Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T10:04:44.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Peter Draper
Affiliation:
South African Institute of International Affairs
Tsidiso Disenyana
Affiliation:
South African Institute of International Affairs
Gilberto Biacuana
Affiliation:
South African Institute of International Affairs
Ann Capling
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Patrick Low
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Trade policy-making is a complex affair. In all countries a host of factors influence the outcome, with the mix varying according to domestic circumstances and the relationship of the country concerned with the global economy. As the introductory chapter of this book attests, strictly state-centric explanations regarding how trade policy decisions are made are no longer sufficient in a world where international trade negotiations increasingly impinge on domestic policies. Therefore, a nuanced understanding of how trade policy is made is required, and must interrogate the roles of non-state actors (NSAs), institutions and ideas, and their interactions with each other, in shaping preferences and policy.

This chapter explores those issues in the context of South Africa. Section 2 provides a brief historical overview of South Africa’s trade policy history; section 3 reviews the broad patterns of the country’s external trade. From this history and structural analysis it is clear that the early preference for liberalization in the post-1990 period has recently given way to a more defensive approach to trade policy and negotiations, which are now regarded as subordinate to sector-based industrial policy. This shift reflects a broader shift within the African National Congress-led tripartite alliance concerning the role of liberalization in economic policy; in other words, the ideological basis for trade policy shifted in the early years of this decade in response to perceived shortcomings of the liberal model. However, as section 4 charts, the institutional arrangements within the state have not really changed much. Furthermore, as section 5 elaborates, the executive branch retained its dominance of the trade policy-making process throughout this period in relation to NSAs in particular. In other words, the ideological shift in trade policy has not yet been matched by institutional changes through which particular interests are expressed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Governments, Non-State Actors and Trade Policy-Making
Negotiating Preferentially or Multilaterally?
, pp. 249 - 283
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

African National Congress 2009. 2009 Manifesto Policy Framework: Working Together we can do More.
Bell, T. 1997. ‘Trade Policy’, in Michie, J. and Padayachee, V. (eds.), The Political Economy of South Africa’s Transition. London: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Bertelsman-Scott, T., Mills, G. and Sidiropoulos, E. 2000. ‘The EU–SA Agreement: South Africa, Southern Africa, and the European Union’, South African Institute of International Affairs, Johannesburg.
Bilal, S. and Laporte, G. 2004. ‘How Did David Prepare to Talk to Goliath? South Africa’s experience of trade negotiations with the EU’, ECDPM, available at: .Google Scholar
Cassim, R. and Zarenda, H. 2004. ‘South Africa’s Trade Policy Paradigm’, in Sidiropoulos, E. (ed.), Apartheid Past, Renaissance Future – South Africa’s Foreign Policy: 1994–2004. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Department of Trade and Industry 2007. ‘National Industrial Policy Framework’, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Draper, P. 2004. ‘The SACU–US FTA: In Search of a Contract Zone’, The Exporter (Business Day supplement), June.
Draper, P. and Alves, P. 2007. ‘Déja Vu? The Department of Trade and Industry’s National Industrial Policy Framework’, Occasional Paper No. 2, Business Leadership, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Draper, P. and Erasmus, G. 2008. ‘Fragments of Trade’, Mail and Guardian, 11 April.Google Scholar
Draper, P. and Freytag, A. 2008. ‘South Africa’s Current Account Deficit: Are Proposed Cures Worse than the Disease?’, Trade Policy Report No. 25, South African Institute of International Affairs, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Draper, P. and Khumalo, N. 2007. ‘One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Deal-Breaker Issues in the Failed US–SACU Free Trade Negotiations’, South African Institute of International Affairs, Johannesburg.
Draper, P. and Khumalo, N. 2009. ‘European Free Trade Association – Southern African Customs Union Free Trade Agreement’, in Lester, S. and Mercurio, B. (eds.), Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements–Case-Studies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Draper, P. and Soko, M. 2004. ‘US Trade Strategy After Cancun: Implications, and Prospects for the SACU–US FTA’, SAIIA Trade Policy Report No. 4, South African Institute of International Affairs, Johannesburg.
Draper, P., Khumalo, N. and Stern, M. 2008. ‘Why isn’t South Africa more Proactive in International Services Negotiations?’, in Marchetti, J. and Roy, M. (eds.), Opening Markets for Trade in Services; Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, L. and Lawrence, R. 2006. ‘South African Trade Policy Matters: Trade Performance and Trade Policy’, CID Working Paper No. 135, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of South Africa 2009. ‘Framework for South Africa’s Response to the International Economic Crisis’, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Hausmann, R. and Klinger, B. 2006. ‘South Africa’s Export Predicament’, CID Working Paper No. 129, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ismail, F., Draper, P. and Carim, X. 2000. ‘South Africa’s Global Economic Strategy: A Policy Framework and Key Elements’, International Trade and Economic Development Division, Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Joffe, A., Kaplan, D., Kaplinsky, R. and Lewis, D. 1993. ‘Meeting the Global Challenge: A Framework for Industrial Revival in South Africa’, in Baker, P. H., Boraine, A. and Krafchik, W. (eds.), South Africa and the World Economy in the 1990s. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar
Group, Macro-economic Research 1993. ‘Making Democracy Work: A Framework for Macro-economic Policy in South Africa’, Centre for Development Studies, Bellville, South Africa.Google Scholar
Manuel, T. A. 2009. Address by the Minister in the Presidency: National Planning Commission on the Presidency’s Budget Vote debate, 24 June.
Patel, E. 2009. Speech by Minister of Economic Development, Debate on the Trade and Industry Budget, Vote 32, 30 June.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • South Africa
  • Edited by Ann Capling, University of Melbourne, Patrick Low, World Trade Organization, Geneva
  • Book: Governments, Non-State Actors and Trade Policy-Making
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511687082.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • South Africa
  • Edited by Ann Capling, University of Melbourne, Patrick Low, World Trade Organization, Geneva
  • Book: Governments, Non-State Actors and Trade Policy-Making
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511687082.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • South Africa
  • Edited by Ann Capling, University of Melbourne, Patrick Low, World Trade Organization, Geneva
  • Book: Governments, Non-State Actors and Trade Policy-Making
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511687082.011
Available formats
×