Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T05:05:46.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Fine-Needle Aspiration of the Kidney and Adrenal Gland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

By
Susan L. Haley ,
Luan D. Truong  and
Blythe K. Gorman
Edited by
Ji-Weon Park ,
Paolo Gattuso ,
Vijaya B. Reddy  and
Shahla Masood
Ji-Weon Park
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Paolo Gattuso
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Vijaya B. Reddy
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Shahla Masood
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Proximal tubular cells are positive for the Renal Cell Carcinoma Marker (RCCMa) antigen, PAX2, PAX8, and CD10; negative for kidney-specific cadherin

Type
Chapter
Information
Differential Diagnosis in Cytopathology , pp. 548 - 596
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Juul, N, Torp-Pederson, S, Gronvall, S, et al. Ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal masses. J Urol 1985; 133: 579–581.Google Scholar
Kim, Y-J, Nast, CC. Identification of tubular cell nephron segment origin in renal fine-needle aspirates. Mod Pathol 1993; 6: 150–154.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Granter, SR, Cibas, ES. Fine-needle aspiration of the adult kidney. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1997; 81: 71–88.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Ramzy, I. Fine-needle aspiration of renal masses in adults: Analysis of results and diagnostic problems in 108 cases. Diagnostic Cytopathol 1999; 20: 339–349.Google Scholar
Young, NAS, Mody, DR, Davey, DD. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of lymphoproliferative disorders – interpretations based on morphologic criteria alone: results from the College of American Path-ologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130: 1766–1771.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Heffernan, JA, Munoz-Hernandez, P, Canca Velasco, A, et al. Fine needle aspiration of the normal kidney: a cyto-histological and immunocytochemical correlation study. Diagn Cytopathol 2018; 46(6): 482–488.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Bosniak, MA. Difficulties in classifying cystic lesions of the kidney. Urol Radiol 1991; 13: 91–93.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Granter, SR, Cibas, ES. Fine-needle aspiration of the adult kidney. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1997; 81: 71–88.Google Scholar
Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Mody, D, Truong, Ramzy I. LD. Fine-needle aspiration of cystic lesions of the kidney. Morphologic spectrum and diagnostic problems in 41 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 317–328.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Ramzy, I. Fine-needle aspiration of renal masses in adults: analysis of results and diagnostic problems in 108 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20: 339–349.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renshaw, AA, Granter, SR, Cibas, ES. Fine-needle aspiration of adult kidney. Cancer Cytopathol 1997, 81: 71–88.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Gould, EW. Ancillary studies in fine needle aspiration of the kidney. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126(Suppl 8): 711–723.Google Scholar
Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Mody, D, Truong, Ramzy I. LD. Fine-needle aspiration of cystic lesions of the kidney. Morphologic spectrum and diagnostic problems in 41 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 317–28.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Ramzy, I. Fine-needle aspiration of renal masses in adults: analysis of results and diagnostic problems in 108 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20: 339–349.Google Scholar
Chen, KT. Cytology of cystic nephroma: a case report. Acta Cytol 2008; 52(1): 91–3.Google Scholar
Clark, SP, Kung, IT, Tang, SK. Fine-needle aspiration of cystic nephroma (multilocular cyst of the kidney). Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 349–351.Google Scholar
Dey, P, Das, A, Radhika, S. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cystic partially differentiated nephroblastoma. A case report. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 770–772.Google Scholar
Drut, R. Cystic nephroma: cytologic findings in fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 593–595.Google Scholar
Gupta, R, Dhingra, K, Singh, S, et al. Multicystic nephroma: A case report. Acta Cytol 2007; 51: 651–3.Google Scholar
Hughes, JH, Niemann, TH, Thomas, PA. Multicystic nephroma: report of a case with fine-needle aspiration findings. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 14: 60–63.Google Scholar
Nayak, A, Iver, VK, Agarwala, S, Verma, K. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cystic partially differentiated nephroblastoma of the kidney. Cytopathology 2006; 17: 145–148.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Granter, SR, Cibas, ES. Fine-needle aspiration of the adult kidney. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1997; 81: 71–88.Google Scholar
Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Mody, D, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of cystic lesions of the kidney. Morphologic spectrum and diagnostic problems in 41 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 317–328.Google Scholar
Dey, P, Das, A, Radhika, S. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cystic partially differentiated nephroblastoma. A case report. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 770–772.Google Scholar
Katz, RI. Kidney, adrenals, and retroperitoneum. In Bibbo, M, ed. Comprehensive Cytopathology, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1997: 781–797.Google Scholar
Nayak, A, Iver, VK, Agarwala, S, Verma, K. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cystic partially differentiated nephroblastoma of the kidney. Cytopathology 2006; 17: 145–148.Google Scholar
