Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:46:19.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Plant-mediated interactions between below- and aboveground processes: decomposition, herbivory, parasitism, and pollination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

Katja Poveda
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Stefan Scheu
Affiliation:
Technische Universitat, Darmstadt
Teja Tscharntke
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Timothy P. Craig
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Peter W. Price
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

All terrestrial ecosystems are constituted of a belowground and an aboveground subsystem. These subsystems depend on each other, since above the ground primary producers are the main source of organic carbon for the system, whereas below the ground soil organisms are responsible for the breakdown and recycling of organic matter and the mineralization of the nutrients therein (Scheu and Setälä 2002, Wardle 2002, Porazinska et al. 2003). To understand community and ecosystem-level processes it is necessary to study the interactions within and between these subsystems. However, most ecologists have investigated belowground and aboveground communities separately, leaving the “between subsystems” interactions unstudied (but see Wardle 1999, 2002, Bonkowski et al. 2001, Masters et al. 2001, van der Putten et al. 2001, Brown and Gange 2002). Moreover, studies of different types of plant–animal interactions, such as pollination, herbivory, and seed dispersal, have traditionally progressed separately, focusing on just one kind of interaction and ignoring the possible interference with others (Herrera et al. 2002). This leads to an oversimplification of our understanding of plant–animal interactions, as most plants interact simultaneously with a broad spectrum of animals. Aboveground communities are affected by both direct and indirect effects of soil organisms on plants. Soil biota exert direct effects on plants by feeding on roots and forming antagonistic or mutualistic relationships with their host plants (Wardle et al. 2004). Such direct interactions with plants influence not only the performance of the host plants themselves, but also that of the herbivores and their predators.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Communities
Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs
, pp. 147 - 163
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alphei, J., Bonkowski, M., and Scheu, S.. 1996. Protozoa, Nematoda, and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europaeus (Poaceae): faunal interactions, response to microorganisms and effects on plant growth. Oecologia 106:111–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, D. 1987. Below-ground herbivory in natural communities: a review emphasizing fossorial animals. Quarterly Review of Biology 62:261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, R. D., and Wardle, D. A.. 2003. Herbivore mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities. Ecology 84:2258–2268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, R. D., Leemans, D. K., Cook, R., and Hobbs, P.. 1997. Temporal and spatial variation in soil biota of grazed and ungrazed hill grassland in Snowdonia, North Wales. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29:1286–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, R. D., Keiller, S., Cook, R., and Gilburn, A. S.. 1998. Dynamic interactions between soil animals and microorganisms in upland grassland soils amended with sheep dung: a microcosm experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30:531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, T. M., Wagenaar, R., Dam, N. M., and Wäckers, F. L.. 2002. Interactions between root and shoot feeding insects are mediated by primary and secondary plant compounds. Proceedings of the Section Experimental and Applied Entomology of the Netherlands Entomological Society (NEV) 13:117–121.Google Scholar
Bohlen, P., Scheu, S., Hale, C., et al. 2004. Non-native invasive earthworms as agents of change in northern temperate forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonkowski, M. 2004. Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited. New Phytologist 162:617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonkowski, M., Cheng, W., Griffiths, B., Alphei, J., and Scheu, S.. 2000. Microbial–faunal interactions in the rhizosphere and effects on plant growth. European Journal of Soil Biology 36:135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonkowski, M., Geoghegann, I., Nicholas, A., Birch, E., and Griffiths, B.. 2001. Effects of soil decomposer invertebrates (protozoa and earthworms) on above-ground phytophagous insects (cereal aphid) mediated through changes in the host plant. Oikos 95:441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. G., C. A. Edwards, and L. Brussaard. 2004. How earthworms affect plant growth: burrowing into mechanisms, pp. 13–49 in Edwards, C. A. (ed.) Earthworm Ecology, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, V. K., and Gange, A. C.. 1989. Herbivory by soil-dwelling insects depresses plant species richness. Functional Ecology 3:667–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, V. K., and Gange, A. C.. 1990. Insect herbivory below ground. Advances in Ecological Research 20:1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, V. K., and A. C. Gange. 