Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:26:26.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chap. 2 - CLEAN AND ASEPTIC TECHNIQUE AT THE BEDSIDE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Sapna Amin
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine
Aron J. Gewirtzman
Affiliation:
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Stephen Tyring
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health Science Center
Ronni Wolf
Affiliation:
Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
Batya B. Davidovici
Affiliation:
Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
Jennifer L. Parish
Affiliation:
Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University
Lawrence Charles Parish
Affiliation:
Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University
Get access

Summary

CUTANEOUS SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS are becoming more and more popular as this area of dermatology continues to rapidly expand. Dermatologists are performing progressively more surgical procedures in their private offices. A survey performed by the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) in 2003 revealed that 3.9 million procedures were performed that year by participating ASDS members. These outpatient procedures allow the dermatologist to provide more comprehensive care to the patient and present the patient with a more affordable option, because outpatient procedures under local anesthesia are less expensive than in the hospital setting.

With the upsurge in the number of cutaneous surgeries, an important goal remains to keep patients free of nosocomial and surgical site infections (SSIs). Traditionally, dermatologic procedures and surgeries have benefited from relatively low infection rates, despite varying infection-control practices. Strict adherence to aseptic technique is required to maintain this low rate of infectious complications. In addition to the principles of asepsis, the surgeon must also minimize patient and environmental risk factors, achieve adequate preoperative preparation, decide if antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary, as well as maintain proper surgical suite protocol and surgical technique.

SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS

Postoperative infections after dermatologic procedures are rare. These surgeries are largely considered either “clean” or “clean-contaminated,” with infection rates of less than 5% and 5%–10%, respectively. Studies examining the rate of infectious complications following dermatologic procedures have indicated an even lower incidence in this field.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rogues, AM, Lasheras, A, Amici, JM, et al. Infection control practices and infectious complications in dermatological surgery. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65:258–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aasi, SZ, Leffell, DJ. Complications in dermatologic surgery: how safe is safe? Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:213–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salopek, TG, Slade, JM, Marghoob, AA, et al. Management of cutaneous malignant melanoma by dermatologists of the American Academy of Dermatology. II. Definitive surgery for malignant melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:451–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas, AF, Grekin, RC. Practical thoughts on antibiotic prophylaxis. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:872–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babcock, MD, Grekin, RC. Antibiotic use in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Clin. 2003;21:337–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amici, JM, Rogues, AM, Lasheras, A, et al. A prospective study of the incidence of complications associated with dermatological surgery. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153:967–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futoryan, T, Grande, D. Postoperative wound infection rates in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21:509–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, JL, Perone, JB. A prospective evaluation of the incidence of complications associated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:143–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahie, S, Lawrence, CM. Wound complications following diagnostic skin biopsies in dermatology inpatients. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:1267–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helbling, I, Muston, HL, Ferguson, JE, McKenna, M. Audit of admissions to dermatology beds in Greater Manchester. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2002;27:519–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantlon, CA, Stemper, ME, Schwan, WR, Hoffman, MA, Qutaishat, SS. Significant pathogens isolated from surgical site infections at a community hospital in the Midwest. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34:526–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, L, Crook, S.Minor surgery in general practice–setting the standards. J Public Health Med. 1998;20:169–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maragh, SL, Otley, CC, Roenigk, RK, Phillips, PK. Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: updated guidelines. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, CP. Normal flora. In: Baron, S, editor. Medical microbiology. 4th ed. Galveston,TX: The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996.Google ScholarPubMed
Aseptic technique. In: Dougherty, L, Lister, S, editors. The Royal Marsden Hospital manual of clinical nursing procedures. 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell. 2004. 50–63.
Hurst, EA, Grekin, RC, Yu, SS, Neuhaus, IM. Infectious complications and antibiotic use in dermatologic surgery. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007;26:47–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, et al., The Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google ScholarPubMed
Dixon, AJ, Dixon, MP, Askew, DA, Wilkinson, D. Prospective study of wound infections in dermatologic surgery in the absence of prophylactic antimicrobials. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:819–26; discussion 826–7.Google Scholar
Olsen, MA, Lock-Buckley, P, Hopkins, D, et al. The risk factors for deep and superficial chest surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery are different. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:136–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garland, R, Frizelle, FA, Dobbs, BR, Singh, H. A retrospective audit of long-term lower limb complications following leg vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:950–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, S. Using an aseptic technique to reduce the risk of infection. Nurs Stand. 2007;21:43–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,NHS Estates. Guide to decontamination of reusable surgical instruments. London: Department of Health; 2003, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. Disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities: what clinicians need to know. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:702–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, RC, Perry, C. Decontamination of reusable surgical instruments. Hosp Med. 2001;62:662–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Danziger, L, Hassan, E. Antimicrobial prophylaxis of gastrointestinal surgical procedures and treatment of intraabdominal infections. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987;21:406–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez, R, Freeman, S, Sohmer, H, Sichel, JY. Vestibular and cochlear ototoxicity of topical antiseptics assessed by evoked potentials. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:1522–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murthy, S, Hawksworth, NR, Cree, I. Progressive ulcerative keratitis related to the use of topical chlorhexidine gluconate (0.02%). Cornea. 2002;21:237–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, J, Swarbrook, S, Stuart, J. Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; CD004288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, D, Ream, E. Assessing nurses' hand decontamination performance. Nurs Times. 1993;89:47–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Gould, DJ, Chudleigh, J, Drey, NS, Moralejo, D. Measuring handwashing performance in health service audits and research studies. J Hosp Infect. 2007;66:109–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, LJ. An evaluation of handwashing techniques-1. Nurs Times. 1978;74:54–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (Association for Professionals in Infection Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51:1–45, quiz CE41–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Grinbaum, RS, Mendonca, JS, Cardo, DM. An outbreak of handscrubbing-related surgical site infections in vascular surgical procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995;16:198–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winnefeld, M, Richard, MA, Drancourt, M, Grob, JJ. Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:546–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartor, C, Jacomo, V, Duvivier, C, et al. Nosocomial Serratia marcescens infections associated with extrinsic contamination of a liquid nonmedicated soap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21:196–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archibald, LK, Corl, A, Shah, B, et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak associated with extrinsic contamination of 1% chlorxylenol soap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997; 18:704–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, RM. Surgical procedures, techniques, and skills. In: Lawrence, PF, Beel, RM. Dayton, MT editors. Essentials of general surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Williams: 1999. 519–62.Google Scholar
Lamberg, L. Dermatologists debate sentinel node biopsy, safety of liposuction, and antibiotic prophylaxis. JAMA. 2000;283:2223–4.Google ScholarPubMed
George, PM. Dermatologists and antibiotic prophylaxis: a survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:418–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmichael, AJ, Flanagan, PG, Holt, PJ, Duerden, BI. The occurrence of bacteraemia with skin surgery. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:120–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, RW, Scoy, RE, Washington, JA. Incidence of bacteremia in adults without infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1975;2:94–5.Google Scholar
Scheinfeld, N, Struach, S, Ross, B. Antibiotic prophylaxis guideline awareness and antibiotic prophylaxis use among New York State dermatologic surgeons. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:841–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Huether, MJ, Griego, RD, Brodland, DG, Zitelli, JA. Clindamycin for intraincisional antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:1145–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×