Kurose, N, Takenaka, M, Yamashita, M, et al. A case report of infantile cystic nephroblastoma. Diagn Pathol 2018; 13(1): 84.Google Scholar
Dey, P, Srinivasan, R, Nijhawan, R, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of mesoblastic nephroma. A case report. Acta Cytol 1992; 36: 404–406.Google Scholar
Iyer, VK, Agarwala, S, Verma, K. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney: Studies of eight cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 33: 83–89.Google Scholar
Kaw, YT. Cytologic findings in congenital mesoblastic nephroma. A case report. Acta Cytol 1994; 38: 235–240.Google Scholar
Kumar, N, Jain, S. Aspiration cytology of mesoblastic nephroma in adult: Diagnostic dilemma. Diag Cytopathol 2000; 23: 124–126.Google Scholar
Williamson, SR. Renal cell carcinomas with a mesenchymal stromal component: what do we know so far? Pathology 2019; 51(5): 453–462.Google Scholar
Bishop, JA, Hosler, GA, Kulesza, P, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of renal cell carcinoma: is accurate Fuhrman grading possible on cytologic material? Diagn Cytopathol 2011; 39: 168–171.Google Scholar
Fetsch, PA, Powers, CN, Zakowski, MF, Abati, A. Anti-alpha-inhibin: marker of choice for the consistent distinction between adrenocortical carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration. Cancer 1999; 87: 168–172.Google Scholar
Netto, GJ, Epstein, JI. Immunohistology of the prostate, bladder, kidney, and testis. In: Dabbs, D, ed. Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: Theranostic and Genomic Applications. 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2010: 631–643.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Lee, KR, Madge, R, Granter, SR. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration in distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 987–994.Google Scholar
Roh, MH, Dal Cin, P, Silverman, SG, Cibas, ES. The application of cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization to fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and subclassification of renal neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol 2010: 118: 137–145.Google Scholar
Sangoi, AR, Karamchandani, J, Kim, J, et al. The use of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A review of PAX-8, PAX-2, hKIM-1, RCCma, and CD10. Adv Anat Pathol 2010; 17: 377–393.Google Scholar
Silverman, JF, Gurley, AM, Harris, JP. Fine needles aspiration cytology of renal infarct. Cytomorphologic findings and potential diagnostic pitfalls in two cases. Acta Cytol 1991; 35: 736–741.Google Scholar
Simsir, A, Chhieng, D, Wei, XJ, et al. Utility of CD10 and RCCma in the diagnosis of metastatic conventional renal-cell adenocarcinoma by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 33: 3–7.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Shen, SS. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of renal neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011; 153: 92–109.Google Scholar
Unger, P, Hague, K, Klein, G, Fine needle aspiration of a renal cell carcinoma with eosinophilic globules. A case report. Acta Cytol 1993; 37: 201–204.Google Scholar
Volpe, A, Jewett, MAS. The natural history of small renal masses. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2005; 2: 384–390.Google Scholar
Wasco, MJ, Pu, RT. Comparison of PAX-2, RCC antigen, and antiphosphorylated H2AX antibody (gamma-H2AX) in diagnosing metastatic renal cell carcinoma by fine needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36: 568–573.Google Scholar
Yang, B, Ali, SZ, Rosenthal, DL. CD10 facilitates the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma from primary adrenal cortical neoplasm in adrenal fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27: 149–152.Google Scholar
Zaman, MB. The kidneys, adrenals, and retroperitoneum. In: Koss, LG, Melemed, MR, eds. Koss’s Diagnostic Cytology and its Histopathologic Basis, 5th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006: 1466–1470.Google Scholar
Dhakal, HP, McKenney, JK, Khor, LY, et al. Renal neoplasms with overlapping features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 37 cases from a single institution. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40(2): 141–154.Google Scholar
Perrino, CM, Cramer, HM, Chen, S, et. al. World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading in fine‐needle aspiration biopsies of renal masses. Diagnc Cytopathol 2018; 46: 895–900.Google Scholar
Tang, PA, Vickers, MM, Heng, DY. Clinical and molecular prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma: what we know so far. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2011; 25(4): 871–91.Google Scholar
Tariq, N, Mamoon, N, Haroon, A, et al. Role of immunohistochemistry in subtyping renal cell carcinomas with overlapping morphological features. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2018; 30(3): 325–332.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Gould, EW. Ancillary studies in fine needle aspiration of the kidney. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126 (Suppl 8): 711–723.Google Scholar
Alshenawy, HA. Immunohistochemical panel for differentiating renal cell carcinoma with clear and papillary features. J Microsc Ultrastruct 2015; 3(2): 68–74.Google Scholar
Armah, HB, Parwani, AV. Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010; 134: 124–129.Google Scholar
Dekmezian, R, Sneige, N, Shabb, N. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: fine-needle aspiration of 15 cases. Diag Cytopathol 1991; 7: 198–203.Google Scholar
Dhillon, J, Mohanty, SK, Krishnamurthy, S. Cytologic diagnosis of thyroid-like follicular carcinoma of the kidney: A case report. Diagn Cytopathol 2012; 42:273-277.Google Scholar
Lim, JC, Wojcik, EM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of papillary renal cell carcinoma: the association with concomitant secondary malignancies. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34:797–800.Google Scholar
Lin, X. Cytomorphology of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125(1): 48–54.Google Scholar
Marks-Jones, DA, Zynger, DL, Parwani, AV, Cai, G. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: a report of two cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2010; 38: 51–55.Google Scholar
Olgac, S, Hutchinson, B, Tickoo, SK, Reuter, VE. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase as a marker in the differential diagnosis of metanephric adenoma. Mod Pathol 2006; 19: 218–224.Google Scholar
Ortega, JA. Cytologic aspect of mucinous tubular and spindle-cell renal carcinoma in fine-needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34: 660–662.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Gould, EW. Ancillary studies in fine needle aspiration of the kidney. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126 (Suppl 8): 711–723.Google Scholar
Roh, MH, Dal Cin, P, Silverman, SG, Cibas, ES. The application of cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization to fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and subclassification of renal neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118: 137–45.Google Scholar
Ross, H, Martignoni, G, Argani, P. Renal cell carcinoma with clear cell and papillary features. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012; 136: 391–399.Google Scholar
Wang, S, Filipowicz, EA, Schnadig, VJ. Abundant intracytoplasmic hemosiderin in both histiocytes and neoplastic cells: a diagnostic pitfall in fine-needle aspiration of cystic papillary renal-cell carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2001; 24: 82–85.Google Scholar
Adley, BP, Schafernak, KT, Yeldandi, AV, et al. Cytologic and histologic findings in multiple hybrid oncocytic tumors in a patient with Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome: a case report. Acta Cytol 2006; 50:584–588.Google Scholar
Akhtar, M, Ali, MA. Aspiration cytology of chrmophobe cell carcinoma of the kidney. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 287–294.Google Scholar
Granter, SR, Renshaw, AA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Analysis of six cases. Cancer Cytopathol 1997; 81: 122–128.Google Scholar
Liu, J, Fanning, CV. Can renal oncocytoma be distinguished from renal cell carcinoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens? A study of conventional smears in conjunction with anxillary studies. Cancer Cytopathol 2001, 93: 3909–3917.Google Scholar
Rocca, PC, Brunelli, M, Gobbo, S, et al. Diagnostic utility of S100A1 expression in renal cell neoplasms: an immunohistochemical and quantitative RT-PCR study. Mod Pathol 2007; 20: 722–728.Google Scholar
Salamaca, J, Alberti, N, Lopez-Rios, F, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Acta Cytol 2007; 51: 9–15.Google Scholar
Sharma, SG, Mathur, SR, Aron, M, et al. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with calcification: Report of a case with a rare finding on aspiration smears. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36: 647–650.Google Scholar
Sun, W, McGregor, DK, Ordonez, NG, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of a low grade myxoid renal epithelial neoplasm: a case report. Acta Cytol 2005; 49: 525–529.Google Scholar
Tejerina, E, Gonzalez-Oeramato, P, Jiminez-Heffernan, JA, et al. Cytological features of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, classic type. A report of nine cases. Cytopathol 2009; 20: 44–49.Google Scholar
Wiatrowska, BA, Zakowski, MF. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. Comparison of cytomorphologic features. Cancer Cytopathol 1999; 87: 161–167.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Gould, EW. Ancillary studies in fine needle aspiration of the kidney. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126 (Suppl 8): 711–723.Google Scholar
Lau, HD, Kong, CS, Kao, CS. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and a practical algorithmic approach for the diagnosis of renal masses by FNA. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126(9): 782–796.Google Scholar
Assad, L, Resetkova, E, Oliveira, VL, et al. Cytologic features of renal medullary carcinoma. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2005; 105: 28–34.Google Scholar
Bejar, J, Szvalb, S, Maly, B, et al. Collecting duct carcinoma of kidney: a cytological study and case report. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 15: 136–138.Google Scholar
Caraway, NP, Wojcik, EM, Katz, RL, et al. Cytologic findings of collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 304–309.Google Scholar
Gupta, R, Billis, A, Shah, RB, et al. Carcinoma of the collecting ducts of Bellini and renal medullary carcinoma: Clinicopathologic analysis of 52 cases of rare aggressive subtypes of renal cell carcinoma with a focus on their interrelationship. Am J Surg Pathol 2012; 36: 1265–1278.Google Scholar
Layfield, LJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of renal collecting duct carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11: 74–78.Google Scholar
Ono, K, Nishino, E, Nakamine, H. Renal collecting duct carcinoma. Report of a case with cytologic findings on fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2000; 44: 380–384.Google Scholar
Pagani, F, Colecchia, M, Sepe, P, et al. Collecting ducts carcinoma: an orphan disease. Literature overview and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 79: 101891.Google Scholar
Sironi, M, Salvina, AG. New cytological findings on fine-needle aspiration of renal collecting duct carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29: 239–240.Google Scholar
Zaman, SS, Sack, MJ, Ramchandani, P, et al. Cytopathology of retrograde renal pelvis brush specimens: an analysis of 40 cases with emphasis on collecting duct carcinoma and low-intermediate grade transitional cell carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 15: 312–321.Google Scholar
