Adams, Maurice and van der Schyff, Gerhard, ‘Constitutional Review by the Judiciary in the Netherlands’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht, Vol. 66 (2006), 399–413.Google Scholar

Akçay, Deniz, ‘A Reminder of the Main Elements of the Reforms Agreed by the Committee of Ministers, Speech at the Colloquy Organized under the Swedish Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, “Towards Stronger Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at National Level”, Stockholm, 9–10 June 2008’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A Work in Progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 477–481.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R. and Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘How Context Shapes Authority of International Courts’, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 79 (2016), 1–36.Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Local Remedies in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ando, Nisuke, ‘National Implementation and Interpretation’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 698–718.Google Scholar

Andresen, Steinar, Boasson, Elin Lerum and Hønneland, Geir, ‘An International Environmental Policy Takes Shape’, in: International Environmental Agreements: An Introduction, Andresen, Steinar, Lerum, Elin and Hønneland, Geir (eds.), Routledge, 2012, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antkowiak, Thomas M., ‘Truth as Right and Remedy in International Human Rights Experience’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 23 (2001–2002), 977–1006.Google Scholar

Antkowiak, Thomas M., ‘Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Beyond’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 46 (2008), 351–419.Google Scholar

Antkowiak, Thomas M., ‘An Emerging Mandate for International Courts: Victim Centered Remedies and Restorative Justice’, Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 47 (2011), 279–332.Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, ‘Rethinking the Two Margins of Appreciation’, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 12 (2016), 27–53.Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 15 (2017), 9–35.Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, ‘The Brighton Aftermath and the Changing Role of the European Court of Human Rights’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 9 (2018), 223–239.Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Odný Mjöll and Buyse, Antoine (eds.), Shifting Centers of Gravity in Human Rights Protection. Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders, Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Arold, Nina-Louisa, ‘The Melting Pot or the Salad Bowl Revisited – Rendezvous of Legal Cultures at the European Court of Human Rights’, in: Rendezvous of European Legal Cultures, Sunde, Jørn Øyrehagen and Skodvin, Knut Einar (eds.), Fagbokforlaget, 2010, 61–76.Google Scholar

Ashworth, Andrew and Horder, Jeremy, Principles of Criminal Law, Seventh Edition, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Backer, Inge Lorange, ‘Definition und Entwicklung der Menschenrechte im internationalen Kontext und Volkssouveränität’, in: Menschenrechte und Volkssouveränität in Europa: Gerichte als Vormund der Demokratie?, Haller, Gret, Günther, Klaus and Neumann, Ulfrid (eds.), Campus, 2011, 187–196.Google Scholar

Barak, Aharon, ‘On Judging’, in: Judges as Guardians of Constitutionalism and Human Rights, Scheinin, Martin, Krunke, Helle and Aksenova, Marina (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016, 27–49.Google Scholar

Bårdsen, Arnfinn, Krenkelser og klager: vilkårene for realitetsbehandling av private klager ved Den europeiske menneskerettighetsdomstolen, Universitetsforlaget, 1999.Google Scholar

Barkhuysen, Tom, Artikel 13 EVRM: Effectieve nationale rechtsbescherming bij schending van mensenrechten (thesis Leiden University), Koninklijke Vermande, 1998.Google Scholar

Barkhuysen, Tom and van Emmerik, Michiel, ‘Legitimacy of European Court of Human Rights Judgments: Procedural Aspects’, in: The Legitimacy of the Highest Courts’ Rulings: Judicial Deliberations and Beyond, Huls, Nick, Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco (eds.), Springer, 2008, 437–450.Google Scholar

Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Bates, Ed, ‘The Birth of the European Convention on Human Rights – and the European Court of Human Rights’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 17–42.Google Scholar

Bates, Ed, ‘Activism and Self-Restraint: The Margin of Appreciation’s Strasbourg Career … Its “Coming of Age”?’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 36 (2016), 261–276.Google Scholar

Bates, Ed, ‘Strasbourg’s Integrationist Role, or the Need for Self-restraint?’, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 1 (2021), 14–21.Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles R., The Idea of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Békés, Imre, ‘L’Article 13’, in: The Birth of European Human Rights Law: Liber Amicorum Carl Aage Nørgaard, de Salvia, Michelle and Villiger, Mark E. (eds.), Nomos, 1998, 25–29.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Conventions: Political Constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 25 (2014), 1019–1042.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Conventions: Political Constitutionalism and the Hirst Case’, in: The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives, Føllesdal, Andreas, Karlsson, Johan Schaffer and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2014, 243–271.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla, Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times, Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Bernt, Jan Fridthjof, ‘Hvorfor skal vi bry oss om prejudikater?’, in: Rettsteori og rettsliv: Festskrift til Carsten Smith til 70-årsdagen 13. juli 2002, Lødrup, Peter, Tjomsland, Steinar, Aarbakke, Magnus and Aasland, Gunnar (eds.), Universitetsforlaget, 2002, 81–96.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, ‘Whose Constitution(s)? International Law, Constitutionalism, and Democracy’, in: Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2009, 381–408.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, ‘Das Menschenrecht auf Demokratie – Eine moralische Verteidigung mit einer rechtlichen Nuance’, in: Menschenrechte und Volkssouveränität in Europa, Gerichte als Vormund der Demokratie?, Haller, Gret, Günther, Klaus and Neumann, Ulfried (eds.), Campus, 2011, 61–101.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, ‘European human rights, supranational judicial review and democracy. Thinking outside the jud[i]cial box’, in: Human rights protection in the European legal order: The interaction between the European and the national courts, Popelier, Patricia, Van De Heyning, Catherine and Van Nuffel, Piet (eds.), Intersentia, 2011, 97–146.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, ‘Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Law – What is Subsidiary about Human Rights?’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 61 (2016), 69–107.Google Scholar

Bingham, Tom, The Rule of Law, Penguin, 2011.Google Scholar

Bjorge, Eirik, Domestic Application of the ECHR, Courts as Faithful Trustees, Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Björgvinsson, David Thór, ‘The Role of Judges of the European Court of Human Rights as Guardians of Fundamental Rights of the Individual’, in: Judges as Guardians of Constitutionalism and Human Rights, Scheinin, Martin, Krunke, Helle and Aksenova, Marina (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Globalization and Europe: How to Square Democracy, Globalization, and International Law’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 15 (2004), 885–906.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship Between International and Domestic Constitutional law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 6 (2008), 397–413.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin and Venzke, Ingo, ‘Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’, German Law Journal, Vol. 12 (2011), 979–1003.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin and Venzke, Ingo, ‘On the Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking’, German Law Journal, Vol. 12 (2011), 1341–1370.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin and Venzke, Ingo, ‘In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and its Democratic Justification’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 23 (2012), 7–41.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin and Venzke, Ingo, ‘The Spell of Precedents: Lawmaking by International Courts and Tribunals’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J. and Shany, Yuval (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2014, 503–522.Google Scholar

Boillat, Philippe, ‘Final Observations at the Regional Conference Organized by the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs and the Supreme Court of Serbia in the Framework of Serbia’s Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, “The Role of Supreme Courts in the Domestic Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights”, Belgrade, 20–21 September 2007’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A Work in Progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 376–378.Google Scholar

Boillat, Philippe, ‘Summary Conclusions of the Colloquy Organized under the Swedish Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, “Towards Stronger Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at National Level”, Stockholm, 9–10 June 2008’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A Work in Progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 553–557.Google Scholar

Boillat, Philippe, ‘Vers une mise en oeuvre renforcée de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme au niveau national’, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, Vol. 20 (2009), 17–26.Google Scholar

Bossuyt, Marc J., Guide to the “travaux préparatoires” of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, M. Nijhoff Publishers, 1987.Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan and Chinkin, Christine, The Making of International Law, Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B., ‘Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel’s Idealism: Negotiation and Administration in Hegel’s Account of the Structure and Content of Conceptual Norms’, European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 7 (1999), 164–189.Google Scholar

Bratza, Nicolas, ‘The Relationship between the UK Courts and Strasbourg’, European Human Rights Law Review (2011), 505–512.Google Scholar

