Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:11:52.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Prostate cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Christopher Sweeney
Affiliation:
Indiana University Cancer Pavilion, Indianapolis
Michael J. Fisch
Affiliation:
University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Eduardo Bruera
Affiliation:
University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Get access

Summary

Prostate cancer is the most common male malignancy in the US. In the year 2000 there were approximately 180 400 new cases of prostate cancer with approximately 31 900 deaths. Most patients present with localized disease and treatment choices include surgery, radiation (external beam or brachytherapy), or observation. It is well recognized that a minority of patients will develop metastatic disease after definitive local therapy or present with metastatic disease. Some of these patients will have a very indolent course and not die of prostate cancer, whereas others will have aggressive disease that will metastasize from the prostate gland and be the cause of the patient's death. Progression is often first manifest by an increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The mere presence of an elevated PSA after definitive local therapy does not portend a poor outlook. For example, in one series of 315 patients who underwent a prostatectomy it was noted that the median survival was more than 10 years if the PSA rose 2 years after the surgery, took longer than 10 months to double and the Gleason's score was 7 or less.

However, survival is shorter once patients have visible metastases on radiographic imaging and/or symptomatic lesions. Standard initial therapy for metastatic disease consists of androgen ablation. Dr. Huggins won the Nobel prize in medicine for his discovery that prostatic epithelium will undergo atrophy with withdrawal of androgen stimulation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greenlee, R T, Murray, T, Bolden, S. Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50:7–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pound, C R, Partin, A W, Eisenberger, M A. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. J Am Med Assoc 1999;281:1591–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huggins, C, Hodges, C V. Studies on prostatic cancer; effect of castration of estrogen and androgen injection on serum phosphates in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res 1941;1:293–7Google Scholar
The Leuprolide Study Group. Leuprolide versus diethylstilbestrol for metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1281–6CrossRef
Crawford, E D, Eisenberger, M A, McLeod, D G. A controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostatic carcinoma [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1989;321:1420]. N Engl J Med 1989;321:419–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Prostate Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;355:1491–8
Scher, H I, Kelly, W K. Flutamide withdrawal syndrome: its impact on clinical trials in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:1566–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, E J, Baron, A D, Fippin, L. Ketoconazole retains activity in advanced prostate cancer patients with progression despite flutamide withdrawal. J Urol 1997;157:1204–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, E J, Halabi, S, Picus, J, Dawson, N, Chen, Y, Vogelzang, N J. A prospective randomized trial of antiandrogen withdrawal alone or antiandrogen withdrawal in combination with high-dose ketoconazole in androgen independent prostate cancer patients. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001;20:174 (abstr)Google Scholar
Small, E J, Vogelzang, N J. Second-line hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer: a shifting paradigm. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:382–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newling, D W, Denis, L, Vermeylen, K. Orchiectomy versus goserelin and flutamide in the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Analysis of the criteria of evaluation used in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer – Genitourinary Group Study 30853. Cancer 1993;72:3793–83.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serafini, A N, Houston, S J, Resche, I. Palliation of pain associated with metastatic bone cancer using samarium-153 lexidronam: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1574–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tannock, I F, Osoba, D, Stockler, M R. Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone for symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a Canadian randomized trial with palliative end points [see comments]. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1756–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantoff, P W, Halabi, S, Conaway, M. Hydrocortisone with or without mitoxantrone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results of the cancer and leukemia group B 9182 study [see comments]. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2506–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, M E, Tew, K D. Estramustine binds MAP-2 to inhibit microtubule assembly in vitro. J Cell Sci 1988;89:331–42Google ScholarPubMed
Stearns, M E, Wang, M, Tew, K D. Estramustine binds a MAP-1-like protein to inhibit microtubule assembly in vitro and disrupt microtubule organization in DU 145 cells. J Cell Biol 1988;107:2647–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, G P, Slack, N H, Mittelman, A. Use of estramustine phosphate in prostate cancer by the National Prostatic Cancer Project and by Roswell Park Memorial Institute. Urology 1984;23:54–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, B J, Yeap, B Y, Wilding, G. Taxol in advanced, hormone-refractory carcinoma of the prostate. A phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Cancer 1993; 72:2457–603.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beer, T M, Pierce, W C, Lowe, B A, Henner, W D. Phase II Study of weekly docetaxel in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000;19:348 (abstr)Google Scholar
Speicher, L A, Barone, L, Tew, K D. Combined antimicrotubule activity of estramustine and taxol in human prostatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res 1992;52:4433–40Google ScholarPubMed
Hudes, G R, Greenberg, R, Krigel, R L. Phase II study of estramustine and vinblastine, two microtubule inhibitors, in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1754–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudes, G R, Nathan, F E, Khater, C. Paclitaxel plus estramustine in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Semin Oncol 1995;22:41–5Google ScholarPubMed
Pienta, K J, Redman, B G, Bandekar, R. A phase II trial of oral estramustine and oral etoposide in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Urology 1997;50:401–6; discussion 406–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carles, J, Domenech, M, Gelabert-Mas A et al. Phase II study of estramustine and vinorelbine in hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma patients. Acta Oncol 1998;37:187–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colleoni, M, Graiff, C, Vicario, G. Phase II study of estramustine, oral etoposide, and vinorelbine in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 1997;20:383–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudes, G, Einhorn, L, Ross, E. Vinblastine versus vinblastine plus oral estramustine phosphate for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A Hoosier Oncology Group and Fox Chase Network phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:3160–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields-Jones, S, Koletsky, A, Wilding, G. Improvements in clinical benefit with vinorelbine in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a phase II trial. Ann Oncol 1999; 10:1307–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M R, Kaufman, D, Oh, W. Vinorelbine and estramustine in androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer 2000;89:1824–83.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweeney, C, Monaco, F, Hanna, M. Phase II study of weekly vinorelbine (VNR) and estramustine phosphate for hormone refractory prostate cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000;19:335 (abstr)Google Scholar
Hortobagyi, G N, Theriault, R L, Porter, L. Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1785–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenson, J R, Lichtenstein, A, Porter, L. Long-term pamidronate treatment of advanced multiple myeloma patients reduces skeletal events. Myeloma Aredia Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:593–602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adami, S. Bisphosphonates in prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1997;80:1674–93.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heidenreich, A, Hofmann, R, Engelmann, U H. The use of bisphosphonate for the palliative treatment of painful bone metastasis due to hormone refractory prostate cancer. J Urol 2001;165:136–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dearnaley, D P, Sydes, M R, MRC Pr05 Collaborators. Preliminary evidence that oral clodronate delays symptomatic progression of bone metastases from prostate cancer: first results of MRC Pr05 trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001;20:174 (abstr)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Prostate cancer
  • Edited by Michael J. Fisch, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Eduardo Bruera, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Book: Handbook of Advanced Cancer Care
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527081.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Prostate cancer
  • Edited by Michael J. Fisch, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Eduardo Bruera, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Book: Handbook of Advanced Cancer Care
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527081.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Prostate cancer
  • Edited by Michael J. Fisch, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Eduardo Bruera, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Book: Handbook of Advanced Cancer Care
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527081.021
Available formats
×