Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:14:01.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

21 - Ecosystems

from Part VI - Terrestrial Plant Ecology

Gordon B. Bonan
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
Get access

Summary

Chapter summary

This chapter extends the discussion of the preceding chapter from that of populations and communities to their functioning as ecosystems. Plants interact with one another and with soil resources as an ecosystem. The soil matrix provides water, nutrients, and other resources required for growth and survival. The availability of these resources to sustain plant growth is modulated by biological activity from plants themselves and also from microorganisms in the soil. The interrelationships between the physical and biological environments are embodied in the concept of an ecosystem. A terrestrial ecosystem combines living organisms and their physical environment into a functional system linked through a variety of biological, chemical, and physical processes. The structure of an ecosystem is measured by the amount of materials such as carbon and nitrogen and their distribution among living, decaying, and inorganic components. The functioning of an ecosystem is measured by processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, evapotranspiration, and elemental cycling. Plant productivity and nutrient cycling are tightly linked. High nutrient availability leads to high nutrient uptake during plant growth and high net primary production so that more nutrients are returned to the soil in litterfall. The good quality of the litter allows for rapid decomposition and mineralization, which reinforces the high nutrient availability. Low nutrient availability has the opposite effect.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Climatology
Concepts and Applications
, pp. 303 - 325
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbour, M. G., Burk, J. H., Pitts, W. D., Gilliam, F. S., and Schwartz, M. W., 1999. Terrestrial Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bonan, G. B., 1989. Environmental factors and ecological processes controlling vegetation patterns in boreal forests. Landscape Ecology, 3, 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., 1990a. Carbon and nitrogen cycling in North American boreal forests. I. Litter quality and soil thermal effects in interior Alaska. Biogeochemistry, 10, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., 1990b. Carbon and nitrogen cycling in North American boreal forests. II. Biogeographic patterns. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 1077–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., 1993. Physiological controls of the carbon balance of boreal forest ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 1453–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B. and Cleve, K., 1992. Soil temperature, nitrogen mineralization, and carbon source–sink relationships in boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 22, 629–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, F. H. and Likens, G. E., 1967. Nutrient cycling. Science, 155, 424–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bormann, F. H., and Likens, G. E., 1979. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, 253 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, F. H., Siccama, T. G., Likens, G. E., and Whittaker, R. H., 1970. The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: composition and dynamics of the tree stratum. Ecological Monographs, 40, 373–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, F. H., Likens, G. E., and Melillo, J. M., 1977. Nitrogen budget for an aggrading northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Science, 196, 981–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapin, F. S., Oswood, M. W., Cleve, K., Viereck, L. A., and Verbyla, D. L., 2006a. Alaska's Changing Boreal Forest. Oxford University Press, 354 pp.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S., Woodwell, G. M., Randerson, J. T., et al., 2006b. Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods. Ecosystems, 9, 1041–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, F. E., 1916. Plant Succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution Publication Number 242, Carnegie Institution, Washington, D.C., 512 pp.
Clements, F. E., 1928. Plant Succession and Indicators. H. W. Wilson Company, 453 pp.Google Scholar
Cleveland, C. C., Townsend, A. R., Schimel, D. S., et al., 1999. Global patterns of terrestrial biological nitrogen (N2) fixation in natural ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13, 623–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, A. L., Barford, C. C., Wofsy, S. C., Goulden, M. L., and Daube, B. C., 2007. A long-term record of carbon exchange in a boreal black spruce forest: means, responses to interannual variability, and decadal trends. Global Change Biology, 13, 577–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, N. T., Johnson, D. W., McLaughlin, S. B., and Harris, W. F., 1989. Carbon dynamics and productivity. In Analysis of Biogeochemical Cycling Processes in Walker Branch Watershed, ed. Johnson, D. W. and Hook, R. I., Springer-Verlag, pp. 197–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahey, T. J., Siccama, T. G., Driscoll, C. T., et al., 2005. The biogeochemistry of carbon at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry, 75, 109–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. F. and Cleve, K., 1983. Relationships between cellulose decomposition, Jenny's k, forest-floor nitrogen, and soil temperature in Alaskan taiga forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 789–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., et al., 2004. Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry, 70, 153–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholz, H. L. and Fisher, R. F., 1982. Organic matter production and distribution in slash pine (Pinus elliottii) plantations. Ecology, 63, 1827–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A., 1917. The structure and development of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 44, 463–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A., 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 53, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A., 1939. The individualistic concept of the plant association. American Midland Naturalist, 21, 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golley, F. B., 1993. A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More Than the Sum of the Parts. Yale University Press, 254 pp.Google Scholar