Bratza, Nicolas, ‘Living Instrument or Dead Letter – the Future of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (2014), 116–128.Google Scholar

Bratza, Nicolas, ‘Opening Address at the High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, Brighton, 19–20 April 2012’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. Interlaken, Izmir, Brighton and Beyond, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2014, 80–83.Google Scholar

Brauch, Jeffrey A., ‘Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law’, Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 11 (2004–2005), 113–150.Google Scholar

Brems, Eva, ‘Procedural Protection: An Examination of Procedural Safeguards Read into Substantive Convention Rights’, in: Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights, Brems, Eva and Gerards, Janneke (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2014, 137–161.Google Scholar

Brems, Eva, ‘The ‘Logics’ of Procedural-Type Review by the European Court of Human Rights’, in: Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases, Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2017, 17–39.Google Scholar

Brems, Eva, ‘Positive Subsidiarity and Its Implications for the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 37 (2019), 210–227.Google Scholar

Brems, Eva and Lavrysen, Laurens, ‘Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 35 (2013), 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breuer, Martin, ‘Principled Resistance to the European Court of Human Rights and Its Case Law: A Comparative Assessment’, in: The European Court of Human Rights. Current Challenges in Historical Perspective, Aust, Helmut Philipp and Demir-Gürsel, Esra (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, 43–70.Google Scholar

Brink, Stefan, Über die richterliche Entscheidungsbegründung: Funktion-Position-Methodik, Peter Lang GmbH, 1999.Google Scholar

Brooks, Thom (ed.), Deterrence, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2014.Google Scholar

Brugger, Winfried, ‘Legal Interpretation, Schools of Jurisprudence, and Anthropology: Some Remarks From a German Point of View’, American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 42 (1994), 395–421.Google Scholar

de Bruyn, Donatienne, ‘Le droit à un recours effectif’, in: Les droits de l’homme au seuil du troisième millénaire: Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Lambert, Bruylant (ed.), Bruylant, 2000, 185–205.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, ‘What’s So Special about Rights?’, Social Philosophy & Policy, Vol. 2 (1984), 61–83.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, The Heart of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas, ‘The Effect of the European Convention on Human Rights on the Internal Law of Member States’, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Supplementary Publication, Vol. 11 (1965), 79–106.Google Scholar

Buyse, Antoine, ‘A Lifeline in Time – Non-retroactivity and Continuing Violations under the ECHR’, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 75 (2006), 63–88.Google Scholar

Buyse, Antoine, ‘Lost and Regained? Restitution as a Remedy for Human Rights Violations in the Context of International Law’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 68 (2008), 129–153.Google Scholar

Buyse, Antoine, ‘Significantly Insignificant? Studies in the Margins of the Admissibility Criterion in Article 35(3)(b) European Convention on Human Rights’, in: The Realisation of Human Rights, Studies in Honor of Leo Zwaak, Haeck, Yves, Leyh, Brianne McConigle, Burbano-Herrera, Clara and Contreras-Garduño, Diana (eds.), Intersentia, 2014, 107–123.Google Scholar

Bydlinski, Franz, ‘Methodological Approaches to the Tort Law of the ECHR’, in: Tort Law in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, Fenyves, Attila, Karner, Ernst, Koziol, Kelmut and Steiner, Elisabeth (eds.), De Gruyter, 2011, 29–128.Google Scholar

Cali, Basak, ‘The Purposes of the European Human Rights System: One or Many?’, European Human Rights Law Review (2008), 299–306.Google Scholar

Çalı, Başak, ‘From Flexible to Variable Standards of Judicial Review: The Responsible Domestic Courts Doctrine at the European Court of Human Rights’, in: Shifting Centers of Gravity in Human Rights Protection. Rethinking relations between the ECHR, EU and national legal orders, Arnardóttir, Odný Mjöll and Buyse, Antoine (eds.), Routledge, 2016, 144–160.Google Scholar

Çalı, Başak, ‘Explaining Variation in the Intrusiveness of Regional Human Rights Remedies in Domestic Orders’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 16 (2018), 214–234.Google Scholar

Çalı, Başak, ‘Coping with Crisis: Whither the Variable Geometry in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, Vol. 35 (2018), 237–276.Google Scholar

Çalı, Başak, ‘Autocratic Strategies and the European Court of Human Rights’, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 2 (2021), 11–19.Google Scholar

Callewaert, Johan, ‘La Convention européenne des droits de l’homme entre effectivité et prévisibilité’, in: Les droits de l’homme au seuil du troisième millénaire: Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Lambert, Bruylant (ed.), Bruylant, 2000, 93–108.Google Scholar

Cameron, Iain, ‘Damages for Violations of ECHR: The Swedish Example’, Swedish Studies in European Law, Vol. 1 (2006), 97–128.Google Scholar

Campbell, Tom, ‘Human Rights: Moral or Legal?’, in: Human Rights: Old Problems, New Possibilities, Kinley, David, Sadurski, Wojciech and Walton, Kevin (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013, 1–26.Google Scholar

Carozza, Paolo G., ‘Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97 (2003), 38–79.Google Scholar

Carter, William M., ‘Rethinking Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Adjudication’, Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy, Vol. 30 (2009), 319–334.Google Scholar

Chavez, Leiry Cornejo, ‘New Remedial Responses in the Practice of Regional Human Rights Courts: Purposes beyond Compensation’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 15 (2017), 372–392.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas, Fair balance: proportionality, subsidiarity and primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights, Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas, ‘Individual and Constitutional Justice: Can the Power Balance of Adjudication be Reversed’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 181–203.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), The European Convention on Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘Introduction: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 1–13.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘Postscript: Understanding the Past, Present and Future of the European Court of Human Rights’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 230–250.Google Scholar

Chryssogonos, Kostas, ‘Zur Inkorporation der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention in den nationalen Rechtsordnungen der Mitgliedstaaten’, Europarecht, Vol. 36 (2001), 49–61.Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights in the Private Sphere, Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Collected edition of the “Travaux préparatoires” of the European Convention on Human Rights / Council of Europe, Martinus Nijhoff, 1975–1985, 8 vols.Google Scholar

Lord Mackay of Clashfern, ‘The Margin of Appreciation and the Need for Balance’, in: Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal, Mahoney, Paul, Matscher, Franz, Petzold, Herbert and Wildhaber, Luzius (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000, 837–844.Google Scholar

Costa, Jean-Paul, ‘Comments on the Wise Persons’ Report from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights, Speech at the Colloquy Organized by the San Marino Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, “Future Developments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Wise Persons’ Report”, San Marino, 22–23 March 2007’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A work in Progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 238–244.Google Scholar

Costa, Jean-Paul, ‘Les aspects nationaux de la réforme du système de protection des droits de l’homme: les attents de la Court européenne des droits de l’homme’, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, Vol. 20 (2009), 7–16.Google Scholar

Costa, Jean-Paul, ‘National Aspects of the Reform of the Human Rights Protection System: The Expectations of the ECHR, Speech at the Colloquy Organized under the Swedish Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, “Towards Stronger Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at National Level”, Stockholm, 9–10 June 2008’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A Work in Progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 472–476.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Cumper, Peter and Lewis, Tom, ‘Blanket Bans, Subsidiarity, and the Procedural Turn of the European Court of Human Rights’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 68 (2019), 611–638.Google Scholar

Czerner, Frank, ‘Inter partes-versus erga omnes-Wirkung der EGMR-Judikate in den Konventionsstaaten gemäß Art. 46 EMRK. Eine Problemanalyse auch aus strafverfahrensrechtlicher Perspektive’, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Vol. 46 (2008), 345–367.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., On Democracy, Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

David, Valeska, ‘Expanding Right to an Effective Remedy: Common Developments at the Human Rights Committee and the Inter-American Court’, British Journal of American Legal Studies, Vol. 3 (2014), 259–286.Google Scholar

