Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Access
  • Open access
  • Print publication year: 2018
  • Online publication date: May 2018

6 - Experimentation

from Part III - Polycentric Governance Processes
  • View HTML
    • Send chapter to Kindle

      To send this chapter to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Available formats
      ×
      Send chapter to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Available formats
      ×
      Send chapter to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Available formats
      ×
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Governing Climate Change
  • Online ISBN: 9781108284646
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Abbott, K. and Snidal, D. (2016). Experimentalist Governance 2.0: Taking ‘Experiments’ (More) Seriously. Available at: www.buffalo.edu/content/www/baldycenter/events/speakers/_jcr_content/par/download/file.res/Abbott%20XG%20Buffalo%209–16.pdf [retrieved 19 December 2016].
Akrich, M., Callon, M. and Latour, B. (2002). The key to success in innovation part I: the art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187206.
Ansell, C. (2016). Pragmatist interpretivism. In Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science, ed. Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R. A. W.. London: Routledge, 8698.
Ansell, C. and Bartenberger, M. (2016). Varieties of experimentalism. Ecological Economics, 130, 6473.
Bulkeley, H. and Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361375.
Bulkeley, H., Edwards, G. and Fuller, S. (2014). Contesting climate justice in the city: examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Global Environmental Change, 25, 3140.
Callon, M. (2009). Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 34(3–4), 535548.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Campbell, D. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24(4), 409429.
Cole, D. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5(2), 114118.
Cole, D. and McGinnis, M. (eds.). (2014). Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy: Polycentricity in Public Administration and Political Science. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Collins, H. (1983). An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge. In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, ed. Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkay, M.. London: Sage, 85114.
De Búrca, G., Keohane, R. and Sabel, C. (2014). Global experimentalist governance. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 477486.
Dewey, J. (1986). Logic: the theory of inquiry. In John Dewey: The Later Works, Vol. 12, ed. Boydston, J. A. G.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dixon, R. (1998). Report on Accomplishments and Descriptions of Projects Accepted under USIJI for UNFCCC Secretariat. Washington, DC: US Government.
Dorsch, M. and Flachsland, C. (2017). A polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(2), 4564.
Easton, D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics, 9(3), 383400.
Evans, J., Karvonen, A. and Raven, R. (2016). The Experimental City. London: Routledge.
Evans, K. G. (2000). Reclaiming John Dewey: democracy, inquiry, pragmatism, and public management. Administration & Society, 32(3), 308328.
Fleck, L. (1994). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Gilbert, G. and Mulkay, M. (1982). Warranting scientific belief. Social Studies of Science, 12(3), 383408.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns: Handungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hacking, I. (1992). The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In Science as Practice and Culture, ed. Pickering, A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2964.
Heiskanen, E., Kivisaari, S., Lovio, R. and Mickwitz, P. (2009). Designed to travel? Transition management encounters environmental and innovation policy histories in Finland. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 409427.
Hendriks, C. (2008). On inclusion and network governance: the democratic disconnect of Dutch energy transitions. Public Administration, 86(4), 10091031.
Hendriks, C. (2009). Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 341368.
Hoffmann, M. (2011). Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jepma, C. J. (1995). The feasibility of joint implementation. Heidelberg: Springer.
Kemp, R., Rip, A. and Schot, J. (2001). Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. In Path Dependence and Creation, ed. Garud, R. and Karnøe, P.. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 269299.
Kemp, R. and Rotmans, J. (2009). Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 303322.
Kern, F. and Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391408.
Kern, F. and Smith, A. (2008). Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36(11), 40934103.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C. and Pinch, T.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 140166.
Latour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In Science Observed. Perspectives on the Social Studies of Science, ed. Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkay, M..London: Sage, 141170.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2013). An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lindblom, C. (1965). The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making through Mutual Adjustment. New York: Free Press.
Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323340.
Misiko, M. (2009). Collective experimentation: lessons from the field. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15(4), 401416.
Mol, A. (1998). Ontological politics: a word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 46(S), 7489.
Muniesa, F. and Callon, M. (2007). Economic experiments and the construction of markets. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, ed. MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 163189.
Norton, B. 2005. Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641672.
Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 727.
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. and Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pel, B. (2016). Trojan horses in transitions: a dialectical perspective on innovation ‘capture’. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(5), 673691.
Project 88. (1988). Harnessing Market Forces to Protect the Environment, ed. Stavins, R.. Cambridge, MA: Project 88.
Rheinberger, H. (2005). Gaston Bachelard and the notion of ‘phenomenotechnique’. Perspectives on Science, 13(3), 313328.
Sabel, C. and Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In Oxford Handbook of Governance, ed. Levi-Faur, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169183.
Saward, M. (2006). The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory, 5(3), 297318.
Schroth, F. (2016). The Politics of Governance Experiments. Constructing the Clean Development Mechanism. Doctoral Dissertation. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J. and Raven, R. (2016). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: a systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, in press.
Shapin, S. (1984). Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology. Social Studies of Science, 14(4), 481520.
Simons, A. (2015). Documented Authority. The Discursive Construction of Emissions Trading in the Expert Literature. Doctoral Dissertation. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
Simons, A. (2016). Fact-making in permit markets: document networks as infrastructures of emissions trading. In Knowing Governance: The Epistemic Construction of Political Order, ed. Voß, J.-P. and Freeman, R.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 177192.
Simons, A., Lis, A. and Lippert, I. (2014). The political duality of scale-making in environmental markets. Environmental Politics, 23(4), 632649.
Stoker, G. and John, P. (2009). Design experiments: engaging policy makers in the search for evidence about what works. Political Studies, 57(2), 356373.
Thiel, A. (2016). The Polycentricity Approach and the Research Challenges Confronting Environmental Governance. THESys Discussion Paper No. 2016–1. Berlin: Humboldt University.
Trexler, M. C. and Kosloff, L. H. (1998). The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for project-based climate change mitigation? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 3(1), 158.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (1999). Activities Implemented Jointly under the Pilot Phase. Views on the review process of activities implemented jointly under the pilot phase and information on experience gained and lessons learned, including on the uniform reporting format. Compilation of submissions from parties. Bonn: UNFCCC Secretariat.
Van der Gaast, W. (2015). International Climate Negotiation Conditions – Past and Future. PhD Thesis. Groningen: University of Groningen.
Voß, J.-P. (2007a). Designs on Governance. Development of Policy Instruments and Dynamics in Governance. Doctoral Dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.
Voß, J.-P. (2007b). Innovation processes in governance: the development of ‘emissions trading’ as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy, 34(5), 329343.
Voß, J.-P. (2014). Performative policy studies: realising ‘transition management’. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 317343.
Voß, J.-P. (2016). Realizing instruments: performativity in emissions trading and citizen panels. In Knowing Governance: The Epistemic Construction of Political Order, ed. Voß, J.-P. and Freeman, R.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 127153.
Voß, J.-P. and Amelung, N. (2016). Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Social Studies of Science, 26(5), 749772.
Voß, J.-P. and Bornemann, B. (2011). The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 9.
Voß, J.-P. and Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: introduction. In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, ed. Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D. and Kemp, R.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 328.
Voß, J.-P. and Simons, A. (2014). Instrument constituencies and the supply-side of policy innovation: the social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 735754.
Voß, J.-P., Smith, A. and Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275302.
Wilkinson, M. (2012). Dewey’s’ ‘democracy without politics’: on the failures of liberalism and the frustrations of experimentalism. Contemporary Pragmatism, 9(2), 117142.