Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Introduction
- PART I FROM THE HISTORY AND STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LEGITIMACY TO FAULT LINES IN CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL POLITICS
- PART II THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL: EXPRESSION, VENUE, AND PROMOTER OF INTERNATIONAL LEGITIMACY?
- 6 Legal Deliberation and Argumentation in International Decision Making
- 7 The UN Security Council, Regional Arrangements, and Peacekeeping Operations
- 8 The Security Council's Alliance of Gender Legitimacy: The Symbolic Capital of Resolution 1325
- PART III LEGITIMACY OF INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTIONS AND HIERARCHY OF INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS
- PART IV IN SEARCH OF NEW FORMS OF INTERNATIONAL LEGITIMACY: BETWEEN POWER AND PRINCIPLES
- Conclusion: The Legitimacies of International Law
- Index
- References
8 - The Security Council's Alliance of Gender Legitimacy: The Symbolic Capital of Resolution 1325
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2010
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Introduction
- PART I FROM THE HISTORY AND STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LEGITIMACY TO FAULT LINES IN CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL POLITICS
- PART II THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL: EXPRESSION, VENUE, AND PROMOTER OF INTERNATIONAL LEGITIMACY?
- 6 Legal Deliberation and Argumentation in International Decision Making
- 7 The UN Security Council, Regional Arrangements, and Peacekeeping Operations
- 8 The Security Council's Alliance of Gender Legitimacy: The Symbolic Capital of Resolution 1325
- PART III LEGITIMACY OF INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTIONS AND HIERARCHY OF INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS
- PART IV IN SEARCH OF NEW FORMS OF INTERNATIONAL LEGITIMACY: BETWEEN POWER AND PRINCIPLES
- Conclusion: The Legitimacies of International Law
- Index
- References
Summary
The Security Council recognizes that peace is inextricably linked with equality between women and men…[and] that the equal access and full participation of women in power structures and their full involvement in all efforts for the prevention and resolution of conflicts are essential for the maintenance and promotion of peace and security.
– Ambassador Anwarul Karim Chowdury (2000) President, UN Security CouncilRecent feminist efforts to engage with the United Nations (UN) Security Council could be dismissed as a futile attempt to employ the “master's tools” to dismantle the “master's house.” There is a long history of lip service by international institutions to the antimilitaristic ways of thinking that have been at the heart of women's peace movements for centuries. However unlikely it was, these efforts have borne fruit as evidenced by the Statement of the Council's President, Bangladeshi Ambassador Chowdury, on International Women's Day in 2000, linking gender equality “inextricably” with peace, the core project of the UN. The Statement was followed several months later, on October 31, by the Council's unanimous adoption of Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security. The resolution calls for inter alia the increased participation of women in decision making related to the prevention, management, and resolution of armed conflict. Although it is nonbinding, the resolution has been enormously productive. Not only has it provided the basis for strengthening institutional commitment to gender mainstreaming and continuing annual dialogue between women's peace advocates and the Security Council in New York, it has also supplied leverage for many grassroots women's groups to claim a role in peace negotiations and postconflict decision making.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fault Lines of International Legitimacy , pp. 239 - 276Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(1993). “The Master's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master's House,” in Zami, Sister Outsider, Undersong (New York: Quality Paperback Book Club), pp. 110–113Google Scholar
(1999). “The Silencing of Women,” in & (eds.), Human Rights in Global Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 259Google Scholar
(2006). “A Sign of ‘Weakness’? Disrupting Gender Certainties in the Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325,” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 13, no. 1, 113Google Scholar
(1985). Most Dangerous Women: Feminist Peace Campaigners of the Great War (London: Pandora)Google Scholar
(1997). Worlds of Women: The Making of an International Women's Movement (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 19, 51–81Google Scholar
, , & (2004). “Women, Peace and Security: Resolution 1325,” International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 6, no. 1, 130, 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power at the United Nations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
; ; ; & (2006). “From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape, Prostitution/Sex Work, and Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism,” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, Vol. 29: 335Google Scholar
, & (2002). Women, War, and Peace: The Independent Experts' Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women's Role in Peacebuilding (New York: United Nations Development Fund for Women)Google Scholar
(2003). Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 167–179Google Scholar
(2002). “The Security Council,” in (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
(1993). Cooperating for Peace: The Global Agenda for the 1990s and Beyond (Sydney: Allen & Unwin)Google Scholar
(1991). “The Use of Force in the Persian Gulf,” in & (eds.), Law and Force in the New International Order (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), p. 3Google Scholar
(1991). “Security Council Resolution 678 and Persian Gulf Decision Making: Precarious Legitimacy,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85: 516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). “The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87: 552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). “The Security Council, Legitimacy, and the Concept of Collective Security After the Cold War,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 32: 201Google Scholar
(1995). “The Police in the Temple: Order, Justice, and the UN: A Dialectical View,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 6/3: 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). “The Security Council in the 1990s: Inconsistent, Improvisational, Indispensable?,” in & (eds.), New Millennium, New Perspectives: The United Nations, Security, and Governance (Toronto: United Nations University Press), p. 21Google Scholar
(1994). “Expanding the Permanent Membership in the UN Security Council: Opening a Pandora's Box of Needed Change?,” Dickenson Journal of International Law, Vol. 12: 173Google Scholar
(ed.) (1997). The Once and Future Security Council (New York: St. Martin's Press)