Auger, M, Katz, RL, Sella, A, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: a morphologic and immunocytochemical study of 15 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 46–51.Google Scholar
de Peralta-Venturina, M, Moch, H, Amin, M, et al. Sarcomatoid differentiation in renal cell carcinoma: a study of 101 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25: 275–284.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Weiss, LM, Hu, B, et al. Usefulness of immunohistochemistry in delineating renal spindle cell tumours. A retrospective study of 31 cases. Histopathology 2004; 44: 462–471.Google Scholar
Williamson, SR. Renal cell carcinomas with a mesenchymal stromal component: what do we know so far? Pathology 2019; 51(5): 453–462.Google Scholar
Chang, A, Amin, A, Gabrielson, E. Illei, P, Roden, RB, Sharma, R, Epstein, JI. Utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry in differentiating urothelial carcinoma from prostate adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix, anus, and lung. Am J Surg Pathol 2012; 36: 1472–1476.Google Scholar
DeMay, R. The kidney. In: DeMay, R, ed. The Art and Science of Cytopathology. Superficial Aspiration Cytology, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: ASCP Press, 2012: 1345–1382.Google Scholar
Juul, N, Torp-Pederson, S, Gronvall, S, et al. Ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal masses. J Urol 1985; 133: 579–581.Google Scholar
Kannan, V. Papillary transitional-cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a cytological review. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 6: 204–209.Google Scholar
Powers, CN, Elbadawi, A. Cercariform cells: a clue to the cytodiagnosis of transitional cell origin of metastatic neoplasms? Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 15–21.Google Scholar
Santamaría, M, Jauregui, I, Urtasun, F, Bertol, A. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 443–438.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Ramzy, I. Fine-needle aspiration of renal masses in adults: analysis of results and diagnostic problems in 108 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20: 339–349.Google Scholar
Dragoescu, EA, Liu, L. Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities. Cytojournal 2013; 10: 15.Google Scholar
Bynum, JP, Duffield, A, Ali, SZ. Importance of flow cytometry in the cytopathologic evaluation of lymphoid lesions involving the kidney. Acta Cytol 2016; 60(2): 131–138.Google Scholar
Garcia, M, Konoplev, S, Morosan, C, et al. MALT lymphoma involving the kidney: a report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 128: 464–473.Google Scholar
Gattuso, P, Castelli, MJ, Peng, Y, Reddy, VB. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders: a fine-needle aspiration biopsy study. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16: 392–395.Google Scholar
Hunter, S, Samir, A, Eisner, B, et al. Diagnosis of renal lymphoma by percutaneous image guided biopsy: experience with 11 cases. J Urol 2006; 176: 1952–1956.Google Scholar
Subhawong, AP, Subhawong, TK, Vandendussche, CJ, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders of the kidney on fine-needle aspiration: cytomorphology and angiographic correlates in 33 cases. Acta Cytol 2013; 57(1): 19–25.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Caraway, N, Ngo, T, et al. Renal lymphoma. The diagnostic and therapeutic roles of fine-needle aspiration. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 115: 18–31.Google Scholar
Wang, LL, Perlman, EJ, Vujanic, GM, et al. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the kidney in childhood. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 576–584.Google Scholar
Dragoescu, EA, Liu, L. Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities. Cytojournal 2013; 10: 15Google Scholar
Gattuso, P, Ramzy, I, Truong, LD, et al. Utilization of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of metastatic tumors to the kidney. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 21: 35–38.Google Scholar
Giashuddin, S, Cangiarella, J, Elgert, P, Levine, PH. Metastases to the kidney: eleven cases diagnosed by aspiration biopsy with histological correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32: 325–329.Google Scholar
Marec-Bérard, P, Crassard, N, Schell, M, et al. Osteosarcoma metastatic to the kidney and iatrogenic hemorrhage. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50: 690–692.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Gould, EW. Ancillary studies in fine needle aspiration of the kidney. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126 (Suppl 8): 711–723.Google Scholar
Akhtar, M, Ali, MA. Aspiration cytology of chromophobe cell carcinoma of the kidney. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 287–294.Google Scholar
Granter, SR, Renshaw, AA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Analysis of six cases. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1997, 81: 122–128.Google Scholar
Liu, J, Fanning, CV. Can renal oncocytoma be distinguished from renal cell carcinoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens? A study of conventional smears in conjunction with anxillary studies. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001; 93: 3909–3917.Google Scholar
Nguyen, GK, Amy, RW, Tsang, S. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology of renal oncocytoma. Acta Cytol 1985; 29: 33–36.Google Scholar
Rocca, PC, Brunelli, M, Gobbo, S, et al. Diagnostic utility of S100A1 expression in renal cell neoplasms: an immunohistochemical and quantitative RT-PCR study. Mod Pathol 2007; 20: 722–728.Google Scholar
Wiatrowska, BA, Zakowski, MF. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. Comparison of cytomorphologic features. Cancer Cytopathol 1999; 87: 161–167.Google Scholar
Lau, HD, Kong, CS, Kao, CS. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and a practical algorithmic approach for the diagnosis of renal masses by FNA. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126(9): 782–796.Google Scholar