Demir-Gürsel, Esra, ‘For the Sake of Unity: the Drafting History of the European Convention on Human Rights and its Current Relevance’, in: The European Court of Human Rights. Current Challenges in Historical Perspective, Aust, Helmut Philipp and Demir-Gürsel, Esra (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, 109–132.Google Scholar

van Dijk, Pieter, van Hoof, Fried, van Rijn, Arjen and Zwaak, Leo (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Fifth Edition, Intersentia, 2018.Google Scholar

Dörr, O., Grote, R. and Marauhn, T. (eds.), EMRK/GG Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz, Second Edition, Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, ‘The Three Traditional Approaches to Treaty Interpretation: A Current Application to the European Court of Human Rights’, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 42 (2019), 765–794.Google Scholar

Douzinas, Costas and Gearty, Conor, ‘Introduction’, in: The Meanings of Rights. The Philosophical and Social Theory of Human Rights, Douzinas, Costas and Gearty, Conor (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2014, 1–12.Google Scholar

Drobak, John N. and North, Douglass C., ‘Understanding Judicial Decision-Making: The Importance of Constraints on Non-rational Deliberations’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, Vol. 26 (2008), 131–152.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Justice for Hedgehogs, Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, ‘A New Philosophy for International Law’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 41 (2013), 2–30.Google Scholar

Eborah, Solomon T., ‘Chapter 11 International Human Rights Courts’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J. and Shany, Yuval (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2014, 225–249.Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Emberland, Marius, The Human Rights of Companies: Exploring the Structure of ECHR Protection, Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Eng, Svein, ‘Why Reflective Equilibrium? I: Reflexivity of Justification’, Ratio Juris, Vol. 27 (2014), 138–154.Google Scholar

Eng, Svein, ‘Why Reflective Equilibrium? III: Reflective Equilibrium as a Heuristic Tool’, Ratio Juris, Vol. 27 (2014), 440–459.Google Scholar

Etinson, Adam, ‘Human Rights, Claimability and the Uses of Abstraction’, Utilitas, Vol. 25 (2013), 463–486.Google Scholar

Evans, Malcolm and Petkoff, Peter, ‘Marginal Neutrality – Neutrality and the Margin of Appreciation in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, in: The European Convention on Human Right and the Freedom of Religion and Belief, Temperman, Jeroen, Gunn, Jeremy and Evans, Malcolm (eds.), Brill Academic Publishers, 128–153.Google Scholar

Fabbrini, Federico, ‘The European Court of Human Rights, Extraordinary Renditions and the Right to the Truth: Ensuring Accountability for Gross Human Rights Violations Committed in the Fight against Terrorism’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 14 (2014), 85–106.Google Scholar

Feteris, Eveline T., ‘The Rational Reconstruction of Weighing and Balancing on the Basis of Teleological‐Evaluative Considerations in the Justification of Judicial Decisions’, Ratio Juris, Vol. 21 (2008), 481–495.Google Scholar

Feteris, Eveline T., ‘Weighing and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions’, Informal Logic, Vol. 28 (2008), 20–30.Google Scholar

Fikfak, Veronika, ‘Changing State Behaviour: Damages before the European Court of Human Rights’, The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 29 (2019), 1091–1125.Google Scholar

Fischborn, Birgit Iris, Enteignung ohne Entschädigung nach der EMRK?: Zur Vereinbarkeit des entschädigungslosen Entzugs von Eigentum mit Artikel 1 des Zusatzprotokolls zur EMRK, Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar

Flauss, Jean-François, ‘Le droit à un recours effectif – L’article 13 de la Convention européenne de droits de l’homme’, Revue universelle des droits de l’homme, Vol. 3 (1991), 324–336.Google Scholar

Flauss, Jean-François, ‘L’effectivité des arrêts de la Court européenne des droits de l’homme : du politique au juridique ou vice-versa’, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, Vol. 20 (2009), 27–72.Google Scholar

Fletcher, William A., ‘The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy’, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 91 (1982), 635–697.Google Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas, ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law’, Jean Monnet Working Papers, No. 12 (2011).Google Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas, ‘Squaring the Circle at the Battle at Brighton: Is the War between Protecting Human Rights or Respecting Sovereignty Over, or Has It Just Begun?’, in: Shifting Centers of Gravity in Human Rights Protection. Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU, and National Legal Orders, Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll and Buyse, Antoine (eds.), Routledge, 2016, 189–204.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Andreas, ‘Subsidiarity and International Human Rights Courts: Respecting Self-Governance and Protecting Human Rights – Or Neither?’, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 79 (2016), 147–163.Google Scholar

Forowicz, Magdalena, ‘Factors Influencing the Reception of International Law in the ECtHR’s Case Law: An Overview’, in: A Farewell to Fragmentation. Reassertion and Convergence in International Law, Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2015, 191–217.Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen Abr., ‘Art. 13 as a Growing Pillar of Convention Law’, in: Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal, Mahoney, Paul, Matscher, Franz, Petzold, Herbert and Wildhaber, Luzius (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000, 545–550.Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen Abr., and Peukert, Wolfgang, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention: EMRK-Kommentar, Third Edition, Norbert P. Engel Verlag, 2009.Google Scholar

Fyrnys, Markus, ‘Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights’, German Law Journal, Vol. 12 (2011), 1231–1260.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, Revised Second Edition 2004, Bloomsbury, 1975.Google Scholar

Garner, Bryan A., and Black, Henry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary, Ninth Edition, West, 2009.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights’, in: The Legitimacy of the Highest Courts’ Rulings, Huls, Nick, Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco (eds.), T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008, 407–436.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, European Law Journal, Vol. 17 (2011), 80–120.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘The Prism of Fundamental Rights’, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 8 (2012), 173–202.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Judicial Minimalism and ‘Dependency’. Interpretation of the European Convention in a Pluralist Europe’, in: Fundamental Rights and Principles. Liber Amicorum Pieter van Dijk, van Roosmalen, Marjolein, Vermeulen, Ben, van Hoof, Fried and Oosting, Marten (eds.), Intersentia, 2013, 73–92.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the National Courts: Giving Shape to the Notion of ‘Shared Responsibility’’, in: Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-Law. A Comparative Analysis, Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph (eds.), Intersentia, 2014, 13–94.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Inadmissibility Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Critique of the Lack of Reasoning’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 14 (2014), 148–158.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: A Typology’, in: Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases, Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerards, Janneke, ‘Margin of Appreciation and Incrementalism in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 18 (2018), 495–515.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-Law: A Comparative Analysis, Intersentia, 2014.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph, ‘Comparative Analysis’, in: Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-Law. A Comparative Analysis, Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph (eds.), Intersentia, 2014, 333–374.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke and Glas, Lize R., ‘Access to Justice in the European Convention on Human Rights System’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 35 (2017), 11–30.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases, Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Gewirtz, Paul, ‘Remedies and Resistance’, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 92 (1983), 585–681.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking’, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 45 (2004), 631–674.Google Scholar

Glas, Lize R., ‘Changes in the Procedural Practice of the European Court of Human Rights: Consequences for the Convention System and Lessons to be Drawn’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 14 (2014), 671–699.Google Scholar

Glas, Lize R., ‘The European Court of Human Rights Supervising the Execution of Its Judgments’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 37 (2019), 228–244.Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann, A World Made New: Eleanore Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2001.Google Scholar

Golsong, Heribert, Das Rechtsschutzsystem der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, C.F. Müller Verlag, 1958.Google Scholar

Golsong, Heribert, ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the National Law-Maker: Some General Reflections’, in: Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension, Matscher, Franz and Petzold, Herbert (eds.), Carl Heymans Verlag, 1988, 239–244.Google Scholar

Gosepath, Stefan, ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity’, in: Real World Justice. Grounds, Principles, Human Rights, and Social Institutions, Follesdal, Andreas and Pogge, Thomas (eds.), Springer, 2005, 157–170.Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, Christoph, ‘Das Recht auf effektive Beschwerde gegen überlange Verfahrensdauer’, in: Über Struktur und Vielfalt im Öffentlichen Recht – Festgabe für Bernhard Raschauer, Ennöckl, Daniel, Raschauer, Nicolas, Schulev-Steindl, Eva and Wessely, Wolfgang (eds.), Springer, 2008, 19–29.Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, Christoph, The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary, Beck/Hart/Nomos, 2014.Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, Christoph and Pabel, Katharina, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention: Ein Studienbuch, Sixth Edition, MANZ Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar

