Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T15:19:16.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Joe Davies
Affiliation:
College Lecturer in Music at Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford.
James William Sobaskie
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Music at Mississippi State University and serves as Book Reviews Editor of Nineteenth-Century Music Review.
Get access

Summary

Constraints and Misconceptions

As Lorraine Byrne Bodley suggests in the first chapter of our volume, Franz Schubert was thought a failure in the field of dramatic music throughout much of the twentieth century. This perception stemmed in part from the lack of critical acclaim for certain of his large-scale stage works, as well as ignorance of other projects that were never performed nor closely studied. For instance, the melodrama Die Zauberharfe (D. 644) and the Singspiel Die Zwillingsbrüder (D. 647) were briefly staged in Vienna during 1820, but they attracted little attention and enjoyed no revivals during the composer's lifetime. Regrettably, the more substantial operas Alfonso und Estrella (D. 732; 1822) and Fierabras (D. 796; 1823) were never produced, while several other promising theatrical endeavours, including Adrast (D. 137; 1817), Claudine von Villa Bella (D. 239; 1815), and Der Graf von Gleichen (D. 918; 1827), as well as the sacred oratorio Lazarus (D. 689; 1820), remained incomplete at his death. Without positive critical reception of these works, and no demonstrable evidence of their influence on later composers, the opinion arose that Schubert lacked the capacity for dramatic music.

Many factors seem to have conspired to limit Schubert's success in the venerable vocal domain. Italian and French opera remained dominant in early nineteenthcentury Vienna, and new, home-grown works were hard-pressed to compete. The unique achievements of Mozart's Die Entführung aus dem Serail (K. 384; 1782) and Die Zauberflöte (K. 620; 1791) were difficult to duplicate and had not yet led to a strong, clearly defined German tradition, while the implications of Carl Maria von Weber's Der Freischutz (Op. 77; 1821) had not yet been fully realized. There was limited local financial support for opera at the time, and, quite understandably, benefactors hesitated to take chances on unproven artists. Certainly the implications of the newly emerging Romantic aesthetic for dramatic music were not quite clear. And of course, Schubert needed to earn a living and could not focus solely on opera. While this survey surely represents an over-simplification of the composer's creative circumstances, it appears that the time just was not right for Schubert to contribute to traditionally recognized dramatic genres.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Preface
    • By Joe Davies, College Lecturer in Music at Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford., James William Sobaskie, Associate Professor of Music at Mississippi State University and serves as Book Reviews Editor of Nineteenth-Century Music Review.
  • Edited by Joe Davies, James William Sobaskie
  • Book: Drama in the Music of Franz Schubert
  • Online publication: 25 March 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787444393.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Preface
    • By Joe Davies, College Lecturer in Music at Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford., James William Sobaskie, Associate Professor of Music at Mississippi State University and serves as Book Reviews Editor of Nineteenth-Century Music Review.
  • Edited by Joe Davies, James William Sobaskie
  • Book: Drama in the Music of Franz Schubert
  • Online publication: 25 March 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787444393.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Preface
    • By Joe Davies, College Lecturer in Music at Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford., James William Sobaskie, Associate Professor of Music at Mississippi State University and serves as Book Reviews Editor of Nineteenth-Century Music Review.
  • Edited by Joe Davies, James William Sobaskie
  • Book: Drama in the Music of Franz Schubert
  • Online publication: 25 March 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787444393.001
Available formats
×