Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: June 2011

Chapter 1 - Economic perspectives

from PART I - Introduction
Summary

To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.

– Ecclesiastes

Extending this famous verse, we can also say that there is a time for work and a time for play. There is a time for leisure.

An important distinction, however, needs to be made between the precise concept of a time for leisure and the semantically different and much fuzzier notion of leisure time, our initial topic. In the course of exploring this subject, the fundamental economic forces that affect spending on all forms of entertainment will be revealed, and our understanding of what motivates expenditures for such goods and services will be enhanced. Moreover, the perspectives provided by this approach will enable us to see how entertainment is defined and how it fits into the larger economic picture.

Time concepts

Leisure and work

Philosophers and sociologists have long wrestled with the problem of defining leisure – the English word derived from the Latin licere, which means “to be permitted” or “to be free.” In fact, as Kraus (1978, p. 38) and Neulinger (1981, pp. 17–33) have noted, leisure has usually been described in terms of its sociological and psychological (state-of-mind) characteristics. And closely tied in to this is the more recent notion that “play” is a fundamental aspect of life.

The classical attitude was epitomized in the work of Aristotle, for whom the term leisure implied both availability of time and absence of the necessity of being occupied (De Grazia 1962, p. 19).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Entertainment Industry Economics
  • Online ISBN: 9780511976803
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976803
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Selected additional reading
Albarran, A. (1996). Media Economics: Understanding Markets, Industries and Concepts. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Alexander, A., Owers, J., Carveth, R., et al. eds. (2004). Media Economics: Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ, and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Aron, C. S. (1999). Working at Play: A History of Vacations in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
Athavaley, A. (2007). “Vacation Deflation: Breaks Get Shorter,” Wall Street Journal, August 15.
“Crossroads for Planet Earth,” Scientific American, September, 2005.
Cutler, B. (1990). “Where Does the Free Time Go?,” American Demographics, 12(11)(November).
“The Determinants of Working Hours,” OECD Employment Outlook, September 1983.
“The Entertainment Economy,” BusinessWeek, No. 3362 (March 14, 1994).
Epstein, G. (1995). “Myth: Americans Are Working More. Fact: More Women Are Working,” Barron's, April 3.
Filer, R. K., Hamermesh, D. S., and Rees, A. E. (1996). The Economics of Work and Play, 6th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
Fuchsberg, G. (1994). “Four-Day Workweek Has Become a Stretch for Some Employees,” Wall Street Journal, August 3.
Gabriel, T. (1995). “A Generation's Heritage: After the Boom, a Boomlet,” New York Times, February 12.
Gray, M. B. (1992). “Consumer Spending on Durables and Services in the 1980s,” Monthly Labor Review, 115(5)(May).
Hedges, J. N. (1980). “The Workweek in 1979: Fewer but Longer Workdays,” Monthly Labor Review, 103(8)(August).
Hedges, J. N. (1973). “New Patterns for Working Time,” Monthly Labor Review, 96(2)(February).
Hunnicutt, B. K. (1988). Work without End: Abandoning Shorter Hours for the Right to Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Jablonski, M., Kunze, K., and Otto, P. (1990). “Hours at Work: A New Base for BLS Productivity Statistics,” Monthly Labor Review, 113(2)(February).
Kilborn, P. T. (1996). “Factories That Never Close Are Scrapping 5-Day Week,” New York Times, June 4.
Malabre, A. L. Jr., and Clark, L. H. Jr. (1992). “Productivity Statistics for the Service Sector May Understate Gains,” Wall Street Journal, August 12.
Marano, H. E. (1999). “The Power of Play,” Psychology Today, 32(4)(August).
Meyersohn, R., and Larrabee, E. (1958). “A Comprehensive Bibliography on Leisure, 1900–1958,” in Mass Leisure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. Also in American Journal of Sociology, 62(6)(May 1957): 602–615.
Moore, G. H., and Hedges, J. N. (1971). “Trends in Labor and Leisure,” Monthly Labor Review, 94(2)(February).
Oi, W. (1971). “A Disneyland Dilemma: Two-Part Tariffs for a Mickey Mouse Monopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(February).
Owen, J. D. (1971). “The Demand for Leisure,” Journal of Political Economy, 79(1)(January/February): 56–75.
Pollak, R. A., and Wachter, M. L. (1975). “The Relevance of the Household Production Function and Its Implications for the Allocation of Time,” Journal of Political Economy, 83(2).
“The Productivity Paradox,” BusinessWeek, No. 3055 (June 6, 1988).
“The Revival of Productivity,” BusinessWeek, No. 2828 (February 13, 1984).
Rhoads, C. (2002). “Short Work Hours Undercut Europe in Economic Drive,” Wall Street Journal, August 8.
“Riding High: The Productivity Bonanza,” BusinessWeek, No. 3445 (October 9, 1995).
Rifkin, J. (1995). The End of Work. New York: Putnam.
Robbins, L. (1930). “On the Elasticity of Income in Terms of Effort,” Economica, 10(June).
Robinson, J. P., and Godbey, G. (1996). “The Great American Slowdown,” American Demographics (June).
Rosen, S., and Rosenfield, A. (1997). “Ticket Pricing,” Journal of Law & Economics, XL(2)(October).
Scott, J. (1999). “Working Hard, More or Less,” New York Times, July 10.
Staines, G. L., and O'Connor, P. (1980). “Conflicts among Work, Leisure, and Family Roles,” Monthly Labor Review, 103(8)(August).
Tseng, N. (2003). “Expenditures on Entertainment,” Consumer Expenditure Survey Anthology, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Vitello, P. (2008). “More Americans Are Giving Up Golf,” New York Times, February 21.
“Wheel of Fortune: A Survey of Technology and Entertainment,” The Economist, November 21, 1998.
Yoon, L. (2006). “More Play, Less Toil Is a Stressful Shift for Some Koreans,” Wall Street Journal, August 10.
Torkildsen (1999, p. 93) makes further distinctions between play, recreation, and leisure. Play
play, and leisure concepts form partially overlapping circles centered on pleasure. See also Roberts, (1995)
Linder, (1970), standard indifference-curve/budget-line analysis is used to show how the supply of labor is a function of income and substitution effects
Section 11.5 and Levy, and Sarnat, (1972)