Graham, Lewis, ‘Strategic Admissibility Decisions in the European Court of Human Rights’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 69 (2020), 79–102.Google Scholar

Gray, Christine, ‘Chapter 40 Remedies’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Alter, Karen J., Shany, Yuval and Romano, Cesare P. R. (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2014, 871–897.Google Scholar

Greene, Jamal, ‘The Rule of Law as a Law of Standards’, The Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 99 (2010), 1289–1299.Google Scholar

Greer, Steven, ‘“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas-Alexy Debate’, The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 63 (2004), 412–434.Google Scholar

Greer, Steven, The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects, Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Greer, Steven and Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 12 (2012), 655–687.Google Scholar

Griffin, James, On Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Groome, Dermot, ‘The Right to Truth in the Fight against Impunity’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 29 (2011), 175–199.Google Scholar

Grote, Rainer and Marauhn, Thilo (eds.), EMRK/GG: Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz, Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar

Gyorfi, Tamas, ‘The Legitimacy of the European Human Rights Regime – A View from the United Kingdom’, Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 8 (2019), 123–156.Google Scholar

Schermers, H. G., ‘The Eleventh Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Law Review, Vol. 19 (1994), 367–384.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms, MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hampson, Françoise, ‘The Future of the European Court of Human Rights’, in: Strategic Visions for Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Professor Kevin Boyle, Gilbert, Geoff, Hampson, Françoise and Sandoval, Clara (eds.), Routledge, 2010, 141–166.Google Scholar

Harmsen, Robert, ‘The Reform of the Convention System: Institutional Restructuring and the (Geo-) Politics of Human Rights’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 119–143.Google Scholar

Harris, David J., O’Boyle, Michael and Warbrick, Colin, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Harris, David, O’Boyle, Michael, Bates, Ed and Buckley, Carla, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., ‘Bentham on Legal Rights’, in: Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Second Series, Simpson, A. W. B. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1973, 171–201.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law Third Edition: With a Postscript edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz and with an Introduction and Notes by Leslie Green, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Harutyunyan, Armen, ‘The Future of the European Court of Human Rights in the Era of Radical Democracy’, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 2 (2021), 20–26.Google Scholar

Hauge, Ragnar, Straffens begrunnelser, Universitetsforlaget, 1996.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights’, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 26 (1993), 133–165.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 19 (2008), 125–159.Google Scholar

Van De Heyning, Catherine, ‘No Place Like Home: Discretionary Space for the Domestic Protection of Fundamental Rights’, in: Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts, Popelier, Patricia, Van De Heyning, Catherine and Van Nuffel, Piet (eds.), Intersentia, 2011, 65–96.Google Scholar

Hioureas, Christina G., ‘Behind the Scenes of Protocol No. 14: Politics in Reforming the European Court of Human Rights’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 24 (2006), 718–757.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Danielle Elyce, ‘A Defense of Structural Injunctive Remedies in South African Law’, Oregon Review of International Law, Vol. 9 (2007), 1–66.Google Scholar

Hodges, Christopher, Laws and Corporate Behaviour. Integrating Theories of Regulation, Enforcement, Compliance and Ethics, Hart/Beck/Nomos, 2015.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Herwig C. H., ‘Article 47. III Specific Provisions (Meaning)’, in: The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Peers, Steve, Hervey, Tamara, Kenner, Jeff and Ward, Angela (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2014, 1211–1228.Google Scholar

Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb and Cook, Walter Wheeler, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning: And Other Legal Essays, The Lawbook Exchange Ltd, 1919.Google Scholar

Holoubek, Michael, ‘Das Recht auf eine wirksame Beschwerde bei einer nationalen Instanz’, Juristische Blätter, Vol. 114 (1992), 137–155.Google Scholar

van Hoof, Fried, ‘The Stubbornness of the European Court of Human Rights Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, in: The Realisation of Human Rights: When Theory Meets Practice. Studies in Honour of Leo Zwaak, Haeck, Yves, Leyh, Brianne McGonigle, Burbano-Herrera, Clara and Contreras-Garduño, Diana (eds.), Intersentia, 2014, 125–149.Google Scholar

Horsey, Kirsty and Rackley, Erika, Tort Law, Third Edition, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Huijbers, Leonie M., ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Procedural Approach in the Age of Subsidiarity’, Cambridge International Law Journal, Vol. 6 (2017) 177–201.Google Scholar

Huijbers, Leonie M., Process-Based Fundamental Rights Review. Practice, Concept, and Theory, Intersentia, 2019.Google Scholar

Huneeus, Alexandra, ‘Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights’, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 44 (2011), 493–534.Google Scholar

Huneeus, Alexandra, ‘Chapter 20 Compliance with Judgments and Decisions’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J and Shany, Yuval (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2014, 437–463.Google Scholar

Ichim, Octavian, Just Satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Iglesias, Carlos Rodríguez, ‘Presentation of the Wise Persons Report, Speech at the Colloquy Organized by the San Marino Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, “Future Developments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Wise Persons’ Report”, San Marino, 22–23 March 2007’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A Work in Progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 233–237.Google Scholar

Ioannidis, Michael, ‘The ECtHR, National Constitutional Law, and the Limits of Democracy: Sitaropoulos and Others v. Greece’, European Public Law, Vol. 17 (2011), 661–671.Google Scholar

Jacob, Marc, ‘Precedents: Lawmaking through International Adjudication’, German Law Journal, Vol. 12 (2011), 1005–1032.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Francis G., White, Robin C. A., Ovey, Clare, Rainey, Bernadette, Wicks, Elizabeth, The European Convention on Human Rights, Seventh Edition, Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Jagland, Thorbjørn, ‘Opening Address at the High level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, Brighton, 19–20 April 2012’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. Interlaken, Izmir, Brighton and beyond, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2014, 74–77.Google Scholar

Jahn, Jannika, ‘Ruling (In)directly through Individual Measures? – Effect and Legitimacy of the ECtHR’s New Remedial Power’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 74 (2014), 1–39.Google Scholar

Jareborg, Nils, Scraps of Penal Theory, Iustus, 2002.Google Scholar

Jötten, Sara, Enforced Disappearances und EMRK, Duncker & Humblot GmbH, 2010.Google Scholar

Kartner, Fay and Meuwese, Anne, ‘Responsiveness towards Fundamental Rights Impacts in the Preparation of EU Legislation’, in: Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases, Cambridge University Press, 2017, 95–124.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen, ‘Proportionality and Parliamentary Debates: Exploring Some Forbidden Territory’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 34 (2014), 443–479.Google Scholar

Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alec Stone, ‘The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Orders’, in: A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alec Stone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2008, 3–26.Google Scholar

Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alec Stone, ‘Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems’, in: A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alec Stone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2008, 677–710.Google Scholar

Keller, Helen, Fischer, Andreas and Kühne, Daniela, ‘Debating the Future of the European Court of Human Rights after the Interlaken Conference: Two Innovative Proposals’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 21 (2010), 1025–1048.Google Scholar

Keller, Helen and Marti, Cedric, ‘Reconceptualizing Implementation: The Judicialization of the Execution of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 26 (2015), 829–850.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, Claire, ‘The Future of Remedies in Europe’, in: The Future of Remedies in Europe, Kilpatrick, Claire, Novitz, Toni and Skidmore, Paul (eds.), Hart Publishing, 2000, 1–34.Google Scholar

Kim, Eun-Jung Katherine, ‘Justifying Human Rights: Does Consensus Matter?’, Human Rights Review, Vol. 13 (2012), 261–278.Google Scholar

Kinley, David, Sadurski, Wojciech and Walton, Kevin (eds.), Human Rights: Old Problems, New possibilities, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar

Klein, Eckart, ‘Should the Binding Effect of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Be Extended?’, in: Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal, Mahoney, Paul, Matscher, Franz, Petzold, Herbert and Wildhaber, Luzius (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000, 705–713.Google Scholar

Klein, Eckart, ‘Menschenrechtsinflation?’, in: Mensch und Recht: Festschrift für Eibe Riedel zum 70. Geburtstag, Hanschel, Dirk, Kielmansegg, Sebastian Graf, Kischel, Uwe, Koenig, Christian and Lorz, Ralph Alexander (eds.), Duncker & Humblot GmbH, 2013, 117–129.Google Scholar

Kleinlein, Thomas, ‘The Procedural Approach of the European Court of Human Rights: Between Subsidiarity and Dynamic Evolution’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 68 (2019), 91–110.Google Scholar

Klinkner, Melanie and Davis, Howard, The Right to the Truth in International Law. Victims’ Rights in Human Rights and International Criminal Law, Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar

Klinkner, Melanie and Smith, Ellie, ‘The Right to Truth, Appropriate Forum and the International Criminal Court’, in: Current Issues in Transitional Justice, Szablewska, Natalia and Bachmann, Sascha-Dominik (eds.), Springer, 2015, 3–29.Google Scholar

Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘The Rule of Law as perceived by the European Court of Human Rights’, in: Protecting the Rights of Others: Festskrift til Jens Vedsted-Hansen, Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, Koch, Ida Elisabeth, Kristiansen, Bettina Lemann and Schaumburg-Müller, Sten (eds.), Djoef Publishing, 2013, 323–344.Google Scholar

Kosař, David, ‘Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights Shapes Domestic Judicial Design’, Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 13 (2017), 112–123.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Lauterpacht: The Victorian Tradition in International Law’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 8 (1997), 215–263.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument: Reissue with New Epilogue, Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law’, The Modern Law Review, Vol. 71 (2008), 183–216.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law, Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 15 (2004), 907–931.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias, ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State’, in: Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2009, 258–325.Google Scholar

Langford, Malcolm, ‘Why Judicial Review?’, Oslo Law Review, Vol. 1 (2015), 36–85.Google Scholar

Lautenbach, Geranne, The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Lavender, Nicholas, ‘The Problem of the Margin of Appreciation’, European Human Rights Law Review (1997), 380–390.Google Scholar

Lavrysen, Laurens, Human Rights in a Positive State: Rethinking the Relationship between Positive and Negative Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, Intersentia, 2016.Google Scholar

Law, David S. and Versteeg, Mila, ‘The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution’, New York University Law Review, Vol. 87 (2012), 762–858.Google Scholar

Leach, Philip, ‘Beyond the Bug River – A New Dawn for Redress before the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (2005), 148–164.Google Scholar

Leach, Philip, ‘The Chechen conflict: analysing the oversight of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (2008), 732–761.Google Scholar

Leach, Philip, ‘No Longer Offering Fine Mantras to a Parched Child? The European Court’s Developing Approach to Remedies’, in: Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, Føllesdal, Andreas, Peters, Birgit and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2013, 142–180.Google Scholar

Leach, Philip, ‘The European System and Approach’, in: Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Sheeran, Scott and Rodley, Nigel (eds.), Routledge, 2013, 407–426.Google Scholar

Leach, Philip, Hardman, Helen, Stephenson, Svetlana and Blitz, Brad K., Responding to Systemic Human Rights Violations: An Analysis of ‘Pilot Judgments’ of the European Court of Human Rights and Their Impact at National Level, Intersentia, 2010.Google Scholar

Legg, Andrew, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Lester, Anthony, ‘The European Court of Human Rights after 50 Years’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 98–115.Google Scholar

Letsas, George, ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 26 (2006), 705–732.Google Scholar

Letsas, George, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Letwin, Jeremy, ‘Why Completeness and Coherence Matter for the European Court of Human Rights’, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 2 (2021), 119–154.Google Scholar

Lorenzen, Peer, Christoffersen, Jonas, Holst-Christensen, Nina, Kessing, Peter Vedel, Scaumburg-Müller, Sten and Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention, Djøf Forlag, 2011.Google Scholar

Loucaides, Loukis G., ‘The Concept of “Continuing” Violations of Human Rights’, in: Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal, Mahoney, Paul, Matscher, Franz, Petzold, Herbert and Wildhaber, Luzius (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000, 803–815.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin, ‘The rule of law in European jurisprudence’, document CDL-DEM(2009)006 presented to the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission).Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Legitimation durch Verfahren, Third Edition, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Das Recht der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, ‘Rights in Legislation’, in: Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of HLA Hart, Hacker, P. M. S. and Raz, Joseph (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

MacDonald, R. St. J., ‘The Margin of Appreciation’, in: The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, MacDonald, R. St. J., Matscher, Franz and Petzold, Herbert (eds.), M. Nijhoff, 1993, 83–124.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics’, Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 32 (2007), 137–159.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘The Protracted Institutionalization of the Strasbourg Court: From Legal Diplomacy to Integrationist Jurisprudence’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 43–60.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe?’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 9 (2018), 199–222.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘From Boom to Backlash? The European Court of Human Rights and the Transformation of Europe’, in: The European Court of Human Rights. Current Challenges in Historical Perspective, Aust, Helmut Phillip and Demir-Gürsel, Esra (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, 21–42.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘The Narrowing of the European Court of Human Rights? Legal Diplomacy, Situational Self-Restraint, and the New Vision for the Court’, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 2 (2021), 180–208.Google Scholar

Maduro, Miguel Poiares, ‘Courts and Pluralism: Essay on a Theory of Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Legal and Constitutional Pluralism’, in: Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2009, 356–380.Google Scholar

Mahoney, Paul, ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin’, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 11 (1990), 57–88.Google Scholar

Mahoney, Paul, ‘Universality versus Subsidiarity in the Strasbourg Case Law on Free Speech: Explaining Some Recent Judgments’, European Human Rights Law Review (1997), 364–379.Google Scholar

Mahoney, John, The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development, and Significance, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.Google Scholar

Malinverni, Giorgio, ‘Variations sur un thème encore méconnu : l’article 13 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme’, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, Vol. 35 (1998), 647–657.Google Scholar

Malinverni, Giorgio, ‘Ways and Means of Strengthening the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at National Level, Speech at the Colloquy Organized under the Swedish Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, “Towards Stronger Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at National Level”, Stockholm, 9–10 June 2008’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A Work in Progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 486–490.Google Scholar

Martinez, Jenny S., ‘Towards an International Judicial System’, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 6 (2003), 429–529.Google Scholar

Matscher, Franz, ‘Der Rechtsmittelbegriff der EMRK’, in: Festschrift für Winfried Kralik zum 65. Geburtstag, Rechberger, Walter H. and Wesler, Rudolf (eds.), MANZ Verlag, 1986, 257–271.Google Scholar

Matscher, Franz, ‘Zur Funktion und Tragweite der Bestimmung des Art. 13 EMRK’, in: Völkerrecht, Recht der Internationalen Organisationen, Weltwirtschaftsrecht: Festschrift für Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldem, Böckstiegel, Karl-Heinz, Folz, Hans-Erns, Mössner, Jörg Manfred and Zemanek, Karl (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1988, 315–337.Google Scholar

Matscher, Franz, ‘Methods of Interpretation of the Convention’, in: The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, Macdonald, R. St. J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), M. Nijhoff, 1993, 63–82.Google Scholar

McGregor, Lorna, ‘The Role of Supranational Human Rights Litigation in Strengthening Remedies for Torture Nationally’, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 16 (2012), 737–754.Google Scholar

Mertens, Pierre, ‘Le droit à un recours effectif devant l’autorité nationale compétente dans les conventions internationales relatives à la protection des droits de l’homme’, Revue belge de droit international (1968), 446–470.Google Scholar

Mertens, Pierre, Le droit de recours effectif devant les instances nationales en cas de violation d’un droit de l’homme: Analyse des incidences de l’article 13 de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1973.Google Scholar