2002. Tritrophic below- and above-ground interactions in succession, pp. 197–222 in Tscharntke, T. and Hawkins, B. (eds.) Multitrophic Level Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaham, M. A., and Hendrix, P. E.. 1998. Impact of earthworms (Diplocardia, Megascolecidae) on cycling and uptake of nitrogen in coastal plain forest soils from northwest Florida, USA. Applied Soil Ecology 9:233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarholm, M. 1985. Possible roles for roots, bacteria, protozoa and fungi in supplying nitrogen to plants, pp. 355–365 in Fitter, A. H. (ed.) Ecological Interactions in Soils. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. C. 1994. The microbial loop as used in terrestrial soil ecology. Microbial Ecology 28:245–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dafni, A. 1992. Pollination Ecology: A Practical Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gange, A. C., and Brown, V. K.. 1989. Effects of root herbivory by an insect on a foliar feeding species, mediated through changes in the host plant. Oecologia 81:38–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haimi, J., and Einbork, M.. 1992. Effects of endogeic earthworms on soil processes and plant growth in coniferous forest soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 13:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haimi, J., Huhta, V., and Boucelham, M.. 1992. Growth increase of birch seedlings under the influence of earthworms: a laboratory study. Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry 24:1525–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, C. M., Medrano, M., Rey, P. J., et al. 2002. Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism- and antagonism-related traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:16823–16828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M.. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavelle, P., and Spain, A. V.. 2001. Soil Ecology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtilä, K., and Strauss, S.. 1997. Leaf damage by herbivores affects attractiveness to pollinators in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 111:396–403.Google ScholarPubMed
Lehtilä, K., and Strauss, S.. 1999. Effects of foliar herbivory on male and female reproductive traits of wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Ecology 80:116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maron, J. L. 2001. Intraspecific competition and subterranean herbivory: individual and interactive effects on bush lupine. Oikos 92:178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J. 1995a. The effect of herbivore density on host plant mediated interactions between two insects. Ecological Research 10:125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J. 1995b. The impact of root herbivory on aphid performance: field and laboratory evidence. Acta Oecologica 16:135–142.Google Scholar
Masters, G. J., and Brown, V. K.. 1992. Plant mediated interactions between two spatially separated insects. Functional Ecology 6:175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J., and V. K. Brown. 1997. Host-plant mediated interactions between spatially separated herbivores: effects on community structure, pp. 217–237 in Gange, A. C. and Brown, V. K. (eds.) Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Masters, G. J., Brown, V. K., and Gange, A. C.. 1993. Plant mediated interactions between above- and below-ground insect herbivores. Oikos 66:148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J., Jones, H., and Rogers, M.. 2001. Host-plant mediated effects of root herbivory on insect seed predators and their parasitoids. Oecologia 127:246–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikola, J., Yeates, G. W., Barker, G. M., Wardle, D. A., and Bonner, K. I.. 2001. Effects of defoliation intensity on soil food web properties in an experimental grassland community. Oikos 92:333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. C., McCann, K., Setälä, H., and Ruiter, P. C.. 2003. Top–down is bottom–up: does predation in the rhizosphere regulate aboveground dynamics? Ecology 84:846–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, N. A., and Whitham, T. G.. 1990. Interspecific competition between root-feeding and leaf-galling aphids mediated by host-plant resistance. Ecology 71:1050–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, S. R., W. van der Putten, and V. K. Brown. 1999. Insect and nematode herbivory below ground: interactions and role in vegetation succession, pp. 205–238 in Olff, H., Brown, V. K., and Drent, R. H. (eds.) Herbivores: Between Plants and Predators. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
Mothershead, K., and Marquis, R.. 2000. Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant–pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa. Ecology 81:30–40.Google Scholar
