Adkins, R. M., Walton, A. H., and Honeycutt, R. L. (2002). Higher level systematics of rodents and divergence time estimates based on two congruent nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 26, 409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahearn, M. E. and Lance, J. F. (1980). A new species of Neochoerus (Rodentia: Hydrochoeridae) from the Blancan (Late Pliocene) of North America. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 93, 435–42.Google Scholar

Black,, C. C. and Stephens,, J. J. III. (1973). Rodents from the Paleogene of Guanajuato, Mexico. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Technical University, 14, 1–10.Google Scholar

Bonaparte, C. L. P. (1845). Catologo Metodico dei Mammiferi Europe. Milano: Giacomo Pirola.Google Scholar

Brünnich, M. T. (1772). Zoologiae Fundamenta Praelectionibus Academicis Accomodata. Grunde i Dyrelaeren: Hasniae et Lipsiae.Google Scholar

Bugge,, J. (1985). Systematic value of the carotid arterial pattern in rodents. In Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents: A Multidisciplinary Analysis, ed. Luckett, W. P. and Hartenberger, J.-L., pp. 355–79. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Carranza-Castañeda, O. and Miller, W. E. (1993). Roedores caviomorfos de la Mesa Central de México, Blancano temprano (Plioceno tardío) de la fauna local Rancho Viejo, Estado de Guanajuato. Revista Instituto de Geologia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 7, 182–99.Google Scholar

Cuvier, F. (1822). Examen des éspèces du genre porc-épic, et formation des genres ou sous-genres Acanthion, Eréthizon, Sinéthère et Sphiggure. Mémoires du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, 9, 413–456.Google Scholar

Dashzeveg, D. (1990). New trends in adaptive radiation of Early Tertiary rodents (Rodentia, Mammalia). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 33, 11–35.Google Scholar

Dawson, M. R. and Beard, K. C. (1996). New Late Paleocene rodents (Mammalia) from Big Multi Quarry, Washakie Basin, Wyoming. Palaeovertebrata, 25, 301–21.Google Scholar

Ferrusquía-Villafranca,, I. (1989). A new rodent genus from Central Mexico and its bearing on the origin of the Caviomorpha. [In Papers on Fossil Rodents in Honor of Albert Elmer Wood, ed. Black, C. C. and Dawson, M. R..] Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Science Series 33, 91–117.Google Scholar

Flynn, L. J., Jacobs, L. L., and Cheema, I. U. (1986). Baluchimyinae, a new ctenodactyloid rodent subfamily from the Miocene of Baluchistan. American Museum Novitates, 2841, 1–58.Google Scholar

Frazier, M. K. (1981). A revision of the fossil Erethizontidae of North America. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences, 27, 1–76.Google Scholar

Gray, J. E. (1825). Outline of an attempt at the disposition of the Mammalia into tribes and families with a list of the genera apparently appertaining to each tribe. Annals of Philosopy, new series, 10, 337–344.Google Scholar

Hay, O. P. (1923). The Pleistocene of North America and its vertebrated animals from the states east of the Mississippi River and from the Canadian Provinces east of longitude 95°. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 322, 1–499.Google Scholar

Hay, O. P. (1926). A collection of Pleistocene vertebrates from southwestern Texas. Proceedings of the National Museum of the United States, 68, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huchon,, D. and Douzery,, E. J. P. (2001). From the Old World to the New World: a molecular chronicle of phylogeny and biogeography of hystricognath rodents. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20, 238–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huchon, D., Madsen, O., Sibbald, M. J. J. B., et al. (2002). Rodent phylogeny and a timescale for the evolution of Glires: evidence from an extensive taxon sampling using three nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 19, 1053–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulbert, R. C. Jr. (1997). A new Late Pliocene porcupine (Rodentia: Erethizontidae) from Florida. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17, 623–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koenigswald, W. (2004). Enamel microstructure of rodents, classification, and parallelisms, with a note on the systematic affiliation of the enigmatic Eocene rodent Protoptychus. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 11, 127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korth, W. W. (1984). Earliest Tertiary evolution and radiation of rodents in North America. Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 24, 1–71.Google Scholar

Korth, W. W. (1994). The Tertiary Record of Rodents in North America. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacépède, M. le comte (1799). Mémiore sur une nouvelle table méthodique des animaux à mamelles. Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique, Year 7 of the Republic, 469–502Google Scholar

Landry, S. O. Jr. (1957). The interrelationships of the New and Old World hystricomorph rodents. University of California Publications in Zoology, 56, 1–118.Google Scholar

Landry, S. O. Jr. (1999). A proposal for a new classification and nomenclature for the Glires (Lagomorpha and Rodentia). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum fur Naturkunde in Berlin, Zoologische Reihe, 75, 283–316.Google Scholar

Lavocat, R. (1969). La systématique des rongeurs hystricomorphes et la dérive des continents. Comptes Rendus des Seances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 269, 1496–7.Google Scholar

