Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T19:48:47.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 41 - Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction: Pathophysiology, Prenatal Assessment, and In Utero Intervention

from Fetal Urinary Tract Obstruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Get access

Summary

Congenital renal and urinary tract anomalies are common, accounting for up to 21% of all congenital abnormalities [1]. The reported incidence is approximately 1:250–1:1000 pregnancies [2] and the routine use of prenatal ultrasonography allows relatively early detection, particularly for the obstructive uropathies, which account for the majority. According to the latest UK renal registry report in 2015, ‘obstructive uropathy’ was the second leading cause (19%) of chronic renal failure in children under 16 years of age after renal dysplasia +/− reflux [3]. The obstructions may occur within the upper or lower urinary tract, and their prognosis varies significantly, with obstructions at the level of the bladder neck being associated with the majority of neonatal mortality and renal failure. In untreated cases, perinatal mortality is high (up to 45%, often because of associated severe oligohydramnios and pulmonary hypoplasia) [4], and 30% of the survivors suffer from end-stage renal failure (ESRF) requiring dialysis and renal transplantation before the age of 5 [5]. The overall chance of survival in childhood is lowest if renal support therapy or transplantation is commenced before 2 years old when compared with starting at 12–16 years old (hazard ratio [HR] of 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7–9.9, P = 0.002) [3]. Therefore, in utero intervention, by the insertion of a vesicoamniotic shunt, or therapeutic treatment by fetal cystoscopy and valvular ablation, has been attempted to attenuate in utero progression of these pathologies (and their consequences) and to alter the natural history of congenital bladder neck obstruction in childhood. In this chapter, we discuss the etiology, pathophysiology, prenatal presentation and diagnosis of congenital bladder neck obstruction. Suggested algorithms for screening and the prenatal prognostic evaluation in selecting candidates for in utero therapy will be discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
, pp. 426 - 437
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grandjean, H, Larroque, D, Levi, S. The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 446–54.Google Scholar
Lewis, MA. Demography of renal disease in childhood. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008; 13: 118–24.Google Scholar
Hamilton, AJ, Braddon, F, Casula, A, Lewis, M, Mallett, T, Marks, SD, Shenoy, M, Sinha, MD, Tse, Y, Maxwell, H. UK Renal Registry 19th Annual Report: Chapter 4 Demography of the UK Paediatric Renal Replacement Therapy Population in 2015. Nephron. 2017; 137: 103–16.Google Scholar
Freedman, AL, Johnson, MP, Gonzalez, R. Fetal therapy for obstructive uropathy: past, present, future? Pediatr Nephrol. 2000; 14: 167–76.Google Scholar
Parkhouse, HF, Barratt, TM, Dillon, MJ, Duffy, PG, Fay, J, Ransley, PG, Woodhouse, CR, Williams, DI. Long-term outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol. 1988; 62: 5962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anumba, DO, Scott, JE, Plant, ND, Robson, SC. Diagnosis and outcome of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction in the northern region of England. Prenat Diagn. 2005; 25: 713.Google Scholar
Malin, G, Tonks, AM, Morris, RK, Gardosi, J, Kilby, MD. Congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: a population-based epidemiological study. BJOG. 2012; 119: 1455–64.Google Scholar
Taghavi, K, Sharpe, C, Stringer, MD. Fetal megacystis: a systematic review. J Pediatr Urol. 2017; 13: 715.Google Scholar
Liao, AW, Sebire, NJ, Geerts, L, Cicero, S, Nicolaides, KH. Megacystis at 10–14 weeks of gestation: chromosomal defects and outcome according to bladder length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 21: 338–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boghossian, NS, Sicko, RJ, Kay, DM, Rigler, SL, Caggana, M, Tsai, MY, et al. Rare copy number variants implicated in posterior urethral valves. Am J Med Genet A. 2016; 170: 622–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richer, J, Milewicz, DM, Gow, R, de Nanassy, J, Maharajh, G, Miller, E, Oppenheimer, L, Weiler, G, O’Connor, M. R179H mutation in ACTA2 expanding the phenotype to include prune-belly sequence and skin manifestations. Am J Med Genet A. 2012; 158A: 664–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boghossian, NS, Sicko, RJ, Giannakou, A, Dimopoulos, A, Caggana, M, Tsai, MY, et al. Rare copy number variants identified in prune belly syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2018; 61: 145–51.Google Scholar
De Sousa, J, Upadhyay, V, Stone, P. Megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome: case reports and discussion of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016; 39: 152–7.Google Scholar
Weber, S, Thiele, H, Mir, S, Toliat, MR, Sozeri, B, Reutter, H, et al. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 mutation causes urinary bladder disease and a prune-belly-like syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2011; 89: 668–74.Google Scholar
