Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T11:22:04.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Of horses and carts: theories of indefeasibility and category errors in the Torrens system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Elise Bant
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Matthew Harding
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The essays collected in this volume are drawn from multiple jurisdictions and cover a broad range of legal issues – demonstrating both Michael Bryan's breadth of scholarly interests and the reach of his work. Of the many subjects that have engaged his interest, Bryan's knowledge and expertise in equity is unquestionable, having written dozens of articles on the subject of equity and trusts and being invited to contribute to the seminal Australian text on the law of trusts. One fascinating area in this wide landscape of equity is how equitable principles apply and operate in the context of Torrens land registration. For some years now, Bryan has been teaching this difficult subject in a course entitled ‘Equity in Real Property Law’ for the Melbourne Law Masters programme. However, those of us who have not had the benefit of attending Bryan's course may glimpse his insight into the subject only through his published work.

His first on this subject was originally published in the University of Queensland Law Journal before it was reprinted with an expanded introduction in one of the many Festschriften honouring the late Peter Birks – Structure and Justification in Private Law. In that article, ‘Recipient Liability under the Torrens System: Some Category Errors’, Bryan lamented that, as it analyses what some might consider ‘a narrowly domestic issue of Australian law … it might have disappointed Birks, who was ever the opponent of legal nationalism’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Exploring Private Law , pp. 446 - 467
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ford, H and others, Principles of the Law of Trusts (3rd edn Lawbook Co, Sydney 1994)Google Scholar
Bryan, M (ed), Private Law in Theory and Practice (Routledge-Cavendish, Oxford 2007)
Bryan, M, ‘Recipient Liability under the Torrens System: Some Category Errors’ in Rickett, C and Grantham, R (eds), Structure and Justification in Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford 2008) 339−59Google Scholar
Ruoff, TBF, An Englishman Looks at the Torrens System (The Law Book Co, Sydney 1957)Google Scholar
Harding, M and Bryan, M, ‘Responding to Fraud in Title Registration Systems: A Comparative Study’ in Dixon, M (ed), Modern Studies in Property Law (Vol 5) (Hart Publishing, Oxford 2009) 3Google Scholar
Penner, JE, The Law of Trusts (5th edn Oxford University Press, Oxford2006) 113
Smith, L, ‘Transfers’ in Birks, P and Pretto, A (eds), Breach of Trust (Hart Publishing, Oxford 2002) 111, 138Google Scholar
Meagher, R, Heydon, D and Leeming, M, Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (4th edn Butterworths LexisNexis, Chatswood 2002) ch 19Google Scholar
Mowbray, J and others, Lewin on Trusts (18th edn Sweet & Maxwell, London 2008) 1673Google Scholar
Birks, P, Unjust Enrichment (2nd edn Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005) 64−5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, Sir PJ, ‘Tracing the Proceeds of Fraud’ (1991) 107 LQR71Google Scholar
Cornish, WR and others (eds), Restitution: Past, Present and Future: Essays in Honour of Gareth Jones (Hart Publishing, Oxford 1998) 231
Harpum, C, ‘The Stranger as Constructive Trustee’ (1986) 102 LQR114, 120−7Google Scholar
Gardner, S, ‘Knowing Assistance and Knowing Receipt: Taking Stock’ (1996) 112 LQR56, 57−64Google Scholar
Low, KFK, ‘The Nature of Torrens Indefeasibility: Understanding the Limits of Personal Equities’ (2009) 33 MULR205, 229−30Google Scholar
Chambers, R, ‘Knowing Receipt: Frozen in Australia’ (2007) 2 J Eq40Google Scholar
Harding, M, ‘Barnes v Addy Claims and the Indefeasibility of Torrens Title’ (2007) 31 MULR343Google Scholar
Atkin, H, ‘“Knowing Receipt” Following Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd’ (2007) 29 Syd LR713Google Scholar