(1995). “The Security Council's First Fifty Years,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 89: 506, 518–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). “The ‘Powers of Appreciation’: Who Is the Ultimate Guardian of UN Legality?,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 86: 519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). “The Constitutional Crisis in the United Nations,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87: 83, 86Google Scholar
(1992). “The Security Council and Human Rights: Lessons to be Learned from the Iraq–Kuwait Crisis and Its Aftermath,” Australian Yearbook on International Law, Vol. 13: 107Google Scholar
(1999–2000). “A Human Security Council? Applying a ‘Human Security’ Agenda to Security Council Reform,” Ottawa Law Review/Revue de droit d'Ottawa, Vol. 31: 213, 219Google Scholar
(1989). “Is Justice Relevant to the International Legal System?,” Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 64: 945Google Scholar
, & (1989). “Justice in the International System,” Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 10: 127Google Scholar
(1991). “The Quest for Legitimacy: An Examination of The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations by Thomas M. Franck,” New York University Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 24: 199Google Scholar
(2000). “Reconsidering the Legality of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from Kosovo,” William and Mary Law Review, Vol. 41: 1743, 1751Google Scholar
(ed.) (1994). Mass Rape: The War Against Women in Bosnia-Herzegovenia (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press)
(1975). Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape (New York: Simon & Schuster), pp. 40–86Google Scholar
(1997). The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II (New York: Basic Books)Google Scholar
(2001). “Women's International Tribunal on Japanese Military Sexual Slavery,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 95/2: 335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). “Women, Human Rights, and International Humanitarian Law,” International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 324: 421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). “The Politics of Collective Security,” Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 17: 373, pp. 378–380Google Scholar
, & (2000). “Women and Armed Conflict: The International Response to the Beijing Platform for Action,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 32: 1, p. 18Google Scholar
(1993). The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (Berkley: University of California Press), p. 259Google Scholar
(2003). “Note: Who Will Police the Peacebuilders? The Failure to Establish Accountability of United Nations Civilian Police in the Trafficking of Women in Postconflict Bosnia and Herzegovina,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 34: 475, 528Google Scholar
(2003). “Gender, Human Rights, and Peace Agreements,” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 18: 867, 874Google Scholar
(1992). Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 54–66Google Scholar
, & (2000). The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 275–276Google Scholar
(2002). “Iraq, Sanctions, and Security: A Critique,” Duke Journal of Gender, Law, and Policy, Vol. 9: 237Google Scholar
(2007). “The Security Council and Norm Consumption,” New York University Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 40: 115Google Scholar
(1999). “Whose Security? Re-imagining Post–Cold War Peacekeeping from a Feminist Perspective,” in (ed.), Security in a Post–Cold War World (London: Macmillan Press), pp. 81–85Google Scholar
(1991). “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction,” in , , & (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1, 46Google Scholar
(1996). Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics (St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin), pp. 105–106Google Scholar
(2000). Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives (Berkley: University of California Press), pp. 3–4Google Scholar
(2004). Governing Women, Governing Security: Governmentality, Gender Mainstreaming, and Women's Activism at the UN, unpublished thesis, Graduate Program in Social Anthropology (Toronto: York University), pp. 60–61Google Scholar
(1993). “Wars, Wimps, and Women,” in & (eds.), Gendering War Talk (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), p. 227Google Scholar
“Friends of Women, Peace, and Security,” 1325 PeaceWomen E-News, Vol. 3, June 28, 2002, p. 4
(2002). Women, Peace and Security: Study Submitted by the Secretary-General Pursuant to Security Council Resolution S/RES/1325 (2000) (New York: United Nations)Google Scholar
(1999). “Feminist Methods in International Law,” American Journal of International Law93/2: 379Google Scholar
(2000). “Feminist Curiosity Unravels Militarism: Why Method Matters,” Berkley Women's Law Journal, p. 338Google Scholar
(2000). Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives (Berkley: University of California Press)Google Scholar
“Statements by Women from War-Torn Countries,” 1325 PeaceWomen E-News, Vol. 12, November 1, 2002, p. 6
(2002). “Women and Peace and Security: The Implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325,” Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, Vol. 9: 253, 255Google Scholar
(2002). “We Want to Live as Humans”: Repression of Women and Girls in Western Afghanistan (New York: Human Rights Watch)Google Scholar
(2003). Afghanistan: “No One Listens to Us and No One Treats Us as Human Beings”: Justice Denied to Women (London: Amnesty International)Google Scholar
(2003). “Killing You Is a Very Easy Thing for Us”: Human Rights Abuses in Southeast Afghanistan (New York: Human Rights Watch), July, pp. 24–28, 70–88Google Scholar
, & (2002). “Women and Human Rights in the Rebuilding of East Timor,” Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 71: 325, 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1998). “Who Needs [Sex] When You Can Have [Gender]? Conflicting Discourses on Gender at Beijing,” in & (eds.), Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy (New York: Routledge), pp. 19, 22Google Scholar
, & (2005). “Afghans Delay Vote a Third Time: Assembly Elections Moved to September,” International Herald Tribune, March 18, p. 5Google Scholar
(2002). “Feminism, Imperialism, and the Mission of International Law,” Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 71: 275, p. 286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). From Tribal Village to Global Village: Indian Rights and International Relations in Latin America (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press)Google Scholar
, & (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
(1998). “Women and the Evolution of World Politics,” Foreign Affairs Vol. 77/5: 24, 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
; ; ; & (1999). “Fukuyama's Follies: So What If Women Ruled the World?,” Foreign Affairs Vol. 78/1: 118–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by