Cibas, ES, Goss, GA, Kulke, MH, et al. Malignant epithelioid angiomyolipoma (‘sarcoma ex angiomyolipoma’) of the kidney: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25: 121–126.Google Scholar
Crapanzano, JP. Fine-needle aspiration of renal angiomyolipoma: cytological findings and diagnostic pitfalls in a series of five cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32: 53–57.Google Scholar
Handa, U, Nanda, A, Mohan, H. Fine-needle aspiration of renal angiomyolipoma: a report of four cases. Cytopathology 2007; 18: 250–254.Google Scholar
Mai, KT, Yazdi, HM, Perkins, DG, Thijssen, A. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of epithelioid angiomyolipoma. A case report. Acta Cytol 2001; 45: 233–236.Google Scholar
Mojica, WD, Jovanoska, S, Bernacki, EG. Epithelioid angiomyolipoma: appearance on fine-needle aspiration report of a case. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23: 192–195.Google Scholar
Pancholi, V, Munjal, K, Jain, M, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with fine needle aspiration cytology: a report of 3 cases. Acta Cytol 2006; 50: 466–468.Google Scholar
Sangawa, A, Shintaku, M, Nishimura, M. Nuclear pseudoinclusions in angiomyolipoma of the kidney. A case report. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 425–429.Google Scholar
Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Mody, D, et al. Fine needle aspiration of cystic lesions of the kidney: morphologic spectrum and diagnostic problems in 51 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 317–328.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, et al. Fine needle aspiration of renal masses: analysis of results and diagnostic problems in 113 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20: 339–349.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Choi, Y-J, Ayala, G, et al. Renal cystic neoplasms and renal neoplasms associated with renal cystic diseases. Pathogenetic and molecular links. Adv Diagn Pathol 2003; 10: 135–159.Google Scholar
Villari, D, Grosso, M, Vitarelli, E, et al. Nuclear pseudoinclusions in fine-needle aspiration cytology of hepatic angiomyolipoma: case report. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 22: 390–393.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Gould, EW. Ancillary studies in fine needle aspiration of the kidney. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126 (Suppl 8): 711–723.Google Scholar
Zhou, H, Guo, M, Gon, Y. Challenge of FNA diagnosis of angiomyolipoma: a study of 33 cases. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125(4): 257–266.Google Scholar
de Medeiros, CR, Dantas da Cunha, A. Jr., Pasquini, R, Arns da Cunha, C. Primary renal aspergillosis: extremely uncommon presentation in patients treated with bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 24: 113–114.Google Scholar
Hou, J, Jerlitz, LC. Renal infections. Surg Pathol Clin 2014; 7(3): 389–408.Google Scholar
Hyldgaard-Jensen, J, Sandstrøm, HR, Pedersen, JF. Ultrasound diagnosis and guided biopsy in renal actinomycosis. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 510–512.Google Scholar
Todd, TD, Dhurandhar, B, Mody, D, Truong, Ramzy I. LD. Fine-needle aspiration of cystic lesions of the kidney. Morphologic spectrum and diagnostic problems in 41 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 317–328.Google Scholar
Dhinga, KK, Singal, S, Jain, S. Rare coexistence of keratinizing squamous metaplasia with xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Report of a case with the role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis. Acta Cytol 2007; 51: 92–94.Google Scholar
Hou, J, Jerlitz, LC. Renal infections. Surg Pathol Clin 2014 Sep; 7(3): 389–408Google Scholar
Kumar, N, Jain, S. Aspiration cytology of focal xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: a diagnostic challenge. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30: 111–114.Google Scholar
McKee, G. The kidney and retroperitoneum. In: Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2nd edn. Gray, W, McKee, G, eds. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livinston, 2003.Google Scholar
Masoom, S, Venkataraman, G, Jensen, J, et al. Renal FNA-based typing of renal masses remains a useful adjunctive modality: evaluation of 31 renal masses with correlative histology. Cytopathology 2009; 20: 50–55.Google Scholar
Mollier, S, Descotes, JL, Pasquier, D, et al. Pseudoneo-plastic xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. A typical clinical presentation but unusual diagnosis and treatment. Eur Urol 1995; 27: 170–173.Google Scholar
Gupta, M, Vankatesh, SK, Kumar, A, Pandey, R. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of bilateral renal malakoplakia. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 31: 116–117.Google Scholar
Hou, J, Jerlitz, LC. Renal infections. Surg Pathol Clin 2014; 7(3): 389–408Google Scholar
Kapasi, H, Robertson, S, Futter, N. Diagnosis of renal malacoplakia by fine needle aspiration cytology. A case report. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 1419–1423.Google Scholar
Akhtar, M, Ali, MA, Sackey, K, et al. Aspiration cytology of Wilms’ tumor: correlation of cytologic and histologic features. Diagn Cytopathol 1989; 5: 269–74.Google Scholar
Asim, M, Mudassir, G, Hashmi, AA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy in pediatric small round cell tumors. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11(1): 573.Google Scholar
DeMay, R. The kidney. In: DeMay, R, ed. The Art and Science of Cytopathology. Superficial Aspiration Cytology, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: ASCP Press, 2012: 1345–1382.Google Scholar
Dey, P, Radhika, S, Rajwanhi, A, et al. Aspiration cytology of Wilms’ tumor. Acta Cytol 1993; 37: 477–482.Google Scholar
Geisinger, KR, Wakely, PE, Woford, MM. Unresectable stage IV nephroblastoma: a potential indication for fine-needle aspiration biopsy in children. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 197–201.Google Scholar
Iyer, VK, Kapila, K, Agsrwala, S, et al. Wilms’ tumor. Role of fine needle aspiration and DNA ploidy by image analysis in prognostication. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1999; 21: 505–511.Google Scholar
Nayak, A, Iyer, VK, Agarwala, S. The cytomorphologic spectrum of Wilms’ tumor on fine needle aspiration: a single institutional experience of 110 cases. Cytopathology 2011; 22: 50–59.Google Scholar
Peng, L, Perle, MA, Scholes, JV, Yang, GCH. Wilms’ tumor in adults: Aspiration cytology and cytogenetics. Diagnostic Cytopathol 2002; 26: 99–103.Google Scholar
Portugal, R, Barroca, H. Clear cell sarcoma, cellular mesoblastic nephroma, and metanephric adenoma: cytological features and differential diagnosis with Wilms’ tumor. Cytopathology 2008; 19: 80–85.Google Scholar
Quijano, G, Drut, R. Cytologic characteristics of Wilms’ tumors in fine needle aspirates. A study of ten cases. Acta Cytol 1989; 33: 263–6.Google Scholar
Barroca, H, Carvalho, JL, da Costa, MJ, et al. Detection of N-myc amplification in neuroblastomas using Southern blotting on fine needle aspirates. Acta Cytol 2001; 45: 169–172.Google Scholar
Blanco, JZ Jr, Schein, CO, Patel, T, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of metanephric adenoma of the kidney with clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic correlation: A review. Diagn Cytopathol 2013; 41:742–751.Google Scholar
Bosco, M, Galliano, D, La Saponara, F, et al. Cytologic features of metanephric adenoma of the kidney during pregnancy: a case report. Acta Cytol 2007; 51: 468–472.Google Scholar
Das, DK. Fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of small round cell tumor: value and limitations. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2004; 4: 309–318.Google Scholar
Fröstad, B, Martinsson, T, Tani, E, et al. The use of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the molecular characterization of neuroblastoma in children. Cancer 1999; 25; 87: 60–68.Google Scholar
Fröstad, B, Tani, E, Brosjö, O, Skoog, L, Kogner, P. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of children and adolescents with Ewing sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Med Pediatr Oncol 2002; 38: 33–40.Google Scholar
Granja, NM, Begnami, MD, Bortolan, J, et al. Desmoplastic small round cell tumour: cytological and immunocytochemical features. Cytojournal 2005; 18: 2–6.Google Scholar
Halliday, BE, Slagel, DD, Elsheikh, TE, Silverman, JF. Diagnostic utility of MIC-2 immunocytochemical staining in the differential diagnosis of small b Diagnostic utility of MIC-2 immunocyto-chemical staining in the differential diagnosis of small blue cell tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 19: 410–416.Google Scholar
Kang, SH, Perle, MA, Nonaka, D, et al. Primary Ewing sarcoma/PNET of the kidney: fine-needle aspiration, histology, and dual color break apart FISH Assay. Diagn Cytopathol 2007; 35: 353–337.Google Scholar
Khayyata, S, Grignon, DJ, Aulicino, MR, Al-Abbadi, MA. Metanephric adenoma vs. Wilms’ tumor: a report of 2 cases with diagnosis by fine needle aspiration and cytologic comparisons. Acta Cytol 2007; 51: 464–467.Google Scholar
Lane, BR, Chery, F, Jour, G, et al. Renal neuroendocrine tumours: a clinicopathological study. BJU Int 2007; 100: 1030–1035.Google Scholar
Maly, B, Maly, A, Reinhartz, T, Sherman, Y. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney. Report of a case initially diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 2004; 48: 264–268.Google Scholar
Miyake, M, Fujimoto, K, Tanaka, M, et al. A case of small cell carcinoma of the kidney. Hinyokika Kiyo 2007; 53: 235–240.Google Scholar
Portugal, R, Barroca, H. Clear cell sarcoma, cellular mesoblastic nephroma, and metanephric adenoma: cytological features and differential diagnosis with Wilms’ tumor. Cytopathology 2008; 19: 80–85.Google Scholar
Radhika, S, Bakshi, A, Rajwanshi, A, et al. Cytopathology of uncommon malignant renal neoplasms in the pediatric age group. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32: 281–286.Google Scholar
Rajwanshi, A, Srinivas, R, Upasana, G. Malignant small round cell tumors. J Cytol 2009; 26(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Ravindra, S, Kini, U. Cytomorphology and morphometry of small round-cell tumors in the region of the kidney. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32: 211–216.Google Scholar
Serrano, R, Rodríguez-Peralto, JL, De Orbe, GG, et al. Intrarenal neuroblastoma diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration: a report of two cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27: 294–297.Google Scholar
Sharifah, NA. Fine needle aspiration cytology characteristics of renal tumors in children. Pathology 1994; 26: 359–364.Google Scholar
Silverman, JF, Joshi, VV. FNA biopsy of small round cell tumors of childhood: cytomorphologic features and the role of ancillary studies. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 10: 245–255.Google Scholar
Vesoulis, Z, Rahmeh, T, Nelson, R, et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of primary renal synovial sarcoma. A case report. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 668–672.Google Scholar
Wang, LL, Perlman, EJ, Vujanic, GM, et al. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the kidney in childhood. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 576–584.Google Scholar
Akhtar, M, Ali, MA, Sackey, K, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7: 36–40.Google Scholar
Barroca, HM, Costa, MJ, Carvalho, JL. Cytologic profile of rhabdoid tumor of the kidney. A report of 3 cases. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 1055–1058.Google Scholar
Drut, R. Cystic nephroma: cytologic findings in fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 593–595.Google Scholar
Radhika, S, Bakshi, A, Rajwanshi, A, et al. Cytopathology of uncommon malignant renal neoplasms in the pediatric age group. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32: 281–286.Google Scholar