Newington, J. E., Setälä, H., Bezemer, T. M., and Jones, T. H.. 2004. Potential effects of earthworms on leaf-chewer performance. Functional Ecology 18:746–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nötzold, R., Blossey, B., and Newton, E.. 1998. The influence of below ground herbivory and plant competition on growth and biomass allocation of purple loosestrife. Oecologia 113:82–93.Google Scholar
Pellmyr, O. 2002. Pollination by animals, pp. 157–184 in Herrera, C. M. and Pellmyr, O. (eds.) Plant–Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
Porazinska, D. L., Bardgett, R. D., Blaauw, M. B., et al. 2003. Relationships at the aboveground–belowground interface: plants, soil biota and soil processes. Ecological Monographs 73:377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poveda, K., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Scheu, S., and Tscharntke, T.. 2003. Effects of below- and above-ground herbivores on plant growth, flower visitation and seed set. Oecologia 135:601–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preisser, E. L. 2003. Field evidence for a rapidly cascading underground food web. Ecology 84:869–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruess, L., Häggblom, M., Langel, R., and Scheu, S.. 2004. Nitrogen isotope ratios and fatty acid composition as indicators of animal diets in belowground systems. Oecologia 139:336–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheu, S. 2001. Plants and generalist predators as links between the belowground and aboveground system. Basic and Applied Ecology 2:3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheu, S.. 2003. Effects of earthworms on plant growth: patterns and perspectives. Pedobiologia 47:846–856.Google Scholar
Scheu, S., and Parkinson, D.. 1994. Effects of invasion of an aspen forest (Canada) by Dendrobaena octaedra (Lumbricidae) on plant growth. Ecology 75:2348–2361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheu, S., and H. Setälä. 2002. Multitrophic interactions in decomposer food-webs, pp. 223–264 in Tscharntke, T. and Hawkins, B. (eds.) Multitrophic Level Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Scheu, S., Theenhaus, A., and Jones, T. H.. 1999. Links between the detritivore and the herbivore system: effects of earthworms and Collembola on plant growth and aphid development. Oecologia 119:541–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheu, S., L. Ruess, and M. Bonkowski. 2004. Interactions between micro-organisms and soil micro- and mesofauna, pp. 253–278 in Buscot, F. and Varma, A. (eds.) Microorganisms in Soils: Roles in Genesis and Function. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O., and Curry, J. P.. 1999. Effects of earthworms on biomass production, nitrogen allocation and nitrogen transfer in wheat–clover intercropping model systems. Plant and Soil 214:187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setälä, H., and Huhta, V.. 1991. Soil fauna increase Betula pendula growth: laboratory experiments with coniferous forest floor. Ecology 76:1844–1851.Google Scholar
Spain, A. V., Lavelle, P., and Mariotti, A.. 1992. Stimulation of plant growth by tropical earthworms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26:1179–1184.Google Scholar
Stanton, N. L. 1988. The underground in grasslands. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. 1997. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators, and plant fitness. Ecology 78:1640–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, D. R., Whipple, A. V., Child, A. L., and Dennis, B.. 1999. Model selection for a subterranean trophic cascade: root feeding caterpillars and entomopathogenic nematodes. Ecology 80:2750–2761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putten, W., Vet, L. E. M., Harvey, J., and Wäckers, F.. 2001. Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. 1999. How soil food webs make plants grow. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:418–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardle, D. 2002. Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., Klironomos, J. N., et al. 2004. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304:1629–1633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T. C. R. 1993. The Inadequate Environment: Nitrogen and the Abundance of Animals. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurst, S., and Jones, T. H.. 2003. Indirect effects of earthworms (Aporrectodea caliginosa) on an above-ground tritrophic interaction. Pedobiologia 47:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurst, S., Langel, R., Reineking, A., Bonkowski, M., and Scheu, S.. 2003. Effects of earthworms and organic litter distribution on plant performance and aphid reproduction. Oecologia 137:90–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurst, S., Dugassa-Gobena, D., and Scheu, S.. 2004a. Earthworms and litter distribution affect plant defence chemistry. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30:691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurst, S., Dugassa-Gobena, D., Langel, R., Bonkowski, M., and Scheu, S.. 2004b. Combined effects of earthworms and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae on plant and aphid performance. New Phytologist 163:169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×