism and Structural Adjustment in the World Economy, United Nations Document TD/B/888/Rev. 1 (Geneva: UNCTAD Secretariat, 1982).

“Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources”, UNITAR staff paper, in Progressive Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law Relating to the New International Order: Analytical Papers and Analysis of Texts of Relevant Instruments, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/5 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1982) pp. 291–465.

“The Principle of Participatory Equality of Developing Countries in International Economic Relations: Analysis of Texts”, UNITAR staff paper, in Progressive Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law Relating to the New International Economic Order: Analytical Papers and Analysis of Texts of Relevant Instruments, second volume, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/6 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1983) pp. 353–436.

Progressive Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law Relating to the New International Economic Order, Report by the Secretary-General, United Nations Document A/39/504/Add.l (New York: United Nations, 1984).

An Evaluation of US Imports under the Generalized System of Preferences, Publication No. 1379 (Washington: United States International Trade Commission, 1983).

Review of the Effectiveness of Trade Dispute Settlement under the GATT and the Tokyo Round Agreements, Publication No. 1793 (Washington: United States International Trade Commission, 1985).

VERWEY, WIL D, “The Principle of Preferential Treatment for Developing Countries”, in Progressive Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law Relating to the New International Economic Order: Analytical Papers and Analysis of Texts of Relevant Instruments, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/5 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1982) pp. 6–218.Google Scholar

WEINTRAUB, SIDNEY, “Selective Trade Liberalization and Restriction”, in Preeg, Ernest H (ed.), Hard Bargaining Ahead: US Trade Policy and Developing Countries (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, for the Overseas Development Council, 1985) pp. 167–84.Google Scholar

WILCOX, CLAIR, A Charter for World Trade (New York: Macmillan, 1949).Google Scholar

WOLF, MARTIN, “Two-Edged Sword: Demands of Developing Countries and the Trading System”, in Bhagwati, Jagdish N and Ruggie, John Gerard (eds), Power, Passions and Purpose: Prospects for North-South Negotiations (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1984) pp. 201–29.Google Scholar

WOLF, MARTIN, “An Unholy Alliance: The European Community and Developing Countries in the International Trading System”, in Mennes, L.B.M and Kol, Jacob (eds), European Trade Policies and the Developing Countries (London: Croom Helm, forthcoming).

WOLF, MARTIN, “Timing and Sequencing of Trade Liberalization”, Asian Development Review, Manila, Asian Development Bank, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1986.

WOLFRUM, HARRY, “The Principle of the Common Heritage of Mankind”, in Progressive Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law Relating to the New International Economic Order: Analytical Papers and Analysis of Texts of Relevant Instruments, second volume, United Nations Document UNITAR/DS/6 (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1983) pp. 437–564.Google Scholar

YEATS, ALEXANDER J, Trade Barriers Facing Developing Countries (London: Macmillan, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

YUSUF, ABDULQAWI, Legal Aspects of Trade Preferences for Developing States (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoffs, 1982).Google Scholar