Book contents
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Therapeutic Approaches
- Part III Third Party Reproduction: Assessment and Preparation
- Part IV Addressing the Needs of Diverse Populations
- Part V Special Topics in Fertility Counseling
- Part VI Practice Issues
- Index
- References
Part III - Third Party Reproduction: Assessment and Preparation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2022
Edited by
Book contents
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Therapeutic Approaches
- Part III Third Party Reproduction: Assessment and Preparation
- Part IV Addressing the Needs of Diverse Populations
- Part V Special Topics in Fertility Counseling
- Part VI Practice Issues
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies , pp. 49 - 82Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
Illioi, E, Blake, L, Vasanti, J, et al. The role of age of disclosure of biological origins in the psychological well-being of adolescents conceived by reproductive donation: a longitudinal study from age 1 to age 14. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2017;58(3):315–324.Google Scholar
References
Katznelson, H. Reflective functioning: a review. Clin Psychol Rev 2015;34(2):107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, AL. The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. J Appl Psychol 1953;37(2):90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, AM. Mental health counseling in third-party reproduction in the United States: evaluation, psychoeducation, or ethical gatekeeping? Fertil Steril 2015;104(3):501–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Klock, SC, Sheinin, S, Kazer, RR. The disposition of unused frozen embryos. N Engl J Med 2001;345(1):69–70.Google Scholar
Christianson, MS, Stern, JE, Fangbai, S, et al. Embryo cryopreservation and utilization in the United States from 2004–2013. Fertil Steril 2020;1(2):71–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Nachtigall, RD, Becker, G, Friese, C, Butler, A, MacDougall, K. Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril 2005;84(2):431–434.Google Scholar
Goedeke, S, Daniels, K. We wanted to choose us: how embryo donors choose recipients for their surplus embryos. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2018;36(2):132–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, C, Saunders, D. Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation. In Vitro Fertilization 2009;91(1):140–147.Google ScholarPubMed
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Defining embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2016;106(1):15–282.Google Scholar
Parth, K, Datz, F, Seidman, C, Löffler-Stastka, H. Transference and countertransference: a review. Bull Menninger Clin 2017;81(2):167–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Australian and New Zealand Infertility Counsellors Association. ANZICA Guidelines for Professional Standards of Practice: Donor Linking Counselling. Available at: www.fertilitysociety.com.au/professional-groups-anzica-australia-new-zealand/ [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
Donor Conception and IVF: Books for Children. Blog written by Patricia Sarles MA, MLS, MSEd. Available at: http://booksfordonoroffspring.blogspot.com/2009/04/sometimes-it-takes-three-to-make-baby.html [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
We are Donor Conceived Facebook Group, 2.4 k members. Available at: www.facebook.com/groups/wearedonorconceived [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
Reddit Group. Donor conceived: a place for those conceived through gamete donation. 1.7 k members. Available at: www.reddit.com/r/donorconceived/ [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
Donor Conception Network. Available at: www.dcnetwork.org/products/product/telling-and-talking-17-yrs [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
Donor Conception Network. Available at: www.dcnetwork.org/who-are-you/donor-conceived-person/questions [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
We Are Donor Conceived. Available at: www.wearedonorconceived.com/personal-stories/dear-donor/ [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
References
Crawshaw, M, Montuschi, O. It ‘did what it said on the tin’: participants’ views of the content and process of Donor Conception Parenthood Preparation Workshops. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2014;17(1):11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fine, K, Mitchell, T. Donor conception: family of choice. In: Fine K, (Ed.), Donor Conception for Life. London: Karnac Books, 2015, pp. 69–93Google Scholar
Donor Conception Network. Telling and Talking series, including Continuing the Conversation and Mixed Blessings. Available at: www.dcnetwork.org/catalog [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
HFEA. Code of Practice (9th ed.). Available at: https://portal.hfea.gov.uk/knowledge-base/read-the-code-of-practice/ [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
Daniels, K. Building a Family with the Assistance of Donor Insemination. Wellington, NZ: Dunmore Press Ltd., 2004.Google Scholar
Saransohn Glazer, E, Weidman, E. Having Your Baby Through Egg Donation (2nd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley, 2013.Google Scholar