Sharifah, NA. Fine needle aspiration cytology characteristics of renal tumors in children. Pathology 1994; 26: 359–364.Google Scholar
Sigauke, E, Rakheja, D, Maddox, DL, et al. Absence of expression of SMARCB1/INI1 in malignant rhabdoid tumors of the central nervous system, kidneys and soft tissue: an immunohistochemical study with implications for diagnosis. Mod Pathol 2006; 19: 717–725.Google Scholar
Sukov, WR, Cheville, JC, Lager, DJ, et al. Malignant mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney with rhabdoid features: report of a case including immunohisto-chemical, molecular genetic studies and comparison to morphologically similar renal tumors. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 1432–1437.Google Scholar
Yusuf, Y, Belmonte, AH, Tchertkoff, V. Fine needle aspiration cytology of a recurrent malignant tumor of the kidney with rhabdoid features in an adult. A case report. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 1313–1316.Google Scholar
Thomson, TA, Klijanienko, J, Couturer, J, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of renal and extrarenal rhabdoid tumors: the experience of the Institut Curie regarding 20 tumors in 13 patients. Cancer Cytopathol 2011; 119(1): 49–57.Google Scholar
Akhtar, M, Ali, MA, Sackey, K, Burgess A Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of clear-cell sarcoma of the kidney: light and electron microscopic features. Diagn Cytopathol 1989; 5; 181–187.Google Scholar
Drut, R, Pomar, M. Cytologic characteristics of clear-cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK) in fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB): a report of 4 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7: 611–614.Google Scholar
Iyer, VK, Agarwala, S, Verma, K. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of clear-cell sarcoma of the kidney: study of eight cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 33: 83–89.Google Scholar
Iyer, VK, Kapila, K, Verma, K. Fine needle aspiration cytology of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney with spindle cell pattern. Cytopathology 2003; 14: 160–164.Google Scholar
Portugal, R, Barroca, H. Clear cell sarcoma, cellular mesoblastic nephroma and metanephric adenoma: cytological features and differential diagnosis with Wilms tumour. Cytopathology 2008; 19: 80–85.Google Scholar
Das, I, Das, RN, Dalal, BS. FNAC aided diagnosis of clear cell sarcoma of kidney: report of two cases in infants. Diagn Cytopathol 2017; 45(8): 761–765.Google Scholar
Dusenbery, D, Dekker, A. Needle biopsy of the adrenal gland: retrospective review of 54 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 14: 126–134.Google Scholar
Fassina, AS, Borsato, S, Fedeli, U. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of adrenal masses. Cytopathology 2000; 11: 302–311.Google Scholar
Min, KW, Song, J, Bosenberg, M, Aceby, J. Adrenal cortical nodule mimicking small round cell malignancy on fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1988; 32: 543–546.Google Scholar
Subhawong, AP, Subhawong, TK, Li, QK. Fine needle aspiration of metastatic prostate carcinoma simulating a primary adrenal cortical neoplasm: A case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 2010; 38: 147–153.Google Scholar
Wadih, GE, Nance, KV, Silverman, JF. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the adrenal gland. Fifty biopsies in 48 patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116: 841–846.Google Scholar
Wu, HHJ, Cramer, HM, Kho, J, Elsheikh, TM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of benign adrenal cortical nodules. A comparison of cytologic findings with those of primary and metastatic adrenal malignancies. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 1352–1358.Google Scholar
Jhala, NC, Jhala, D, Eloubeidi, MA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of the adrenal glands: analysis of 24 patients. Cancer 2004; 102(5): 308–314.Google Scholar
Dusenbery, D, Dekker, A. Needle biopsy of the adrenal gland: retrospective review of 54 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 14: 126–134.Google Scholar
Jalali, M, Krishnamurthy, S. Comparison of immunomarkers for the identification of adrenocortical cells in cytology specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 33: 78–82.Google Scholar
Jhala, NC, Jhala, D, Eloubeidi, MA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of the adrenal glands: analysis of 24 patients. Cancer 2004; 102(5): 308–314.Google Scholar
Katz, RL, Patel, S, Mackay, B, Zornoza, J. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the adrenal gland. Acta Cytol 1984; 28: 269–282.Google Scholar
Misic, M, Vidas, Z, Skegro, D, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of adrenal cortical carcinoma – a case report. Coll Antropol 2010; 2: 665–669.Google Scholar
Rana, C, Krishnani, N, Kumari, N. Spectrum of adrenal lesions of fine needle aspiration cytology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2012; 55(4): 461–6.Google Scholar
Ren, R, Guo, M, Sneige, N, et al. Fine needle aspiration of adrenal cortical carcinoma: cytologic spectrum and diagnostic challenges. Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 126: 389–398.Google Scholar
Saboorian, MH, Katz, RL, Charnsangavej, C. Fine needle aspiration cytology of primary and metastatic lesions of the adrenal gland. A series of 188 biopsies with radiologic correlation. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 843–851.Google Scholar
Subhawong, AP, Subhawong, TK, Li, QK. Fine needle aspiration of metastatic prostate carcinoma simulating a primary adrenal cortical neoplasm: a case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 2010; 38: 147–153.Google Scholar
Wadih, GE, Nance, KV, Silverman, JF. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the adrenal gland. Fifty biopsies in 48 patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116: 841–846.Google Scholar