Lavocat,, R. (1980). The implications of rodent paleontology and biogeography to the geographical sources and origin of Platyrrhine primates. In Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, ed. Ciochon, R. L. and Chiarelli, A. B., pp. 93–102. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Linneaus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Vol. I: Regnum Animale, 10th edn. Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linneaus, C. (1766). Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, locis. Vol. I: Regnum Animale, 12th edn. Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar

Luckett,, W. P. and Hartenberger,, J.-L. (1985). Evolutionary relationships among rodents: comments and conclusions. In Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents: A Multidisciplinary Analysis, ed. Luckett, W. P. and Hartenberger, J.-L., pp. 685–712. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marivaux, L., Vianey-Liaud, M., Welcomme, J.-L. and Jaeger, J. J. (2002). The role of Asia in the origin and diversification of hystricognathous rodents. Zoologica Scripta, 31, 225–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, T. (1993). Early rodent incisor enamel evolution: phylogenetic implications. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 1, 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKenna, M. C. and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Meng, J., Wyss, A. R., Dawson, M. R., and Zhai, R.-J. (1994). Primitive fossil rodent from Inner Mongolia and its implications for mammalian phylogeny. Nature, 370, 134–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meng, J., Hu, Y., and Li, C. (2003). The osteology of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): implications for phylogeny and evolution of Glires. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 275, 1–247.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mones, A. (1980). Estudios sobre la Familia Hydrochaeridae (Rodentia), IX. Neochoerus lancei, nueva especie del Plioceno de Norteamerica. Communicaciones Paleontologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo, 1, 171–81.Google Scholar

Morgan, G. S. and White, J. A. (1995). Small mammals (Insectivora, Lagomorpha, and Rodentia) from the early Pleistocene (early Irvingtonian) Leisey Shell Pit Local Fauna, Hillsborough County, Florida. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, 37(Part 2), 397–461.Google Scholar

Nowak, R. M. and Paradiso, J. L. (1983). Walker's Mammals of the World, Vol. II, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Schlosser,, M. (1911). Mammalia Säugetiere. In Grundzüge der Paläontologie, vol. II: Vertebrata, neubearbeitetBroili, F., Koken, E., Schlosser, M., ed. Zittel, K. A., pp. 325–585. Munich: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar

Scott, W. B. (1895). Protoptychus hatcheri, a new rodent from the Uinta Eocene. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 1895, 269–86.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. G. (1928). Pleistocene mammals from a cave in Citrus County, Florida. American Museum Novitates, 328, 1–16.Google Scholar

(1930). Rodent Giants. Natural History, 30, 305–13.

Tullberg, T. (1899). Ueber das System der Nagethiere, eine phylogenetische Studie. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarium Upsaliensis, 18(Series 3, Section 2), 1–514.Google Scholar

Turnbull, W. D. (1991). Protoptychus hatcheri Scott, 1895. The Mammalian faunas of the Washakie Formation, Eocene Age, of southern Wyoming. Part II. The Adobetown Member, Middle Division (= Washakie B, Twka/2 In Part). Fieldiana, Geology New Series, 21, 1–33.Google Scholar

Vianey-Liaud, M. (1994). La radiation des Gliridae (Rodentia) à l'Eocène supérieur en Europe Occidentale, et sa descendance Oligocène. Münchener Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen A, 26, 117–60.Google Scholar

Wahlert, J. H. (1973). Protoptychus, a hystricomorphous rodent from the late Eocene of North America. Breviora, Museum of Comparative Zoology, 419, 1–14.Google Scholar

White, J. A. (1968). A new porcupine from the middle Pleistocene of the Anza-Borrego Desert of California. With notes on mastication in Coendu and Erethizon. Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, 136, 1–15.Google Scholar

White, J. A. (1970). Late Cenozoic porcupines (Mammalia, Erethizontidae) of North America. American Museum Novitates, 2421, 1–15.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. A. and Westgate, J. M. (1991). A lophodont rodent from the middle Eocene of the Gulf Coastal Plain. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11, 257–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, R. W. (1935). A new species of porcupine from the later Cenozoic of Idaho. Journal of Mammalogy, 16, 220–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, R. W. (1937). Two new Eocene rodents from the Green River Basin, Wyoming. American Journal of Science, Series 5, 34, 447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, R. W. (1986). The Paleogene record of rodents: fact and interpretation. [In Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy, ed. Flanagan, K. M. and Lillegraven, J. A..] Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming Special Paper, 3, 163–76.Google Scholar

Wood, A. E. (1955). A revised classification of the rodents. Journal of Mammalogy, 36, 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, A. E. (1975). The problem of hystricognathous rodents. Papers on Paleontology, University of Michigan, 12, 75–80.Google Scholar

Wood, A. E. (1985). Northern waif primates and rodents. In The Great American Biotic Interchange, ed. Stehli, F. G. and Webb, S. D., pp. 267–82. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woods,, C. A. (1984). Hystricognath rodents. In Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World, ed. Anderson, S. and Jones, J. K. Jr., pp. 389–446. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Wyss,, A. R., Flynn,, J. J., Norell,, M. A., et al. (1993). South America's earliest rodent and recognition of a new interval of mammalian evolution. Nature, 365, 434–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar