Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T21:52:33.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - WTO disciplines and economic dimensions of the 2008 US Farm Bill

from PART 2 - Trade and law: WTO and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2010

Baris Karapinar
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute
Christian Häberli
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute
David Orden
Affiliation:
Senior Research Fellow, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC; Professor and Director, the Global Issues Initiative (GII), Virginia Tech's Institute for Society, Culture, and Environment (ISCE), Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter focuses on the political economy of the US Food, Conservation and Energy (FCE) Act of 2008 in light of current and potential WTO constraints on domestic support to agriculture. The uncertainty in global markets resulting from very sharp increases in the prices of oil and agricultural commodities in early 2008 and the dramatic global financial crisis and economic downturn later in the year set the stage for this evaluation of the new farm policy. As an exporter of its primary agricultural products, the US has maintained a relatively open market. Tariffs on agricultural imports are generally low (with a few exceptions, notably dairy products and sugar) and have been stable, with limited cuts to bound rates to meet WTO Uruguay Round commitments (Blandford, Laborde and Martin 2008). However, the policy story is more fluid in the domestic support arena where there have been substantial changes in policy instruments, particularly during the fourteen-year period since the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (URAA) came into effect. Annual acreage idling, a cornerstone of farm programmes since the 1950s, was abandoned in 1996 and was not resurrected during a subsequent period of low commodity prices. Deficiency payments that had been tied to prices and the production of specific crops were also replaced in 1996 by fixed direct payments largely decoupled from production decisions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Food Crises and the WTO
World Trade Forum
, pp. 220 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arha, Kaush, Josling, Tim, Sumner, Daniel A. and Thompson, Barton (eds.) 2007. US Agricultural Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill. Stanford, California: Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University.
Babcock, Bruce 2008, ‘Statement before the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs’, Presented at the Hearing on Fuel Subsidies and Impact on Food Prices, 7 May.
Blandford, David, Laborde, David and Martin, Will 2008. ‘Implications for the United States of the May 2008 Draft Agricultural Modalities’, Washington, DC: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, the International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council and the International Food Policy Research Institute (www.ifpri.org/pubs/cp/ictsd_WTOpapers.asp).
Blandford, David and Josling, Tim 2008. ‘The WTO July 10th Agricultural Modalities Proposals and their Impact on Domestic Support in the EU and the US’, Paper prepared for the World Bank.
Blandford, David and Orden, David 2008. ‘United States: Shadow WTO Agricultural Domestic Support Notifications’, Discussion Paper 821. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Brasher, Philip 2008. ‘Farm Bill's Potential Cost “Off the Charts”’, Des Moines Register, 16 May.
Chite, Ralph 2007. ‘Farm Bill Budget and Costs: 2002 vs. 2007’, RS22694. Congressional Research Service, 7 November.
,Committee on Agriculture, US House of Representatives 2008. ‘Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference, Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (H. R. 2419)’ (www.agriculture.house.gov/inside/2007FarmBill.html).
,Congressional Budget Office 2008a. ‘CBO March 2008 Baseline for CCC and FCIC’, prepared by Dave Hull, Jim Langley and Greg Hitz (www.cbo.gov).
,Congressional Budget Office 2008b. ‘Estimated Effects on Spending and Revenue of the Conference Agreement for H. R. 2419, the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008’ (www.cbo.gov).
Gorter, Harry and Just, David R. 2007. ‘The Law of Unintended Consequences: How the US Biofuel Tax Credit with a Mandate Subsidizes Oil Consumption and has no Impact on Ethanol Consumption’, Department of Applied Economics and Management Working Paper No. 2007–20, Cornell University (updated February 2008) (www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1024525).
,FAPRI 2008. ‘Biofuels: Impact of Selected Farm Bill Provisions and other Biofuel Policy Options’, FAPRI-MU Report No.06–08, June.
Gardner, Bruce 2009. ‘Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in the United States and Canada’, in Anderson, Kym (ed.), Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: A Global Perspective 1955 to 2007. London: Palgrave Macmillan and Washington, DC: World Bank (forthcoming).
Harris, Wes, Lubben, Brad, Novak, James and Sanders, Larry 2008. ‘The Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008: Summary and Possible Consequences’, DAERS-WP-1–7 2008. Prepared for the Extension National Farm Bill Train the Trainer Conference, Kansas City, Missouri, 8–9 July.
Johnson, Renee (coordinator) 2008. ‘Farm Bill Legislative Action in the 110th Congress’, RL33934, Congressional Research Service, 19 June.
Josling, Tim 2007. ‘The Impact of the WTO and Bilateral Trade Agreements on US Farm Policy’, in Gardner, Bruce and Sumner, Daniel A. (eds.), Agricultural Policy for the 2007 Farm Bill and Beyond. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Josling, Timothy E., Tangermann, Stefan and Warley, Thorald K. 1996. Agriculture in the GATT. London and New York: Macmillan.
,OECD 2005. A Review of Empirical Studies of the Acreage and Production Responses to US Production Flexibility Contract Payments. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (AGR/CA/APM(2004)21/Final, 30 March).
Orden, David, Blandford, David and Josling, Timothy 2009. ‘Determinants of Farm Policies in the United States, 1996–2008’, in Anderson, Kym (ed.), Political Economy of Distortions to Agricultural Incentives. London: Palgrave Macmillan and Washington, DC: World Bank (forthcoming).
Orden, David, Paarlberg, Robert and Roe, Terry 1999. Policy Reform in American Agriculture: Analysis and Prognosis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tyner, Wallace 2007. ‘US Ethanol Policy – Possibilities for the Future’, Bioenergy, Purdue Extension ID-342-W, January.
,US Department of Agriculture 2008a. USDA Agricultural Projections to 2017. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief Economist, World Agricultural Outlook Board (Long-term Projections Report OCE-2008–1).
,US Department of Agriculture 2008b. ‘Charts Showing Budget Exposure from the ACRE Revenue Support’, Washington, DC: Office of the Chief Economist.
,WTO 2005. United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton. Geneva: World Trade Organization, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, and WT/DS267/AB/R, 21 March.
,WTO 2007a. United States – Domestic Support and Export Credit Guarantees for Agricultural Products, Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Brazil. Geneva: World Trade Organization, WT/DS365/13, 9 November.
,WTO 2007b. United States – Subsidies and Other Domestic Support for Corn and Other Agricultural Products, Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Canada. Geneva: World Trade Organization, WT/DS357/12, 9 November.
,WTO 2008. Revised Draft Modalities for Agriculture. Geneva: World Trade Organization, Committee on Agriculture, Special Session, TN/AG/W/4/Rev. 3, 10 July.
Zulauf, Carl 2008. ‘2008 Farm Bill with Focus on ACRE and SURE’, Ohio State University, 28 August (www.aede.osu.edu/people/publications.php?user=zulauf.1).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×