Meuwissen, Damian, ‘Reflections on Habermas’s Legal Theory and Human Rights’, in: Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal, Mahoney, Paul, Matscher, Franz, Petzold, Herbert and Wildhaber, Luzius (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000, 905–920.Google Scholar

Milner, David, ‘Protocols no. 15 and 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights in the Context of the Perennial Process of Reform: A Long and Winding Road’, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, Vol. 17 (2014), 19–51.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, ‘The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe’, International Organization, Vol. 54 (2000), 217–252.Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alistair, The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alastair, ‘Between the Will of the Contracting Parties and the Needs of Today: Extending the Scope of the Convention Rights and Freedoms beyond What Could Have Been Foreseen by the Drafters of the ECHR’, in: Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights, Brems, Eva and Gerards, Janneke (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2014, 17–37.Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alastair, ‘Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 15 (2015), 313–341.Google Scholar

Müller, Jörg Paul, ‘Subsidiarität und Menschenrechtsschutz’, in: Die Welt der Verfassungstates, Morlok, Martin (ed.), Nomos, 2003, 35–43.Google Scholar

Naqvi, Yasmin, ‘The Right to the Truth in International Law: Fact or Fiction?’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 88 (2006), 245–273.Google Scholar

Neuman, Gerald L., ‘Subsidiarity’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 360–378.Google Scholar

Neuman, Gerald L., ‘Bi-Level Remedies for Human Rights Violations’, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 55 (2014), 323–483.Google Scholar

Neumann, Ulfrid, ‘Vorwort’, in: Menschenrechte und Volkssouveränität in Europa: Gerichte als Vormund der Demokratie?, Haller, Gret, Neumann, Ulfrid and Günther, Klaus (eds.), Campus, 2011, 7–10.Google Scholar

Nickel, James W., Making Sense of Human Rights, Second Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, ‘Conversations among Courts’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J and Shany, Yuval (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2014, 523–549.Google Scholar

Nonet, Phillippe and Selznick, Philip, Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law, Routledge, 1978.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C., Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Nussberger, Angelika, ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: View from the Court’, in: Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases, Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2017, 161–176.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, Michael, ‘The Role of Dialogue in the Relationship between the European Court of Human Rights and National Courts’, in: The Realisation of Human Rights: Studies in Honour of Leo Zwaak, Haeck, Yves, Leyh, Brianne McGonigle, Burbano-Herrera, Clara and Contreras-Garduño, Diana (eds.), Intersentia, 2014, 91–105.Google Scholar

Okresek, Wolf, ‘Subsidiarität im Verfahren nach der EMRK’, in: Staat und Recht in europäischer Perspektive. Festschrift Heinz Schäffer, Akyürek, Metin, Baumgartner, Gerhard, Jahnel, Dietmar, Lienbacher, Georg and Stolzlechner, Harald (eds.), C.H. Beck, 2006, 575–594.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora, ‘The Dark Side of Human Rights’, International Affairs, Vol. 81 (2005), 427–439.Google Scholar

Papier, Hans-Jürgen, ‘Execution and Effects of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from the Perspective of German National Courts’, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 27 (2006), 1–4.Google Scholar

Paraskeva, Costas, ‘Returning the Protection of Human Rights to Where They Belong, At Home’, International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 12 (2008), 415–448.Google Scholar

Parish, Matthew, Mirages of International Justice. The Elusive Pursuit of a Transnational Legal Order, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar

Partsch, Karl Josef, ‘Die Entstehung der europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 15 (1954), 631–660.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘The Concept of a “Continuing Violation” of an International Obligation: Selected Problems’, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 66 (1996), 415–450.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Jussi Erik, Begrunnelse av rettsavgjørelser, Universitetsforlaget, 2016.Google Scholar

Pellonpää, Matti, ‘Continuity and Change in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, in: Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law. Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflisch, Kohen, Marcelo G. (ed.), M. Nijhoff, 2007, 409–420Google Scholar

Pellonpää, Matti, Europeiska människorättskonventionen, Alma Talent, 2007.Google Scholar

Pelloux, Robert, ‘Précédents et caractères géneraux de la Convention européenne’, in: La protection internationale des droits de l’homme dans le cadre européen, Council of Europe (ed.), Dalloz, 1961.Google Scholar

Petzold, Herbert, ‘The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity’, in: The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, Macdonald, Ronald St. J., Matscher, Franz and Petzold, Herbert (eds.), M. Nijhoff, 1993, 41–62.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, Robert, Das Verhältnis von Völkerrecht und Landesrecht: Eine kritische Betrachtung alter und neuer Lehren unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Europäischen Menchenrechtskonvention, Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar

Polakiewicz, Jörg, ‘The Status of the Convention in National Law’, in: Fundamental Rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and Its Member States, 1950–2000, Blackburn, Robert and Polakiewicz, Jörg (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2001, 31–54.Google Scholar

Pollmann, Arnd and Lohmann, Georg, Menschenrechte: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, J.B. Metzler, 2012.Google Scholar

Popelier, Patricia, ‘The Court as a Regulatory Watchdog: The Procedural Approach in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, in: The Role of Constitutional Courts in Multilevel Governance, Popelier, Patricia, Mazmanyan, Armen and Vandenbruwaene, Werner (eds.), Intersentia, 2012, 249–267.Google Scholar

Popelier, Patricia, ‘Procedural Rationality Review after Animal Defenders International: A Constructively Critical Approach’, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 15 (2019), 272–293.Google Scholar

Popelier, Patricia, Lambrecht, Sarah and Lemmens, Koen (eds.), Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights. Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level, Intersentia, 2016.Google Scholar

Popelier, Patricia, Van De Heyning, Catherine and Van Nuffel, Piet, ‘The Interaction between European and National Courts as to Human Rights Protection: The Editor’s Introduction’, in: Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts, Popelier, Patricia, Van De Heyning, Catherine and Van Nuffel, Piet (eds.), Intersentia, 2011, 1–16.Google Scholar

Popelier, Patricia and Van De Heyning, Catherine, ‘Procedural Rationality: Giving Teeth to the Proportionality Analysis’, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 9 (2013), 230–262.Google Scholar

Popelier, Patricia and Van De Heyning, Catherine, ‘Subsidiarity Post-Brighton: Procedural Rationality as Answer?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 30 (2017), 5–23.Google Scholar

Popovic, Dragoljub, ‘Prevailing of Judicial Activism over Self-restraint in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Creighton Law Review, Vol. 42 (2008), 361–396.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A. and Sykes, Alan O., ‘Efficient Breach of International Law: Optimal Remedies, “Legalized Noncompliance,” and Related Issues’, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 243 (2011), 243–294.Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Raymond, Jean, ‘A Contribution to the Interpretation of Art 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, The Human Rights Review, Vol. V (1980), 161–175.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law. Essays in Law and Morality, Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, ‘On the Authority of Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries’, in: Constitutionalism – Philosophical Foundations, Alexander, Larry (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1998, 152–193.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Reiertsen, Michael, ‘EMD-dommers bindingsvirkning etter EMK artikkel 46(1) sett i lys av den tyske Forfatningsdomstolens behandling av Görgülü-sakene’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 25 (2007), 225–244.Google Scholar

Reiertsen, Michael, ‘Norway: New Constitutionalism, New Counter-Dynamics?’, in: Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights. Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level, Popelier, Patricia, Lambrecht, Sarah and Lemmens, Koen (eds.), Intersentia, 2016, 361–384.Google Scholar

Reiertsen, Michael, The European Convention on Human Rights Article 13. Past, Present and Future, Phd thesis, Oslo, 2017.Google Scholar

Ridruejo, José Antonio Pastor, ‘Le principe de subsidiarité dans la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme’, in: Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70. Geburtstag am 21. Januar 2005, Bröhmer, Jürgen, Bieber, Roland, Caliess, Christian, Langenfeld, Christine, Weber, Stefan and Wolf, Joachim (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2005, 1077–1084.Google Scholar