Griggs, L, ‘In Personam: Barnes v Addy and the High Court's Deliberations in Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd’ (2008) 15 APLJ9Google Scholar
Fox, PM, ‘The Story Behind the Torrens System’ (1950) 23 ALJ 489Google Scholar
Robinson, Cf S, Transfer of Land in Victoria (The Law Book Co, Sydney 1979) 1−25Google Scholar
Pike, D, ‘Introduction of the Real Property Act in South Australia’ (1961) 1 Adel L Rev 169Google Scholar
Moore, JP, ‘Equity, Restitution and In Personam Claims Under the Torrens System’ (1998) 72 ALJ258, (1999) 73 ALJ 712Google Scholar
Griggs, L, ‘In Personam, Garcia v NAB and the Torrens System: Are They Reconcilable?’ (2001) 1 QUTLJ76Google Scholar
Christensen, S and Duncan, B, ‘Is Indefeasibility of Title a Bar to Restitution After Reversal of a Judgment on Appeal?’ (2005) 11 APLJ17Google Scholar
Robinson, S, ‘Claims In Personam in the Torrens System: Some General Principles’ (1993) 67 ALJ355Google Scholar
Tooher, JG, ‘Muddying the Torrens Waters with the Chancellor's Foot? Bahr v Nicolay’ (1993) 1 APLJ1Google Scholar
Skapinker, D, ‘Equitable Interests, Mere Equities, “Personal” Equities and “Personal Equities”: Distinctions with a Difference’ (1994) 68 ALJ593Google Scholar
Hughson, MA, Neave, M and O'Connor, P, ‘Reflections on the Mirror of Title: Resolving the Conflict between Purchasers and Prior Interest Holders’ (1997) 21 MULR460Google Scholar
Stevens, L and O'Donnell, K, ‘Indefeasibility in Decline: The In Personam Remedies’ in Grinlinton, D (ed), Torrens in the Twenty-First Century (LexisNexis, Wellington 2003) 141Google Scholar
Tang, HW, ‘Beyond the Torrens Mirror: A Framework of the In Personam Exception to Indefeasibility’ (2008) 32 MULR 672Google Scholar
Bradbrook, AJ, MacCullum, SV and Moore, AP, Australian Real Property Law (4th edn Lawbook Co, Sydney 2007) 165Google Scholar
Butt, P, Land Law (5th edn Lawbook Co, Sydney 2006) 788 (emphasis in original)Google Scholar
Saxe, JG, ‘The Blind Men and the Elephant: A Hindoo Fable’ in Saxe, JG, The Poems of John Godfrey Saxe: Complete in One Volume (Ticknor and Fields, Boston 1868) 259−60Google Scholar
Neo, D, Tang, HW and Hor, M (eds), Lives in the Law (NUS Faculty of Law and Academy Publishing, Singapore 2007) 191
Whalan, DJ, The Torrens System in Australia (The Law Book Co, Sydney 1982) 296Google Scholar
Torrens, RR, The South Australian System of Conveyancing by Registration of Title (Register and Observer General Printing Offices, Adelaide 1859) 11Google Scholar
Butt, P, ‘Waste of Every Kind of Energy’ (1992) 127 ALN28Google Scholar
Neave, M, ‘Towards a Uniform Torrens System: Principles and Pragmatism’ (1993) 1 APLJ114Google Scholar
MacCallum, SV, ‘Uniformity of Torrens Legislation’ (1993) 1 APLJ135Google Scholar
Kerr, E, ‘Property Law: Uniformity of Laws: Towards a National Property Practice’ (1993) 1 APLJ145Google Scholar
Harrison, WN, ‘Indefeasibility of Torrens Title’ (1952) 2 UQLJ206Google Scholar
Mee, J, ‘Undue Influence, Misrepresentation and the Doctrine of Notice’ (1995) 54 CLJ536, 541−2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennion, FAR, Statutory Interpretation (5th edn LexisNexis, London 2008)Google Scholar
Megarry, R and Wade, HWR, The Law of Real Property (5th edn Stevens & Sons, London 1984) 587Google Scholar
Spence, M, Protecting Reliance (Hart Publishing, Oxford 1999)Google Scholar
McBride, NJ, ‘A Fifth Common Law Obligation’ (1994) 14 LS35Google Scholar
Robertson, A, ‘Situating Equitable Estoppel within the Law of Obligations’ (1997) 19 Syd LR32Google Scholar
Robertson, A, ‘Reliance, Conscience and the New Equitable Estoppel’ (2000) 24 MULR218Google Scholar
Benson, P, ‘The Unity of Contract Law’ in P Benson (ed), The Theory of Contract Law: New Essays (Cambridge University Press, New York 2001) 118−205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A, ‘The Statute of Frauds, Equitable Estoppel and the Need for “Something More”’ (2003) 19 JCL173Google Scholar
Cooke, E, The Modern Law of Estoppel (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalan, DJ, ‘The Meaning of Fraud Under the Torrens System’ (1975) 2 NZULR207Google Scholar
Butt, P, ‘Notice and Fraud in the Torrens System: A Comparative Analysis’ (1977) 13 UWAL Rev354Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×