Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:15:39.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 10 - Ethical, Legal, and Religious Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2021

Edited by
Jacques Donnez  and
S. Samuel Kim
Jacques Donnez
Affiliation:
Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels
S. Samuel Kim
Affiliation:
University of Kansas School of Medicine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Preservation
Principles and Practice
 , pp. 433 - 461
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Gosden, RG. Fertility preservation – definition, history and prospect. Semin Reprod Med, 2009;27(6):433–437.Google Scholar
Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M et al. (eds.). SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975–2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/19752006/Google Scholar
Bromer, JG, Patrizio, P. Gynecologic management of fertility. In Wingardc, JR, Gastineau, D, Leather, H, Snyder, EL, Szczepiorkowski, ZM (eds.) Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Clinician’s Handbook. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press. 2009, 583–594.Google Scholar
Patrizio, P, Butt, S, Caplan, A. Ovarian tissue preservation and future fertility: emerging technologies and ethical considerations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 2005;34:107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirtz, DG, Fitzsimmons, LG. Regulatory and ethical issues in the conduct of clinical research involving children. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2002:14;669–675.Google Scholar
Grundy, R, Larcher, V, Gosden, RG et al. Fertility preservation for children treated for cancer (2): ethics of consent for gamete storage and experimentation. Arch Dis Child, 2001;84:360–362.Google Scholar
Thompson, A, Critchley, H, Kelnar, C, Wallace, WHB. Late reproductive sequelae following treatment of childhood cancer and options for fertility preservation. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002;16:311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. Research in children. Crit Care Med, 2003;31(Suppl.):S131–S136.Google Scholar
Grundy, R, Larcher, V, Gosden, RG et al. Fertility preservation for children treated for cancer (1): scientific advances and research dilemmas. Arch Dis Child, 2001;84:355–359.Google Scholar
Bahadur, G. Ethics of testicular stem cells medicine. Hum Reprod, 2004;19:2702–2710.Google Scholar
Klock, S, Jacob, M, Maier, D. A prospective study of donor insemination of recipients: secrecy, privacy and disclosure. Fertil Steril, 1994;62(3):477–484.Google Scholar
Mc, Gee G, Vaughan, Brakman S, Gurmankin, A. Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes is not optional. Hum Reprod, 2001;16:2033–2035.Google Scholar
Patrizio, P, Mastroianni, A, Mastroianni, L. Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional. Hum Reprod, 2001;16:2036–2038.Google Scholar
Blyth, E, Cameron, C. The welfare of the child: an emerging issue in the regulation of assisted conception. Hum Reprod, 1998;13:2339–2342.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertil Steril, 2004; 81(3): 527–531.Google Scholar
Human Genetic Commission. Choosing the Future: Genetics and Reproductive Decision Making. London: Department of Health, 2004.Google Scholar
Donnez, J, Dolmans, MM, Demylle, D et al. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet, 2004;364(9443):1405–1410.Google Scholar
Donnez, J, Martinez-Madrid, B, Jadoul, P et al. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review. Hum Reprod Update, 2006;12(5):519–535.Google Scholar
Meirow, D, Levron, J, Eldar-Geva, T et al. Pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a patient with ovarian failure after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med, 2005;353(3):318–321.Google Scholar
Jensen, AK, Kristensen, SG, Macklon, KT et al. Outcomes of transplantations of cryopreserved ovarian tissue to 41 women in Denmark. Hum Reprod, 2015;30:2838–2845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Ven, H, Liebenthron, J, Beckmann, M et al. Ninety-five orthotopic transplantations in 74 women of ovarian tissue after cytotoxic treatment in a fertility preservation network: tissue activity, pregnancy and delivery rates. Hum Reprod, 2016;31(9):2031–2041.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Serrano, M, Crespo, J, Mirabet, V et al. Twins born after transplantation of ovarian cortical tissue and oocyte vitrification. Fertil Steril, 2010;93(1):268 e11–e13.Google Scholar
Silber, SJ, DeRosa, M, Pineda, J et al. A series of monozygotic twins discordant for ovarian failure: ovary transplantation (cortical versus microvascular) and cryopreservation. Hum Reprod, 2008;23:1531–1537.Google Scholar
Shapira, M, Raanani, H, Barshack, I et al. First delivery in a leukemia survivor after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue, evaluated for leukemia cells contamination. Fertil Steril, 2018;109:48–53.Google Scholar
Silber, SJ, Grudzinskas, G, Gosden, RG. Successful pregnancy after microsurgical transplantation of an intact ovary. N Engl J Med, 2008;359:2617–2618.Google Scholar
Rettig, R, Jacobson, R, Farquhar, C, Aubry, W. False Hope. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lee, S, Schover, L, Partridge, A et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol, 2006; 28(18):2917–2931.Google Scholar