Wu, HHJ, Cramer, HM, Kho, J, Elsheikh, TM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of benign adrenal cortical nodules. A comparison of cytologic findings with those of primary and metastatic adrenal malignancies. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 1352–1358.Google Scholar
de Agustin, P, Lopez-Rios, F, Alberti, N, Perez-Barrios, A. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the adrenal glands: a ten-year experience. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 21: 92–97.Google Scholar
Deodhare, S, Chalvardjian, A, Lata, A, Marcuzzi, D. Adrenal pheochromocytoma mimicking small cell carcinoma on fine needle aspiration biopsy. A case report. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 1003–1006.Google Scholar
Handa, U, Khullar, U, Mohan, H. Pigmented pheochromocytoma: report of a case with diagnosis by fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2005; 49: 421–423.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Heffernan, JA, Vicandi, B, Lopez-Ferrer, P, et al. Cytologic features of pheochromocytoma and retroperitoneal paraganglioma: a morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 13 cases. Acta Cytol 2006; 50 (4): 372–378.Google Scholar
Nance, KV, McLeod, DL, Silverman, JF. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of spindle cell neoplasms of the adrenal gland. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 235–241.Google Scholar
Shidham, VB, Galindo, LM. Pheochromocytoma. Cytologic findings on intraoperative scrape smears in five cases. Acta Cytol 1999; 43: 207–213.Google Scholar
Rana, C, Krishnanin, , Kumari, N. Spectrum of adrenal lesions of fine needle aspiration cytology . Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2012 Oct-Dec; 55(4): 461–6.Google Scholar
Fassina, AS, Borsato, S, Fedeli, U. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of adrenal masses. Cytopathology 2000; 11: 302–311.Google Scholar
Jhala, NC, Jhala, D, Eloubeidi, MA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of the adrenal glands: analysis of 24 patients. Cancer 2004; 102(5): 308–314.Google Scholar
Rana, C, Krishnani, N, Kumari, N. Spectrum of adrenal lesions of fine needle aspiration cytology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2012; 55(4): 461–466.Google Scholar
Saboorian, MH, Katz, RL, Charnsangavej, C. Fine needle aspiration cytology of primary and meta-static lesions of the adrenal gland. A series of 188 biopsies with radiologic correlation. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 843–851.Google Scholar
Wadih, GE, Nance, KV, Silverman, JF. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the adrenal gland. Fifty biopsies in 48 patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116: 841–846.Google Scholar
Wu, HH, Cramer, HM, Kho, J, Elsheikh, TM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of benign adrenal cortical nodules. A comparison of cytologic findings with those of primary and metastatic adrenal malignancies. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 1352–1358.Google Scholar
Zhang, PJ, Genega, EM, Tomaszewski, JE, et al. The role of calretinin, inhibin, melan-A, BCL-2 and C-kit in differentiating adrenal cortical and medullary tumors: an immunohistochemical study. Mod Pathol 2003; 16: 591–597.Google Scholar
Domanski, HA. Fine-needle aspiration of ganglioneuroma. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32: 363–336.Google Scholar
Frostad, B, Tani, E, Kogner, P, et al. The clinical use of fine needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis and management of children with neuroblastic tumors. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 529–536.Google Scholar
Joshi, VV, Silverman, JF, Altshuler, G, et al. Systematization of primary histopathologic and fine-needle aspiration cytologic features and description of unusual histopathologic features of neuroblastic tumors: a report from the Pediatric Oncology Group. Hum Pathol 1993; 24: 493–504.Google Scholar
Joshi, VV, Silverman, JF. Pathology of neuroblastic tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994; 11: 107–117.Google Scholar
Klijanienko, J, Couturier, J, Brisse, H, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic information obtained on fine-needle aspirates of primary neuroblastic tumors: proposal for a cytology prognostic score. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2011; 119: 411–423.Google Scholar
Kumar, PV. Fine-needle aspiration cytologic diagnosis of ganglioneuroblastoma. Acta Cytol 1987; 31: 583–586.Google Scholar
Deblois, GG, De May, RM. Adrenal myelolipoma diagnosis by computed-tomographic guided fine-needle aspiration. A case report. Cancer 1985; 55: 848–850.Google Scholar
Dunphy, CH. Computed tomography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of adrenal myelolipoma. Case report and review of the literature. Acta Cytol 1991; 35: 353–356.Google Scholar
Hasan, M, Siddiqui, F, Al-Ajmi, M. FNA diagnosis of adrenal myelolipoma: a rare entity. Diagn Cytopathol 2008 Dec; 36(12): 925–926.Google Scholar
Katsuta, K, Nakabayashi, H, Kuroda, Y, Liu, PI. Adrenal myelolioma: preoperative diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1989; 5: 298–300.Google Scholar
Osborn, M, Smith, M, Senbanjo, T, et al. Adrenal myelolipoma – clinical, radiological and cytological findings: a case report. Cytopathology 2002; 13: 242–246.Google Scholar
Settakorn, J, Sirivanchai, C, Rangdaeng, S, Chaiwum, B. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of adrenal myelolipoma: case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 21: 409–412.Google Scholar
Kumar, R, Dey, P. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of non-neoplastic adrenal pathology. Diagn Cytopathol 2016; 44(6): 472–476.Google Scholar
Rana, C, Krishnani, N, Kumari, N. Spectrum of adrenal lesions of fine needle aspiration cytology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2012; 55(4): 461–466.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×