Williams, O, Hutchings, G, Hubinont, C, Debauche, C, Greenough, A. Pulmonary effects of prolonged oligohydramnios following mid-trimester rupture of the membranes – antenatal and postnatal management. Neonatology. 2012; 101: 8390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, MR, Ross, N, Noall, R, de Lorimier, AA. Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero. I. The model: fetal urethral obstruction produces hydronephrosis and pulmonary hypoplasia in fetal lambs. J Pediatr Surg. 1983; 18: 247–56.Google Scholar
Harrison, MR, Nakayama, DK, Noall, R, de Lorimier, AA. Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero. II. Decompression reverses the effects of obstruction on the fetal lung and urinary tract. J Pediatr Surg. 1982; 17: 965–74.Google Scholar
Pringle, KC, Kitagawa, H, Seki, Y, Koike, J, Zuccollo, J. Development of an animal model to study congenital urinary obstruction. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013; 29: 1083–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHugo, J, Whittle, M. Enlarged fetal bladders: aetiology, management and outcome. Prenat Diagn. 2001; 21: 958–63.Google Scholar
Kagan, KO, Staboulidou, I, Syngelaki, A, Cruz, J, Nicolaides, KH. The 11–13-week scan: diagnosis and outcome of holoprosencephaly, exomphalos and megacystis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 36: 1014.Google Scholar
Fontanella, F, Duin, L, Adama van Scheltema, PN, Cohen-Overbeek, TE, Pajkrt, E, Bekker, M, Willekes, C, Bax, CJ, Bilardo, CM. Fetal megacystis: prediction of spontaneous resolution and outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50: 458–63.Google Scholar
Newman, J, Antonakopoulos, GN. The fine structure of the human fetal urinary bladder. Development and maturation. A light, transmission and scanning electron microscopic study. J Anat. 1989; 166: 135–50.Google Scholar
Robyr, R, Benachi, A, Daikha-Dahmane, F, Martinovich, J, Dumez, Y, Ville, Y. Correlation between ultrasound and anatomical findings in fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction in the first half of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25: 478–82.Google Scholar
Fievet, L, Faure, A, Coze, S, Harper, L, Panait, N, Braunstein, D, Carson, J, Gorincour, G, Chaumoitre, K, Guys, JM, Alessandrini, P, D’Ercole, C, Merrot, T. Fetal megacystis: etiologies, management, and outcome according to the trimester. Urology. 2014; 84: 185–90.Google Scholar
Montemarano, H, Bulas, DI, Rushton, HG, Selby, D. Bladder distention and pyelectasis in the male fetus: causes, comparisons, and contrasts. J Ultrasound Med. 1998; 17: 743–9.Google Scholar
Chitrit, Y, Bourdon, M, Korb, D, Grapin-Dagorno, C, Joinau-Zoulovits, F, Vuillard, E, et al. Posterior urethral valves and vesicoureteral reflux: can prenatal ultrasonography distinguish between these two conditions in male fetuses? Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36: 831–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardes, LS, Aksnes, G, Saada, J, Masse, V, Elie, C, Dumez, Y, Lortat-Jacob, SL, Benachi, A. Keyhole sign: how specific is it for the diagnosis of posterior urethral valves? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34: 419–23.Google Scholar
Fontanella, F, Duin, LK, Adama van Scheltema, PN, Cohen-Overbeek, TE, Pajkrt, E, Bekker, M, Willekes, C, Bax, CJ, Gracchi, V, Oepkes, D, Bilardo, CM. Prenatal diagnosis of LUTO: how to improve diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 52: 739–43.Google Scholar
Abdelazim, IA, Abdelrazak, KM, Ramy, AR, Mounib, AM. Complementary roles of prenatal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of fetal renal anomalies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 50: 237–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capito, C, Belarbi, N, Paye Jaouen, A, Leger, J, Carel, JC, Oury, JF, Sebag, G, El-Ghoneimi, A. Prenatal pelvic MRI: additional clues for assessment of urogenital obstructive anomalies. J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10: 162–6.Google Scholar
Millischer, AE, Grevent, D, Rousseau, V, O’Gorman, N, Sonigo, P, Bessieres, B, Ville, Y, Boddaert, N, Salomon, LJ. Fetal MRI compared with ultrasound for the diagnosis of obstructive genital malformations. Prenat Diagn. 2017; 37: 1138–45.Google Scholar
Werner, H, Lopes, J, Ribeiro, G, Jésus, NR, Santos, GR, Alexandria, HAF, Ruano, R, Araujo Júnior, E. Three-dimensional virtual cystoscopy: Noninvasive approach for the assessment of urinary tract in fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2017; 37: 1350–2.Google Scholar
Morris, RK, Malin, GL, Khan, KS, Kilby, MD. Antenatal ultrasound to predict postnatal renal function in congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: systematic review of test accuracy. BJOG. 2009; 116: 1290–9.Google Scholar
Harper, L, Waubant, A, Vignes, J, Amat, S, Dobremez, E, Lefevre, Y, Ferdynus, C. Can quantity of amniotic fluid reliably predict postnatal renal function in boys with posterior urethral valves: a decision curve analysis. Prenat Diagn. 2017; 37: 931–4Google Scholar