Mc, Gee G, Patrizio, P, Kuhn, V, Kraft-Robertson, C. The ethics of stem cell therapy. In Patrizio, P, Guelman, V, Tucker, M (eds.) A Color Atlas for Human Assisted Reproduction, Laboratory and Clinical Insights. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. 2003, 297–309.Google Scholar
Caplan, AL, Patrizio, P. The beginning of the end of the embryo wars. Lancet, 2009;373:1074–1075.Google Scholar
Robertson, JA. Procreative liberty, harm to offspring, and assisted reproduction. Am J Law Med, 2004;30:7–40.Google Scholar
Robertson, JA. Cancer and fertility: ethical and legal challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 2005; 34:104–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Campo- Engelstein L. For the sake of consistency and fairness: why insurance companies should cover fertility preservation treatment for iatrogenic infertility. Cancer Treat Res 2010;156:381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, JR, Su, HI, Roberts, SC, Dominick, SA, Malcarne, VL. Experiencing reproductive concerns as a female cancer survivor is associated with depression. Cancer, 2015;121:935–942. DOI:10.1002/cncr.29133]Google Scholar
King, L, Quinn, GP, Vandaparampil, ST et al. Oncology nurses’ perceptions of barriers to discussion of fertility preservation with patients with cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2008;12:467–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, RH. Survey: little awareness of the ASCO fertility-preservation guidelines by cancer specialists. Oncology Times, 2009;31:26–30.Google Scholar
Schover, LR, Brey, K, Lichtin, A, Lipshultz, LI, Jeha, S. Oncologists’ attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol, 2002;20:1890–1897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, NA, Braun, IM, Meyer, FL. Impact of fertility preservation counseling and treatment on psychological outcomes among women with cancer: a systematic review. Cancer, 2015;121(22):3938–3947. DOI:10.1002/cncr.29637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, EM, Benson, JD, Woods, EJ, Crister, JK. The history of sperm cryopreservation. In Pacey, AA, Tomlinson, MJ (eds.) Sperm Banking Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2009, 1–17.Google Scholar
Practice Committees of ASRM and SART. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a practice guideline. Fertil Steril, 2013;99(1):37–43.Google Scholar
Lee, SJ, Schover, LR, Partridge, AH et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol, 2006;24:1–16.Google Scholar
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making Health Care Decisions. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. 1982, 2–3.Google Scholar
Oktay, K, Harvey, BE, Partridge, AH et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol, 2018;36:1994–2001.Google Scholar
The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril, 2005;83:1622–1628.Google Scholar
Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772, 780 (D.C. Cir. 1972).Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of ASRM. Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: an ethics committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2018;110(3):380–386.Google Scholar
Insogna, IG, Ginsburg, ES, Partridge, AH. Fertility preservation in BRCA carriers: special considerations. In Chagpar, B A. (ed.) Managing BRCA Mutation Carriers. Springer: Cham. 2017.Google Scholar
Friedman, LC, Kramer, RM. Reproductive issues for women with BRCA mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 2005;34:83–86.Google Scholar
Jeruss, JS, Woodruff, TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. NEJM, 2009;360:902–911.Google Scholar
Rosoff, PM, Kastur, ML. Preserving fertility in young cancer patients: a medical, ethical and legal challenge. J Philos, Sci Law 2003;3 at www.psljournal.com/archives/papers/preservingFert.cfm Visited December 10, 2009.Google Scholar
Smith, K, Efymow, B, Gracia, C. Patient navigation and coordination of care for the oncofertility patient: a practical guide. In Gracia, C, Woodruff, T (eds.) Oncofertility Medical Practice. New York: Springer. 2012.Google Scholar
Lacey v. Laird, 166 Ohio St. 12; 139 N.E.2d 25; 1956 Ohio LEXIS 610; 1 Ohio Op. 2d 158, 1956.Google Scholar
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 US 510 (1925).Google Scholar
Glantz, LH. Research with children. Am J Law Med, 1998;24:213–244.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 1995;95:314–317.Google Scholar
Ohio v. Akron Ctr. For Reprod. Health, 497 US 502, 510 (1990).Google Scholar
Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622 (1979).Google Scholar
Capacity of minor to obtain treatment for venereal disease without consent of parent. A.R.S. § 44–132.01 (2009).Google Scholar
Treatment for health-related problems. Md. HEALTH-GENERAL Code Ann. § 20–102 (2009).Google Scholar
Consent by assault victim to treatment. Cal. Fam. Code § 6928 (2009).Google Scholar
Dolin, G, Roberts, DE, Rodriguez, LM, Woodruff, TK. Medical hope, legal pitfalls: Potential legal issues in the emerging field of oncofertility. Santa Clara L. Rev, 2009;49:673–716.Google Scholar
In re Guardianship of Hayes, 608 P.2d 635 (1980).Google Scholar
