Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T17:41:15.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Dietary and ranging overlap in sympatric gorillas and chimpanzees in Kahuzi-Biega National Park, Zaïre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Linda F. Marchant
Affiliation:
Miami University
Toshisada Nishida
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Most primates that live in tropical forests form sympatric populations with other primate species. In some cases they avoid contact or interact aggressively with other primate species, while in other cases they forage, groom, play or mate with others, forming mixed-species groups (Struhsaker, 1978; Gautier-Hion, 1980; Terborgh, 1983). Since these interactions between species are difficult to see in the wild, details of interference competition among sympatric primates are sketchy. However, at least ecological (exploitation) competition can be estimated when two sympatric species show similarities in resource use (Waser, 1987).

Gorillas and chimpanzees live sympatrically and with other primate species in wide areas of Equatorial Africa. Both apes use all strata of the tropical forest and range in various types of vegetation. Unlike Cercopithecus, Cercocebus or Colobus monkeys, these apes do not form mixed-species groups. Because of their larger body size, both apes may dominate the other primate species and be able to exclude them from food resources, even when niche overlap occurs extensively with them. Chimpanzees usually chase monkeys at aggressive encounters and occasionally prey on them (McGrew et al., 1979; Nishida et al., 1983; Goodall, 1986; Sugiyama & Koman, 1987; Boesch & Boesch, 1989), although some arboreal monkeys (such as Colobus badius) may aggressively mob and displace chimpanzees (Struhsaker, 1981; Ghiglieri, 1984). Gorillas and chimpanzees are genetically close and show similarities in morphological features such as craniodental form (Sarich & Cronin, 1977; Shea, 1983), yet they show remarkable differences in ecological features and social organization.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×