Goulden, M. L., Munger, J. W., Fan, S.-M., Daube, B. C., and Wofsy, S. C., 1996a. Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Global Change Biology, 2, 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulden, M. L., Munger, J. W., Fan, S.-M., Daube, B. C., and Wofsy, S. C., 1996b. Exchange of carbon dioxide by a deciduous forest: response to interannual climate variability. Science, 271, 1576–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulden, M. L., Daube, B. C., Fan, S.-M., et al., 1997. Physiological responses of a black spruce forest to weather. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102D, 28 987–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulden, M. L., Wofsy, S. C., Harden, J. W., et al., 1998. Sensitivity of boreal forest carbon balance to soil thaw. Science, 279, 214–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gower, S. T., Vogt, K. A., and Grier, C. C., 1992. Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecological Monographs, 62, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, S. T., Vogel, J. G., Norman, J. M., et al., 1997. Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102D, 29 029–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, M. E., Franklin, J. F., Swanson, F. J., et al., 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research, 15, 133–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W. and Henderson, G. S., 1989. Terrestrial nutrient cycling. In Analysis of Biogeochemical Cycling Processes in Walker Branch Watershed, ed. Johnson, D. W. and Hook, R. I.. Springer-Verlag, pp. 233–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, B. E., Falge, E., Gu, L., et al., 2002. Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, G. E., 2004. Some perspectives on long-term biogeochemical research from the Hubbard Brook ecosystem study. Ecology, 85, 2355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, G. E. and Bormann, F. H., 1995. Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, 159 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, G. E., Bormann, F. H., Pierce, R. S., Eaton, J. S., and Johnson, N. M., 1977. Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, 146 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, G. E., Driscoll, C. T., Buso, D. C., et al., 1994. The biogeochemistry of potassium at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry, 25, 61–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, G. E., Driscoll, C. T., Buso, D. C., et al., 1998. The biogeochemistry of calcium at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry, 41, 89–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeman, R. L., 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23, 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. P., 1985. The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge University Press, 383 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P., 1953. Fundamentals of Ecology. W. B. Saunders, 384 pp.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P., 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164, 262–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odum, E. P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology, 3rd edn. W. B. Saunders, 574 pp.Google Scholar
Oechel, W. C. and Cleve, K., 1986. The role of bryophytes in nutrient cycling in the taiga. In Forest Ecosystems in the Alaskan Taiga, ed. Cleve, K., Chapin, III F. S., Flanagan, P. W., et al. Springer-Verlag, pp. 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J., Aber, J. D., McClaugherty, C. A., and Melillo, J. M., 1984. Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology, 65, 256–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Papale, D., Valentini, R., et al., 2007. Determinants of terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance inferred from European eddy covariance flux sites. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L01402, doi:10.1029/2006GL027880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruess, R. W., Cleve, K., Yarie, J., and Viereck, L. A., 1996. Contributions of fine root production and turnover to the carbon and nitrogen cycling in taiga forests of the Alaskan interior. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26, 1326–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runyon, J., Waring, R. H., Goward, S. N., and Welles, J. M., 1994. Environmental limits on net primary production and light-use efficiency across the Oregon transect. Ecological Applications, 4, 226–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, D. F. and Bormann, F. H., 1982. Nutrient resorption in northern hardwood forests. BioScience, 32, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. G., 1991. Effects of climate change on plant respiration. Ecological Applications, 1, 157–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, M. G., Binkley, D., and Fownes, J. H., 1997. Age-related decline in forest productivity: pattern and process. Advances in Ecological Research, 27, 213–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. G., Binkley, D., Fownes, J. H., Giardina, C. P., and Senock, R. S., 2004. An experimental test of the causes of forest growth decline with stand age. Ecological Monographs, 74, 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, E.-D., 2006. Biological control of the terrestrial carbon sink. Biogeosciences, 3, 147–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, S. J., Gower, S. T., Vogel, J. G., and Norman, J. M., 1997. Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Tree Physiology, 17, 577–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tansley, A. G., 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16, 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, K., Oliver, L., Schlentner, R., Viereck, L. A., and Dyrness, C. T., 1983a. Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 747–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, K., Dyrness, C. T., Viereck, L. A., et al., 1983b. Taiga ecosystems in interior Alaska. BioScience, 33, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, K., Chapin, III F. S., Flanagan, P. W., Viereck, L. A., and Dyrness, C. T. (eds.), 1986. Forest Ecosystems in the Alaskan Taiga: a Synthesis of Structure and Function. Springer-Verlag, 230 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, K., Chapin, III F. S., Dyrness, C. T., and Viereck, L. A., 1991. Element cycling in taiga forests: state-factor control. BioScience, 41, 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viereck, L. A., Dyrness, C. T., Cleve, K., and Foote, M. J., 1983. Vegetation, soils, and forest productivity in selected forest types in interior Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 703–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H., 1966. Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology, 47, 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H., Bormann, F. H., Likens, G. E., and Siccama, T. G., 1974. The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: forest biomass and production. Ecological Monographs, 44, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M., Rastetter, E. B., Fernandes, D. N., et al., 1997. Predicting gross primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 7, 882–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Ecosystems
  • Gordon B. Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805530.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Ecosystems
  • Gordon B. Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805530.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Ecosystems
  • Gordon B. Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805530.022
Available formats
×