Johnson, MP, Danzer, E, Koh, J, Polzin, W, Harman, C, O’Shaughnessy, R, Brown, R, Zaretsky, MV, North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet). Natural history of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction with normal amniotic fluid volume at initial diagnosis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017; 44: 1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruano, R, Safdar, A, Au, J, Koh, CJ, Gargollo, P, Shamshirsaz, AA, Espinoza, J, Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO, Olutoye, OA, Welty, S, Roth, DR, Belfort, MA, Braun, MC. Defining and predicting ‘intrauterine fetal renal failure’ in congenital lower urinary tract obstruction. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016; 31: 605–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, MP, Corsi, P, Bradfield, W, Hume, RF, Smith, C, Flake, AW, Qureshi, F, Evans, MI. Sequential urinalysis improves evaluation of fetal renal function in obstructive uropathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173: 5965.Google Scholar
Walsh, DS, Johnson, MP. Fetal interventions for obstructive uropathy. Semin Perinatol. 1999; 23: 484–95.Google Scholar
Morris, RK, Quinlan-Jones, E, Kilby, MD, Khan, KS. Systematic review of accuracy of fetal urine analysis to predict poor postnatal renal function in cases of congenital urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2007; 27: 900–11.Google Scholar
Nassr, AA, Koh, CK, Shamshirsaz, AA, Espinoza, J, Sangi-Haghpeykar, H, Sharhan, D, Welty, S, Angelo, J, Roth, D, Belfort, MA, Braun, M, Ruano, R. Are ultrasound renal aspects associated with urinary biochemistry in fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction? Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36: 1206–10.Google Scholar
Ruano, R, Sananes, N, Wilson, C, Au, J, Koh, CJ, Gargollo, P, et al. Fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: proposal for standardized multidisciplinary prenatal management based on disease severity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 476–82.Google Scholar
Ruano, R, Dunn, T, Braun, MC, Angelo, JR, Safdar, A. Lower urinary tract obstruction: fetal intervention based on prenatal staging. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017; 32: 1871–8.Google Scholar
Farrugia, MK, Braun, MC, Peters, CA, Ruano, R, Herndon, CD. Report on the society for fetal urology panel discussion on the selection criteria and intervention for fetal bladder outlet obstruction. J Pediatr Urol. 2017; 13: 345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, RK, Malin, GL, Quinlan-Jones, E, Middleton, LJ, Hemming, K, Burke, D, Daniels, JP, Khan, KS, Deeks, J, Kilby, MD, Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (PLUTO) Collaborative Group. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1496–506.Google Scholar
Nassr, AA, Shazly, SAM, Abdelmagied, AM, Araujo Júnior, E, Tonni, G, Kilby, MD, Ruano, R. Effectiveness of vesicoamniotic shunt in fetuses with congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 696703.Google Scholar
Freedman, AL, Johnson, MP, Smith, CA, Gonzalez, R, Evans, MI. Long-term outcome in children after antenatal intervention for obstructive uropathies.Lancet. 1999; 354: 374–7.Google Scholar
Morris, RK, Ruano, R, Kilby, MD. Effectiveness of fetal cystoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic intervention for lower urinary tract obstruction: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 37: 629–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sananes, N, Cruz-Martinez, R, Favre, R, Ordorica-Flores, R, Moog, R, Zaloszy, A, Giron, AM, Ruano, R. Two-year outcomes after diagnostic and therapeutic fetal cystoscopy for lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36: 297303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sananes, N, Favre, R, Koh, CJ, Zaloszyc, A, Braun, MC, Roth, DR, Moog, R, Becmeur, F, Belfort, MA, Ruano, R. Urological fistulas after fetal cystoscopic laser ablation of posterior urethral valves: surgical technical aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45: 183–9.Google Scholar
Ruano, R, Sananes, N, Sangi-Haghpeykar, H, Hernandez-Ruano, S, Moog, R, Becmeur, F, Zaloszyc, A, Giron, AM, Morin, B, Favre, R. Fetal intervention for severe lower urinary tract obstruction: a multicenter case-control study comparing fetal cystoscopy with vesicoamniotic shunting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45: 452–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtz, MP, Koh, CJ, Jamail, GA, Sangi-Haghpeykar, H, Shamshirsaz, AA, Espinoza, J, Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO, Olutoye, OA, Braun, MC, Roth, DR, Belfort, MA, Ruano, R. Factors associated with fetal shunt dislodgement in lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36: 720–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diehl, W, Diemert, A, Grasso, D, Sehner, S, Wegscheider, K, Hecher, K. Fetoscopic laser coagulation in 1020 pregnancies with twin-twin transfusion syndrome demonstrates improvement in double-twin survival rate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50: 728–35.Google Scholar
Haeri, S, Simon, DH, Pillutla, K. Serial amnioinfusions for fetal pulmonary palliation in fetuses with renal failure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 174–6.Google Scholar
Gimpel, C, Avni, FE, Bergmann, C, Cetiner, M, Habbig, S, Haffner, D, et al. Perinatal diagnosis, management, and follow-up of cystic renal diseases: a clinical practice recommendation with systematic literature reviews. JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172: 7486.Google Scholar
Sugarman, J, Anderson, J, Baschat, AA, Herrera Beutler, J, Bienstock, JL, Bunchman, TE, et al. Ethical considerations concerning amnioinfusions for treating fetal bilateral renal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: 130–4.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×