Additional Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research. 45 C.F.R. 46 401, et seq. 2009.Google Scholar
Nahata, L, Quinn, GP, Tishelman, AC. Counseling in pediatric populations at risk for infertility and/or sexual function concerns, Pediatrics, 2018,142(2)e20181435; DOI:10.1542/peds.2018-1435Google Scholar
Fallat, ME, Hutter, J. AAP Committee on Bioethics, AAP Section on Hematology/ Oncology, and AAP Section on Surgery. Preservation of fertility in pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer. Pediatrics, 2008;121:e1461–e1469.Google Scholar
Robertson, JA. Cancer and fertility: ethical and legal challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 2005;34:104–106.Google Scholar
Font‐Gonzalez, A, Mulder, RL, Loeffen, EA. Fertility preservation in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer: quality of clinical practice guidelines and variations in recommendations. Cancer, 2016;122:2216–2223. DOI:10.1002/cncr.30047Google Scholar
Morreim, EH. Medical research litigation and malpractice tort doctrines: Courts on a learning curve. Houst J Health Law Policy, 2003;4:1–86.Google Scholar
Protection of Human Subjects. 45 C.F.R. 46, et. seq. (2009).Google Scholar
Criteria for IRB approval of research. 45 C.F.R. 46. 111.Google Scholar
General requirements for informed consent. 45 C.F.R. 46. 116.Google Scholar
The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Essential elements of informed consent for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2008;90:S134–S135.Google Scholar
Office for Human Research Protections. OHRP research involving children frequently asked questions. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/researchfaq.html#q12 (Accessed December 27, 2009).Google Scholar
Research not involving greater than minimal risk. 45 CFR 46.404.Google Scholar
Research involving greater than minimal risk but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to the individual subjects. 45 CFR 46.405.Google Scholar
Wharton, J. Law and biology: ‘Miracle’ baby denied benefits. Am Bar Assoc J, 1996;82:38.Google Scholar
Woodward v. Commissioner, 760 N.E. 2d 257 (2002).Google Scholar
Peres, J. Children from beyond the grave: surrogate carrying dead woman’s baby. Chicago Tribune. December 15, 1997; 1.Google Scholar
Daar, J, Benward, J, Collins, L et al. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2018;110:1022–1028. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.027.)Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Posthumous retrieval and use of gametes or embryos: an ethics committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2018;110(1):45–49.Google Scholar
Parentage of child resulting from assisted conception. Va. Code Ann. § 20–158 (2009).Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. State laws related to insurance coverage for infertility treatment. 2018. www.ncsl.org/research/health/insurance-coverage-for-infertility-laws.aspx (Accessed December 4, 2018.)Google Scholar
Infertility coverage. § 215 ILCS 5/356 m. (2009).Google Scholar
State of Connecticut. An act requiring health insurance coverage for fertility preservation for insureds diagnosed with cancer; 2017. www.cga.ct.gov/2017/TOB/h/2017HB-05968-R01-HB.htmGoogle Scholar
State of Rhode Island. An Act Relating to Insurance- Coverage for Infertility, § 27–20-20 a.; 2017.Google Scholar
Insurance CD-Fertility Preservation: HB 2617; 2018. www.ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=2617&GAID=14&GA=100&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=103887&SessionID=91#actionsGoogle Scholar

References

Cahill, LS. Theological Bioethics: Participation, Justice, Change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2005, 169–210.Google Scholar
Meilaender, G. Bioethics: A Primer for Christians. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996, 11–25.Google Scholar
Waters, B. Reproductive Technology: Towards a Theology of Procreative Stewardship. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2001.Google Scholar
St Augustine. The Good of Marriage. Various translations and editions.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. The Way of the Lord Jesus, Volume Two: Living a Christian Life. Quincy, IL: Franciscan Press, 1993, 553–752.Google Scholar
Waters, B. This Mortal Flesh: Incarnation and Bioethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2009, 49–60.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Respect for Human Life (Donum Vitae). 1987. www.cin.org/vatcong/donumvit.html (Accessed November 23, 2009).Google Scholar
Felker Jones, B. Marks of His Wounds: Gender Politics and Bodily Resurrection. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, 11.Google Scholar
Waters, B. This Mortal Flesh: Incarnation and Bioethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2009, 115–130.Google Scholar
Ramsey, P. The Patient as Person: Explorations in Medical Ethics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970, 113–164.Google Scholar
Waters, B. Dying and Death: A Resource for Christian Reflection. Cleveland, OH: United Church Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Cahill, LS. Sex, Gender, and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 246–249.Google Scholar
Waters, B. Welcoming children into our homes: a theological reflection on adoption. Scot J Theolog 2002;55:424–437.Google Scholar