Rietiker, Daniel, ‘The Principle of “Effectiveness” in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Its Different Dimensions and Its Consistency with Public International Law – No Need for the Concept of Treaty Sui Generis’, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 79 (2010), 245–277.Google Scholar

Rijnhout, Rianka and Emaus, Jessy M., ‘Damages in Wrongful Death Cases in the Light of European Human Rights Law: Towards a Rights-Based Approach to the Law of Damages’, Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 10 (2014), 91–106.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent, ‘The Disappointing Remedy? Damages as a Remedy for Violations of Human Rights’, University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 69 Supplement 1 (2019), 33–63.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent, Remedies for Human Rights Violations. A Two-Track Approach to Supra-National and National Law, Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Romano, Cesare P. R., ‘The Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies: Theory and Practice in International Human Rights Procedures’, in: International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves, Boschiero, Nerina, Scovazzi, Tullio, Pitea, Cesare and Ragni, Chiara (eds.), Springer, 2013, 561–572.Google Scholar

Rui, Jon Petter, ‘The Interlaken, Izmir and Brighton Declarations: Towards a Paradigm Shift in the Strasbourg Court’s Interpretation of the European Convention of Human Rights’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 31 (2013), 28–54.Google Scholar

Ryssdal, Rolv, ‘On the Road to a European Constitutional Court’, in: Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Vol. II, Book 2, Springer, 1993, 7–20.Google Scholar

Ryssdal, Rolv, ‘The coming of Age of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (1996), 18–29.Google Scholar

Sand, Inger-Johanne, ‘The Interaction of Society, Politics and Law: The Legal and Communicative Theories of Habermas, Luhmann and Teubner’, Scandinavian Studies in Law, Vol. 53 (2008), 45–75.Google Scholar

Sand, Inger-Johanne, ‘Hybridization, Change and the Expansion of Law’, in: Hybrid Forms of Governance, Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm and Sand, Inger-Johanne (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, 186–204.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael J., Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.Google Scholar

Sandoval, Clara and Duttweiler, Michael, ‘Redressing Non-pecuniary Damages of Torture Survivors: The Practice of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, in: The Delivery of Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Professor Sir Nigel Rodley, Gilbert, Geoff, Hampson, Francoise and Sandoval, Clara (eds.), Routledge, 2011, 114–136.Google Scholar

Sarkin, Jeremy, ‘Enforced Disappearance as Continuing Crimes and Continuing Human Rights Violations: Studies in Honour of Leo Zwaak’, in: The Realisation of Human Rights: When Theory Meets Practice, Haeck, Yves, Leyh, Brianne McGonigle, Burbano-Herrera, Crara and Contreras-Garduño, Diana (eds.), Intersentia, 2014, 389–414.Google Scholar

Sathanapally, Aruna, Beyond Disagreement. Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Saul, Matthew, ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Margin of Appreciation and the Processes of National Parliaments’, Human Rights Review, Vol. 15 (2015), 745–774.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin, ‘The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules’, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 56 (1989), 1175–1188.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Giving Reasons’, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 47 (1995), 633–659.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Do Cases Make Bad Law?’, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 73 (2006), 883–918.Google Scholar

Scheek, Laurent, ‘The Relationship between the European Courts and Integration through Human Rights’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 65 (2005), 837–886.Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry G., ‘A European Supreme Court’, in: Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal, Mahoney, Paul, Matscher, Franz, Petzold, Herbert and Wildhaber, Luzius (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000, 1271–1284.Google Scholar

Schilling, Theodor, ‘Art. 13 EMRK und der Rechtsscutz gegen den Richter / Überlegungen aus Anlass von EGMR, Dhabi./. Italien’, Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift, Vol. 41 (2014), 596–601.Google Scholar

Schultz, Mårten, ‘Skadestånd som medel för ersättning vid kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter’, in: Förhandlingarna vid det 39:e nordiska juristmötet i Stockholm 18–19 augusti 2011, Del 1, Mirchandani, Kavita Bäck and Ståhl, Kristina (eds.), Stockholm, 2011, 217–236.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Gary T., ‘Mixed Theories of Tort Law: Affirming Both Deterrence and Corrective Justice’, Texas Law Review, Vol. 75 (1996–1997), 1801–1834.Google Scholar

Schwimmer, Walter, ‘Presentation of the Two Introductory Reports on the Sub-themes of the Ministerial Conference in Rome 3–4 November 2000’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A work in progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 19–23.Google Scholar

Sheeran, Scott and Rodley, Nigel S., Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Senden, Hanneke, Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System: An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, Intersentia, 2011.Google Scholar

Settem, Ola Johan, Applications of the ‘Fair Hearing’ Norm in ECHR Article 6(1) to Civil Proceedings: With Special Emphasis on the Balance between Procedural Safeguards and Efficiency, Springer, 2015.Google Scholar

Shane, Peter M., ‘Rights, Remedies and Restraint’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 64 (1988), 531–572.Google Scholar

Shany, Yuval, ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in General International Law?’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16 (2006), 907–940.Google Scholar

Shany, Yuval, ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 106 (2012), 225–270.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘The Boundaries of Human Rights Jurisdiction in Europe’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Vol. 13 (2003), 95–153.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Subsidiarity and Human Rights Law’, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 27 (2006), 4–11.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts’, Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 9 (2009), 537–571.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Enforcement and Remedies’, in: Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Sheeran, Scott and Rodley, Nigel (eds.), Routledge, 2013, 663–682.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Sources of Article 47 Rights’, in: The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary, Peers, Steeve, Hervey, Tamara, Kenner, Jeff and Ward, Angela (eds.), Hart/Beck, 2014, 1200–1211.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, Third Edition, Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Siess-Scherz, Ingrid, ‘Die Bedeutung des Subsidiaritätsprinzips für den Reformprozess des EGMR’, in: Internationale Gerichtshöfe und nationale Rechtsordnung. Internationales Symposium am Österreichischen Institut für Menschenrechte am 28. und 29. November 2003 in Salzburg zu Ehren von em.o.Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Franz Matscher, Karl, Wolfram (ed.), N.P. Engel Verlag, 2005, 83–109.Google Scholar

Sinkondo, M., ‘Le fabuleux destin de l’article 13 de la C.E.D.H. et ses suites heureuses pour les garanties individuelles’, Revue de Droit international et de Droit comparé, Vol. 81 (2004), 367–417.Google Scholar

Skoghøy, Jens Edvin A., Tvisteløsning, Third edition, Universitetsforlaget, 2017.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Burke-White, William, ‘The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, The European Way of Law)’, in: New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law, Nollkaemper, André and Nijman, Janne Elisabeth (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2007, 110–133.Google Scholar

Smet, Stijn, ‘When Human Rights Clash in ‘the Age of Subsidiarity’: What Role for the Margin of Appreciation?’, in: Human Rights Between Law and Politics: The Margin of Appreciation in Post-National Contexts, Agha, Petr (ed.), Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017, 55–70.Google Scholar

Somek, Alexander, The Cosmopolitan Constitution, Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Somers, Stefan, The European Convention on Human Rights as an Instrument of Tort Law, Intersentia, 2018.Google Scholar

Spano, Robert, ‘Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 14 (2014), 487–502.Google Scholar

Spano, Robert, ‘The Future of the European Court of Human Rights – Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of Law’, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 18 (2018), 473–494.Google Scholar

Spano, Robert, ‘The Rule of Law as the Lodestar of the European Convention on Human Rights: The Strasbourg Court and the Independence of the Judiciary’, European Law Journal (2021), Oneline Early View, 1–17.Google Scholar

Spielmann, Dean, ‘Allowing the Right Margin: The European Court of Human Rights and the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Waiver or Subsidiarity of European Review?’, Speech Delivered at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Heidelberg 13 December 2013, Published on the Webpage of the ECtHR, 2013.Google Scholar

Spielmann, Dean, ‘Keynote Address’, in: Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights – Effects and Implementation, Seibert-Fohr, Anja and Villiger, Mark E. (eds.), Nomos, 2014, 25–32.Google Scholar

