Book contents
- The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
- The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Constitutional Justice in the Americas at the Turn of the Millennium
- 2 Judicial Power and the Design of Constitutional Justice
- 3 Constitutional Governance and the Politics of Judicial Design
- 4 Identifying the Political Origins of Constitutional Justice through Quantitative Analysis
- 5 Guatemala (1985)
- 6 Argentina (1994)
- 7 Bolivia (2009)
- 8 Conclusion
- Appendix A Judicial Power: Concepts and Measures
- References
- Index
- References
Appendix A - Judicial Power: Concepts and Measures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2018
Book contents
- The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
- The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Constitutional Justice in the Americas at the Turn of the Millennium
- 2 Judicial Power and the Design of Constitutional Justice
- 3 Constitutional Governance and the Politics of Judicial Design
- 4 Identifying the Political Origins of Constitutional Justice through Quantitative Analysis
- 5 Guatemala (1985)
- 6 Argentina (1994)
- 7 Bolivia (2009)
- 8 Conclusion
- Appendix A Judicial Power: Concepts and Measures
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin AmericaPolitics, Governance, and Judicial Design, pp. 229 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Polity IV “Constraints on the Executive” (“xconst2”): Marshall, Monty G., Polity IV Project (2014), www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.Google Scholar
Contract Intensive Money Measure (CIM): Clague, Christopher, Keefer, Philip, Knack, Stephen, and Olson, Mancur, Contract-Intensive Money: Contract Enforcement, Property Rights, and Economic Performance, 4(2) J. Econ. Growth 185 (1999).Google Scholar
Wittold Henisz's measure of “judicial independence” (“Henisz”): Henisz, Witold J., The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment, 11(2) Ind. Corp. Change 355 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Political Risk Services “Law & Order” measure (“PRS”): The PRS Group, International Country Risk Guide, www.prsgroup.com/about-us/our-two-methodologies/icrg.Google Scholar
Tate & Keith measure of judicial independence (“tatekeith”): Tate, C. Neal and Keith, Linda Camp, Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Judicial Independence Globally, paper delivered at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 1, 2007, Chicago, IL. Available at Linda Camp Keith, Faculty Page, www.utdallas.edu/∼lck016000/APSA2006.doc.Google Scholar
Cingranelli & Richards measure of judicial independence (“CIRI”): Cingranelli, David and Richards, David, CIRI Human Rights Data Project (2014), www.humanrightsdata.com/p/data-documentation.html.Google Scholar
Howard & Carey measure of judicial independence (“howardcarey”): Howard, Robert M. and Carey, Henry F., Is an Independent Judiciary Necessary for Democracy?, 87(6) Judicature 284 (2004).Google Scholar
Feld & Voigt de jure and de facto measures of judicial independence (“feldvoigt defacto” and “feldvoigt dejure”): Feld, Lars P. and Voigt, Stefan, Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross-country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators, 19(3) Eur. J. Pol. Econ. 497 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Competitiveness Report's measure of “judicial independence” (“Fraser”): World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report (2016) http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016.Google Scholar
Bertelsmann Transformation Index of Judicial Independence (“BTI”): Stiftung, Bertelsmann, Transformation Index BTI (2016), www.bti-project.org/de/startseite.Google Scholar
Apodaca–Keith Scale of de jure judicial independence (“Keith”): Apodaca, Clair, The Rule of Law and Human Rights, 87(6) Judicature 292 (2004);Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
La Porta et al. de jure measure of judicial independence (“Laporta”): Porta, Rafael La, de Silanes, Florencio López, Pop-Eleches, Cristian, and Shleifer, Andrei, Judicial Checks and Balances, 112(2) J. Pol. Econ. 445 (2004).Google Scholar