Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T02:59:57.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Rural landscape differentiation in the face of changing demands and policies: a typology of rural areas in Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jørgen Primdahl
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Simon Swaffield
Affiliation:
Lincoln University, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The current Portuguese rural landscape and the changes through which it is being transformed are a compelling example of how diversified is the situation of European landscapes today. There are landscapes in Portugal that are dominated by farm production activities which are specialised and competitive in a global context – like the wine production regions – and in which other rural sectors are also dynamic. But most of the territory is occupied by less competitive land uses, under transition processes due to their low competitiveness. Nonetheless, in many areas such uses result in land-cover distributions that support many other landscape functions, such as the small-scale mosaic of mountain regions in the north, or the silvo-pastoral landscape dominant in all southern Portugal, with scattered oak trees in different densities over patches of grassland and shrub. These landscapes have a clear identity at a European scale, are environmentally balanced, and are rich in biodiversity and aesthetic values. In these areas, tourism as well as settlement of incomers (mainly urban people) is slowly developing.

However, the agriculture structure and practices which have produced and maintained these highly valuable landscapes are in an unstable condition. Some land-use systems are maintained due to the support payments that still exist, and through the attachment of people to the land, but the required innovation for their survival in the future is not taking place.

Type
Chapter
Information
Globalisation and Agricultural Landscapes
Change Patterns and Policy trends in Developed Countries
, pp. 127 - 148
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baptista, F. O. (1995). Agriculture, rural society and the land question in Portugal. Sociologia Ruralis, XXXV, 3/4, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancela d'Abreu, A., Pinto-Correia, T. and Oliveira, R. (2004). Contributos para a Identificação e Caracterização da Paisagem em Portugal Continental. Vol. I–V, Colecção Estudos 10, Lisboa: DGOT-DU.Google Scholar
Collins, R. and Makowsky, M. (1993). The Discovery of Society. 5th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
Durand, G. and Huylenbroeck, G. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: a general framework. In Multifunctional Agriculture. A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development (ed.) Huylenbroeck, G. and Durand, G.. Ashgate, UK: Aldershot, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2006). Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilbery, B. (1998). Dimensions of rural change. In The Geography of Rural Change (ed.) Ilbery, B.. Harlow, UK: Longman, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Marques, T. S. (2004). Portugal na transição do século – Retratos e dinâmicas territoriais. Lisboa: Edições Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Marsden, T. (1998). Economic perspectives. In The Geography of Rural Change (ed.) Ilbery, B.. Harlow, UK: Longman, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
Marsden, T. (2003). The Condition of Rural Sustainability. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J., Lowe, P., Ward, N. and Marsden, T. (2004). The Differentiated Countryside. Studies in Human Geography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001). Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pinto-Correia, T., Breman, B. C., Jorge, V. and Dneboska, M. (2006). Estudo sobre o Abandono Em Portugal Continental – Análise das dinâmicas da Ocupação do Solo, do Sector Agrícola e da Comunidade Rural. Tipologia de Áreas Rurais. Universidade de Évora.
Pinto-Correia, T., Barroso, F., Menezes, H., Santos, T. and Taveira, R. (2007). Que multifuncionalidade na paisagem rural: sinergias e conflitos entre a agricultura e funções não produtivas. Aplicação ao Concelho de Castelo de Vide. III Congresso de Estudos Rurais. Faro, 1–3 Nov.
Pinto-Correia, T. and Breman, B. (2008). Understanding marginalisation in the periphery of Europe: a multidimensional process. In Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalization of Agriculture (ed.) Brouwer, F., Rheenen, T., Elgersma, A. M. and Dhillion, S.. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pinto-Correia, T. and Primdahl, J. (2008). When rural landscapes change functionality: constraints and development options for multifunctional landscapes. Examples from contrasting case-studies in Portugal and Denmark. In Multifunctional Rural Land Management: Economics and Policies (ed.) Brouwer, F. and Heide, M.. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Pontius, J., Shusas, E. and McEachern, M. (2004). Detecting important categorical landchanges while accounting for persistence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101, 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, C. (2004). Multifunctionality as an agricultural and rural policy concept. In Sustaining Agriculture and the Rural Environment. Governance, Policy and Multifunctionality (ed.) Brouwer, F.. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 15–35.Google Scholar
Vejre, H., Abildtrup, J., Andersen, E.et al. (2007). Multifunctional agriculture and multifunctional landscapes – land use as interface. In Multifunctional Land Use. Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services (ed.) Mander, U., Wiggering, H. and Helming, K.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
Wiggering, H., Dalchow, C., Glemnitz, M. et al. (2006). Indicators for multifunctional land use – linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators, 6, 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. A. (2007). Multifunctional Agriculture. A Transition Theory Perspective. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. A. and Rigg, J. (2003). Post-productivist agricultural regimes and the South: discordant concepts? Progress in Human Geography, 27, 5, 605–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, M. (2005). Rural Geography. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×