Spielmann, Dean, ‘Whither the Margin of Appreciation?’, Current Legal Problems, Vol. 67 (2014), 49–65.Google Scholar

von Staden, Andreas, ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review beyond the State: Normative Subsidiarity and Judicial Standards of Review’, International journal of constitutional law, Vol. 10 (2012), 1023–1049.Google Scholar

Starr, Sonja B., ‘Rethinking “Effective Remedies”: Remedial Deterrence in International Courts’, New York University Law Review, Vol. 83 (2008), 693–768.Google Scholar

Stephens, Beth, ‘Translating Filártiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations’, The Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 27 (2002), 1–57.Google Scholar

Stoyanova, Vladislava, ‘The Disjunctive Structure of Positive Rights under the European Convention on Human Rights’, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 87 (2018), 344–392.Google Scholar

Strasser, Wolfgang, ‘The Relationship between Substantive Rights and Procedural Rights Guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights’, in: Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension: Studies in Honor of Gérard J. Wiarda, Matscher, Franz and Petzold, Herbert (eds.), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1988, 595–604.Google Scholar

Strauss, David A., ‘On the Origin of Rules (With Apologies to Darwin): A Comment on Antonin Scalia’s “The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules”’, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 75 (2008), 997–1013.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict, Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Constitutional Personae, Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone, and Brunell, Thomas L., ‘Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the ECHR, the EU, and the WTO’, Journal of Law and Courts, Vol. 1 (2013), 61–88.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z., On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Tasioulas, John, ‘The Moral Reality of Human Rights’, in: Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor, Pogge, Thomas (ed.), Oxford University Press, 2007, 75–101.Google Scholar

Teitgen, Pierre-Henri, ‘The European Guarantee of Human Rights: A Political Assessment’, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquy about the European Convention on Human Rights Organised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Italy and the Secretariat General of the Council of Europe. Rome, 5–8 November 1975, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 1976.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, ‘Reflexives Recht: Entwicklungsmodelle des Rechts in vergleichender Perspektive’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Vol. LXVIII (1982), 13–59.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centered Constitutional Theory?’, in: Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Hart Publishing, 2004, 3–28.Google Scholar

Thune, Gro Hillestad, ‘The Right to an Effective Remedy in Domestic Law: Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in: Broadening the Frontiers of Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide, Gomien, Donna (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1993, 79–95.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Reparation in Favour of Individual Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law’, in: Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflisch; Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law, Kohen, Marcelo G. (ed.), M. Nijhoff, 2007, 569–590.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Democracy and the Rule of Law’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 469–496.Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H., ‘The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories’, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 89 (1980), 1063–1080.Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H., ‘Comment’, in: A Matter of Interpretation, Gutmann, Amy (ed.), Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Canc̦ado Trindade, A. A., The Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Tripkovic, Bosko, ‘A New Philosophy for the Margin of Appreciation and European Consensus’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 42 (2021), 207–234.Google Scholar

Tsereteli, Nino, Legal Validity and Legitimacy of the Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights, PhD thesis, Oslo, 2015.Google Scholar

Tuori, Kaarlo, Critical Legal Positivism, Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Tuori, Kaarlo, Ratio and Voluntas. The Tension between Reason and Will in Law, Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Tuori, Kaarlo, ‘Transnational Law: On Legal Hybrids and Legal Perspectivism’, in: Transnational Law. Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking, Maduro, Miguel, Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2014, 11–57.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Ulfstein, Geir, ‘The International Judiciary’, in: The Constitutionalization of International Law, Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2009, 126–152.Google Scholar

Ulfstein, Geir, ‘The European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court’, PluriCourts Research Paper No. 14-08 (2014).Google Scholar

Ulfstein, Geir, ‘Interpretation of the ECHR in Light of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 24 (2020), 917–934.Google Scholar

United Nations Yearbook on Human Rights 1948, New York, 1949.Google Scholar

Valentini, Laura, ‘Global Justice and Practice-Dependence: Conventionalism, Institutionalism, Functionalism’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 19 (2011), 399–418.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo, ‘The Role of International Courts as Interpreters and Developers of the Law: Working out the Jurisgenerative Practice of Interpretation’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 34 (2011), 99–131.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo, How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo, ‘Antinomies and Change in International Dispute Settlement: An Exercise in Comparative Procedural Law’, in: International Dispute Settlement: Room for Innovations?, Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Gätzschmann, Ina (eds.), Springer, 2012, 235–269.Google Scholar

Vermeule, Adrian, ‘The Judiciary Is a They, Not an It: Interpretive Theory and the Fallacy of Division’, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, Vol. 14 (2004), 549–584.Google Scholar

Vila, Marisa Iglesias, ‘Subsidiarity, Margin of Appreciation and International Adjudication within a Cooperative Conception of Human Rights’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 15 (2017), 393–413.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity in the European Convention on Human Rights’, in: Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law, Cohen, Marcelo G. (ed.), M. Nijhoff, 2007, 623–637.Google Scholar

Voeten, Eric, ‘Politics, Judicial Behaviour, and Institutional Design’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 61–76.Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik, ‘International Judicial Behavior’, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J. and Shany, Yuval (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2014, 550–568.Google Scholar

Vogiatzis, Nikos, ‘The Admissibility Criterion under Article 35(3)(b) ECHR: A “Significant Disadvantage” to Human Rights Protection?’, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 65 (2016), 185–211.Google Scholar

Vorwerk, Volkert, ‘Kudla gegen Polen—Was kommt danach?’, JuristenZeitung, Vol. 59 (2004), 553–559.Google Scholar

Vospernik, Tanja, ‘Das Verhältnis zwischen Art 13 und Art 6 EMRK – Absorption oder “Apfel und Birne”?’, Österreichische Juristen-Zeitung, Vol. 56 (2001), 361–368.Google Scholar

Voβkuhle, Andreas, ‘Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 6 (2010), 175–198.Google Scholar

Vysockiene, Lyra, ‘Effective Remedy in Asylum Cases with Particular Focus on Lithuania’, Baltic Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 2 (2002), 105–126.Google Scholar

Wacks, Raymond, Understanding Jurisprudence, Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’, The Yale Law Journal (2006), 1346–1406.Google Scholar

Waters, Christopher P. M., ‘Introduction’, in: Adjudicating International Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Sandy Ghandhi, Green, J. A. and Waters, C. P. M. (eds.), Brill Nijhoff, 2014, 1–11.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph, ‘Editorial’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 25 (2014), 635–644.Google Scholar

Wemmers, J. A. M., Reparation for Victims of Crimes against Humanity: The Healing Role of Reparation, Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

White, Robin, ‘Remedies in a Multi-Level Legal Order: The Strasbourg Court and the UK’, in: The Future of Remedies in Europe, Kilpatrick, Claire, Novitz, Tonia and Skidmore, Paul (eds.), Hart Publishing, 2000, 191–204.Google Scholar

White, Brent T., ‘Say You’re Sorry: Court-Ordered Apologies as a Civil Rights Remedy’, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 9 (2005–2006), 1261–1312.Google Scholar

Widmer-Schlumpf, Eveline, ‘Opening Address at the Interlaken Conference’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. Interlaken, Izmir, Brighton and beyond, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2014, 12–14.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘A Constitutional Future for the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 23 (2002), 161–165.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘The European Court of Human Rights in action’, Ritsumeikan Law Review, Vol. 21 (2004), 83–92.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘The European Court of Human Rights: The Past, The Present, The Future’, American University International Law Review, Vol. 22 (2007), 521–538.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘Address Held at the Workshop “The Improvement of Domestic Remedies with Particular Emphasis on Cases of Unreasonable Length of Proceedings”, Held at the Initiative of the Polish Chairmanship of the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers, Strasbourg, 28 April 2005’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights. A work in progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 83–84.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘Statement Made at the European Ministerial Conference on Human Rights in Rome, 3–4 November 2000’, in: Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights: A work in progress, Council of Europe (ed.), Council of Europe Publishing, 2009, 33–34.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘Rethinking the European Court of Human Rights’, in: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Paperback Edition, Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013, 204–229.Google Scholar