Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- List of Abbreviations
- Preface
- 1 Literary Debates since Unification: “European” Modernism or “American” Pop?
- 2 Literature in the East
- 3 Literature in the West
- 4 Confronting the Nazi Past I: “Political Correctness”
- 5 Confronting the Nazi Past II: German Perpetrators or German Victims?
- 6 A German-Jewish Symbiosis?
- 7 From the Province to Berlin
- Concluding Remarks
- Bibliography
- Index
7 - From the Province to Berlin
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- List of Abbreviations
- Preface
- 1 Literary Debates since Unification: “European” Modernism or “American” Pop?
- 2 Literature in the East
- 3 Literature in the West
- 4 Confronting the Nazi Past I: “Political Correctness”
- 5 Confronting the Nazi Past II: German Perpetrators or German Victims?
- 6 A German-Jewish Symbiosis?
- 7 From the Province to Berlin
- Concluding Remarks
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Alle reden von Berlin, aber was soll das sein.
— Kathrin Röggla, AbrauschenWRITER AND ACADEMIC W. G. SEBALD, in his book on Austrian literature, declares: “Je mehr von der Heimat die Rede ist, desto weniger gibt es sie.” Elsewhere, speaking of fiction in the German language in general, he elaborates: Heimat is “ein mirage, eine Luftspiegelung.” It is, of course, literature itself that is the most important instrument of this myth, deploying “ihre ganze ethnopoetische Kraft” to deliver “authentische Beschreibungen,” Sebald claims, “aus einer sagenhaften Provinz.” Heimat and Provinz — these are two recurring themes in German-language writing, and, needless to say, of the effort to define German identity.
The tradition of writing about Heimat upon which Sebald draws begins, as Norbert Mecklenburg has established in a number of canonical studies, with the opposition of the province and modernity during the period of rapid industrialization towards the end of the nineteenth century. On the one side, therefore, Mecklenburg depicts a literary avant-garde which celebrated the urban, the cosmopolitan and the complexity of modern life. Opposed to this, he describes the anti-modern impulse of a body of writing stressing traditional values and community. It was precisely this inherently conservative desire for order and the exclusion of all traces of difference that came to be seen as discredited from the late 1960s because of the way it seemed to function as a precursor of Nazi ideology.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- German Literature of the 1990s and BeyondNormalization and the Berlin Republic, pp. 199 - 229Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2005