Ramsey, P. Human sexuality in the history of redemption. J Relig Ethics, 1988;16(1):56–86.Google Scholar
Cole-Turner, R, Waters, B. Pastoral Genetics: Theology and Care at the Beginning of Life. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press, 1996, 93–110.Google Scholar
McKenny, G. To Relieve the Human Condition: Bioethics, Technology, and the Body. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cole-Turner, R, Waters, B. Pastoral Genetics: Theology and Care at the Beginning of Life. Cleveland OH: Pilgrim Press, 1996, 133–141.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. Genetic Turning Points: The Ethics of Human Genetic Intervention. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. Suffering Presence: Theological Reflections on Medicine, the Mentally Handicapped, and the Church. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Donum Vitae and Paul VI. On the Regulation of Birth (Humanae Vitae), 1968. www.papalencyclicals.net/Paul06/p6humana.htm (Accessed November 29, 2009).Google Scholar
Mitchell, CB, Pellegrino, ED, Elshtain, JB, Kilner, JF, Rae, SB. Biotechnology and the Human Good. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. The Way of the Lord Jesus, Volume Two: Living a Christian Life. Quincy, IL: Franciscan Press, 1993, 489–497.Google Scholar
Meilaender, G. Neither Beast nor God: The Dignity of the Human Person. New York: Encounter Books, 2009, 87–104.Google Scholar
Grant, G. English-speaking Justice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1985, 69–89.Google Scholar
Grant, G. Technology and Justice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986, 117–130.Google Scholar
Waters, B, Cole-Turner, R (eds.). God and the Embryo: Religious Voices on Stem Cells and Cloning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Waters, B. This Mortal Flesh: Incarnation and Bioethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2009, 77–90.Google Scholar
Fern, R. Nature, God and Humanity: Envisioning an Ethics of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Scott, P. A Political Theology of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Cahill, LS (ed.). Genetics, Theology, and Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Conversation. New York: Herder and Herder, 2005.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984, 6–35.Google Scholar
Hall, A. Conceiving Parenthood: American Protestantism and the Spirit of Reproduction. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar
Spar, D. The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2006, 97–127.Google Scholar
Claar, V, Klay, R. Economics in Christian Perspective: Theory, Policy and Life Choices. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Novak, M. The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism. Lanham, NY: Madison Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Barth, K. Church Dogmatics: The Doctrine of Creation. Edinburgh: T and T Clark, 1961: III/4, 54–56, 116–685.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Peters, T. For the Love of Children: Genetic Technology and the Future of the Family. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Meilaender, G. Body, Soul, and Bioethics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995, 61–88.Google Scholar
Waters, B. Reproductive Technology: Towards a Theology of Procreative Stewardship. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2001, 9–31, 81–127.Google Scholar
John, Paul II. The Gospel of Life (Evangelium Vitae), 1995. www.vatican.va/holywww.father/johnpaulii/encyclicals/documents/hfjp-iienc25031995evangelium-vitaeen.html (Accessed November 30, 2009).Google Scholar
Cole-Turner, R. The New Genesis: Theology and the Genetic Revolution. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cole-Turner, R. Toward a theology for the age of biotechnology. In Cole-Turner, R. (ed.) Beyond Cloning: Religion and the Remaking of Humanity. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International. 2001, 137–150.Google Scholar
Berkman, J. Adopting embryos in America: a case study and ethical analysis. Scot J Theolog, 2002;55(4):438–460.Google Scholar
De Chardin, PT. The Future of Man. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Borgmann, A. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ellul, J. The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books, 1964.Google Scholar
Grant, G. Technology and Justice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Waters, B. From Human to Posthuman: Christian Theology and Technology in a Postmodern World. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. Morals and Medicine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. The Ethics of Genetics Control: Ending Reproductive Roulette. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1974.Google Scholar
McCormick, R. How Brave a New World? Dilemmas in Bioethics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1981.Google Scholar
Ramsey, P. Fabricated Man: The Ethics of Genetic Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Ramsey, P. The Patient as Person: Explorations in Medical Ethics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Jonsen, A. The Birth of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×